Advertisement

Plant Ecology

, Volume 214, Issue 8, pp 1059–1070 | Cite as

Can the nutrient-rich soil patches created by leaf-cutting ants favor plant compensation for foliar damage? A test of the compensatory continuum hypothesis

  • Gabriela Inés PirkEmail author
  • Alejandro G. Farji-Brener
Article

Abstract

Compensation, the degree of plant recovery after herbivory, is influenced by nutrient availability. The compensatory continuum hypothesis (CCH) predicts that the more abundant the resources in an environment, the greater the potential for compensation. Nutrient-rich patches generated by leaf-cutting ants near their nests could modify plants’ responses to damage. We performed a greenhouse and a field experiment to evaluate the effects of refuse dumps (RDs) created by Acromyrmex lobicornis on plant compensation for foliar herbivory in roadside areas of the Patagonian steppe. We expected higher tolerance in plants growing in RDs than in adjacent non-nest soils (NNSs). We also assessed whether compensation differed between native and exotic species common in the area. We expected higher compensation in exotic than native plants since they perform better in RDs. Native and exotic plants fully compensated for simulated herbivory resembling natural levels. In the greenhouse, clipped plants achieved similar biomass as control plants and in the field reproductive output was similar between treatments. However, compensation was not higher in RDs than NNSs or in exotic than native plants as expected. Both native and exotic plants in roadside areas may have traits associated with disturbance which allow them to tolerate natural occurring herbivory without compromising their performance. Our study, the first one to test the CCH on RDs, shows that enhanced levels of resources do not always determine higher tolerance to herbivory.

Keywords

Acromyrmex lobicornis Disturbance Herbivory Patagonian steppe Tolerance 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank R. Dirzo and E. Gianoli for their critical reading and comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript. We are also grateful for the contributions of two anonymous reviewers. N. Lescano, S. González, C. Ezcurra, J. Franzese, C. Ziperovich, and L. Ghermandi helped at several stages of this study. GP was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from CONICET (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas) and financial support was partially supplied by Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica of Argentina (lately through PICT 2008-0352).

Supplementary material

11258_2013_231_MOESM1_ESM.doc (77 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 77 kb)

References

  1. Agrawal AA, Kotanen PM (2003) Herbivores and success of exotic plants: a phylogenetically controlled experiment. Ecol Lett 6:712–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beattie A, Culver D (1977) Effects of the mounds of the ant Formica obscuripes on the surrounding soil. Am Midl Nat 97:390–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belsky AJ (1986) Does herbivory benefit plants? A review of the evidence. Am Nat 127:870–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blossey B, Nötzold R (1995) Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive non-indigenous plants: a hypothesis. J Ecol 83:887–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buckley RC (1982) Ant-plant interactions: a world review. In: Buckley RC (ed) Ant-plant interactions in Australia. W Junk, The Hague, pp 111–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carlson SR, Whitford WG (1991) Ant mound influence on vegetation and soils in a semiarid mountain ecosystem. Am Midl Nat 126:125–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coley PD, Bryant JP, Chapin FS III (1985) Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense. Science 230:895–899PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Correa MN (1969–1998) Flora Patagónica. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Buenos AiresGoogle Scholar
  9. Cox CS, McEvoy PB (1983) Effect of summer moisture stress on the capacity of tansy ragwort (Senecio jacobaceae) to compensate for defoliation by cinnabar moth (Tyria jacobaceae). J App Ecol 20:225–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. D’Antonio CM, Mahall BE (1991) Root profiles and competition between the invasive, exotic perennial, Carpobrotus edulis, and two native shrub species in California coastal scrub. Am J Bot 78:885–894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis M, Pelsor M (2001) Experimental support for a resource-based mechanistic model of invasibility. Ecol Lett 4:421–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ezcurra C, Brion C (2005) Plantas del Nahuel Huapi, catálogo de la flora vascular del Parque Nacional Nahuel Huapi, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, BarilocheGoogle Scholar
  13. Farji-Brener AG, Ghermandi L (2000) The influence of nests of leaf-cutting ants on plant species diversity in road verges of northern Patagonia. J Veg Sci 11:453–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Farji-Brener AG, Ghermandi L (2004) Seedling recruitment in a semi-arid Patagonian steppe: facilitative effects of refuse dumps of leaf-cutting ants. J Veg Sci 15:823–830Google Scholar
  15. Farji-Brener AG, Ghermandi L (2008) Leaf-cutting ant nests near roads increase fitness of exotic plant species in natural protected areas. Proc R Soc London B 275:1431–1440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Farji-Brener AG, Illes A (2000) Do leaf-cutting ant nests make ‘bottom up’ gaps in neotropical rain forests? A critical review of the evidence. Ecol Lett 3:219–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Farji-Brener AG, Silva JF (1995) Leaf-cutting ants and forest groves in a tropical parkland savanna of Venezuela: facilitated succession? J Trop Ecol 11:651–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Farji-Brener AG, Lescano N, Ghermandi L (2010) Ecological engineering by a native leaf-cutting ant increases the performance of exotic plant species. Oecologia 163:163–169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Funk JL (2008) Differences in plasticity between invasive and native plants from a low resource environment. J Ecol 96:1162–1173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. González-Teuber M, Gianoli E (2007) Tolerance to simulated herbivory in two populations of Convolvulus chilensis (Convolvulaceae). Acta Oecol 32:119–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hawkes CV, Sullivan JJ (2001) The impact of herbivory on plants in different resource conditions: a metaanalysis. Ecology 82:2045–2058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hjältén J, Kjell D, Erikson L (1993) Effects of simulated herbivory and intraspecific competition on the compensatory ability of birches. Ecology 74:1136–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. Horvitz C, Schemske D (2002) Effects of plant size, leaf herbivory, local competition and fruit production on survival, growth and future reproduction of a neotropical herb. J Ecol 90:279–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Houle G, Simard G (1996) Additive effects of genotype, nutrient availability and type of tissue damage on the compensatory response of Salix planifolia ssp. planifolia to stimulated herbivory. Oecologia 107:373–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Irwin DL, Aarssen LW (1996) Effects of nutrient level on cost and benefit of apical dominance in Epilobium ciliatum. Am Midl Nat 136:14–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leishman MR, Thomson VP, Cooke J (2010) Native and exotic invasive plants have fundamentally similar carbon capture strategies. J Ecol 98:28–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Levine MT, Paige KN (2004) Direct and indirect effects of drought on compensation following herbivory in scarlet gilia. Ecology 85:3185–3191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Loucks O, Plumb-Mentjes M, Rogers D (1985) Gap processes and large-scale disturbance in sand prairies. In: Pickett STA, White PS (eds) The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. Academic Press, New York, pp 72–82Google Scholar
  30. Mabry CM, Wayne PW (1997) Defoliation of the annual herb Abutilon theophrasti: mechanisms underlying reproductive compensation. Oecologia 111:225–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. MacMahon JA, Mull JF, Crist TO (2000) Harvester ants (Pogonomyrmex spp.): their community and ecosystem influences. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 31:265–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Margutti L, Ghermandi L, Rapoport E (1996) Seed bank and vegetation in a Patagonian roadside. Int J Ecol Environ Sci 22:159–175Google Scholar
  33. Marquis RJ (1984) Leaf herbivores decrease fitness of a tropical plant. Science 226:537–539PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Maschinski J, Whitham TG (1989) The continuum of plant responses to herbivory: the influence of plant association, nutrient availability, and timing. Am Nat 134:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Meyer GA, Root RB (1993) Effects of herbivorous insects and soil fertility on reproduction of goldenrod. Ecology 74:1117–1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mutikainen P, Walls M (1995) Growth, reproduction and defence in nettles: responses to herbivory modified by competition and fertilization. Oecologia 104:487–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pirk GI, Farji-Brener AG (2012) Foliar herbivory and its effects on plant growth in native and exotic species in the Patagonian steppe. Ecol Res 27:903–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rogers WE, Siemann E (2002) Effects of simulated herbivory and resource availability on native and invasive exotic tree seedlings. Basic Appl Ecol 3:293–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rosenthal JP, Kotanen PM (1994) Terrestrial plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends Ecol Evol 9:145–148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rosenthal JP, Welter SC (1995) Tolerance to herbivory by a stemboring caterpillar in architecturally distinct maizes and wild relatives. Oecologia 102:146–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stowe KA, Marquis RJ, Hochwender CG, Simms EL (2000) The evolutionary ecology of tolerance to consumer damage. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 31:565–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Strauss Y, Agrawal AA (1999) The ecology and evolution of plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends Ecol Evol 14:179–185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Thompson K, Davis MA (2011) Why research on traits of invasive plants tells us very little. Trends Ecol Evol 26:155–156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. van Kleunen M, Weber E, Fischer M (2010) A meta-analysis of trait differences between invasive and non-invasive plant species. Ecol Lett 13:235–245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wise MJ, Abrahamson WG (2005) Beyond the compensatory continuum: environmental resource levels and plant tolerance of herbivory. Oikos 109:417–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wise MJ, Abrahamson WG (2007) Effects of resource availability on tolerance of herbivory: a review and assessment of three opposing models. Am Nat 169:443–453PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Woodell S, King T (1991) The influence of tumulo-building ants on British lowland vegetation. In: Huxley C, Cutler D (eds) Ant-plant interactions. Oxford Univ Press, Oxford, pp 521–535Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabriela Inés Pirk
    • 1
    Email author
  • Alejandro G. Farji-Brener
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratorio EcotonoINIBIOMA, CONICET-Universidad Nacional del ComahueBarilocheArgentina

Personalised recommendations