Advertisement

Plant Ecology

, Volume 216, Issue 2, pp 307–318 | Cite as

Functional trait expression of grassland species shift with short- and long-term nutrient additions

  • Kimberly J. La PierreEmail author
  • Melinda D. Smith
Article

Abstract

Humans are altering nutrient availability worldwide, likely affecting plant trait expression, with consequences for community composition and ecosystem function. Here, we examined the responses of plant species dominant under ambient nutrient conditions (baseline species) versus those that become dominant under increased nutrient conditions (enriched species) in a tallgrass prairie ecosystem. The expression of 8 functional traits was quantified for 3 baseline and 3 enriched species within one short-term and one long-term nutrient addition experiment. We found that enriched species occupied a trait space characterized by traits that generally correspond with faster growth rates than baseline species. Additionally, the enriched species shifted in their trait expression relative to the control more than the baseline species with nutrient additions, particularly within the long-term experiment. The trait space shifts of individual species with nutrient additions scaled up to affect community aggregate trait values within both experiments. However, traits that responded to nutrient additions at the community level were not strong predictors of aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP) within the short-term experiment. In contrast, in the long-term experiment, one response trait (community aggregate height) strongly correlated with variation in ANPP with nutrient additions. The link between plant functional traits and community and ecosystem responses to chronic nutrient additions shown here will provide important insight into key mechanisms driving grassland responses to global change.

Keywords

Baseline species Effect trait Enriched species Nutrient addition Response trait Tallgrass prairie 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for field and lab help from M. Avolio, D. Blumenthal, C. Chang, S. Koerner, A. Kuhl, B. La Pierre, J. Nippert, A. Potter, R. Ramundo, and K. Wilcox. The Post and Vasseur labs, as well as two anonymous reviewers, provided helpful feedback on earlier manuscript drafts. Funding was provided by a Yale Institute for Biospheric Studies Center for Field Ecology Pilot Grant to K. La Pierre, a grant from the Lee Pierce Fund to K. La Pierre, and the Konza LTER. This work was generated using data from a site within the Nutrient Network collaborative experiment, funded at the site-scale by individual researchers and coordinated through Research Coordination Network funding from NSF to E. Borer and E. Seabloom (NSF-DEB-1042132). Nitrogen fertilizer was donated by Crop Production Services, Loveland, CO. K. La Pierre was supported by an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship.

Supplementary material

11258_2014_438_MOESM1_ESM.doc (92 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 92 kb)

References

  1. Albert CH, Thuiller W, Yoccoz NG, Douzet R, Aubert S, Lavorel S (2010) A multi-trait approach reveals the structure and the relative importance of intra- vs. interspecific variability in plant traits. Funct Ecol 24:1192–1201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albert CH, Grassein F, Schurr FM, Vieilledent G, Violle C (2011) When and how should intraspecific variability be considered in trait-based plant ecology? Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 13:217–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Avolio ML, Beaulieu JM, Smith MD (2013) Genetic diversity of a dominant C4 grass is altered with increased precipitation variability. Oecologia 171:571–581PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Avolio ML, Koerner SE, La Pierre KJ, Wilcox KR, Wilson GWT, Smith MD, Collins SL (2014) Changes in plant community composition, not diversity, during a decade of nitrogen and phosphorus additions drive above-ground productivity in a tallgrass prairie. J Ecol 102:1649–1660Google Scholar
  5. Bachmann D, Both S, Bruelheide H, Ding B-Y, Gao M, Härdtle W, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Erfmeier A (2012) Functional trait similarity of native and invasive herb species in subtropical China—environment-specific differences are the key. Environ Exp Bot 83:82–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ceulemans T, Merckx R, Hens M, Honnay O (2011) A trait-based analysis of the role of phosphorus vs. nitrogen enrichment in plant species loss across North-west European grasslands. J Appl Ecol 48:1155–1163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chapin FS (1980) The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:233–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chapin FS, Autumn K, Pugnaire F (1993) Evolution of suites of traits in response to environmental stress. Am Nat 142:S78–S92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark CM, Tilman D (2008) Loss of plant species after chronic low-level nitrogen deposition to prairie grasslands. Nature 451:712–715PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark CM, Cleland EE, Collins SL, Fargione JE, Gough L, Gross KL, Pennings SC, Suding KN, Grace JB (2007) Environmental and plant community determinants of species loss following nitrogen enrichment. Ecol Lett 10:596–607PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cleland EE, Harpole WS (2010) Nitrogen enrichment and plant communities. Year in ecology and conservation biology 2010. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 46–61Google Scholar
  12. Cowling R, Campbell B (1980) Convergence in vegetation structure in the mediterranean communities of California, Chile and South Africa. Plant Ecol 197:191–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cunningham S (1999) Evolutionary divergences in leaf structure and chemistry, comparing rainfall and soil nutrient gradients. Ecol Monogr 69:569–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Diaz S, Cabido M (2001) Vive la difference: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends Ecol Evol 16:646–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Diaz S, Hodgson JG, Thompson K, Cabido M, Cornelissen JHC, Jalolo A, Montserrat-Marti G, Grime JP, Zarrinkamar F, Asri Y, Band S, Basconcelo S, Castro-Diez P, Funes G, Hamzehee B, Khoshnevi M, Perez-Harguindeguy N, Perez-Rontome M, Shirvany F, Vendramini F, Yazdani S, Abbas-Azimi R, Bogaard A, Boustani S, Charles M, Dehghan M, de Torres-Espuny L, Falczuk V, Guerrero-Campo J, Hynd A, Jones G, Kowsary E, Kazemi-Saeed F, Maestro-Martinez M, Romo-Diez A, Shaw S, Siavahs B, Villar-Salvador P, Zak M (2004) The plant traits that drive ecosystems: evidence from three continents. J Veg Sci 15:295–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Drenovsky RE, Grewell BJ, D’Antonio CM, Funk JL, James JJ, Molinari N, Parker IM, Richards CL (2012) A functional trait perspective on plant invasion. Ann Bot 110:141–153PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Firn J, Prober SM, Buckley YM (2012) Plastic traits of an exotic grass contribute to its abundance but are not always favourable. PLoS One 7:e35870PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fonseca CR, Overton JM, Collins B, Westoby M (2000) Shifts in trait-combinations along rainfall and phosphorus gradients. J Ecol 88:964–977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Funk JL (2008) Differences in plasticity between invasive and native plants from a low resource environment. J Ecol 96:1162–1173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. García-Palacios P, Maestre FT, Milla R (2013) Community-aggregated plant traits interact with soil nutrient heterogeneity to determine ecosystem functioning. Plant Soil 364:119–129Google Scholar
  21. Garnier E, Cortez J, Billès G, Navas M (2004) Plant functional markers capture ecosystem properties during secondary succession. Ecology 85:2630–2637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grime JP (1977) Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Am Nat 111:1169–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grömping U (2006) Relative importance for linear regression in R: the package relaimpo. J Stat Softw 17:1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harpole WS, Tilman D (2007) Grassland species loss resulting from reduced niche dimension. Nature 446:791–793PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harpole WS, Ngai JT, Cleland EE, Seabloom EW, Borer ET, Bracken MES, Elser JJ, Gruner DS, Hillebrand H, Shurin JB, Smith JE (2011) Nutrient co-limitation of primary producer communities. Ecol Lett 14:852–862PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Inouye RS, Tilman D (1995) Convergence and divergence of old-field vegetation after 11 yr of nitrogen addition. Ecology 76:1872–1887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Isbell F, Reich PB, Tilman D, Hobbie SE, Polasky S, Binder S (2013) Nutrient enrichment, biodiversity loss, and consequent declines in ecosystem productivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:11911–11916PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kichenin E, Wardle DA, Peltzer DA, Morse CW, Freschet GT (2013) Constrasting effects of plant inter- and intraspecific variation on community-level trait measures along an environmental gradient. Funct Ecol 27:1254–1261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Knops JMH, Reinhart K (2000) Specific leaf area along a nitrogen fertilization gradient. Am Midl Nat 144:265–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Laliberté E, Shipley B, Norton DA, Scott D (2012) Which plant traits determine abundance under long-term shifts in soil resource availability and grazing intensity? J Ecol 100:662–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lanta V, Klimešová J, Martincová K, Janeček Š, Doležal J, Rosenthal J, Lepš J, Klimeš L (2011) A test of the explanatory power of plant functional traits on the individual and population levels. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 13:189–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lavorel S, Grigulis K (2012) How fundamental plant functional trait relationships scale-up to trade-offs and synergies in ecosystem services. J Ecol 100:128–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lavorel S, Grigulis K, Lamarque P, Colace M-P, Garden D, Girel J, Pellet G, Douzet R (2011) Using plant functional traits to understand the landscape distribution of multiple ecosystem services. J Ecol 99:135–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. LeBauer DS, Treseder KK (2008) Nitrogen limitation of net primary productivity in terrestrial ecosystems is globally distributed. Ecology 89:371–379PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McDonald PG, Fonseca CR, Overton JM, Westoby M (2003) Leaf-size divergence along rainfall and soil-nutrient gradients: is the method of size reduction common among clades? Funct Ecol 17:50–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McGill BJ, Enquist BJ, Weiher E, Westoby M (2006) Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. Trends Ecol Evol 21:178–185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Messier J, McGill BJ, Lechowicz MJ (2010) How do traits vary across ecological scales? A case for trait-based ecology. Ecol Lett 13:838–848PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Milchunas DG, Lauenroth W (1995) Inertia in plant community structure: state changes after cessation of nutrient-enrichment stress. Ecol Appl 5:452–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Minden V, Kleyer M (2011) Testing the effect-response framework: key response and effect traits determining above-ground biomass of salt marshes. J Veg Sci 22:387–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Oksanen JF, Blanchet G, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H (2013) Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.0–7. http://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/vegan/index.html
  41. Ordoñez JC, Van Bodegom PM, Witte J-PM, Wright IJ, Reich PB, Aerts R (2009) A global study of relationships between leaf traits, climate and soil measures of nutrient fertility. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 18:137–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pakeman RJ (2011) Multivariate identification of plant functional response and effect traits in an agricultural landscape. Ecology 92:1353–1365PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Poorter H, De Jong R (1999) A comparison of specific leaf area, chemical composition and leaf construction costs of field plants from 15 habitats differing in productivity. New Phytol 143:163–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  45. Reich PB, Walters M, Ellsworth D (1992) Leaf life-span in relation to leaf, plant, and stand characteristics among diverse ecosystems. Ecol Monogr 62:365–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schellberg J, da Silveira Pontes L (2012) Plant functional traits and nutrient gradients on grassland. Grass Forage Sci 67:305–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Smith MD, Knapp AK, Collins SL (2009) A framework for assessing ecosystem dynamics in response to chronic resource alterations induced by global change. Ecology 90:3279–3289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Suding KN, Goldstein LJ (2008) Testing the Holy Grail framework: using functional traits to predict ecosystem change. New Phytol 180:559–662PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Suding KN, Goldberg DE, Hartman KM (2003) Relationships among species traits: separating levels of response and identifying linkages to abundance. Ecology 84:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Suding KN, Collins SL, Gough L, Clark CM, Cleland EE, Gross KL, Milchunas DG, Pennings SC (2005) Functional- and abundance-based mechanisms explain diversity loss due to N fertilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102:4387–4392PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Suding KN, Lavorel S, Chapin FS, Cornelissen JHC, Diaz S, Garnier E, Goldberg DE, Hooper DU, Jackson ST, Navas ML (2008) Scaling environmental change through the community-level: a trait-based response-and-effect framework for plants. Global Change Biol 14:1125–1140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S, 4th edn. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Violle C, Navas M-L, Vile D, Kazakou E, Fortunel C, Hummel I, Garnier E (2007) Let the concept of trait be functional! Oikos 116:882–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vitousek PM, Aber JD, Howarth RW, Likens GE, Matson P, Schindler DW, Schlesinger WH, Tilman GD (1997a) Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: sources and consequences. Ecol Appl 7:737–750Google Scholar
  55. Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Lubchenco J, Melillo JM (1997b) Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science 277:494–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Vitousek PM, Porder S, Houlton BZ, Chadwick OA (2010) Terrestrial phosphorus limitation: mechanisms, implications, and nitrogen-phosphorus interactions. Ecol Appl 20:5–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Walker B, Kinzig A, Langridge J (1999) Plant attribute diversity, resilience, and ecosystem function: the nature and significance of dominant and minor species. Ecosystems 2:95–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Webb CT, Hoeting Ja, Ames GM, Pyne MI, LeRoy Poff N (2010) A structured and dynamic framework to advance traits-based theory and prediction in ecology. Ecol Lett 13:267–283PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Westoby M, Wright IJ (2006) Land-plant ecology on the basis of functional traits. Trends Ecol Evol 21:261–268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M (2001) Strategy shifts in leaf physiology, structure and nutrient content between species of high- and low-rainfall and high- and low-nutrient habitats. Funct Ecol 15:423–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wright IJ, Reich PB, Cornelissen JHC, Falster DS, Garnier E, Hikosaka K, Lamont BB, Lee W, Oleksyn J, Osada N, Poorter H, Villar R, Warton DI, Westoby M (2005) Assessing the generality of global leaf trait relationships. New Phytol 166:485–496PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yang H, Li Y, Wu M, Zhang ZHE, Li L, Wan S (2011) Plant community responses to nitrogen addition and increased precipitation: the importance of water availability and species traits. Global Change Biol 17(9):2936–2944CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyYale UniversityNew HavenUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biology, Graduate Degree Program in EcologyColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA
  3. 3.Department of Integrative BiologyUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations