Plant Ecology

, Volume 212, Issue 10, pp 1663–1674 | Cite as

Rapid biodiversity declines in both ungrazed and intensely grazed exotic grasslands

Article

Abstract

Exotic-dominated ecosystems with low diversity are becoming increasingly common. It remains unclear, though, whether differences between native and exotic species (driver model), or changes in disturbances or resources (passenger model), allow exotics to become competitive dominants. In our field experiment, plant species origin (native or exotic), cattle grazing (ungrazed or intensely grazed once), and species composition treatments were fully crossed and randomly assigned to four-species mixtures and monocultures of grassland plants. We found that biodiversity declined more rapidly in exotic than in native species mixtures, regardless of our grazing disturbance treatment. Early declines in species evenness (i.e., increases in dominance) led to subsequent declines in species richness (i.e., local extinctions) in exotic mixtures. Specifically, Simpson’s diversity was 29% lower after 1 year, and species richness was 15% lower after 3 years, in exotic than in native mixtures. These rapid biodiversity declines in exotic mixtures were partly explained by decreased complementarity (i.e., niche partitioning and facilitation), presumably because exotic species lack the coevolutionary history that can lead to complementarity and coexistence in native communities. Thus, our results suggest that exotic species can drive biodiversity declines in the presence or absence of a grazing disturbance, partly because exotic species interactions differ from native species interactions. This implies that restoring plant biodiversity in grasslands may require removal of exotic species, in addition to disturbance management.

Keywords

Land use change Novel ecosystems Coexistence Complementarity Conservation 

References

  1. Adler PB, HilleRisLambers J, Levine JM (2007) A niche for neutrality. Ecol Lett 10:95–104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asner GP, Elmore AJ, Olander LP, Martin RE, Harris AT (2004) Grazing systems, ecosystem responses, and global change. Annu Rev Environ Resour 29:261–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Best RJ, Arcese P (2009) Exotic herbivores directly facilitate the exotic grasses they graze: mechanisms for an unexpected positive feedback between invaders. Oecologia 159:139–150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cardinale BJ, Wright JP, Cadotte MW, Carroll IT, Hector A, Srivastava DS, Loreau M, Weis JJ (2007) Impacts of plant diversity on biomass production increase through time because of species complementarity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:18123–18128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chapin FS, Zavaleta ES, Eviner VT, Naylor RL, Vitousek PM, Reynolds HL, Hooper DU, Lavorel S, Sala OE, Hobbie SE, Mack MC, Diaz S (2000) Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature 405:234–242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chesson P (2000) Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:343–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. D’Antonio CM, Vitousek PM (1992) Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass fire cycle, and global change. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 23:63–87Google Scholar
  8. Didham RK, Tylianakis JM, Hutchison MA, Ewers RM, Gemmell NJ (2005) Are invasive species the drivers of ecological change? Trends Ecol Evol 20:470–474PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fargione J, Tilman D, Dybzinski R, Lambers JHR, Clark C, Harpole WS, Knops JMH, Reich PB, Loreau M (2007) From selection to complementarity: shifts in the causes of biodiversity-productivity relationships in a long-term biodiversity experiment. Proc R Soc B 274:871–876PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fuhlendorf SD, Engle DM (2001) Restoring heterogeneity on rangelands: ecosystem management based on evolutionary grazing patterns. Bioscience 51:625–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gurevitch J, Padilla DK (2004) Are invasive species a major cause of extinctions? Trends Ecol Evol 19:470–474PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harper JL (1977) Population biology of plants. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Harpole WS, Suding KN (2007) Frequency-dependence stabilizes competitive interactions among four annual plants. Ecol Lett 10:1164–1169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hejda M, Pysek P, Jarosik V (2009) Impact of invasive plants on the species richness, diversity and composition of invaded communities. J Ecol 97:393–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hillebrand H, Bennett DM, Cadotte MW (2008) Consequences of dominance: a review of evenness effects on local and regional ecosystem processes. Ecology 89:1510–1520PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. HilleRisLambers J, Yelenik SG, Colman BP, Levine JM (2010) California annual grass invaders: the drivers or passengers of change? J Ecol 98:1147–1156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hobbs RJ, Arico S, Aronson J, Baron JS, Bridgewater P, Cramer VA, Epstein PR, Ewel JJ, Klink CA, Lugo AE, Norton D, Ojima D, Richardson DM, Sanderson EW, Valladares F, Vila M, Zamora R, Zobel M (2006) Novel ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 15:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huston MA (2004) Management strategies for plant invasions: manipulating productivity, disturbance, and competition. Divers Distrib 10:167–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Isbell FI, Wilsey BJ (2011) Increasing native, but not exotic, biodiversity increases aboveground productivity in ungrazed and intensely grazed grasslands. Oecologia 165:771–781PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Isbell FI, Polley HW, Wilsey BJ (2009a) Biodiversity, productivity, and the temporal stability of productivity: patterns and processes. Ecol Lett 12:443–451PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Isbell FI, Polley HW, Wilsey BJ (2009b) Species interaction mechanisms maintain grassland plant diversity. Ecology 90:1821–1830PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kimball S, Schiffman PM (2003) Differing effects of cattle grazing on native and alien plants. Conserv Biol 17:1681–1693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leach MK, Givnish TJ (1996) Ecological determinants of species loss in remnant prairies. Science 273:1555–1558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Levine JM, HilleRisLambers J (2009) The importance of niches for the maintenance of species diversity. Nature 461:U130–U254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Loreau M (2004) Does functional redundancy exist? Oikos 104:606–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Loreau M, Hector A (2001) Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments. Nature 412:72–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Losure DA, Wilsey BJ, Moloney KA (2007) Evenness-invasibility relationships differ between two extinction scenarios in tallgrass prairie. Oikos 116:87–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. MacDougall AS, Turkington R (2005) Are invasive species the drivers or passengers of change in degraded ecosystems? Ecology 86:42–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mack RN, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Evans H, Clout M, Bazzaz FA (2000) Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol Appl 10:689–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Martin LM, Moloney KA, Wilsey BJ (2005) An assessment of grassland restoration success using species diversity components. J Appl Ecol 42:327–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McKane RB, Johnson LC, Shaver GR, Nadelhoffer KJ, Rastetter EB, Fry B, Giblin AE, Kielland K, Kwiatkowski BL, Laundre JA, Murray G (2002) Resource-based niches provide a basis for plant species diversity and dominance in arctic tundra. Nature 415:68–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Milchunas DG, Lauenroth WK (1993) Quantitative effects of grazing on vegetation and soils over a global range of environments. Ecol Monogr 63:327–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Olff H, Ritchie ME (1998) Effects of herbivores on grassland plant diversity. Trends Ecol Evol 13:261–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Parker JD, Burkepile DE, Hay ME (2006) Opposing effects of native and exotic herbivores on plant invasions. Science 311:1459–1461PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Petermann JS, Fergus AJF, Turnbull LA, Schmid B (2008) Janzen-Connell effects are widespread and strong enough to maintain diversity in grasslands. Ecology 89:2399–2406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pimm SL, Russell GJ, Gittleman JL, Brooks TM (1995) The future of biodiversity. Science 269:347–350PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Proulx M, Mazumder A (1998) Reversal of grazing impact on plant species richness in nutrient-poor vs nutrient-rich ecosystems. Ecology 79:2581–2592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schoener TW (1970) Nonsynchronous spatial overlap of lizards in patchy habitats. Ecology 51:408–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Seastedt TR, Hobbs RJ, Suding KN (2008) Management of novel ecosystems: are novel approaches required? Front Ecol Environ 6:547–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Simoes M, Baruch Z (1991) Responses to simulated herbivory and water-stress in two tropical C4 grasses. Oecologia 88:173–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Smith MD, Knapp AK (2001) Physiological and morphological traits of exotic, invasive exotic, and native plant species in tallgrass prairie. Int J Plant Sci 162:785–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. van Ruijven J, Berendse F (2009) Long-term persistence of a positive plant diversity-productivity relationship in the absence of legumes. Oikos 118:101–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vandermeer J (1981) The interference production principle: an ecological theory for agriculture. Bioscience 31:361–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vila M, Weiner J (2004) Are invasive plant species better competitors than native plant species? evidence from pair-wise experiments. Oikos 105:229–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vitousek PM (1990) Biological invasions and ecosystem processes: towards an integration of population biology and ecosystem studies. Oikos 57:7–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wilsey BJ (2005) Importance of species replication in understanding plant invasions into North American grasslands. In: Inderjit S (ed) Invasive plants: ecological and agricultural aspects. Birkhauser, BaselGoogle Scholar
  47. Wilsey BJ, Polley HW (2004) Realistically low species evenness does not alter grassland species-richness–productivity relationships. Ecology 85:2693–2700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wilsey BJ, Polley HW (2006) Aboveground productivity and root-shoot allocation differ between native and introduced grass species. Oecologia 150:300–309PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wilsey BJ, Chalcraft DR, Bowles CM, Willig MR (2005) Relationships among indices suggest that richness is an incomplete surrogate for grassland biodiversity. Ecology 86:1178–1184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wilsey BJ, Teaschner TB, Daneshgar PP, Isbell FI, Polley HW (2009) Biodiversity maintenance mechanisms differ between native and novel exotic-dominated communities. Ecol Lett 12:432–442PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal BiologyIowa State UniversityAmesUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations