Plant Ecology

, Volume 214, Issue 10, pp 1257–1272 | Cite as

Propagule morphology and river characteristics shape secondary water dispersal in tree species



Plant migration is a multi-stage process often driven by multiple dispersal vector systems. Water-mediated dispersal (hydrochory) is known to move propagules of nonaquatic species over long distances, but whether propagule morphology affects floating processes is an open question. We used a multi-species approach to assess the role of propagule morphology in the dispersal of primarily wind-dispersed tree species in different urban rivers; the impact of hydraulic structures (locks, spillways) on floating was also considered. We released tagged propagules of eight tree species (Acer platanoides, Acer negundo, Acer saccharinum, Ailanthus altissima, Fraxinus excelsior, Robinia pseudoacacia, Tilia platyphyllos, Ulmus glabra) in the main lowland Spree River and in the small tributary Panke River (Berlin, Germany) and directly observed the fate of the floating propagules over river sections of 1,200 m. Our results demonstrate the following: (1) Water is an effective dispersal agent for wind-dispersed tree species, extending typical wind-related transport distances by several times. (2) Interspecific differences in transport distances reflect propagule characteristics (dry weight, maximum wing width) and river system. (3) Propagule morphology also affects deposition patterns as it was generally the large propagules that were trapped along semi-natural embankments in slow flow areas. (4) Hydraulic structures hampered but did not entirely stop water-mediated dispersal and diminished the effects of propagule morphology on floating processes. These results provide novel insights into the functioning of hydrochory as an important dispersal vector of tree species in river systems and as a driver of plant invasions.


Buoyancy Hydrochory Long-distance dispersal Plant invasion Secondary dispersal 



This research has been supported by the Technische Universität Berlin (Projekt Spreeathen 2008/09). We thank Daria Andreeva, Tom Bewernick, Silvia Groeger, Robin Grunzke, Janosch Marder, Linda Mai, Annette Müller, Christoph Schikora, Sarah Schöner, Luisa Späth, Charles Strohmeyer, Sebastian Ossenkop, Salka Waterloo, Frauke Weber, Victoria Wölk and Sandra Woicke for supporting field work, the Wasser- and Schifffahrtsamt in Berlin for providing access to hydraulic structures, Willy Rohloff, Yoganathan Gopalasamy and Gabi Hinz for technical assistance, two anonymous reviewer for helpful comments and Kelaine Ravdin for improving our English.


  1. Andersson E, Nilsson C, Johansson ME (2000) Plant dispersal in boreal rivers and its relation to diversity in riparian flora. J Biogeogr 27:1095–1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baskin CC, Baskin JM (1998) Seeds. Ecology, biogeography, and evolution of dormancy and germination. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonn S, Poschlod P (1998) Ausbreitungsbiologie der Pflanzen Mitteleuropas. Grundlagen und kulturhistorische Aspekte. UTB Quelle & Meyer, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  4. Chambert S, James CS (2009) Sorting of seeds by hydrochory. River Res Appl 25:48–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clark JS, Silman M, Kern R, Macklin E, Hille Ris Lambers J (1999) Seed dispersal near and far: patterns across temperate and tropical forests. Ecology 80:1475–1494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Danvind M, Nilsson C (1997) Seed floating ability and distribution of alpine plants along a northern Swedish river. J Veg Sci 8:271–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Engström J, Nilsson C, Jansson R (2009) Effects of stream restoration on dispersal of plant propagules. J Appl Ecol 46:397–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Groffman PM, Bain DJ, Band LE, Belt KT, Brush GS, Grove JM, Pouyat RV, Yesilonis IC, Zipperer WC (2003) Down by the riverside: urban riparian ecology. Frontiers Ecol Environ 6:315–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gurnell A, Thompson K, Goodson J, Moggridge H (2008) Propagule deposition along river margins: linking hydrology and ecology. J Ecol 96:553–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hampe A (2004) Extensive hydrochory uncouples spatiotemporal patterns of seedfall and seedling recruitment in a ‘bird-dispersed’ tree. J Ecol 92:797–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hampe A (2011) Plants on the move: the role of seed dispersal and initial population establishment for climate-driven range expansions. Acta Oecol 37:666–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Higgins SI, Nathan R, Cain ML (2003) Are long-distance dispersal events in plants usually caused by nonstandard means of dispersal? Ecology 84:1945–1956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hirsch H, Wypior C, von Wehrden H, Wesche K, Renison D, Hensen I (2012) Germination performance of native and non-native Ulmus pumila populations. NeoBiota 15:53–68Google Scholar
  14. Howe HF, Smallwood J (1982) Ecology of seed dispersal. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 13:201–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hulme PE et al (2008) Grasping at the routes of biological invasions: a framework for integrating pathways into policy. J Appl Ecol 45:403–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ikeda H, Itoh K (2001) Germination and water dispersal of seeds from a threatened plant species Penthorum chinense. Ecol Res 16:99–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jansson R, Zinko U, Merrit DM, Nilsson C (2005) Hydrochory increases riparian plant species richness: a comparison between a free-flowing and a regulated river. J Ecol 93:1094–1103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johansson ME, Nilsson C, Nilsson E (1996) Do rivers function as corridors for plant dispersal? J Veg Sci 7:593–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson WC (1988) Estimating dispersibility of Acer, Fraxinus and Tilia in fragmented landscapes from patterns of seedling establishment. Landsc Ecol 1:175–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kaproth MA, McGraw JB (2008) Seed viability and dispersal of the wind-dispersed invasive Ailanthus altissima in aqueous environments. For Sci 54:490–496Google Scholar
  21. Katul GG, Porporato A, Nathan R, Siqueira M, Soons MB, Poggi D, Horn HS, Levin SA (2005) Mechanistic analytical models for long-distance seed dispersal by wind. Am Nat 166:368–381CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kowarik I, Säumel I (2007) Biological flora of Central Europe: Ailanthus altissima (Mill.) Swingle. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 8:207–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kowarik I, Säumel I (2008) Water dispersal as an additional pathway to invasions by the primarily wind-dispersed tree Ailanthus altissima. Plant Ecol 198:241–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kowarik I, von der Lippe M (2011) Secondary wind dispersal enhances long-distance dispersal of an invasive species in urban road corridors. NeoBiota 9:49–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Küßner R, Wagner S (2002) Struktur, Dynamik und Bewirtschaftung von Auenwäldern am Mittellauf der Elbe. In: Roloff A, Bonn S (Hrsg.) Ergebnisse ökologischer Forschung zur nachhaltigen Bewirtschaftung von Auenwäldern an der Mittleren Elbe. Forstwiss Beitr Tharandt/Contrib For Sc 17:193–227Google Scholar
  26. Landenberger RE, Kota NL, McGraw JB (2007) Seed dispersal of the non-native invasive tree Ailanthus altissima into contrasting environments. Plant Ecol 192:55–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lopez-Almansa JC (2004) Review. Reproductive ecology of riparian elms. Invest Agrar Sist Recur For 13:17–27Google Scholar
  28. Matlack GR (1987) Diaspore size, shape, and fall behavior in wind-dispersed plant species. Am J Bot 74:1150–1160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Merritt DM, Wohl EE (2002) Processes governing hydrochory along rivers: hydraulics, hydrology, and dispersal phenology. Ecol Appl 12:1071–1087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Middleton BA (2002) Flood pulsing in the regeneration and maintenance of species in Riverine Forested Wetlands of the Southeastern United States. In: Middleton BA (ed) Flood pulsing in wetlands: restoring the natural hydrological balance. Wiley, New York, pp 223–295Google Scholar
  31. Morimoto J, Kominami R, Koike T (2010) Distribution and characteristics of the soil seed bank of the black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) in a headwater basin in northern Japan. Landsc Ecol Eng 6:193–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nathan R, Schurr F, Spiegel O, Steinitz O, Trakhtenbrot A, Tsoar A (2008) Mechanisms of long-distance seed dispersal. Trends Ecol Evol 23:638–647CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Nilsson C, Ekblad A, Dynesius M, Backe S, Gardfjell M, Carlberg B, Hellqvist S, Jansson R (1994) A comparison of species richness and traits of riparian plants between a main river channel and its tributaries. J Ecol 82:281–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nilsson C, Brown RL, Jansson R, Merritt DM (2010) The role of hydrochory in structuring riparian and wetland vegetation. Biol Rev 85:837–858PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Palmer MA, Bernhardt ES, Allan JD et al (2005) Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. J Appl Ecol 42:208–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Paulsen TR, Hogstedt G (2002) Passage through bird guts increases germination rate and seedling growth in Sorbus aucuparia. Funct Ecol 16:608–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Richardson DM, Holmes PM, Esler KJ, Galatowitsch SM, Stromberg JC, Pysek P, Hobbs RJ (2007) Riparian vegetation: degradation, alien plant invasions, and restoration prospects. Divers Distrib 13:126–139Google Scholar
  38. Richardson DM, Rejmánek M (2011) Trees and shrubs as invasive alien species—a global review. Divers Distrib 17:788–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rood SB, Braatne JH, Goater LA (2010) Favorable fragmentation: river reservoirs can impede downstream expansion of riparian weeds. Ecol Appl 20:1664–1677CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Rouifed S, Puijalon S, Viricel MR, Piola F (2011) Achene buoyancy and germinability of the terrestrial invasive Fallopia × bohemica in aquatic environment: a new vector of dispersion? EcoScience 18:79–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Säumel I, Kowarik I (2010) Urban rivers as dispersal corridors for primarily wind-dispersed invasive tree species. Landsc Urban Plan 94:244–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schmiedel D (2010) Fraxinus pennsylvanica in den Auenwäldern der Mittelelbe—Invasionsbiologie und ökologisches Verhalten im naturschutzfachlichen Kontext. Berliner Beiträge zur Ökologie Band 6. Weißensee Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  43. Schneider RL, Sharitz RR (1988) Hydrochory and regeneration in a bald cypress-water tupelo swamp forest. Ecology 69:1055–1063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Seiwa K, Tozawa M, Ueno N, Kimura M, Yamasaki M, Maruyama K (2008) Roles of cottony hairs in directed seed dispersal in riparian willows. Plant Ecol 198:27–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Siedschlag S (1997) Erfahrungen mit dem SIMK Verfahren bei der Durchflußermittlung an Bundeswasserstraßen im Zusammenhang mit unterschiedlichen Methoden zur lokalen Fließgeschwindigkeitsmessung. BfG-Bericht 1099, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  46. Soomers H, Winkel DN, Du Y, Wassen MJ (2010) The dispersal and deposition of hydrochorous plant seeds in drainage ditches: hydrochorous dispersal driven by wind. Freshw Biol 55:2032–2046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sutherland EK, Hale BJ, Hix DM (2000) Defining species guilds in the central hardwood forest, USA. Plant Ecol 174:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Thébauld C, Debussche M (1991) Rapid invasion of Fraxinus ornus L. along the Hérauld river system in Southern France. The importance of seed dispersal by water. J Biogeogr 18:7–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Traveset A, Riera N, Mas ME (2001) Passage through bird guts causes interespecific differences in seed germination characteristics. Funct Ecol 15:669–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Van der Wall SB, Longland WS (2004) Diplochory: are two seed dispersers better than one? Trends Ecol Evol 19:155–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. von der Lippe M, Kowarik I (2007) Long-distance dispersal by vehicles as driver in plant invasions. Conserv Biol 21:986–996CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. von der Lippe M, Bullock JM, Kowarik I, Knopp T, Wichmann M (2013) Human-mediated dispersal of seeds by the airflow of vehicles. PLoS ONE 8(1):e52733CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Wagner S, Wälder K, Ribbens E, Zeibig A (2004) Directionality in fruit dispersal models for anemochorous forest trees. Ecol Model 179:487–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zalapa JE, Brunet J, Guries RP (2009) Patterns of hybridization and introgression between invasive Ulmus pumila (Ulmaceae) and native U. rubra. Am J Bot 96:1116–1128CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology, Chair of Plant Ecology and Ecosystem ScienceTechnische Universität BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Department of Ecology, Chair of Ecological Impact Research and EcotoxicologyTechnische Universität BerlinBerlinGermany
  3. 3.Berlin-Brandenburg Institute of Advanced Biodiversity Research (BBIB)BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations