Plant Ecology

, Volume 213, Issue 8, pp 1345–1355

Effects of disturbance on plant regrowth along snow pack gradients in alpine habitats



Human disturbance in alpine habitats is expected to increase, and improved knowledge of short-term recovery after disturbance events is necessary to interpret vegetation responses and formulate planning and mitigation efforts. The ability of a plant community to return to its original state after a disturbance (community resilience) depends on species composition and environmental conditions. The aim of this study is to analyze initial short-term effects of disturbance in alpine plant communities in contrasting climates (oceanic vs. continental; central Norway). We used a nested block-design to examine vegetative regrowth and seedling recruitment after experimental perturbation. Three plant community types along the snow pack gradient were exposed to (1) no disturbance, (2) clipping, and (3) clipping and uprooting. Slow vegetative regrowth and low seedling establishment rates were found in dry alpine ridges and late-melting oceanic snowbed communities. Leeside habitats with intermediate snow conditions were found more resilient. The difference was related to growth form and species diversity. Woody species, which dominated in ridges and oceanic snowbeds, showed the most negative response to disturbance. Species-rich plant communities dominated by graminoids and herbs showed higher rates of regrowth. Species richness seems to cause resilience to the plant communities through higher response diversity. Plant communities at the extreme ends of abiotic gradients, ridges and late-melting snowbeds, will be most sensitive to both disturbance and environmental change. In an up-scaled human-used landscape disturbance effects will be amplified and further limit recovery to a pre-disturbance state.


Climate gradients Experimental perturbation Linear effect models Ordination analyses Plant growth form Revegetation 


  1. Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol 26:32–46Google Scholar
  2. Bell KL, Bliss LC (1980) Plant reproduction in a high Arctic environment. Arct Alp Res 12:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bråthen KA, Oksanen J (2001) Reindeer reduce biomass of preferred plant species. J Veg Sci 12:473–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bråthen KA, Ims RA, Yoccoz NG, Fauchald P, Tveraa T, Hausner VH (2007) Induced shift in ecosystem productivity? Extensive scale effects of abundant large herbivores. Ecosystems 10(5):773–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruelheide H, Luginbühl U (2009) Peeking at ecosystem stability: making use of a natural disturbance experiment to analyze resistance and resilience. Ecology 90:1314–1325PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bullock JM (2000) Gaps and seedling colonization. In: Fenner M (ed) Seeds. The ecology of regeneration in plant communities. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp 375–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cingolani AM, Cabido MR, Renison D, Solís Neffa V (2003) Combined effects of environment and grazing on vegetation structure in Argentine granite grasslands. J Veg Sci 14:223–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cole DN (2007) Seedling establishment and survival on restored campsites in subalpine forest. Restor Ecol 15:430–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Comín FA (ed) (2010) Ecological restoration—a global challenge. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooper EJ, Alsos IG, Hagen D, Smith FM, Coulson SJ, Hodkinson ID (2004) Plant recruitment in the High Arctic: seed bank and seedling emergence on Svalbard. J Veg Sci 15:115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coulson SJ, Hodkinson ID, Strathdee AT, Bale JS, Block W, Worland MR, Webb NR (1993) Simulated climate change: the interaction between vegetation type and microhabitat temperatures at Ny Ålesund, Svalbard. Polar Biol 13:67–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. den Herder M, Kytoviita MM, Niemela J (2003) Growth of reindeer lichens and effects of reindeer grazing on ground cover vegetation in a Scots pine forest and a subarctic heathland in Finnish Lapland. Ecography 26(1):3–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dickson TL, Wilsey BJ, Busby RR, Gebhart DL (2008) Grassland plant composition alters vehicular disturbance effects in Kansas, USA. Environ Manag 41:676–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Didham RK, Watts CH, Norton DA (2005) Are systems with strong underlying abiotic regimes more likely to exhibit alternative stable states? Oikos 110:409–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ebersole JJ (2002) Recovery of alpine vegetation on small, denuded plots, Niwot Ridge, Colorado, USA. Arct Antarct Alp Res 34:389–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elmqvist T, Folke C, Nyström M, Peterson G, Bengtsson J, Walker B, Norberg J (2003) Response diversity, ecosystem change, and resilience. Front Ecol Environ 1:488–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Erschbamer B, Kneringer E, Schlag RN (2001) Seed rain, soil seed bank, seedling recruitment, and survival of seedlings on a glacier foreland in the Central Alps. Flora 196:304–312Google Scholar
  18. Evju M, Austrheim G, Halvorsen R, Mysterud A (2009) Grazing responses in herbs in relation to herbivore selectivity and plant traits in an alpine ecosystem. Oecologia 161:77–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Felix NA, Raynolds MK, Jorgenson JC, DuBois KE (1992) Resistance and resilience of tundra plant communities to disturbance by winter seismic vehicles. Arct Alp Res 24:69–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Forbes BC, Ebersole JJ, Strandberg B (2001) Anthropogenic disturbance and patch dynamics in circumpolar arctic ecosystems. Conserv Biol 15:954–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Forbis TA (2003) Seedling demography in an alpine environment. Am J Bot 90:1197–1206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Galen BJ, Stanton ML (1995) Responses of snowbed plant-species to changes in growing season length. Ecology 76:1546–1557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Graae BJ, Ejrnæs R, Lang SI, Meineri E, Ibarra PT, Bruun HH (2011) Strong microsite control of seedling recruitment in tundra. Oecologia 166:565–576PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hagen D, Vistad OI, Eide NE, Flyen AC, Fangel K (2012) Managing visitor sites in Svalbard: from a precautionary approach towards knowledge-based management. Polar Res 31:18432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hanssen-Bauer I, Drange H, Førland EJ, Roald LA, Børsheim KY, Hisdal H, Lawrence D, Nesje A, Sandven S, Sorteberg A, Sundby S, Vasskog K, Ådlandsvik B (2009) Klima i Norge 2100: Bakgrunnsmateriale til NOU Klimatilpasning. Norsk klimasenter, OsloGoogle Scholar
  26. Haukeland JV, Grue B, Veisten K (2010) Turning national parks into tourist attractions: nature orientation and quest for facilities. Scand J Hosp Tour 10:247–271Google Scholar
  27. Jumpponen A, Väre H, Mattson KG, Ohtonen R, Trappe JM (1999) Characterization of “safe sites” for pioneers in primary succession on recently deglaciated terrain. J Ecol 87:98–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kevan PG, Forbes BC, Kevan SM, Behanpelletier V (1995) Vehicle tracks on High Arctic tundra—their effects on the soil, vegetation, and soil arthropods. J Appl Ecol 32:655–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Klanderud K (2010) Species recruitment in alpine plant communities: the role of species interactions and productivity. J Ecol 98:1128–1133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lid J, Lid DT (2005) Norsk flora. Det norske samlaget, OsloGoogle Scholar
  31. MacGillivray CW, Grime JP, Band SR, Booth RE, Campbell B, Hendry GAF, Hillier SH, Hodgson JG, Hunt R, Jalili A, Mackey JML, Mowforth MA, Neal AM, Reader R, Rorison IH, Spencer RE, Thompson K, Thorpe PC (1995) Testing predictions of the resistance and resilience of vegetation subjected to extreme events. Funct Ecol 9:640–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Manning RE (2004) Recreation planning frameworks. In: Manfredo MJ et al (eds) Society and natural resources: a summary of knowledge. Modern Litho, Jefferson, pp 83–96Google Scholar
  33. McCune B, Mefford MJ (2011) PC-ORD. Multivariate analysis of ecological data. Version 6.0. MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, OregonGoogle Scholar
  34. Minchin PR (1987) An evaluation of the relative robustness of techniques for ecological ordination. Vegetatio 69:89–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Monz CA (2002) The response of two arctic tundra plant communities to human trampling disturbance. J Environ Manag 64:207–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moser B, Schütz M (2006) Tolerance of understory plants subject to herbivory by roe deer. Oikos 114:311–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nepal SK, Way P (2007) Characterizing and comparing backcountry trail conditions in Mount Robson Provincial Park, Canada. Ambio 36:394–400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Norwegian Geological Survey (2011).
  39. Norwegian Meteorological Institute (2010).
  40. Olofsson J (2006) Short- and long-term effects of changes in reindeer grazing pressure on tundra heath vegetation. J Ecol 94:431–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Olofsson J, Oksanen L, Callaghan T, Hulme PE, Oksanen T, Suominen O (2009) Herbivores inhibit climate-driven shrub expansion on the tundra. Global Chang Biol 15:2681–2693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Peck JE (2010) Multivariate analysis for community ecologists. Step-by-step using PC-ORD. MjM Software Design, Gleneden BeachGoogle Scholar
  43. Pimm SL (1984) The complexity and stability of ecosystems. Nature 307:321–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Development Core Team (2008) Nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effect models. R package version 3, 1–88Google Scholar
  45. R Development Core Team (2009) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  46. Rydgren K, Halvorsen R, Odland A, Skjerdal G (2011) Restoration of alpine spoil heaps: successional rates predict vegetation recovery in 50 years. Ecol Eng 37:294–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schaaf W, Bens O, Fischer A, Gerke HH, Gerwin W, Grünewald U, Holländer HM, Kögel-Knabner I, Mutz M, Schloter M, Schulin R, Veste M, Winter S, Hüttl RF (2011) Patterns and processes of initial terrestrial-ecosystem development. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 174:229–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schöb C, Kammer P, Choler P, Veit H (2009) Small-scale plant species distribution in snowbeds and its sensitivity to climate change. Plant Ecol 200:91–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Speed JDM, Cooper EJ, Jónsdóttir IS, van der Wal R, Woodin SJ (2010) Plant community properties predict vegetation resilience to herbivore disturbance in the Arctic. J Ecol 98:1002–1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Strauss SY, Agrawal AA (1999) The ecology and evolution of plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends Ecol Evol 14:179–185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sundseth K (2009) Natura 2000 in the Alpine Region. European Communities.
  52. Tischew S, Baasch A, Conrad MK, Kirmer A (2010) Evaluating restoration success of frequently implemented compensation measures: results and demands for control procedures. Restor Ecol 18:467–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vandvik V (2004) Gap dynamics in perennial subalpine grasslands: trends and processes change during secondary succession. J Ecol 92:86–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Walker B, Kinzig A, Langridge J (1999) Plant attribute diversity, resilience, and ecosystem function: the nature and significance of dominant and minor species. Ecosystems 2:95–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Welling P, Laine K (2000) Characteristics of the seedling flora in alpine vegetation, subarctic Finland, I. Seedling densities in 15 plant communities. Ann Bot Fenn 37:69–76Google Scholar
  56. Willard BE, Cooper DJ, Forbes BC (2007) Natural regeneration of alpine tundra vegetation after human trampling: a 42-year data set from Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado, USA. Arct Antarct Alp Res 39:177–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wise MJ, Abrahamson WG (2005) Beyond the compensatory continuum: environmental resource levels and plant tolerance of herbivory. Oikos 109:417–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Norwegian Institute for Nature ResearchOsloNorway
  2. 2.Norwegian Institute for Nature ResearchTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations