Advertisement

Plant Ecology

, Volume 213, Issue 10, pp 1633–1642 | Cite as

Seed dispersal of three sympatric oak species by forest rodents in the Qinling Mountains, Central China

  • Gang ChangEmail author
  • Tiezhi Jin
  • Junfeng Pei
  • Xiaoning Chen
  • Bo Zhang
  • Zijun Shi
Article

Abstract

Forest rodents play an essential role as seed dispersal vectors through their caching behaviors. Using seeds of Quercus aliena, Q. glandulifera, and Cyclobalanopsis engleriana (Fagaceae), which are dominant, but poorly studied species, in the Qinling Mountains, Central China, we investigated seed predation and dispersal by forest rodents in 2010 and 2011. There were significant differences in rodent seed-eating and caching strategies among the three tree species. Seeds of Q. aliena and C. engleriana had hard coats, high nutrition contents (e.g., protein, fat, and starch), and long germination schedules (C. engleriana only). They were less frequently eaten in situ, but more likely to be eaten after removal or cached. Seeds of Q. glandulifera had soft coats and low nutrition contents and were more often eaten in situ and less likely to be eaten after removal or cached. Our findings indicated that forest rodents were primarily responsible for seed predation and dispersal of these three tree species in the Qinling Mountains, and seed traits, especially coat hardness, nutrition content, and germination schedule, were important factors influencing rodent eating and caching behaviors. In addition, seed dispersal process of each tree species differed significantly between the 2 years, reflecting the effect of mast seeding on the eating and caching strategies of forest rodents.

Keywords

Fagaceae trees Forest rodents Seed caching Seed traits Mast seeding 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to Edanz Editing China for valuable comments and language editing on this manuscript. We thank the Foping National Nature Reserve for support. We are also very grateful to the Associate Editor and the two anonymous reviewers for their critical comments and constructive suggestions for improving the manuscript. Funds were provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31100283), the Science and Technology Program of Shaanxi Academy of Science (2011-K07), the Shaanxi Natural Science Foundation (2011JQ3003), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (20090451366), and the State Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Pest Insects and Rodents (Chinese IPM1004). Experimental and animal-handling protocols comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed.

References

  1. Chang G, Zhang ZB (2011) Differences in hoarding behaviors among six sympatric rodent species on seeds of oil tea (Camellia oleifera) in Southwest China. Acta Oecol 37:165–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chang G, Xiao ZS, Zhang ZB (2009) Hoarding decisions by Edward’s long-tailed rats (Leopoldamys edwardsi) and South China field mice (Apodemus draco): the responses to seed size and germination schedules in acorns. Behav Process 82:7–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chang G, Xiao ZS, Zhang ZB (2010) Effects of burrow condition and seed handling time on hoarding strategies of Edward’s long-tailed rats (Leopoldamys edwardsi). Behav Process 85:163–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen MR (1983) Climate and agriculture in the Qinling Mountains. Shaanxi People’s Press, Xi’an (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  5. Clarkson K, Eden SF, Sutherland WJ (1986) Density dependence and magpie food hoarding. J Anim Ecol 55:111–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crawley MJ (2007) The R book. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Forget PM (1996) Removal of seeds of Carapa procera (Meliaceae) by rodents and their fate in rain forest in French Guiana. J Trop Ecol 12:751–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hadi-Chikh LZ, Steele MA, Smallwood PD (1996) Caching decisions by grey squirrels: a test of the handing time and perishability hypotheses. Anim Behav 52:941–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hollander JL, Vander Wall SB (2004) Effectiveness of six species of rodents as dispersers of singleleaf pinon pine (Pinus monophylla). Oecologia 138:57–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Howe HF, Smallwood J (1982) Ecology of seed dispersal. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 13:201–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Izhaki I (2002) The role of fruit traits in determining fruit removal in east Mediterranean ecosystems. In: Levey D, Silva WR, Galetti M (eds) Seed dispersal and frugivory: ecology evolution and conservation. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp 161–175Google Scholar
  12. Jacobs LF (1992) The effect of handling time on the decision to cache by grey squirrels. Anim Behav 43:522–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jansen PA, Forget PM (2001) Scatter-hoarding rodents and tree regeneration. In: Bongers F, Charles-Dominique P, Forget PM (eds) Nouragues: dynamics and plant–animal interactions in a neotropical rainforest. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, pp 275–288Google Scholar
  14. Jansen PA, Hemerik L, Bongers F (2004) Seed mass and mast seeding enhance dispersal by a neotropical scatter-hoarding rodent. Ecol Monogr 74:569–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kelly D, Sork VL (2002) Mast seeding in perennial plants: why, how, where? Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:427–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lewis AR (1982) Selection of nuts by grey squirrels and optimal foraging theory. Am Midl Nat 107:250–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu SF, Zhang J (2003) Biodiversity and conservation in the Foping National Nature Reserve, Shaanxi, China. Shaanxi Science and Technology Press, Xi’an (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  18. Lu JQ, Zhang ZB (2005) Food-hoarding behavior of David’s rock squirrel Sciurotamias davidianus. Acta Zool Sin 51:376–382Google Scholar
  19. Moore JE, McEuen AB, Swihart RK, Contreras TA, Steele MA (2007) Determinants of seed-removal distance by scatter-hoarding rodents in deciduous forests. Ecology 88:2529–2540PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Smallwood PD, Peters WD (1986) Grey squirrel food preferences: the effect of tannin and fat concentration. Ecology 67:168–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sork VL (1993) Evolutionary ecology of mast-seeding in temperate and tropical oaks (Quercus spp.). Vegetatio 107/108:133–147Google Scholar
  22. Stapanian MA, Smith CC (1978) A model for seed scatterhoarding: coevolution of fox squirrels and black walnuts. Ecology 59:884–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stapanian MA, Smith CC (1984) Density-dependent survival of scatter hoarded nuts: an experimental approach. Ecology 65:1387–1396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Steele MA, Knowles T, Bridle K, Simms EL (1993) Tannins and partial consumption of acorns: implication for dispersal of oaks by seed predators. Am Midl Nat 130:229–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Steele MA, Smallwood PD, Spunar A, Nelsen E (2001) The proximate basis of the oak dispersal syndrome: detection of seed dormancy by rodents. Am Zool 41:852–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Steele MA, Manierre S, Genna T, Contreras TA, Smallwood PD, Pereira ME (2006) The innate basis of food-hoarding decisions in grey squirrels: evidence for behavioural adaptations to the oaks. Anim Behav 71:155–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Vander Wall SB (1990) Food hoarding in animals. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  28. Vander Wall SB (2001) The evolutionary ecology of nut dispersal. Bot Rev 67:74–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vander Wall SB (2002a) Second dispersal of Jeffrey pine seeds by rodent scatter hoarders: the roles of pilfering, reaching, and a variable environment. In: Levey DJ, Silva WR, Galetti M (eds) Seed dispersal and frugivory: ecology evolution and conservation. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp 193–208Google Scholar
  30. Vander Wall SB (2002b) Masting in animal-dispersed pines facilitates seed dispersal. Ecology 83:3508–3516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vander Wall SB (2003) Effects of seed size of wind-dispersed pines (Pinus) on secondary seed dispersal and the caching behavior of rodents. Oikos 100:25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang B, Chen J (2008) Tannin concentration enhances seed caching by scatter-hoarding rodents: an experiment using artificial ‘seeds’. Acta Oecol 34:379–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang B, Chen J (2009) Seed size, more than nutrient or tannin content, affects seed caching behavior of a common genus of Old World rodents. Ecology 90:3023–3032PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wenny DG (2000) Seed dispersal, seed predation, and seedling recruitment of a neotropical montane tree. Ecol Monogr 70:331–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Xiao ZS, Zhang ZB (2006) Nut predation and dispersal of Harland Tanoak Lithocarpus harlandii by scatter-hoarding rodents. Acta Oecol 29:205–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Xiao ZS, Zhang ZB, Wang YS (2005a) Effects of seed size on dispersal distance in five rodent-dispersed fagaceous species. Acta Oecol 28:221–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Xiao ZS, Zhang ZB, Wang YS (2005b) The effect of seed abundance on seed predation and dispersal by rodents in Castanopsis fargesii (Fagaceae). Plant Ecol 177:249–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Xiao ZS, Wang YS, Zhang ZB (2006a) Spatial and temporal variation of seed predation and removal of sympatric large-seeded species in relation to innate seed traits in a subtropical forest, Southwest China. For Ecol Manag 222:46–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Xiao ZS, Jansen PA, Zhang ZB (2006b) Using seed-tagging methods for assessing post-dispersal seed fate in rodent-dispersed trees. For Ecol Manag 223:18–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Xiao ZS, Chang G, Zhang ZB (2008) Testing the high-tannin hypothesis with scatter-hoarding rodents: experimental and field evidence. Anim Behav 75:1235–1241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Xiao ZS, Gao X, Jiang MM, Zhang ZB (2009) Behavioral adaptation of Pallas’s squirrels to germination schedule and tannins in acorns. Behav Ecol 20:1050–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yi XF, Zhang ZB (2008) Seed predation and dispersal of glabrous filbert (Corylus heterophylla) and pilose filbert (Corylus mandshurica) by small mammals in a temperate forest, northeast China. Plant Ecol 196:135–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhang ZB, Wang FS (2001) Effect of rodents on seed dispersal and survival of wild apricot (Prunus armeniaca). Acta Ecol Sin 21:839–845Google Scholar
  44. Zhang HM, Zhang ZB (2008) Endocarp thickness affects seed removal speed by small rodents in a warm-temperate broad-leafed deciduous forest, China. Acta Oecol 34:285–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhang HM, Chen Y, Zhang ZB (2008) Differences of dispersal fitness of large and small acorns of Liaodong oak (Quercus liaotungensis) before and after seed caching by small rodents in a warm temperate forest, China. For Ecol Manag 255:1243–1250CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gang Chang
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Tiezhi Jin
    • 1
  • Junfeng Pei
    • 1
  • Xiaoning Chen
    • 1
  • Bo Zhang
    • 3
  • Zijun Shi
    • 3
  1. 1.Shaanxi Institute of ZoologyBeilin DistrictChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Pest Insects and Rodents in AgricultureInstitute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.College of Life SciencesShaanxi Normal UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations