Advertisement

Plant Ecology

, Volume 216, Issue 3, pp 395–405 | Cite as

Bud bank dynamics and clonal growth strategy in the rhizomatous grass, Pascopyrum smithii

  • Jacqueline P. OttEmail author
  • David C. Hartnett
Article

Abstract

Recruitment of rhizomatous perennial grass ramets primarily occurs from the belowground bud bank. Investment in guerilla versus phalanx growth is determined by bud availability, development, and spatial distribution. The tiller and bud bank dynamics of Pascopyrum smithii, a dominant rhizomatous grass of the northern mixed-grass prairie, were examined in South Dakota throughout an annual cycle to assess the investment in guerilla versus phalanx growth and the role of different bud populations in renewal versus regenerative functions and vegetative spread via rhizomes. Pascopyrum smithii invested substantially in both phalanx and guerilla tiller production. However, investment in rhizome production before tiller recruitment prioritized guerilla over phalanx growth. Annual tiller recruitment of P. smithii was capable of flexible timing, occurring in either spring or fall. Renewal buds, from which rhizomes and tillers were recruited, primarily consisted of the youngest generation of buds borne at the base of tillers. Although rhizome axillary buds and older tiller axillary buds were rarely used in annual tiller recruitment, they provided a sizable reserve (regenerative) bud bank. The spatial distribution of bud development produced the mixed guerrilla–phalanx growth pattern and flexible tiller recruitment timing of P. smithii. Therefore, P. smithii is capable of employing both conservative and foraging growth strategies which will facilitate its persistence under local neighborhood variability and changing resource availability associated with environmental change. Understanding the spatial distribution of buds as determined by rhizome architecture is essential to understanding the distribution and composition of species within plant communities dominated by clonal species.

Keywords

Bud Guerilla Phalanx Rhizome Vegetative reproduction Western wheatgrass 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Kansas State University Division of Biology, the Konza Prairie Long-Term Ecological Research Program, and the USDA Rangeland Research Program [Grant number 310306]. We thank C. Ferguson, J. Nippert, and L. Murray for helpful suggestions on previous drafts of this manuscript. We also thank K. Sebes for lab assistance, and Wind Cave NP, especially B. Burkhart, for their field site support.

Supplementary material

11258_2014_444_MOESM1_ESM.jpg (888 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (JPG 889 kb)

References

  1. Agresti A (2007) An introduction to categorical data analysis. Wiley, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asay KH, Jensen KB (1996) Wheatgrasses. In: Moser LE, Buxton DR, Casler MD (eds) Cool-season forage grasses. American Society of Agronomy, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  3. Briske DD, Derner JD (1998) Clonal biology of caespitose grasses. In: Cheplick GP (ed) Population biology of grasses. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Busso CA, Mueller RJ, Richards JH (1989) Effects of drought and defoliation on bud viability in 2 caespitose grasses. Ann Bot 63:477–485Google Scholar
  5. Carlsson BA, Callaghan TV (1990) Programmed tiller differentiation, intraclonal density regulation and nutrient dynamics in Carex bigelowii. Oikos 58:219–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen XS, Xie YH, Deng ZM, Li F, Hou ZY (2011) A change from phalanx to guerrilla growth form is an effective strategy to acclimate to sedimentation in a wetland sedge species Carex brevicuspis (Cyperaceae). Flora 206:347–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dalgleish HJ, Kula AR, Hartnett DC, Sandercock BK (2008) Responses of two bunchgrasses to nitrogen addition in tallgrass prairie: the role of bud bank demography. Am J Bot 95:672–680CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. de Kroon H, Knops J (1990) Habitat exploration through morphological plasticity in 2 chalk grassland perennials. Oikos 59:39–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de Kroon H, Schieving F (1990) Resource partitioning in relation to clonal growth strategy. In: van Groenendael J, de Kroon H (eds) Clonal growth in plants: regulation and function. SPB Academic Publishing, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  10. Frank AB, Karn JF (1988) Growth, water-use efficiency, and digestibility of crested, intermediate, and western wheatgrass. Agron J 80:677–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Geber MA (1990) The cost of meristem limitation in Polygonum arenastrum: negative genetic correlations between fecundity and growth. Evolution 44:799–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gibson J (2009) Grasses and grassland ecology. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Great Plains Flora Association (1986) Flora of the great plains. University Press of Kansas, LawrenceGoogle Scholar
  14. Harper JL (1977) Population biology of plants. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Hendrickson JR, Briske DD (1997) Axillary bud banks of two semiarid perennial grasses: occurrence, longevity, and contribution to population persistance. Oecologia 110:584–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Humphrey LD, Pyke DA (1998) Demographic and growth responses of a guerrilla and a phalanx perennial grass in competitive mixtures. J Ecol 86:854–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Judziewicz EJ, Clark LG, Londono X, Stern MJ (1999) American bamboos. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  18. Klimesova J, Klimes L (2007) Bud banks and their role in vegetative regeneration—a literature review and proposal for simple classification and assessment. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 8:115–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Klimesova J, Klimes L (2008) Clonal growth diversity and bud banks of plants in the Czech flora: an evaluation using the CLO-PLA3 database. Preslia 80:255–275Google Scholar
  20. Lamp HF (1952) Reproductive activity in Bromus inermis in relation to phases of tiller development. Bot Gazette 113:413–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lovett Doust L (1981) Population dynamics and local specialization in a clonal perennial (Ranunculus repens). 1. The dynamics of ramets in contrasting habitats. J Ecol 69:743–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McIntyre GI (1967) Environmental control of bud and rhizome development in seedlings of Agropyron repens L. Beauv. Can J Bot 45:1315–1326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McIntyre GI (1976) Apical dominance in rhizome of Agropyron repens—influence of water stress on bud activity. Can J Bot 54:2747–2754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Monson RK, Sackschewsky MR, Williams GJ III (1986) Field measurements of photosynthesis, water-use efficiency, and growth in Agropyron smithii (C3) and Bouteloua gracilis (C4) in the Colorado shortgrass steppe. Oecologia 68:400–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mueller RJ, Richards JH (1986) Morphological analysis of tillering in Agropyron spicatum and Agropyron desertorum. Ann Bot 58:911–921Google Scholar
  26. Mullahey JJ, Waller SS, Moser LE (1991) Defoliation effects on yield and bud and tiller numbers of 2 Sandhills grasses. J Range Manag 44:241–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Murphy JS, Briske DD (1992) Regulation of tillering by apical dominance—chronology, interpretative value, and current perspectives. J Range Manag 45:419–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Navas ML, Garnier E (1990) Demography and growth forms of the clonal perennial Rubia peregrina in Mediterranean vineyard and unmanaged habitats. J Ecol 78:691–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ott JP (2014) Ecological implications of grass bud bank and tiller dynamics in mixed-grass prairie. Dissertation, Kansas State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  30. Ott JP, Hartnett DC (2012a) Contrasting bud bank dynamics of two co-occurring grasses in tallgrass prairie: implications for grassland dynamics. Plant Ecol 213:1437–1448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ott JP, Hartnett DC (2012b) Higher-order bud production increases tillering capacity in the perennial caespitose grass Scribner’s Panicum (Dichanthelium oligosanthes). Botany 90:884–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rogler GA (1962) The wheatgrasses. In: Hughes HD, Heath ME, Metcalfe DS (eds) Forages: the science of grassland agriculture. Iowa State University Press, AmesGoogle Scholar
  33. Rusch GM, Wilmann B, Klimesova J, Evju M (2011) Do clonal and bud bank traits vary in correspondence with soil properties and resource acquisition strategies? Patterns in Alpine communities in the Scandian Mountains. Folia Geobot 46:237–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. SAS Institute (2008) SAS 9.2. SAS Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar
  35. Soil survey staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture (2013) Web soil survey. http://www.websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/. Accessed 1 May 2014
  36. Turkington R, Hamilton RS, Gliddon C (1991) Within-population variation in localized and integrated responses of Trifolium repens  to biotically patchy environments. Oecologia 86:183–192Google Scholar
  37. Watson MA (1984) Developmental constraints—effect on population growth and patterns of resource allocation in a clonal plant. Am Nat 123:411–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Watson MA, Hay MJM, Newton PCD (1997) Developmental phenology and the timing of determination of shoot bud fates: ways in which the developmental program modulates fitness in clonal plants. In: de Kroon H, van Groenendael J (eds) The ecology and evolution of clonal plants. Backhuys Publishers, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  39. Weaver JE (1968) Prairie plants and their environment: a fifty-five year study in the midwest. University of NE Press, LincolnGoogle Scholar
  40. White RS, Currie PO (1983) Prescribed burning in the Northern Great Plains—yield and cover responses of 2 forage species in mixed grass prairie. J Range Manag 36:179–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. White R, Murray S, Rohweder M (2000) Pilot analysis of global ecosystems: grassland ecosystems technical report. World Resources Institute, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  42. Ye XH, Yu FH, Dong M (2006) A trade-off between guerrilla and phalanx growth forms in Leymus secalinus under different nutrient supplies. Ann Bot 98:187–191CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhang J, Romo JT (1995) Impacts of defoliation on tiller production and survival in Northern wheatgrass. J Range Manag 48:115–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhang JT, Mu CS, Wang DL, Wang JF, Chen GX (2009) Shoot population recruitment from a bud bank over two seasons of undisturbed growth of Leymus chinensis. Botany 87:1242–1249CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of BiologyKansas State UniversityKSUSA
  2. 2.Forest and Grassland Research LaboratoryUS Forest Service-Rocky Mountain Research StationRapid CityUSA

Personalised recommendations