Plant Ecology

, Volume 213, Issue 8, pp 1329–1336 | Cite as

Scatter-hoarding rodents use different foraging strategies for seeds from different plant species

  • Bo WangEmail author
  • Gang Wang
  • Jin Chen


Seed predation and dispersal by scatter-hoarding rodents are key processes that determine seed survival, and thus, plant regeneration within forests. For decades, there has been much debate on the important effects of seed size (one of the most important seed traits) on rodent foraging preference. Furthermore, the possible selective forces in the evolution of seed size may be influenced by primary selectivity and how rodents treat seeds after harvesting. In this study, different-sized seeds from four species (Pinus armandii, Pinus densata, Abies sp., and Viburnum sp.) harvested by scatter-hoarding rodents were studied in an alpine forest in Southwestern China for two consecutive years. Our results showed that seed size influenced rodent foraging preferences, with bigger seeds being preferred over smaller seeds, within and across species. Rodents only removed and cached the larger seeds of P. armandii, and ate the seeds of the other three species in situ. Rodents are purely seed predators for these three species. For the cached seeds of P. armandii, significantly positive correlations were observed between seed size and dispersal distance among both primary and secondary cached seeds in 2006, but not in 2005. Our results indicate that among many coexisting species with widely different-sized seeds, scatter-hoarding rodents played important roles in the seed dispersal of the big-seeded species alone. This caching behavior could offset the limited seed dispersal of large-seeded and wingless species (P. armandii), in comparison with that of small winged seed species (P. densata and Abies sp.) and frugivore-dispersed species (Viburnum sp.).


Seed size Seed dispersal Seed predation Rodent Cache 



We thank Ms. Xiaolan Yang for help with the field data collection. We acknowledge Mr. Zhendong Fang, director of Shangri-La Alpine Botanical Garden for logistical support for fieldwork. This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31100315) and the Knowledge Innovation Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (KSCX2-SW-123).

Supplementary material

11258_2012_91_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (37 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 36 kb)


  1. Blate GM, Peart DR, Leighton M (1998) Post-dispersal predation on isolated seeds: a comparative study of 40 tree species in a Southeast Asian rainforest. Oikos 82:522–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boman JS, Casper BB (1995) Differential post-dispersal seed predation in disturbed and intact temperate forests. Am Midl Nat 134:107–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. DeMattia EA, Curran LM, Rathcke BJ (2004) Effects of small rodents and large mammals on neotropical seeds. Ecology 85:2161–2170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Forget PM, Milleron T, Feer F (1998) Patterns in post-dispersal seed removal by neotropical rodents and seed fate in relation to seed size. In: Newbery DM, Prins HT, Brown ND (eds) Dynamics of tropical communities. Blackwell, New York, pp 25–49Google Scholar
  5. Greenwood JJD (1985) Frequency-dependent selection by seed-predators. Oikos 44:195–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jansen PA, Bartholomeus M, Bongers F, Elzinga JA, Den Ouden J, Van Wieren SE (2002) The role of seed size in dispersal by a scatterhoarding rodent. In: Levey D, Silva WR, Galetti M (eds) Seed dispersal and frugivory: ecology, evolution and conservation. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp 209–225Google Scholar
  7. Jansen PA, Bongers F, Hemerik L (2004) Seed mass and mast seeding enhance dispersal by a neotropical scatter-hoarding rodent. Ecol Monogr 74:569–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Johnson WC, Webb T (1989) The role of blue jays (Cyanocitta Cristata L.) in the postglacial dispersal of fagaceous trees in eastern North America. J Biogeogr 16:561–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kelrick MI, MacMahon JA, Parmenter RR, Sisson DV (1986) Native seed preferences of shrub-steppe rodents, birds and ants: the relationships of seed attributes and seed use. Oecologia 68:327–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kollmann J, Coomes DA, White SM (1998) Consistencies in post-dispersal seed predation of temperate fleshy-fruited species among seasons, years and sites. Funct Ecol 12:683–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Li HJ, Zhang ZB (2007) Effects of mast seeding and rodent abundance on seed predation and dispersal by rodents in Prunus armeniaca (Rosaceae). For Ecol Manag 242:511–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Moles AT, Warton DI, Westoby M (2003) Do small-seeded species have higher survival through seed predation than large-seeded species? Ecology 84:3148–3161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Moore JE, McEuen AB, Swihart RK, Contreras TA, Steele MA (2007) Determinants of seed removal distance by scatter-hoarding rodents in deciduous forests. Ecology 88:2529–2540PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Takahashi K, Sato K, Washitani I (2007) Acorn dispersal and predation patterns of four tree species by wood mice in abandoned cut-over land. For Ecol Manag 250:187–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Theimer TC (2003) Intraspecific variation in seed size affects scatterhoarding behaviour of an Australian tropical rain-forest rodent. J Trop Ecol 19:95–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Vander Wall SB (1990) Food hoarding in animals. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  17. Vander Wall SB (1995) The effects of seed value on the caching behavior of yellow pine chipmunks. Oikos 74:533–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Vander Wall SB (2002) Masting in animal-dispersed pines facilitates seed dispersal. Ecology 83:3508–3516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Vander Wall SB (2003) Effects of seed size of wind-dispersed pines (Pinus) on secondary seed dispersal and the caching behavior of rodents. Oikos 100:25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wang B, Chen J (2008) Tannin concentration enhances seed caching by scatter-hoarding rodents: an experiment using artificial ‘seeds’. Acta Oecol 34:379–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wang B, Chen J (2009) Seed size, more than nutrient or tannin content, affects seed caching behavior of a common genus of Old World rodents. Ecology 90:3023–3032PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wang B, Chen J (2011) Scatter-hoarding rodents prefer slightly astringent food. PLoS ONE 6:e26424PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wang B, Chen J (2012) Effects of fat and protein levels on foraging preferences of tannin in scatter-hoarding rodents. PLoS ONE. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040640
  24. Webb SL (1986) Potential role of passenger pigeons and other vertebrates in the rapid Holocene migrations of nut trees. Quat Res 26:367–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Willson MF, Whelan CJ (1990) Variation in post dispersal survival of vertebrate-dispersed seeds: effects of density, habitat, location, season, and species. Oikos 57:191–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Xiao ZS, Zhang ZB, Wang YS (2004) Impacts of scatter-hoarding rodents on restoration of oil tea Camellia oleifera in a fragmented forest. For Ecol Manag 196:405–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Xiao ZS, Zhang ZB, Wang YS (2005) Effects of seed size on dispersal distance in five rodent-dispersed fagaceous species. Acta Oecol 28:221–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Xiao ZS, Wang YS, Harris M, Zhang ZB (2006) Spatial and temporal variation of seed predation and removal of sympatric large-seeded species in relation to innate seed traits in a subtropical forest, southwest China. For Ecol Manag 222:46–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Xiao ZS, Gao X, Steele MA, Zhang ZB (2010) Frequency-dependent selection by tree squirrels: adaptive escape of nondormant white oaks. Behav Ecol 21:169–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhang ZB, Wang FS (2001) Effect of rodents on seed dispersal and survival of wild apricot (Prunus armeniaca). Acta Ecol Sin 21:839–845Google Scholar
  31. Zhang HM, Chen Y, Zhang ZB (2008) Differences of dispersal fitness of large and small acorns of Liaodong oak (Quercus liaotungensis) before and after seed caching by small rodents in a warm temperate forest, China. For Ecol Manag 255:1243–1250CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Tropical Forest EcologyXishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of SciencesMenglaChina
  2. 2.Graduate School of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations