Plant Ecology

, Volume 213, Issue 7, pp 1157–1166 | Cite as

No evidence for evolutionarily decreased tolerance and increased fitness in invasive Chromolaena odorata: implications for invasiveness and biological control



Tolerance, the degree to which plant fitness is affected by herbivory, is associated with invasiveness and biological control of introduced plant species. It is important to know the evolutionary changes in tolerance of invasive species after introduction in order to understand the mechanisms of biological invasions and assess the feasibility of biological control. While many studies have explored the evolutionary changes in resistance of invasive species, little has been done to address tolerance. We hypothesized that compared with plants from native populations, plants from invasive populations may increase growth and decrease tolerance to herbivory in response to enemy release in introduced ranges. To test this hypothesis, we compared the differences in growth and tolerance to simulated herbivory between plants from invasive and native populations of Chromolaena odorata, a noxious invader of the tropics and subtropics, at two nutrient levels. Surprisingly, flower number, total biomass (except at high nutrient), and relative increase in height were not significantly different between ranges. Also, plants from invasive populations did not decrease tolerance to herbivory at both nutrient levels. The invader from both ranges compensated fully in reproduction after 50 % of total leaf area had been damaged, and achieved substantial regrowth after complete shoot damage. This strong tolerance to damage was associated with increased resource allocation to reproductive structures and with mobilization of storage reserves in roots. The innately strong tolerance may facilitate invasion success of C. odorata and decrease the efficacy of leaf-feeding biocontrol agents. Our study highlights the need for further research on biogeographical differences in tolerance and their role in the invasiveness of exotic plants and biological control.


Biomass allocation Compensation Evolution Fitness Growth Leaf clipping Shoot removal Stimulated herbivory 



We are grateful to Dr. Jorge A. Sánchez, Xiao Ming Zou, Franklin Axelrod, Steven W. Woodmansee, Chang-Long Zhang, Dao-Ling Du, Zhi-Yong Liao, and Yan-Bao Lei for collecting seeds, the associate editor and the two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on an earlier version of the manuscript, and to Xishuangbanna Station for Tropical Rain Forest Ecosystem Studies for providing meteorological data. This research was financially supported by the projects of National Natural Science Foundation of China (30830027) and Knowledge Innovation Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (KSCX2-YW-Z-1019).


  1. Abhilasha D, Joshi J (2009) Enhanced fitness due to higher fecundity, increased defence against a specialist and tolerance towards a generalist herbivore in an invasive annual plant. J Plant Ecol 2:77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ambika SR (2002) Allelopathic plants. 5. Chromolaena odorata (L) King and Robinson. Allelopathy J 9:35–41Google Scholar
  3. Ashton I, Lerdau M (2008) Tolerance to herbivory, and not resistance, may explain differential success of invasive, naturalized, and native North American temperate vines. Divers Distrib 14:169–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blair AC, Wolfe LM (2004) The evolution of an invasive plant: an experimental study with Silene latifolia. Ecology 85:3035–3042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blossey B, Notzold R (1995) Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants: a hypothesis. J Ecol 83:887–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bossdorf O, Schroder S, Prati D, Auge H (2004) Palatability and tolerance to simulated herbivory in native and introduced populations of Alliaria petiolata (Brassicaceae). Am J Bot 91:856–862PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bossdorf O, Auge H, Lafuma L, Rogers W, Siemann E, Prati D (2005) Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plant populations. Oecologia 144:1–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cripps M, Hinz H et al (2009) No evidence for an evolution of increased competitive ability for the invasive Lepidium draba. Basic Appl Ecol 10:103–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cyr H, Face ML (1993) Magnitude and patterns of herbivory in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Nature 361:148–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Del-Val E, Crawley MJ (2005) Are grazing increaser species better tolerators than decreasers? An experimental assessment of defoliation tolerance in eight British grassland species. J Ecol 93:1005–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Feng Y-L, Wang J-F, Sang W-G (2007) Biomass allocation, morphology and photosynthesis of invasive and noninvasive exotic species grown at four irradiance levels. Acta Oecol 31:40–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Feng Y-L, Lei Y-B, Wang R-F, Callaway RM, Valiente-Banuet A, Inderjit Li Y-P, Zheng Y-L (2009a) Evolutionary tradeoffs for nitrogen allocation to photosynthesis versus cell walls in an invasive plant. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:1853–1856PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Feng Y-L, Liao Z-Y, Zhang R, Zheng Y-L, Li Y-P, Lei Y-B (2009b) Adaptive evolution in response to environmental gradients and enemy release in invasive alien plant species. Biodivers Sci 17:340–352Google Scholar
  14. Fornoni J (2011) Ecological and evolutionary implications of plant tolerance to herbivory. Funct Ecol 25:399–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fornoni J, Valverde P, Nunez-Farfan J (2003) Quantitative genetics of plant tolerance and resistance against natural enemies of two natural populations of Datura stramonium. Evol Ecol Res 5:1049–1065Google Scholar
  16. Franks SJ, Pratt PD, Dray FA, Simms EL (2008) No evolution of increased competitive ability or decreased allocation to defense in Melaleuca quinquenervia since release from natural enemies. Biol Invasions 10:455–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Garrido E, Fornoni J (2010) To be resistant or tolerant: the evolution of mixed defence strategies. Nature Precedings. doi: 10101/npre.2010.4791.1
  18. Gassmann AJ (2004) Effect of photosynthetic efficiency and water availability on tolerance of leaf removal in Amaranthus hybridus. J Ecol 92:882–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heil M (2009) Damaged-self recognition in plant herbivore defence. Trends Plant Sci 14:356–363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hochwender CG, Janson EM, Cha DH, Fritz RS (2005) Community structure of insect herbivores in a hybrid system: examining the effects of browsing damage and plant genetic variation. Ecol Entomol 30:170–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Joshi J, Vrieling K (2005) The enemy release and EICA hypothesis revisited: incorporating the fundamental difference between specialist and generalist herbivores. Ecol Lett 8:704–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kimball S, Schiffman P (2003) Differing effects of cattle grazing on native and alien plants. Conserv Biol 17:1681–1693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lei Y-B, Feng Y-L, Zheng Y-L, Wang R-F, Gong H-D, Zhang Y-P (2011) Innate and evolutionary advantages of invasive Eupatorium adenophorum over native E. japonicum under ambient and doubled atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Biol Invasions 13:2703–2714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lennartsson T, Tuomi J, Nilsson P (1997) Evidence for an evolutionary history of overcompensation in the grassland biennial Gentianella campestris (Gentianaceae). Am Nat 149:1147–1155PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mabry C, Wayne P (1997) Defoliation of the annual herb Abutilon theophrasti: mechanisms underlying reproductive compensation. Oecologia 111:225–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Maschinski J, Whitham TG (1989) The continuum of plant responses to herbivory: the influence of plant association, nutrient availability, and timing. Am Nat 134:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McFadyen RE (1991) In: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Bio-Control & Management of Chromolaena odorata, Bogor, Indonesia, Biotrop, pp 1–9Google Scholar
  28. Meyer G (1998) Mechanisms promoting recovery from defoliation in goldenrod (Solidago altissima). Botany 76:450–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Meyer G, Clare R, Weber E (2005) An experimental test of the evolution of increased competitive ability hypothesis in goldenrod, Solidago gigantea. Oecologia 144:299–307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Müller-Schärer H, Schaffner U, Steinger T (2004) Evolution in invasive plants: implications for biological control. Trends Ecol Evol 19:417–422PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Núñez-Farfán J, Fornoni J, Valverde PL (2007) The Evolution of resistance and tolerance to herbivores. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 38:541–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pearson DE, Callaway RM (2003) Indirect effects of host-specific biological control agents. Trends Ecol Evol 18:456–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rao Y (1920) Lantana insects in India. Memoirs, Department of Agriculture in India. Entomology Series, Calcutta 5:239–302Google Scholar
  34. Rogers W, Siemann E (2003) Effects of simulated herbivory and resources on Chinese tallow tree (Sapium sebiferum, Euphorbiaceae) invasion of native coastal prairie. Am J Bot 90:243–249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rogers W, Nijjer S, Smith C, Siemann E (2000) Effects of resources and herbivory on leaf morphology and physiology of Chinese tallow (Sapium sebiferum) tree seedlings. Texas J Sci 52:43–56Google Scholar
  36. Rosenthal JP, Kotanen PM (1994) Terrestrial plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends Ecol Evol 9:145–148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schierenbeck K, Mack R, Sharitz R (1994) Effects of herbivory on growth and biomass allocation in native and introduced species of Lonicera. Ecology 75:1661–1672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Siemann E, Rogers WE (2003) Increased competitive ability of an invasive tree may be limited by an invasive beetle. Ecol Appl 13:1503–1507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Simms EL, Triplett J (1994) Costs and benefits of plant responses to disease: resistance and tolerance. Evolution 48:1973–1985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Simons AM, Johnston MO (1999) The cost of compensation. Am Nat 153:683–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stevens M, Kruger E, Lindroth R (2008) Variation in tolerance to herbivory is mediated by differences in biomass allocation in aspen. Funct Ecol 22:40–47Google Scholar
  42. Strauss S, Agrawal A (1999) The ecology and evolution of plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends Ecol Evol 14:179–185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tahmasebi Kohyani P, Bossuyt B, Bonte D, Hoffmann M (2009) Differential herbivory tolerance of dominant and subordinate plant species along gradients of nutrient availability and competition. Plant Ecol 201:611–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tiffin P (2000) Mechanisms of tolerance to herbivore damage: what do we know? Evol Ecol 14:523–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Uyi O, Wilson DD, Zachariades C (2009) The Impact of Pareuchaetes pseudoinsulata (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae), on the Growth Rate of Chromolaena odorata in Southern Ghana. J Appl Sci Environ Manage 13:59–65Google Scholar
  46. Van der Heyden F, Stock W (1996) Regrowth of a semiarid shrub following simulated browsing: the role of reserve carbon. Funct Ecol 10:647–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wise MJ, Abrahamson WG (2007) Effects of resource availability on tolerance of herbivory: a review and assessment of three opposing models. Am Nat 169:443–454PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Xu J, Liu E-D, Xiang C-L, Chen L, Peng H (2011) Orthezia quadrua (Homoptera: Ortheziidae): a native natural enemy of Ageratina adenophora and Chromolaena odorata. J Yunnan Agric Univ 26:577–579 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  49. Zhang L-H, Feng Y-L (2007) Chromolaena odorata and its biocontrol. Chin J Biol Control 23:83–88 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  50. Zou J-W, Rogers WE, Siemann E (2009) Plasticity of Sapium sebiferum seedling growth to light and water resources: inter- and intraspecific comparisons. Basic Appl Ecol 10:79–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical GardenChinese Academy of SciencesKunmingChina
  2. 2.Graduate University, Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.College of Bioscience and BiotechnologyShenyang Agricultural UniversityShenyangChina
  4. 4.Department of Life SciencesUniversity of the West IndiesSt. AugustineRepublic of Trinidad and Tobago

Personalised recommendations