What makes a plant species specialist in mixed broad-leaved deciduous forests?
- 314 Downloads
Knowledge about relationships between specialization degree of species, i.e. the width of their realized niche and functional traits, may have important implications for the assessment of future population developments under environmental change. In this study, we used a recently introduced method to calculate ecological niche widths of plant species in mixed broad-leaved deciduous forests and to investigate the dependence between niche widths of plants and their functional traits and Ellenberg indicator values. The research is based on a dataset of 4556 phytosociological relevés of mixed broad-leaved deciduous forests in Slovenia. We calculated theta indices for 326 species, which ranks them along a continuous gradient of habitat specialization. For 272 species, we compiled 26 functional traits and Ellenberg indicator values. We found some significant correlations between theta indices of species and their functional traits and Ellenberg indicator values; habitat specialists thrive primarily on the highest altitudes, on colder, dry sites and achieve the age of first flowering later than generalists. They also have smaller seed diameter, lower leaf dry matter content, lower mean canopy height and bigger specific leaf area than generalists. Two species groups, chamaephytes and spring green species, are particularly characterized as specialist species. The added value of our work is in complementing the knowledge about the niche differentiating along different environmental gradients and species coexistence in mixed broad-leaved deciduous forests.
KeywordsNiche width Functional traits Ecological indicator value Habitat specialism Deciduous forest Vegetation ecology
We would like to thank Martin Cregeen and Urša Marinšek who kindly reviewed our English. We would also like to thank two anonymous referees whose comments improved the manuscript. This work was funded by the ARRS (Slovenian Research Agency) Grant P1-0236.
- Chytrý M (2013) LB Carpino-Fagetea Jakucs ex Passarge 1968. In: Chytrý M (ed) Vegetation of the Czech Republic 4. Forest and shrub vegetation. Academia, Praha, pp 194–198Google Scholar
- Čarni A, Juvan N, Košir P, Marinšek A, Paušič A, Šilc U (2011) Plant communities in gradients. Plant Biosyst 145(Supp. 1):54–64Google Scholar
- Crawley MJ (1997) The structure of plant communities. Plant ecology, 2nd edition, Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Ellenberg H, Weber HE, Dull R, Wirth V, Werner W, Paulisen D (1992) Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. Scripta Geobotanica, 18, Goltze Verlag, GöttingenGoogle Scholar
- Elton C (1927) Animal ecology. Sidgwick and Jackson, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Gitay H, Noble IR (1997) What are functional types and how should we seek them? In: Woodward F (ed) Plant functional types—their relevance to ecosystem properties and global change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–19Google Scholar
- Klotz S, Kühn I, Durka W (2002) BIOLFLOR—Eine Datenbank mit biologisch-ökologischen Merkmalen zur Flora von Deutschland. Schr.reihe Veg.kd 38:1–334Google Scholar
- MacArthur RH (1972) Geographical ecology. Harper & Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Magri D, Vendramin GG, Comps B, Dupanloup I, Geburek T, Gomory D, Latalowa M, Litt T, Paule L, Roure JM, Tantau I, van der Knaap WO, Petit RJ, de Beaulieu JL (2006) A new scenario for the Quaternary history of European beech populations: palaeobotanical evidence and genetic consequences. New Phytol 171(1):199–221CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marinček L, Čarni A (2002) Commentary to the vegetation map of forest communities of Slovenia in a scale of 1:400,000. ZRC SAZU, LjubljanaGoogle Scholar
- R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/
- Šilc U, Lososová Z, Vrbničanin S (2014) Weeds shift from generalist to specialist: narrowing of ecological niches along a north-south gradient. Preslia 86:35–46Google Scholar
- Trinajstić I (1992) A contribution to the phytogeographical classification of the Illyrian floral element. Acta Bot Croat 51:135–142Google Scholar
- Trinajstić I (1997) Phytogeographical analysis of the illyricoid floral element. Acta Biol Slov 41(2–3):77–85Google Scholar
- Tutin TG, Burges NA, Chater AO, Edmondson JR, Heywood VH, Moore DM, Valentine DH, Walters SM, Webb DA (1993) Flora Europaea, vol 1. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burges NA, Moore DM, Valentine DH, Walters SM, Webb DA (1964–1980). Flora Europaea, vol 2–5. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Zelený D, Li CF, Chytrý M (2010) Pattern of local plant species richness along a gradient of landscape topographical heterogeneity: result of spatial mass effect or environmental shift? Ecography 33:578–589Google Scholar