Plant Ecology

, Volume 218, Issue 5, pp 547–554 | Cite as

Effects of a multi-year drought on a drought-adapted shrub, Artemisia tridentata

  • Richard KarbanEmail author
  • Enrico Pezzola


Models of climate change predict more variable precipitation for much of western North America, including more severe multi-year droughts. Droughts are known to increase mortality to trees although less is known about effects on shrubs from arid environments and about effects on reproduction. In this study, we followed a cohort of young sagebrush plants from 2010 to 2016, a period that included a severe drought from 2012 to 2015. Plants experienced little mortality preceding and during the drought. However, in the year following the drought, 14% of individuals died and 33% of branches on living plants died. There was little flowering in the years preceding the drought and flowering increased in each successive year from 2014 to 2016. Plants that produced more flowers in 2015 had more dead branches in 2016. Larger plants had fewer branches that died. Contrary to expectations, afternoon shade was not associated with greater survival or flowering, perhaps because shaded plants were in proximity to large trees which likely competed for water. Plants of the two common chemotypes had similar rates of survival and flowering. Experimental watering during the summer of 2015 did not affect survival and may have increased flowering in 2016. If multi-year droughts become more common in the future, even drought-adapted shrubs may be expected to suffer high rates of mortality.


Chemotype Climate change Competition Mortality Reproduction Sagebrush Shade Water stress 



This study was conducted at UC Sagehen Field Station in Tahoe National Forest, and we thank Jeff Brown and Faerthan Felix for facilitating our work there. James Blande conducted the volatile analyses that allowed us to characterize the chemotypes, Mikaela Huntzinger helped with fieldwork, and Louie Yang lent us equipment. This paper was improved by William Rogers and two anonymous reviewers. We were supported by USDA regional project NC-7 and a fellowship from the University of Florence.


  1. Allen CD, Macalady AK, Haroun et al (2010) A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. For Ecol Man 259:660–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berg N, Hall A (2015) Increased interannual precipitation extremes over California under climate change. J Climate 28:6324–6334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bertness MD, Callaway RM (1994) Positive interactions in communities. Trends Ecol Evol 9:191–193CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bigler C, Gavin DG, Gunning C, Veblin TT (2007) Drought induces lagged tree mortality in a subalpine forest in the rocky mountains. Oikos 116:1983–1994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boot R, Raynal DJ, Grime JP (1986) A comparative study of the influence of drought stress on flowering in Urtica dioica and Urtica urens. J Ecol 74:485–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell GS, Harris GA (1977) Water relations and water use patterns for Artemisia tridentata Nutt. in wet and dry years. Ecology 58:652–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Condit R, Hubbell SP, Foster RB (1995) Mortality rates of 205 neotropical tree and shrub species and the impact of a severe drought. Ecol Mono 65:419–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DePuit EJ, Caldwell MM (1973) Seasonal pattern of net photosynthesis of Artemisia tridentata. Am J Bot 60:426–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DiCristina K, Germino M (2006) Correlation of neighborhood relationships, carbon assimilation, and water status of sagebrush seedlings establishing after fire. West N Am Nat 66:441–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diffenbaugh NS, Swain DL, Touma D (2015) Anthropogenic warming has increased drought risk in California. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:3931–3936CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Esque TC, Medica PA, Shryock DF, Defalco LA, Webb RH, Hunter RB (2015) Direct and indirect effects of environmental variability on growth and survivorship of pre-reproductive Joshua trees, Yucca brevifolia Engelm. (Agavaceae). Am J Bot 102:85–91CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Evans RD, Black RA (1993) Growth, photosynthesis, and resource investment for vegetative and reproductive modules of Artemisia tridentata. Ecology 74:1516–1528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Griffin D, Anchukaitis KJ (2014) How unusual is the 2012-2014 California drought? Geophys Res Lett 41:9017–9023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hanson CL, Johnson CW, Wight JR (1982) Foliage mortality of mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata subsp vaseyana) in southwestern Idaho during the winter of 1976-77. J Range Man 35:142–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harper JL (1977) Population biology of plants. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. He Q, Bertness MD, Altieri AH (2013) Global shifts towards positive species interactions with increasing environmental stress. Ecol Lett 16:695–706CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hunt LP (2010) Spatial variation in the demography and population dynamics of a perennial shrub (Atriplex vesicaria) under sheep grazing in semi-arid Australian rangelends. Aust Ecol 35:794–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hursh CR, Haasis FW (1931) Effects of 1925 summer drought on southern Appalachian hardwoods. Ecology 12:380–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change [Core Writing Team, Pachauri RK, Meyer LA (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  20. Karban R, Wetzel WC, Shiojiri K, Ishizaki S, Ramirez SR, Blande JD (2014) Deciphering the language of plant communication: volatile chemotypes of sagebrush. New Phytol 204:380–385CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Karban R, Grof-Tisza P, Blande JD (2016) Chemotypic variation in volatiles and herbivory for sagebrush. J Chem Ecol 42:829–840CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kessler A, Halitschke R, Diezel C, Baldwin IT (2006) Priming of plant defense responses in nature by airborne signaling between Artemisia tridentata and Nicotiana attenuata. Oecologia 148:280–292CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Mann ME, Gleick PH (2015) Climate change and California drought in the 21st century. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:3858–3859CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Matzner SL, Richards JH (1996) Sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata Nutt.) roots maintain nutrient uptake capacity under water stress. J Exp Bot 47:1045–1056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McDowell N, Pockman WT, Allen CD, Breshears DD, Kolb CN, Plaut J, Sperry J, West A, Plaut J, Williams DJ, Yepez EA (2008) Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought? New Phytol 178:719–739CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Noy-Meir I (1973) Desert ecosystems: environment and producers. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:25–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Orsenigo S, Mondoni A, Rossi G, Abeli T (2014) Some like it hot and some like it cold, but not too much: plant responses to climate extremes. Plant Ecol 215:677–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Palmquist KA, Schlaepfer DR, Bradford JB, Lauenroth WK (2016) Mid-latitude shrub steppe plant communities: climate change consequences for soil water resources. Ecology 97:2343–2354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pickford GD (1932) The influence of continued heavy grazing and of promiscuous burning on spring-fall ranges in Utah. Ecology 13:159–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pielou EC (1962) The use of plant-to-neighbour distances for the detection of competition. J Ecol 50:357–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Richards JH, Caldwell MM (1987) Hydraulic lift: substantial nocturnal water transport between soil layers by Artemisia tridentata roots. Oecologia 73:486–489CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Rowland MM, Wisdom MJ, Suring LH, Meinke CW (2006) Greater sage-grouse as an umbrella species for sagebrush-associated vertebrates. Biol Cons 129:323–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sanford MP, Huntly NJ (2010) Seasonal patterns of arthropod diversity and abundance on big sagebrush, Artemisia tridentata. W North Am Nat 70:67–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schlaepfer DR, Lauenroth WK, Bradford JB (2014) Natural regeneration processes in big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata). Range Ecol Man 67:344–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Swain DL, Horton DE, Singh D, Diffenbaugh NS (2016) Trends in atmospheric patterns conducive to seasonal precipitation and temperature extremes in California. Sci Adv 2:e1501344CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Venturas MD, MacKinnon ED, Dario HL, Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Davis SD (2016) Chaparral shrub hydraulic traits, size and life history types relate to species mortality during California’s historic drought of 2014. PLoS ONE 11:e0159145CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. West AG, Dawson TE, February EC, Midgley GF, Bond WJ, Aston TL (2012) Diverse functional responses to drought in a Mediterranean type shrubland in South Africa. New Phytol 195:396–407CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Wu D, Zhao X, Liang S, Zhou T, Huang K, Tang B, Zhao W (2015) Time-lag effects of global vegetation responses to climate change. Global Change Biol 21:3520–3531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Young JA, Evans RA, Major J (1988) Sagebrush steppe. In: Barbour MG, Major J (eds) Terrestrial vegetation of California. Second Edition. Special Publication 9, California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, California, USA, pp 763–769Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Entomology and NematologyUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA
  2. 2.Department of Agri-Food and Environmental ScienceUniversity of FlorenceSesto FiorentinoItaly

Personalised recommendations