Advertisement

Plant Ecology

, Volume 214, Issue 10, pp 1199–1209 | Cite as

Regeneration capacity from buds on roots and rhizomes in five herbaceous perennials as affected by time of fragmentation

  • J. Liew
  • L. Andersson
  • U. BoströmEmail author
  • J. Forkman
  • I. Hakman
  • E. Magnuski
Article

Abstract

Variation in seasonal sprouting pattern from roots and rhizomes of perennial herbaceous plants influence the success of plant proliferation ability, invasiveness and escape from weed control measures. The latter often rely on methods, which repeatedly fragment the underground system, thereby trigger adventitious and axillary buds to sprout, and consequently reduce the amount of stored energy. If carried out at times when no re-growth occurs, treatments will have little effect on weed populations, but cost much in terms of labour and energy. The purpose of this experiment was to determine the seasonal variation in bud sprouting capacity after fragmentation. Five troublesome perennial weed species, collected in northern and southern Sweden, were grown outdoors in Uppsala, Sweden (N 59°49′, E 17°39′), from May 2009 to January 2010. Cut root and rhizome fragments, taken at two weeks intervals from July to January, were used to evaluate bud sprouting capacity, which was statistically analyzed using generalized additive models. In Elytrigia repens from southern Sweden and Sonchus arvensis sprouting capacity was significantly impaired during a period from September to November. In Equisetum arvense and Tussilago farfara sprouting was low between July and November where after it increased. In contrast, Cirsium arvense and E. repens from northern Sweden sprouted readily throughout the period. Except for E. repens, a model by populations was significantly better than one based on latitudinal origin. The result suggests a species-specific timing of treatments in weed management, avoiding the non-effective autumn period for E. arvense, S. arvensis and T. farfara, and in some cases in E. repens.

Keywords

Dormancy Vegetative reproduction Weed biology Disturbance 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning and the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.

References

  1. Anderson JV, Gesch RW, Jia Y, Chao WS, Horvath DP (2005) Seasonal shift in dormancy status, carbohydrate metabolism, and related gene expression in crown buds of leafy spurge. Plant Cell Environ 28:1567–1578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson L, Boström U, Forkman J, Hakman I, Liew J, Magnuski E (2013) Sprouting capacity from intact root systems of Cirsium arvense and Sonchus arvensis decreases in autumn. Weed Res 53:183–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boström U, Andersson L, Forkman J, Hakman I, Liew J, Magnuski E (2013) Seasonal variation in sprouting capacity from intact rhizome systems of three perennial weeds. doi: 10.1111/wre.12035
  4. Brandsæter LO, Fogelfors H, Fykse H et al (2010) Seasonal restrictions of bud growth on roots of Cirsium arvense and Sonchus arvensis and rhizomes of Elymus repens. Weed Res 50:102–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chao WS, Fooley ME, Horvath DP, Anderson JV (2007) Signals regulating dormancy in vegetative buds. Int J Plant Dev Biol 1:49–56Google Scholar
  6. Cloutier D, Watson AK (1985) Growth and reproduction of field horsetail (Equisetum arvense). Weed Sci 33:358–365Google Scholar
  7. Fykse H (1974) Studium av Åkerdylle. Utbreiing i Noreg, Vokster og Kvile–dels jamforg med narstaande arter. Forskning og Forsok i Landbruket 25:389–412 (in Norwegian with German summary)Google Scholar
  8. Fykse H (1977) Untersuchungen über Sonchus arvensis L., Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. und Tussilago farfara L. Entwicklung sowie Translokation von radioaktiv markierten Kohlenhydraten und MCPA. Sci Rep Agr Univ Norway 56Google Scholar
  9. Håkansson S (1969) Experiments with Sonchus arvensis L. I. development and growth, and the response of burial and defoliation in different developmental stages. Ann Agr Coll Sweden 35:989–1030Google Scholar
  10. Håkansson S, Wallgren B (1972) Experiments with Sonchus arvensis L. II. reproduction, plant development and response to mechanical disturbance. Swedish J Agr Res 2:3–14Google Scholar
  11. Håkansson S, Wallgren B (1976) Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv, Holcus mollis L. and Agrostis gigantea Roth. as weeds–some properties. Swedish J Agr Res 6:109–120Google Scholar
  12. Hastie T, Tibshirani R (1990) Generalized Additive Models. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Heide OM (2001) Photoperiodic control of dormancy in Sedum telephium and some other herbaceous perennial plants. Physiol Plant 113:332–337PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Holm LG, Plucknett DL, Pancho JV, Herbeger JP (1977) World’s worst weeds distribution and biology. University of Hawaii, HonoluluGoogle Scholar
  15. Horvath DP, Anderson JV, Chao WS, Foley ME (2003) Knowing when to grow: signals regulating bud dormancy. Trends Plant Sci 11:534–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Klimesova J, Klimes L (2007) Bud banks and their role in vegetative regeneration—a literature review and proposal for simple classification and assessment. Persp Plant Ecol Evol Syst 8:115–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kvist M, Håkansson S (1985) Rhythm and dormancy periods in the vegetative development and growth of some perennial weeds. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Department of Crop Production. Uppsala, Sweden. Report 156Google Scholar
  18. Latzel V, Klimesova J (2010) Year-to-year changes in expression of maternal effects in perennial plants. Bas Appl Ecol 11:702–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Latzel V, Klimesova J, Hajek T, Gomez S, Smilauer P (2010) Maternal effects alter progeny’s response to disturbance and nutrients in two plantago species. Oikos 119:1700–1710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lemna WK, Messersmith CG (1990) The biology of Canadian weeds. 94. Sonchus arvensis L. Can J Plant Sci 70:509–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liew J, Andersson L, Boström U, Forkman J, Hakman I, Magnuski E (2012) Influence of photoperiod and temperature on sprouting capacity in Cirsium arvense and Sonchus arvensis root buds. Weed Res 52:449–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McIntyre GI (1970) Studies on bud development in the rhizome of Agropyron repens. 1. the influence of temperature, light intensity, and bud position on the pattern of development. Can J Bot 48:1903–1909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nadeau LB, Vanden Born WH (1988) The root system of Canada thistle. Can J Plant Sci 69:1199–1206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nkurunziza L, Streibig JC (2011) Carbohydrate dynamics in roots and rhizomes of Cirsium arvense and Tussilago farfara. Weed Res 51:461–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ofir M, Kiegel J (2006) Opposite effects of daylength and temperature on flowering and summer dormancy of Poa bulbosa. Ann Bot 97:659–666PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ogden J (1974) Reproductive strategy of higher plants. 2. reproductive strategy of Tussilago farfara L. J Ecol 62:291–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Olsen JE (2010) Light and temperature sensing and signalling in induction of bud dormancy in woody plants. Plant Mol Biol 73:37–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ott JP, Hartnett DC (2011) Bud production and dynamics of flowering and vegetative tillers in Andropogon gerardii (Poaceae): the role of developmental constraints. Am J Bot 98:1293–1298PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sakamaki Y, Ino Y (2006) Tubers and rhizome fragments as propagules: competence for vegetative reproduction in Equisetum arvense. J Plant Res 119:677–683PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Salonen J, Andersson L, Andreasen C, Semb Tørresen K (2008) Key perennial weeds in arable crops in the Nordic countries. Proc. EWRS–NJF Workshop 387. Wageningen, pp.3–4Google Scholar
  31. Schimming WK, Messersmith CG (1988) Freezing resistance of overwintering buds of four perennial weeds. Weed Sci 36:568–573Google Scholar
  32. Shimizu-Sato S, Mori H (2001) Control of outgrowth and dormancy in axillary buds. Plant Physiol 127:1405–1413PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Taylor JS (1995) Apical dominance in rhizomes of quackgrass, Elytrigia repens: the effect of auxin, cytokinins, and abscisic acid. Can J Bot 73:307–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tiley GED (2010) Biological flora of the British Isles: Cirisum arvense (L.) Scop. J Ecol 98:938–983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Waldie T, Hayward A, Beveridge CA (2010) Axillary bud outgrowth in herbaceous shoots: how do strigolactones fit into the picture? Plant Mol Biol 73:27–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Werner PA, Rioux R (1977) The biology of Canadian weeds. 24. Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv. Can J Plant Sci 57:905–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Williams ED (1979) Studies on the depth distribution and on the germination and growth of Equisetum arvense L. (field horsetail) from tubers. Weed Res 19:25–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Liew
    • 1
  • L. Andersson
    • 1
  • U. Boström
    • 1
    Email author
  • J. Forkman
    • 1
  • I. Hakman
    • 2
  • E. Magnuski
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Crop Production EcologySwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUppsalaSweden
  2. 2.School of Natural SciencesLinnaeus UniversityKalmarSweden

Personalised recommendations