Plant Ecology

, Volume 213, Issue 8, pp 1289–1301 | Cite as

The invasion of plant communities following extreme weather events under ambient and elevated temperature

  • Christine S. SheppardEmail author
  • Jake M. Alexander
  • Regula Billeter


Although the problem of plant invasions is expected to increase with climate change, there is as yet little experimental evidence, in particular, for the effects of extreme weather events. We established communities of European meadow species, which were subjected to warming and extreme event (drought and deluge) treatments in a factorial design at an experimental garden in Zurich, Switzerland. Phylogenetically matched pairs of native and alien species (Bromus erectus, B. inermis, Trifolium pratense, T. hybridum, Lactuca serriola, and Conyza canadensis) were introduced into the communities to test if invader performance is favored by warming and extreme events, and if alien invaders perform better than native colonizers. With a warming of on average 0.3 °C, a higher cover of native plant communities was observed, while drought decreased cover in the short-term and lowered biomass. Germination, survival, and growth of the introduced species were lower under elevated temperature. Survival of all pairs and growth of Trifolium was greater in drought pots, while deluge had no effect. While the alien species showed a faster rate of increase in the number of leaves, mortality of alien species was greater than of native species. Overall, the performance of the focal species varied much more among taxonomic groups than native/alien provenances. The results suggest that with climate change, different types of extreme events will differ in the severity of their effects on native plant communities. Meanwhile, the effects of climate change on plant invasions are more likely to operate indirectly through the impacts on native vegetation.


Invasive plants Climate change Warming Drought Flooding Alien-native congeners 



We would like to thank Martin Fotsch, Marilyn Gaschen, Markus Hofbauer, and Gurbir Singh Bhullar for their field assistance.

Supplementary material

11258_2012_86_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (42 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 42 kb)


  1. Alpert P (2006) The advantages and disadvantages of being introduced. Biol Invasions 8(7):1523–1534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker T, Dietz H, Billeter R, Buschmann H, Edwards PJ (2005) Altitudinal distribution of alien plant species in the Swiss Alps. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 7(3):173–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blumenthal DM, Hufbauer RA (2007) Increased plant size in exotic populations: a common-garden test with 14 invasive species. Ecology 88:2758–2765PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Braun-Blanquet J (1964) Pflanzensoziologie. Springer, Wien, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burns JH (2006) Relatedness and environment affect traits associated with invasive and noninvasive introduced Commelinaceae. Ecol Appl 16(4):1367–1376PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crawley MJ (1987) What makes a community invasible? In: Gray AJ, Crawley MJ, Edwards PJ (eds) Colonization, succession and stability. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 429–453Google Scholar
  7. Daehler CC (2003) Performance comparisons of co-occurring native and alien invasive plants: implications for conservation and restoration. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:183–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis MA, Grime JP, Thompson K (2000) Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. J Ecol 88(3):528–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davis MA, Chew MK, Hobbs RJ et al (2011) Don’t judge species on their origins. Nature 474:153–154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dukes JS, Mooney HA (1999) Does global change increase the success of biological invaders? Trends Ecol Evol 14(4):135–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Falk-Petersen J, Bøhn T, Sandlund OT (2006) On the numerous concepts in invasion biology. Biol Invasions 8:1409–1424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Filella I, Penuelas J, Llorens L, Estiarte M (2004) Reflectance assessment of seasonal and annual changes in biomass and CO2 uptake of a mediterranean shrubland submitted to experimental warming and drought. Remote Sens Environ 90(3):308–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gillespie IG, Loik ME (2004) Pulse events in great basin desert shrublands: physiological responses of Artemisia tridentata and Purshia tridentata seedlings to increased summer precipitation. J Arid Environ 59(1):41–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gordon C, Woodin SJ, Alexander IJ, Mullins CE (1999) Effects of increased temperature, drought and nitrogen supply on two upland perennials of contrasting functional type: Calluna vulgaris and Pteridium aquilinum. New Phytol 142(2):243–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grime JP, Brown VK, Thompson K et al (2000) The response of two contrasting limestone grasslands to simulated climate change. Science 289(5480):762–765PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Jentsch A, Kreyling J, Beierkuhnlein C (2007) A new generation of climate-change experiments: events, not trends. Front Ecol Environ 5(7):365–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Koc A (2001) Autumn and spring drought periods affect vegetation on high elevation rangelands of Turkey. J Range Manage 54(5):622–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lambertini M, Leape J, Marton-Levèvre J et al (2011) Invasives: a major conservation threat. Science 333:404–405PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Laubner K, Wagner G (2001) Flora Helvetica, 3rd edn. Verlag Paul Haupt, BernGoogle Scholar
  21. Le Roux PC, McGeoch MA, Nyakatya MJ, Chown SL (2005) Effects of a short-term climate change experiment on a sub-antarctic keystone plant species. Glob Change Biol 11(10):1628–1639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Llorens L, Penuelas J, Estiarte M, Bruna P (2004) Contrasting growth changes in two dominant species of a mediterranean shrubland submitted to experimental drought and warming. Ann Bot 94(6):843–853PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. MacDougall AS, Boucher J, Turkington R, Bradfield GE (2006) Patterns of plant invasion along an environmental stress gradient. J Veg Sci 17(1):47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Macgillivray CW, Grime JP, Band SR et al (1995) Testing predictions of the resistance and resilience of vegetation subjected to extreme events. Funct Ecol 9(4):640–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Meusel H, Jäger EJ (1992) Vergleichende Chorologie der zentraleuropäischen Flora. Fischer, JenaGoogle Scholar
  26. Morecroft MD, Masters GJ, Brown VK, Clarke IP, Taylor ME, Whitehouse AT (2004) Changing precipitation patterns alter plant community dynamics and succession in an ex-arable grassland. Funct Ecol 18(5):648–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nicholls N (1995) Long-term climate monitoring and extreme events. Climatic Change 31(2–4):231–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Penuelas J, Gordon C, Llorens L et al (2004) Nonintrusive field experiments show different plant responses to warming and drought among sites, seasons, and species in a north-south European gradient. Ecosystems 7(6):598–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Petryna L, Moora M, Nunes CO, Cantero JJ, Zobel M (2002) Are invaders disturbance-limited? Conservation of mountain grasslands in Central Argentina. Appl Veg Sci 5(2):195–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sax DF, Brown JH (2000) The paradox of invasion. Global Ecol Biogeogr 9(5):363–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stampfli A, Zeiter M (2004) Plant regeneration directs changes in grassland composition after extreme drought: a 13-year study in southern Switzerland. J Ecol 92(4):568–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sternberg M, Brown VK, Masters GJ, Clarke IP (1999) Plant community dynamics in a calcareous grassland under climate change manipulations. Plant Ecol 143(1):29–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sutherst RW (2000) Climate change and invasive species: a conceptual framework. In: Mooney HA, Hobbs RJ (eds) Invasive species in a changing world. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 211–240Google Scholar
  34. Thompson K, Hodgson JG, Rich TCG (1995) Native and alien invasive plants: more of the same? Ecography 18(4):390–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Thompson K, Hodgson JG, Grime JP, Burke MJW (2001) Plant traits and temporal scale: evidence from a 5-year invasion experiment using native species. J Ecol 89(6):1054–1060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thuiller W, Richardson DM, Midgley GF (2007) Will climate change promote alien plant invasions? Ecol Stud 193:197–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Truscott AM, Soulsby C, Palmer SCF, Newell L, Hulme PE (2006) The dispersal characteristics of the invasive plant Mimulus guttatus and the ecological significance of increased occurrence of high-flow events. J Ecol 94(6):1080–1091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. van Kleunen M, Dawson W, Schlaepfer D, Jeschke JM, Fischer M (2010) Are invaders different? A conceptual framework of comparative approaches for assessing determinants of invasiveness. Ecol Lett 13:947–958PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Vilà M, Corbin JD, Dukes JS, Pino J, Smith SD (2007) Linking plant invasions to global environmental change. In: Canadell JG, Pataki DE, Pitelka LF (eds) Terrestrial ecosystems in a changing world. Springer, Berlin, pp 93–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. White TA, Campbell BD, Kemp PD, Hunt CL (2000) Sensitivity of three grassland communities to simulated extreme temperature and rainfall events. Glob Change Biol 6(6):671–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wigley TML (1985) Impact of extreme events. Nature 316(6024):106–107Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christine S. Sheppard
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jake M. Alexander
    • 2
  • Regula Billeter
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Biological SciencesThe University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  2. 2.Institute of Integrative BiologyETH ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations