Advertisement

Plant Ecology

, Volume 219, Issue 6, pp 691–704 | Cite as

Biodiversity bottleneck: seedling establishment under changing climatic conditions at the boreal–temperate ecotone

  • Alexandra J. WrightEmail author
  • Nicholas A. Fisichelli
  • Cindy Buschena
  • Karen Rice
  • Roy Rich
  • Artur Stefanski
  • Rebecca Montgomery
  • Peter B. Reich
Article

Abstract

Climate change is increasing global temperatures, severe rainfall events, and the occurrence and severity of drought. Changes in global climate may have negative consequences for particular plant species and for biodiversity overall. In the short term, altered temperature and precipitation regimes may have the most severe effects on plant species near their range limits and in the earliest stages of plant development. To address these issues, we assessed seedling emergence, early survival, and growth of 18 boreal, temperate, and exotic woody species at the boreal–temperate forest ecotone in central Minnesota. We experimentally warmed forest plots to mimic projected warming by the end of the twenty-first century (+ 1.7 °C and + 3.4 °C). We also experimentally removed summer rainfall (~ 42% reduction) to simulate drought conditions in this region. We found that emergence and survival of boreal and exotic species was lower in experimentally warmed plots. This was exacerbated by drought. Temperate species emergence and survival was largely unaffected by climate manipulations (on average). Conversely, temperate seedling growth was greater in warmer conditions, but only when paired with drought. We found that overall seedling species richness was reduced by warming, mostly due to lower boreal and exotic species emergence and survival (conifers were also strongly negatively affected across species-range groups). If temperate seedling emergence and survival does not compensate for loss of boreal species, these forests may experience loss of biodiversity (and associated ecosystem functions) in the future.

Keywords

Temperate Boreal Exotic Invasive Drought Warming Ecotone Seedling Ontogeny 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the US Department of Energy, Grant No. DE-FG02-07ER64456; the Wilderness Research Foundation; Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station, project no. MIN-42-050; and the Maine Timberlands Charitable Trust. We would like to thank the interns and support staff at the Hubachek Wilderness Research Center and the Cloquet Forestry Center.

Author contributions

AJW designed the seedlings study, collected the data, analyzed the data, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript; NAF helped design and conceptualize the seedling study and provided extensive guidance on the manuscript; CB, RR, RM, and PBR conceptualized and designed the B4warmed experiment; and KR and AS collected the data. All authors provided feedback on multiple versions of the manuscript.

Supplementary material

11258_2018_827_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (268 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 268 kb)

References

  1. Beckage B, Osborne B, Gavin DG, Pucko C, Siccama T, Perkins T (2008) A rapid upward shift of a forest ecotone during 40 years of warming in the Green Mountains of Vermont. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:4197–4202.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0708921105 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell DM, Clark JS (2016) Seed predation and climate impacts on reproductive variation in temperate forests of the southeastern USA. Oecologia 180:1223–1234.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-015-3537-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bellard C, Thuiller W, Leroy B, Genovesi P, Bakkenes M, Courchamp F (2013) Will climate change promote future invasions? Glob Change Biol 19:3740–3748.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12344 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonner FT, Karrfalt RP (2008) The woody plant seed manual. USDA Forest Service Agriculture Handbook 727Google Scholar
  5. Buckley YM, Catford J (2015) Does the biogeographic origin of species matter? Ecological effects of native and non-native species and the use of origin to guide management. J Ecol 104:4–17.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12501 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cowles JM, Wragg PD, Wright AJ, Powers JS, Tilman D (2016) Shifting grassland plant community structure drives positive interactive effects of warming and diversity on aboveground net primary productivity. Glob Change Biol 22:741–749.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dukes J, Mooney H (1999) Does global change increase the success of biological invaders? Trends Ecol Evol 14:135–139CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Fisichelli N, Frelich LE, Reich PB (2012) Sapling growth responses to warmer temperatures “cooled” by browse pressure. Glob Change Biol 18:3455–3463.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02785.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fisichelli NA, Frelich LE, Reich PB (2013) Climate and interrelated tree regeneration drivers in mixed temperate–boreal forests. Landsc Ecol 28:149–159.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-012-9827-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fisichelli N, Vor T, Ammer C (2014a) Broadleaf seedling responses to warmer temperatures “chilled” by late frost that favors conifers. Eur J Forest Res 133:587–596.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-014-0786-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fisichelli N, Wright A, Rice K, Mau A, Buschena C, Reich P (2014b) First-year seedlings and climate change: species-specific responses of 15 North American tree species. Oikos 123:1331–1340.  https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.01349 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fridley JD (2016) Extended leaf phenology and the autumn niche in deciduous forest invasions. Nature 485:359–362.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11056 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hulme PE (2016) Climate change and biological invasions: evidence, expectations, and response options. Biol Rev.  https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12282 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ibañez I, Clark J, LaDeau S, Lambers J (2007) Exploiting temporal variability to understand tree recruitment response to climate change. Ecol Monogr 77:163–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Isbell F, Craven D, Connolly J, Loreau M, Schmid B, Beierkuhnlein C, Bezemer TM, Bonin C, Bruelheide H, De Luca E, Ebeling A, Griffin JN, Guo Q, Hautier Y, Hector A, Jentsch A, Kreyling J, Lanta V, Manning P, Meyer ST, Mori AS, Naeem S, Niklaus PA, Polley HW, Reich PB, Roscher C, Seabloom EW, Smith MD, Thakur MP, Tilman D, Tracy BF, Van Der Putten WH, Van Ruijven J, Weigelt A, Weisser WW, Wilsey B, Eisenhauer N (2015) Biodiversity increases the resistance of ecosystem productivity to climate extremes. Nature 526:574–577.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15374 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Jentsch A, Kreyling J, Beierkuhnlein C (2016) A new generation of climate change experiments: events, not trends. Front Ecol Environ 5(6):315–324Google Scholar
  17. Knight KS, Kurylo JS, Endress AG, Stewart JR, Reich PB (2007) Ecology and ecosystem impacts of common buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica): a review. Biol Invasions 9:925–937.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-007-9091-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kunkel KE, Stevens LE, Stevens SE, Sun L, Part EJ (2013) Regional climate trends and scenarios for the US national climate assessment. Part 3. Climate of the Midwest U.S. NOAA Tech. Rep. NESDIS 142–3Google Scholar
  19. Kurylo JS, Knight KS, Stewart JR, Endress AG (2007) Rhamnus cathartica: native and naturalized distribution and habitat preferences. J Torrey Bot Soc 134:420–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lavorel S (1999) Ecological diversity and resilience of Mediterranean vegetation to disturbance. Divers Distrib 5:3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McCulloh KA, Petitmermet J, Stefanski A, Rice KE, Rich RL, Montgomery RA, Reich PB (2016) Is it getting hot in here? Adjustment of hydraulic parameters in six boreal and temperate tree species after three years of warming. Glob Change Biol.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13323 Google Scholar
  22. Miller JR, Bestelmeyer BT (2016) What’s wrong with novel ecosystems, really? Restor Ecol.  https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12378 Google Scholar
  23. Niinemets à (2010) Responses of forest trees to single and multiple environmental stresses from seedlings to mature plants: past stress history, stress interactions, tolerance and acclimation. For Ecol Manag 260:1623–1639.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.07.054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421:37–42CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Parmesan C, Gaines S, Gonzalez L, Kaufman DM, Kingsolver J, Peterson AT, Sagarin R (2005) Empirical perspectives on species borders: from traditional biogeography to global change. Oikos 108:58–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pereira HM, Leadley PW, Proenca V, Alkemade R, Scharlemann JPW, Fernandez-Manjarres JF, Araujo MB, Balvanera P, Biggs R, Cheung WWL, Chini L, Cooper HD, Gilman EL, Guenette S, Hurtt GC, Huntington HP, Mace GM, Oberdorff T, Revenga C, Rodrigues P, Scholes RJ, Sumaila UR, Walpole M (2010) Scenarios for global biodiversity in the 21st century. Science.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1196624 Google Scholar
  27. Pucko C, Beckage B, Perkins T, Keeton WS (2011) Species shifts in response to climate change: individual or shared responses? J Torrey Bot Soc 138:156–176.  https://doi.org/10.3159/TORREY-D-10-00011.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Reich PB, Sendall KM, Rice K, Rich RL, Stefanski A, Hobbie SE, Montgomery RA (2015) Geographic range predicts photosynthetic and growth response to warming in co-occurring tree species. Nat Publ Group 5:148–152.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2497 Google Scholar
  29. Reich PB, Sendall KM, Stefanski A, Wei X, Rich RL (2016) Boreal and temperate trees show strong acclimation of respiration to warming. Nature.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17142 Google Scholar
  30. Rich RL, Stefanski A, Montgomery RA, Hobbie SE, Kimball BA, Reich PB (2015) Design and performance of combined infrared canopy and belowground warming in the B4WarmED (Boreal Forest Warming at an Ecotone in Danger) experiment. Glob Change Biol 21:2334–2348.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12855 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Seager R, Neelin D, Simpson I, Liu H, Henderson N, Shaw T, Kushnir Y, Ting M, Cook B (2014) Dynamical and thermodynamical causes of large-scale changes in the hydrological cycle over north america in response to global warming. J Clim 27:7921–7948.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00153.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sorte CJB, Ibáñez I, Blumenthal DM, Molinari NA, Miller LP, Grosholz ED, Diez JM, D’antonio CM, Olden JD, Jones SJ, Dukes JS (2012) Poised to prosper? A cross-system comparison of climate change effects on native and non-native species performance. Ecol Lett 16:261–270.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12017 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK, Alexander LV, Allen SK, Bindoff NL, Breon FM, Church JA, Cubasch U, Emori S, Forster P, Friedlingstein P, Gillett N, Gregory JM, Hartmann DL, Jansen E, Kirtman B, Knutti R, Krishna Kumar K, Lemke P, Marotzke J, Masson-Delmotte V, Meehl GA, Mokhov II, Piao SL, Ramaswamy V, Randall D, Rhein M, Rojas M, Sabine C, Shindell D, Talley LD, Vaughan DG, Xie SP (2013) Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  34. Thomas CD, Cameron A, Green RE, Bakkenes M (2004) Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427:145–148.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02121 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Walck JL, Hidayati SN, Dixon KW, Thompson K, Poschlod P (2011) Climate change and plant regeneration from seed. Glob Change Biol 17:2145–2161.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02368.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Walther GR (2010) Community and ecosystem responses to recent climate change. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 365:2019–2024.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0021 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Williams J, Post D, Cwynar L, Lotter A, Levesque A (2002) Rapid and widespread vegetation responses to past climate change in the North Atlantic region. Geology 30:971–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wright AJ, Schnitzer SA, Reich PB (2014) Living close to your neighbors—the importance of both competition and facilitation in plant communities. Ecology.  https://doi.org/10.1890/13-1855.1 Google Scholar
  39. Wright A, Schnitzer SA, Reich PB (2015) Daily environmental conditions determine the competition–facilitation balance for plant water status. J Ecol 103:648–656.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12397 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesCalifornia State University – Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Schoodic Institute at Acadia National ParkWinter HarborUSA
  3. 3.Department of Forest ResourcesUniversity of MinnesotaSt. PaulUSA
  4. 4.Smithsonian Environmental Research CenterEdgewaterUSA

Personalised recommendations