Plant Ecology

, Volume 212, Issue 6, pp 975–983 | Cite as

Is spotted knapweed (Centaurea stoebe L.) patch size related to the effect on soil and vegetation properties?

  • Lauchlan H. FraserEmail author
  • Cameron N. Carlyle


Spotted knapweed (Centaurea stoebe L. subsp. Micranthos (Gugler) Hayek) was first introduced in the 1890s from Europe into western North America, where it now occupies over three million hectares of rangeland and pasture in 14 states and two Canadian provinces, reducing forage production and causing economic damage. Despite many reported effects spotted knapweed can have on soils and native vegetation, it is not known whether patch size is correlated with these ecosystem-level effects. The objective of our study was to determine whether the effects of spotted knapweed on plant composition and soil properties was related to spotted knapweed patch size. We asked the following questions: (1) Are there differences in plant species richness and diversity between small and large knapweed patches? and (2) Do soil water and soil mineral nutrient properties change depending on knapweed patch size? Twenty-four knapweed patches, and paired natural grassland plots, were randomly selected within Lac du Bois Provincial Park, British Columbia, Canada. Knapweed patch size ranged from 6 to 366 m2. Sampling and analysis revealed a significant effect of knapweed patch size on soil and vegetation properties. Soil P, soil temperature, and total dry plant biomass (g/0.25 m2) increased, while soil N, soil C, and soil moisture decreased with patch size. Since our results show that spotted knapweed patch size is related to degree of soil alteration, it is important to consider size of patch when modeling the impact of spotted knapweed in North America. Since large patches of spotted knapweed seem to have a proportionately greater effect on soil chemistry properties, large patches may move the system further away from a point where it is possible to restore the site to pre-invasion conditions.


Grasslands Rangelands Invasive plant Plant diversity Plant litter Soil nutrients 



Our study was supported by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Discovery Grant and a Canadian Foundation for Innovation grant to L.H. Fraser. Two anonymous reviewers helped improve an earlier version of the manuscript. We thank B.C. Parks for allowing access to the study site.


  1. Austin AT, Vivanco L (2006) Plant litter decomposition in a semi-arid ecosystem controlled by photodegradation. Nature 442:555–558PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belnap J, Phillips S (2001) Soil biota in an ungrazed grassland: response to annual grass (Bromus tectorum) invasion. Ecol Appl 11:1261–1275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berube DE, Myers JH (1982) Suppression of knapweed invasion by crested wheatgrass in the dry interior in British Columbia. J Range Manag 35:459–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bezemer TM, Lawson CS, Hedlund K, Edwards AR, Brook AJ, Igual JM, Mortimer SR, Van der Putten WH (2006) Plant species and functional group effects on abiotic and microbial soil properties and plant–soil feedback responses in two grasslands. J Ecol 94:893–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blake L, Mercik S, Koerschens M, Goulding KWT, Stempen S, Weigel A, Poulton PR, Powlson DS (1999) Potassium content in soil, uptake in plants and the potassium balance in three European long-term field experiments. Plant Soil 216:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cornelissen JHC, Thompson K (1997) Functional leaf attributes predict litter decomposition rate in herbaceous plants. New Phytol 135:109–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davidson EA, Janssens IA (2006) Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change. Nature 440:165–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis ES, Fay PK, Chicoine TK, Lacey CA (1993) Persistence of spotted knapweed (Centaurea maculosa) seed in soil. Weed Sci 41:57–61Google Scholar
  9. Derner JD, Briske DD, Boutton TW (1997) Does grazing mediate soil carbon and nitrogen accumulation beneath C4, perennial grasses along an environmental gradient? Plant Soil 191:147–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duda JJ, Freeman DC, Emlen JM, Belnap J, Kitchen SG, Zak JC, Sobek E, Tracy M, Montante J (2003) Differences in native soil ecology associated with invasion of the exotic annual chenopod, Halogeton glomeratus. Biol Fert Soils 38:72–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ehrenfeld JG (2003) Effects of exotic plant invasions on soil nutrient cycling processes. Ecosystems 6:503–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harris P, Cranston R (1979) An economic evaluation of control methods for diffuse and spotted knapweed in western Canada. Can J Plant Sci 59:375–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Herben T (2009) Invasibility of neutral communities. Basic Appl Ecol 10:197–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hirsch SA, Leitch JA (1996) The impact of knapweed on Montana’s economy. Agri Econ Report 355. North Dakota Agri Exp Station, Fargo, ND, USAGoogle Scholar
  15. Hobbs RJ (1999) Restoration of disturbed ecosystems. In: Walker L (ed) Ecosystems of disturbed ground. Ecosystems of the world. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 673–687Google Scholar
  16. Hobbs RJ, Huenneke LF (1992) Disturbance, diversity, and invasion: implications for conservation. Conserv Biol 6:324–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hook PB, Olson BE, Wraith JM (2004) Effects of the invasive forb Centaurea maculosa on grassland carbon and nitrogen pools in Montana, USA. Ecosystems 7:686–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Howard TG, Gurevitch J, Hyatt L, Carreiro M, Lerdau M (2004) Forest invasibility in communities in southeastern New York. Biol Invasions 6:393–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Huxel GR (1999) Rapid displacement of native species by invasive species: effects of hybridization. Biol Conserv 89:143–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lacey JR, Marlow CB, Lane JR (1989) Influence of spotted knapweed (Centaurea maculosa) on surface runoff and sediment yield. Weed Technol 3:627–631Google Scholar
  21. Lawton RH (1986) Are there assembly rules for successional communities? In: Gray AJ, Crawley MJ, Edwards PJ (eds) Colonization, succession and stability. Blackwell Scientific Publ, Oxford, pp 225–244Google Scholar
  22. LeJeune KD, Seastedt TR (2001) Centaurea species: the forb that won the west. Conserv Biol 15:1568–1574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. LeJeune KD, Suding KN, Seastedt TR (2006) Nutrient availability does not explain invasion and dominance of a mixed grass prairie by the exotic forb Centaurea diffusa lam. Appl Soil Ecol 32:98–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. MacDougall AS, Turkington R (2005) Are invasive species the drivers or passengers of change in degraded ecosystems? Ecology 86:42–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mack RN, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Evans H, Clout M, Bazzaz FA (2000) Biotic Invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol Appl 10:689–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Malmstrom CM, McCullough AJ, Johnson HA, Newton LA, Borer ET (2005) Invasive annual grasses indirectly increase virus incidence in California native perennial bunchgrasses. Oecologia 145:153–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Masters RA, Sheley RL (2001) Principles and practices for managing rangeland invasive plants. J Range Manag 54:502–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Noss RF, LaRoe III ET, Scott JM (1995) Endangered ecosystems of the United States: a preliminary assessment of loss and degradation. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Biological Service, Biological Report 28, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  29. Ochsmann J (2001) On the taxonomy of spotted knapweed (Centaurea stoebe L.). In: Smith L (ed) Proceedings of the first international knapweed symposium of the twenty-first century, March 15–16, Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, pp 33–41Google Scholar
  30. Ortega YK, Pearson DE (2005) Weak vs. strong invaders of natural plant communities: assessing invasibility and impact. Ecol Appl 15:651–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pyšek P, Jarošík V (2005) Residence time determines the distribution of alien plants. In: Inderjit S (ed) Invasive plants: ecological and agricultural aspects. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 77–96Google Scholar
  32. Ridenour WM, Callaway RM (2001) The relative importance of allelopathy in interference: the effects of an invasive weed on a native bunchgrass. Oecologia 126:444–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rimer RL, Evans RD (2006) Invasion of downy brome (Bromus tectorum L.) causes rapid changes in the nitrogen cycle. Am Midl Nat 156:252–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stevenson FJ, Cole MA (1999) Cycles of the soil: carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, sulfur, micronutrients, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  35. Story J, Callan N, Corn J, White L (2006) Decline of spotted knapweed density at two sites in western Montana with large populations of the introduced root weevil, Cyphocleonus achates (Fahraeus). Biol Control 38:227–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Suding KN, LeJeune KD, Seastedt TR (2004) Competitive impacts and responses of an invasive weed: dependencies on nitrogen and phosphorus availability. Oecologia 141:526–535PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. SYSTAT (1998) SYSTAT® 8.0 Statistics. SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USAGoogle Scholar
  38. Thorpe AS, Archer V, De Luca TH (2006) The invasive forb, Centaurea maculosa, increases phosphorus availability in Montana grasslands. Appl Soil Ecol 32:118–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tilman D (1988) Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USAGoogle Scholar
  40. Tyser RW, Key CH (1988) Spotted knapweed in natural area fescue grasslands: an ecological assessment. Northwest Sci 62:151–160Google Scholar
  41. van Ryswyk AL, McLean A, Marchand LS (1966) The climate, native vegetation, and soils of some grasslands at different elevations in British Columbia. Can J Plant Sci 46:35–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vitousek PM, Walker LR, Whiteaker LD, Muellerdombois D, Matson PA (1987) Biological invasion by Myrica faya alters ecosystem development in Hawaii. Science 238:802–804PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wolfe BE, Klironomos JN (2005) Breaking new ground: soil communities and exotic plant invasion. Bioscience 55:477–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zabinski CA, Quinn L, Callaway RM (2002) Phosphorus uptake, not carbon transfer, explains arbuscular mycorrhizal enhancement of centaurea maculosa in the presence of native grassland species. Funct Ecol 16:758–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Natural Resource Sciences and Biological SciencesThompson Rivers UniversityKamloopsCanada
  2. 2.Department of BotanyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations