Plant Ecology

, Volume 213, Issue 8, pp 1241–1250 | Cite as

Genetic analysis reveals human-mediated long-distance dispersal among war cemeteries in Trifolium micranthum

  • Bram D’hondtEmail author
  • Peter Breyne
  • Wouter Van Landuyt
  • Maurice Hoffmann


Many grassland plant species have limited capacity to disperse their seeds beyond local boundaries by natural means. Meanwhile, various forms of human transportation are observed to provide long-distance dispersal. However, the contribution of human-mediated dispersal to the spatial dynamics of established (meta)populations on the regional scale has only scarcely been addressed. Trifolium micranthum is a very small legume that is rare in western Belgium. It is found (i) inland, as a lawn weed on war cemeteries that are managed by the Commonwealth War Graves Commission, and (ii) in coastal grasslands that are managed for conservation. These stations lie over 30 km apart, though interestingly, a number of satellite war cemeteries are found within the vicinity of the coastal reserves, and these also harbor T. micranthum. We have sampled plants from these populations to study their affinities through genetic analysis (AFLP). Results indicated that the coastal cemetery populations were closely related to the inland cemeteries and not to the coastal reserves. This most likely is the result of exchange of seeds with composted lawn material among regions, whereas mowing machinery and livestock may effectuate frequent dispersal within regions. Assignment tests nonetheless indicated limited genetic admixture to have taken place at the coastal cemeteries. Thus, human management is responsible for the realization of gene flow among these remote gene pools. Human-mediated long-distance dispersal is likely to play a role in the local or regional dynamics of many other native plants, including more common and well-dispersing species.


Anthropochory Regional ensemble Spatial genetic structure Gene flow Landscape genetics Amplified fragment length polymorphism 



We sincerely thank the people of the Commonwealth War Graves Commission, for their valuable information and their kind permission to pick their ‘weeds’. We are equally indebted to the people from the Nature & Forest Agency for their support in locating and sampling plant specimens in their reserves. We further wish to acknowledge the team of the Laboratory for Genetic Analysis from the Research Institute for Nature & Forest for their thorough preparation and analysis of plant samples. We also thank Hans Matheve for assistance with the figures, and three reviewers for providing valuable comments on a former version of this manuscript.

Supplementary material

11258_2012_82_MOESM1_ESM.doc (296 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 295 kb)


  1. Alexander HM, Foster BL, Ballantyne F, Collins CD, Antonovics J, Holt RD (2012) Metapopulations and metacommunities: combining spatial and temporal perspectives in plant ecology. J Ecol 100:88–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ansari HA, Ellison NW, Williams WM (2008) Molecular and cytogenetic evidence for an allotetraploid origin of Trifolium dubium (Leguminosae). Chromosoma 117:159–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barabási A-L (2002) Linked: the new science of networks. Perseus Publishing, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Baskin JM, Baskin CC, Li X (2000) Taxonomy, anatomy and evolution of physical dormancy in seeds. Plant Spec Biol 15:139–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennett SJ, Bullitta S (2003) Ecogeographical analysis of the distribution of six Trifolium species in Sardinia. Biodivers Conserv 12:1455–1466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bennett SJ, Mathews A (2003) Assessment of genetic diversity in clover species from Sardinia, Italy, using AFLP analysis. Plant Breed 122:362–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonin A, Ehrich D, Manel S (2007) Statistical analysis of amplified fragment length polymorphism data: a toolbox for molecular ecologists and evolutionists. Mol Ecol 16:3737–3758PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bullock JM, Moy IL, Coulson SJ, Clarke RT (2003) Habitat-specific dispersal: environmental effects on the mechanisms and patterns of seed movement in a grassland herb Rhinanthus minor. Ecography 26:692–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cain ML, Milligan BG, Strand AE (2000) Long-distance seed dispersal in plant populations. Am J Bot 87:1217–1227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cosyns E, Claerbout S, Lamoot I, Hoffmann M (2005) Endozoochorous seed dispersal by cattle and horse in a spatially heterogeneous landscape. Plant Ecol 178:149–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cousens R, Dytham C, Law R (2008) Dispersal in plants. A population perspective. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. D’hondt B, Hoffmann M (2011) A reassessment of the role of simple seed traits in survival following herbivore ingestion. Plant Biol 13(Suppl. 1):118–124PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Earl DA, vonHoldt BM (2012) STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resour 4:359–361Google Scholar
  14. Ellstrand NC, Elam DR (1993) Population genetic consequences of small population size: implications for plant conservation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 24:217–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eriksson O, Jakobsson A (1999) Recruitment trade-offs and the evolution of dispersal mechanisms in plants. Evol Ecol 13:411–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2003) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164:1567–1587PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Freckleton RP, Watkinson AR (2002) Large-scale spatial dynamics of plants: metapopulations, regional ensembles and patchy populations. J Ecol 90:419–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Freckleton RP, Watkinson AR (2003) Are all plant populations metapopulations? J Ecol 91:321–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Higgins SI, Nathan R, Cain ML (2003) Are long-distance dispersal events in plants usually caused by nonstandard means of dispersal? Ecology 84:1945–1956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hodkinson DJ, Thompson K (1997) Plant dispersal: the role of man. J Appl Ecol 34:1484–1496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Honnay O, Bossuyt B, Jacquemyn H, Shimono A, Uchiyama K (2008) Can a seed bank maintain the genetic variation in the above ground plant population? Oikos 117:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hughes L, Dunlop M, French K, Leishman MR, Rice B, Rodgerson L, Westoby M (1994) Predicting dispersal spectra: a minimal set of hypotheses based on plant attributes. J Ecol 82:933–950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Juan A, Crespo MB, Cowan RS, Lexer C, Fay MF (2004) Patterns of variability and gene flow in Medicago citrina, an endangered endemic of islands in the western Mediterranean, as revealed by amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP). Mol Ecol 13:2679–2690PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keller LF, Waller DM (2002) Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol Evol 17:230–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Klotz S, Kühn I, Durka W (2002) BIOLFLOR—Eine Datenbank zu biologisch-ökologischen Merkmalen der Gefäßpflanzen in Deutschland, vol 38. Schriftenreihe für Vegetationskunde, Bundesamt für Naturschutz, BonnGoogle Scholar
  27. Leimu R, Mutikainen P, Koricheva J, Fischer M (2006) How general are positive relationships between plant population size, fitness and genetic variation? J Ecol 94:942–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lenormand T (2002) Gene flow and the limits to natural selection. Trends Ecol Evol 17:183–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Malo JE, Suárez F (1995) Herbivorous mammals as seed dispersers in a Mediterranean dehesa. Oecologia 104:246–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nathan R, Schurr FM, Spiegel O, Steinitz O, Trakhtenbrot A, Tsoar A (2008) Mechanisms of long-distance seed dispersal. Trends Ecol Evol 23:638–647PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nei M (1978) Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89:583–590PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Niggemann M, Jetzkowitz J, Brunzel S, Wichmann MC, Bialozyt R (2009) Distribution patterns of plants explained by human movement behaviour. Ecol Model 220:1339–1346Google Scholar
  33. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Poschlod P, Bonn S (1998) Changing dispersal processes in the central European landscape since the last ice age: an explanation for the actual decrease of plant species richness in different habitats? Acta Bot Neerl 47:27–44Google Scholar
  35. Poschlod P, Kiefer S, Tränkle U, Fischer S, Bonn S (1998) Plant species richness in calcareous grasslands as affected by dispersability in space and time. Appl Veg Sci 1:75–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Provoost S, Laurence M, Jones M, Edmondson SE (2011) Changes in landscape and vegetation of coastal dunes in northwest Europe: a review. J Coast Conserv 15:207–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Raybould AF, Mogg RJ, Clarke RT, Gliddon CJ, Gray AJ (1999) Variation and population structure at microsatellite and isozyme loci in wild cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) in Dorset (UK). Genet Resour Crop Evol 46:351–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Reichard SH, White P (2001) Horticulture as a pathway of invasive plant introductions in the United States. Bioscience 51:103–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Richardson DM, Pysek P, Rejmánek M, Barbour MG, Panetta FD, West CJ (2000) Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Divers Distrib 6:93–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ridley HN (1930) The dispersal of plants throughout the world. L. Reeve & Co., Ltd., AshfordGoogle Scholar
  42. Russi L, Cocks PS, Roberts EH (1992) The fate of legume seeds eaten by sheep from a Mediterranean grassland. J Appl Ecol 29:772–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Salisbury EJ (1929) The biological equipment of species in relation to competition. J Ecol 17:197–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Suckling FET (1952) Dissemination of white clover (Trifolium repens) by sheep. NZ J Sci Technol 33:64–77Google Scholar
  45. Thomson FJ, Moles AT, Auld TD, Kingsford RT (2011) Seed dispersal distance is more strongly correlated with plant height than with seed mass. J Ecol 99:1299–1307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. van der Pijl L (1969) Principles of dispersal in higher plants. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  47. Van Landuyt W, Vercruysse E, Zwaenepoel A (2004) Trifolium filiforme in Flanders Fields. Verspreiding en standplaatsen op militaire begraafplaatsen in de omgeving van Ieper (West-Vlaanderen). Dumortiera 82:10–15Google Scholar
  48. Vekemans X, Beauwens T, Lemaire M, Roldan-Ruiz I (2002) Data from amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers show indication of size homoplasy and of a relationship between degree of homoplasy and fragment size. Mol Ecol 11:139–151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Verkaar HJ, Schenkeveld AJ, Vandeklashorst MP (1983) The ecology of short-lived forbs in chalk grasslands: dispersal of seeds. New Phytol 95:335–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, Vandelee T, Hornes M, Frijters A, Pot J, Peleman J, Kuiper M, Zabeau M (1995) AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res 23:4407–4414PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wichmann MC, Alexander MJ, Soons MB, Galsworthy S, Dunne L, Gould R, Fairfax C, Niggemann M, Hails RS, Bullock JM (2009) Human-mediated dispersal of seeds over long distances. Proc Roy Soc B 276:523–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zwaenepoel A, Roovers P, Hermy M (2006) Motor vehicles as vectors of plant species from road verges in a suburban environment. Basic Appl Ecol 7:83–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bram D’hondt
    • 1
    Email author
  • Peter Breyne
    • 2
  • Wouter Van Landuyt
    • 2
  • Maurice Hoffmann
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Terrestrial Ecology Unit, Biology DepartmentGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
  2. 2.Research Institute for Nature and ForestBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations