Advertisement

Plant Ecology

, Volume 214, Issue 9, pp 1169–1180 | Cite as

Temporal dynamics of plant community regeneration sources during tallgrass prairie restoration

  • Jason E. WillandEmail author
  • Sara G. Baer
  • David J. Gibson
  • Ryan P. Klopf
Article

Abstract

Ecological restoration aims to augment and steer the composition and contribution of propagules for community regeneration in degraded environments. We quantified patterns in the abundance, richness, and diversity of seed and bud banks across an 11-year chronosequence of restored prairies and in prairie remnants to elucidate the degree to which the germinable seed bank, emerged seedlings, belowground buds, and emerged ramets were related to community regeneration. There were no directional patterns in the abundance, richness, or diversity of the germinable seed bank across the chronosequence. Emerged seedling abundance of sown species decreased during restoration. Richness and diversity of all emerged seedlings and non-sown emerged seedling species decreased across the chronosequence. Conversely, abundance and richness of belowground buds increased with restoration age and belowground bud diversity of sown species increased across the chronosequence. Numbers of emerged ramets also increased across the chronosequence and was driven primarily by the number of graminoid ramets. There were no temporal changes in abundance and richness of sown and non-sown emerged ramets, but diversity of sown emerged ramets increased across the chronosequence. This study demonstrates that after initial seeding, plant community structure in restored prairies increasingly reflects the composition of the bud bank.

Keywords

Chronosequence Community assembly Diversity Propagules Species richness 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Bill Kleiman, Cody Considine, and all the Nachusa Grasslands stewards for access to the study sites and logistical support. Rachel K. Goad, Jake Jeffries, and Ben R. Wodika assisted in the field, lab, and greenhouse. John W. Miller provided valuable assistance in the greenhouse for the seed bank portion of this study. Funding was provided by National Science Foundation (DEB-0516429) with additional support from The A. W. Mellon Foundation.

Supplementary material

11258_2013_241_MOESM1_ESM.doc (351 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 351 kb)

References

  1. Auffret AG, Cousins SAO (2011) Past and present management influences the seed bank and seed rain in a rural landscape mosaic. J Appl Ecol 48:1278–1285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baer SG, Blair JM, Collins SL, Knapp AK (2003) Soil resources regulate productivity and diversity in newly established tallgrass prairie. Ecology 84:724–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baer SG, Blair JM, Collins SL, Knapp AK (2004) Plant community responses to resource availability and heterogeneity during restoration. Oecologia 139:617–639PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bakker JD, Wilson SD, Christian JM, Li X, Ambrose LG, Waddington J (2003) Contingency of grassland restoration on year, site, and competition from introduced grasses. Ecol Appl 13:137–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bekker RM, Verweij GL, Bakker JP, Fresco LFM (2000) Soil seed bank dynamics in hayfield succession. J Ecol 88:594–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benson EJ, Harnett DC (2006) The role of seed and vegetative reproduction in plant recruitment and demography in tallgrass prairie. Plant Ecol 187:163–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benson EJ, Hartnett DC, Mann KH (2004) Belowground bud banks and meristem limitations in tallgrass prairie. Am J Bot 91:416–421PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Betz RF (2011) The prairie of the Illinois country. DPM Ink, WestmontGoogle Scholar
  9. Bossuyt B, Hermy M (2004) Seed bank assembly follows vegetation succession in dune slacks. J Veg Sci 15:449–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bossuyt B, Honnay O (2008) Can the seed bank be used for ecological restoration? An overview of seed bank characteristics in European communities. J Veg Sci 19:875–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bossuyt B, Butaye J, Honnay O (2006) Seed bank composition of open and overgrown calcareous grassland soils: a case study from southern Belgium. J Environ Manag 79:364–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bradford KJ, Hillhorst H, Nonogaki H (2013) Environmental regulation of dormancy and germination. Seeds. Springer, New York, pp 299–339Google Scholar
  13. Brudvig LA, Mabry CM (2008) Trait-based filtering of the regional species pool to guide understory plant reintroductions in Midwestern oak savannas, USA. Restor Ecol 16:290–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Camill P, McKone MJ, Sturges ST, Severud WJ, Ellis E, Limmer J, Martin CB, Navaratil RT, Purdie AJ, Sandel BS, Talukder S, Trout A (2004) Community- and ecosystem-level changes in a species-rich tallgrass prairie restoration. Ecol Appl 14:1680–1694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carter DL, Blair JM (2012a) High richness and dense seeding enhance grassland restoration establishment but have little effect on drought tolerance. Ecol Appl 22:1308–1319PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carter DL, Blair JM (2012b) Recovery of native plant community characteristics on a chronosequence of restored prairies seeded into pastures in west-central Iowa. Restor Ecol 20:170–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carter DL, VanderWeide BL, Blair JM (2012) Drought-mediated stem and below-ground bud dynamics in restored grasslands. Appl Veg Sci 15:470–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chapin FSI, Sala OE, Huber-Sanwald E (2001) Global biodiversity in a changing environment: scenarios for the 21st century. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clarke KR, Green RH (1988) Statistical design and analysis for a “biological effects” study. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 46:213–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dalgleish HJ, Hartnett DC (2009) The effects of fire frequency and grazing on tallgrass prairie productivity and plant composition are mediated through bud bank demography. Plant Ecol 201:411–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Diboll N (2005) Designing seed mixes. In: Packard S, Mutel CF (eds) The tallgrass prairie restoration handbook. Island Press, Washington, pp 135–150Google Scholar
  22. Dölle M, Schmidt W (2009) The relationship between soil seed bank, above-ground vegetation and disturbance intensity on old-field successional permanent plots. Appl Veg Sci 12:415–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Elmer SL, Zwicker SE (2005) Soil survey of Lee County, Illinois. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, in cooperation with the Illinois Agricultural Experiment StationGoogle Scholar
  24. Fagan KC, Pywell RF, Bullock JM, Marrs RH (2010) The seed banks of English lowland calcareous grasslands along a restoration chronosequence. Plant Ecol 208:199–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Foster BL, Tilman D (2000) Dynamic and static views of succession: testing the descriptive power of the chronosequence approach. Plant Ecol 146:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gibson DJ (1989) Effects of animal disturbance on tallgrass prairie vegetation. Am Midl Nat 121:144–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gibson DJ, Baer SG, Klopf RP, Reed LK, Wodika BR, Willand JE (2013) Limited effects of dominant species population source on community composition during community assembly. J Veg Sci 24:429–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gleason HA, Cronquist A (1991) Manual of vascular plants of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. The New York Botanical Garden Press, BronxGoogle Scholar
  29. Hansen MJ, Gibson DJ (2013) Use of multiple criteria in an ecological assessment of a prairie restoration chronosequence. Appl Veg Sci. doi: 10.1111/avsc.12051 (in press)Google Scholar
  30. Harper JL (1977) Population biology of plants. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Hartnett DC (1993) Regulation of clonal growth and dynamics of Panicum virgatum (Poaceae) in tallgrass prairie: effects of neighbor removal and nutrient addition. Am J Bot 80:1114–1120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hartnett DC, Keeler KH (1995) Population processes. In: Joern A, Keeler KH (eds) The changing prairie: North American grasslands. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 82–99Google Scholar
  33. Hendrickson JR, Briske DD (1997) Axillary bud banks of two semiarid perennial grasses: occurrence, longevity, and contribution to population persistence. Oecologia 110:584–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hobbs RJ, Yates S, Mooney HA (2007) Long-term data reveal complex dynamics in grassland in relation to climate and disturbance. Ecol Monogr 77:545–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Iacona GD, Kirkman LK, Bruna EM (2010) Effects of resource availability on seedling recruitment in a fire-maintained savanna. Oecologia 163:171–180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kalamees R, Zobel M (2002) The role of the seed bank in gap regeneration in a calcareous grassland community. Ecology 83:1017–1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kalamees R, Püssa K, Zobel K, Zobel M (2012) Restoration potential of the persistent soil seed bank in successional calcareous (alvar) grasslands in Estonia. Appl Veg Sci 15:208–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kindscher K, Tieszen LL (1998) Floristic and soil organic matter changes after five and thirty-five years of native tallgrass prairie restoration. Restor Ecol 6:181–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Klimešová J, Klimeš L (2007) Bud banks and their role in vegetative reproduction-a literature review and proposal for simple classification and assessment. Persp Plant Ecol Evol System 8:115–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Klopf RP (2013) Community and ecosystem changes in tallgrass prairie restorations: the effects of population source and diversity. Dissertation, Southern Illinois University Google Scholar
  41. Koch MA, Scheriau C, Schupfner M, Bernhardt KG (2011) Long-term monitoring of the restoration and development of limestone grasslands in north western Germany: vegetation screening and soil seed bank analysis. Flora 206:52–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lockwood JL, Samuels CL (2004) Assembly models and the practice of restoration. In: Temperton VM, Hobbs RJ, Nuttle T, Halle S (eds) Assembly rules and restoration ecology. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 55–70Google Scholar
  43. Martin LM, Moloney KA, Wilsey BJ (2005) An assessment of grassland restoration success using species diversity components. J Appl Ecol 42:327–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Minchin PR (1989) DECODA user’s manual. Research School of Pacific Studies. Australian National University, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  45. Münzbergová Z, Herben T (2005) Seed, dispersal, microsite, and habitat and recruitment limitation: identification of terms and concepts in studies of limitations. Oecologia 145:1–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ott JP, Hartnett DC (2011) Bud production and dynamics of flowering and vegetative tillers in Andropogon gerardii (Poaceae): the role of developmental constraints. Amer J Bot 98:1293–1298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ott JP, Hartnett DC (2012) Contrasting bud bank dynamics of two co-occurring grasses in tallgrass prairie: implications for grassland dynamics. Plant Ecol 213:1437–1448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pakeman RJ, Small JL (2005) The role of the seed bank, seed rain and the timing of disturbance in gap generation. J Veg Sci 16:121–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rabinowitz D, Rapp JK (1980) Seed rain in a North American tall grass prairie. J Appl Ecol 17:793–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rogers WE, Hartnett DC (2001) Temporal vegetation dynamics and recolonization mechanisms in different-sized soil disturbances in tallgrass prairie. Am J Bot 88:1634–1642PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sluis WJ (2002) Patterns of species richness and composition in re-created grassland. Restor Ecol 10:677–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Taft JB, Hauser C, Robertson KR (2006) Estimating floristic integrity in tallgrass prairie. Biol Conserv 131:42–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Thompson K (1987) Seeds and seed banks. New Phytol 106:23–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Thompson K, Band SR, Hodgson JG (1993) Seed size and shape predict persistence in the soil. Funct Ecol 7:236–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Walker LR, Wardle DA, Bardgett RD, Clarkson BD (2010) The use of chronosequences in studies of ecological succession and soil development. J Ecol 98:725–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Weiher E, Freund D, Bunton T, Stefanski A, Lee T, Bentivenga S (2011) Advances, challenges and a developing synthesis of ecological community assembly theory. Phil Trans R Soc B 366:2403–2413PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zobel M (1997) The relative role of species pools in determining plant species richness: an alternative explanation of species coexistence? Trends Ecol Evol 12:266–269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jason E. Willand
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sara G. Baer
    • 1
  • David J. Gibson
    • 1
  • Ryan P. Klopf
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant Biology and Center for EcologySouthern Illinois UniversityCarbondaleUSA

Personalised recommendations