Plant Ecology

, Volume 210, Issue 2, pp 291–301

Potential for ants and vertebrate predators to shape seed-dispersal dynamics of the invasive thistles Cirsium arvense and Carduus nutans in their introduced range (North America)

Article

Abstract

The population dynamics of invasive plants are influenced by positive and negative associations formed with members of the fauna present in the introduced range. For example, mutualistic associations formed with pollinators or seed dispersers may facilitate invasion, but reduced fitness from attack by native herbivores can also suppress it. Since population expansion depends on effective seed dispersal, interactions with seed dispersers and predators in a plant species introduced range may be of particular importance. We explored the relative contributions of potential seed dispersers (ants) and vertebrate predators (rodents and birds) to seed removal of two diplochorous (i.e., wind- and ant-dispersed), invasive thistles, Cirsium arvense and Carduus nutans, in Colorado, USA. We also conducted behavior trials to explore the potential of different ant species to disperse seeds, and we quantified which potential ant dispersers were prevalent at our study locations. Both ants and vertebrate predators removed significant amounts of C. arvense and C. nutans seed, with the relative proportion of seed removed by each guild varying by location. The behavior trials revealed clear seed preferences among three ant species as well as differences in the foragers’ abilities to move seeds. In addition, two ant species that acted as potential dispersal agents were dominant at the study locations. Since local conditions in part determined whether dispersers or predators removed more seed, it is possible that some thistle populations benefit from a net dispersal effect, while others suffer proportionally more predation. Additionally, because the effectiveness of potential ant dispersers is taxon-specific, changes in ant community composition could affect the seed-dispersal dynamics of these thistles. Until now, most studies describing dispersal dynamics in C. arvense and C. nutans have focused on primary dispersal by wind or pre-dispersal seed predation by insects. Our findings suggest that animal-mediated dispersal and post-dispersal seed predation deserve further consideration.

Keywords

Myrmecochory Elaiosome Mutualism Seed dispersal Ants Vertebrate predators 

References

  1. Andersen A (1988) Dispersal distance as a benefit of myrmecochory. Oecologia 75:507–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen UV (1993) Dispersal strategies of Danish seashore plants. Ecography 16:289–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Auld TD, Denham AJ (1999) The role of ants and mammals in dispersal and post-dispersal seed predation of the shrubs Grevillea (Proteaceae). Plant Ecol 144:201–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beattie AJ (1985) The evolutionary ecology of ant-plant mutualisms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bossard CC (1991) The role of habitat disturbance, seed predation and ant dispersal on establishment of the exotic shrub Cytisus scoparius in California. Am Midl Nat 126:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boyd RS (2001) Ecological benefits of myrmecochory for the endangered chaparral shrub Fremontodendron decumbens (Sterculiaceae). Am J Bot 88:231–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bustamante RO, Simonetti JA (2000) Seed predation and seedling recruitment in plants: the effect of the distance between parents. Plant Ecol 147:173–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carney SE, Byerley MB, Holway DA (2003) Invasive Argentine ants (Linepithema humile) do not replace native ants as seed dispersers of Dendromecon rigida (Papaveraceae) in California, USA. Oecologia 135:576–582PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Colautti RI, MacIsaac HJ (2004) A neutral terminology to define ‘invasive’ species. Divers Distrib 10:135–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Connell JH (1971) On the role of natural enemies in preventing competitive exclusion in some marine animals and in rain forest trees. In: Den Boer PJ, Gradwell G (eds) Dynamics of populations. Center for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen (Netherlands)Google Scholar
  11. Crawley MJ (1989) Insect herbivores and plant population dynamics. Ann Rev Entomol 34:531–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Creed RP, Sheldon SP (1995) Weevils and watermilfoil: Did a North American herbivore cause the decline of an exotic plant? Ecol App 5:1113–1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Daehler CC, Strong DR (1997) Reduced herbivore resistance in introduced smooth cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora) after a century of herbivore-free growth. Oecologia 110:99–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. DiVittorio CT, Corbin JD, D’Antonio CM (2007) Spatial and temporal patterns of seed dispersal: an important determinant of grassland invasion. Ecol Appl 17:311–316CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Elton CS (1958) The ecology of invasions by plants and animals. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  16. Faegri K, van der Pijl L (1966) The principles of pollination ecology. Pergamon, Oxford, U.KGoogle Scholar
  17. Fedriani JM, Rey PJ, Garrido JL, Guitián J, Herrera CM, Medrano M, Sánchez-Lafuente AM, Cerdá X (2004) Geographical variation in the potential of mice to constrain an ant-seed dispersal mutualism. Oikos 105:181–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Giladi I (2006) Choosing benefits or partners: a review of the evidence for the evolution of myrmecochory. Oikos 112:481–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gomez C, Espadaler X (1998) Myrmecochorous dispersal distances: a world survey. J Biogeogr 25:573–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hansen AA (1918) Canada thistle and methods of eradication. USDA Farmer’s Bulletin 1002Google Scholar
  21. Hanzawa FM, Beattie AJ, Culver DC (1988) Directed dispersal: demographic analysis of an ant-seed mutualism. Am Nat 131:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harris P (1971) Current approaches to biological control in weeds. In: Biological control programs against insects and weeds in Canada 1958–1968. Technical communications, vol 4. Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control, Ascot, pp 67–76Google Scholar
  23. Harris P (1984) Carduus nutans L., nodding thistle, and C. acanthoides L., plumeless thistle (Compositae). In: Kelleher JS, Hulme MA (eds) Biological control programs against insects and weeds in Canada 1969–1980. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau, Slough, UKGoogle Scholar
  24. Heimann B, Cussans GW (1996) The importance of seeds and sexual reproduction in the population biology of Cirsium arvense—a literature review. Weed Res 36:493–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heithaus RE (1981) Seed predation by rodents on three ant-dispersed plants. Ecology 62:136–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Holmes PM (1990a) Dispersal and predation in alien Acacia. Oecologia 83:288–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Holmes PM (1990b) Dispersal and predation of alien Acacia seeds: effects of season and invading stand density. South Afr J Bot 56:428–434Google Scholar
  28. Hopkins I (1914) History of the bumblebee in New Zealand: its introduction and results. Bull N Z Dep Agric 46:1–28Google Scholar
  29. Hull AC Jr, Evans JO (1973) Musk thistle (Carduus nutans): an undesirable range plant. J Range Manag 26:383–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hulme PE (1994) Post-dispersal seed predation in grassland: its magnitude and sources of variation. J Ecol 82:645–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hyatt LA, Rosenberg MS, Howard TG, Bole G, Fang W, Anastasia J, Brown K, Grella R, Hinman K, Kurdziel JP, Gurevitch J (2003) The distance dependence prediction of the Janzen-Connell hypothesis: a meta-analysis. Oikos 103:590–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Janzen DH (1969) Seed-eaters versus seed size, number, toxicity and dispersal. Evolution 23:1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Janzen DH (1970) Herbivores and the number of tree species in tropical forests. Am Nat 104:501–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jensen JM, Six DL (2006) Myrmecochory of the exotic plant, Centaurea maculosa: a potential mechanism enhancing invasiveness. Environ Entomol 35:326–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Julien MH (1992) Biological control of weeds: a world catalogue of agents and their target weeds. CAB International/Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Wallingford, Oxon, UKGoogle Scholar
  36. Larson GE, Wittig TA, Higgins KF, Turnipseed B, Gardner DM (2005) Influence of biocontrol insects on Canada thistle: seed production, germinability, and viability. Prairie Nat 37:85–100Google Scholar
  37. Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD, Schabenberger O (2006) SAS for mixed models, 2nd edn. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  38. Mack RN, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Evans H, Clout M, Bazzaz FA (2000) Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol Appl 10:689–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Maron JL, Kauffman MJ (2006) Habitat-specific impacts of multiple consumers on plant population dynamics. Ecology 87:113–124CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Maron JL, Vilà M (2001) When do herbivores affect plan invasion? Evidence for the natural enemies and biotic resistance hypotheses. Oikos 95:361–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mayer V, Silvester O, Fischer R (2005) Myrmecochorous seed dispersal in temperate regions. In: Forget PM, Lambert JE, Hulme PE, Vander Wall SB (eds) Seed fate: predation, dispersal and seedling establishment. CABI Publishing, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  42. McCallum K, Kelly D (1990) Pre- and post-dispersal predation of nodding thistle seeds by birds and rodents. In: Proceedings of 43rd N.Z. weed and pest control conference. pp 216–219Google Scholar
  43. McCay TS, McCay DH, Czajka JL (2009) Deposition of exotic bird-dispersed seeds into three habitats of a fragmented landscape in the northeastern United States. Plant Ecol 203:59–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Moore RJ (1975) The biology of Canadian weeds. 13: Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. Can J Plant Sci 55:1033–1048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Morris WF, Hufbauer RA, Agrawal AA, Bever JD, Borowicz VA, Gilbert GS, Maron JL, Mitchell CE, Parker IM, Power AG, Torchin ME, Vázquez DP (2007) Direct and interactive effects of enemies and mutualists on plant performance: a meta-analysis. Ecology 88:1021–1029CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Mull JE, MacMahon JA (1997) Spatial variation in rates of seed removal by harvester ants (Pogonomyrmex occidentalis) in a shrub-steppe ecosystem. Am Midl Nat 138:1–13Google Scholar
  47. Nunez MA, Simberloff D, Relva MA (2008) Seed predation as a barrier to alien conifer invasion. Biol Invasions 10:1389–1398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. O’dowd DJ, Hay ME (1980) Mutualism between harvester ants and a desert ephemeral: seed escape from rodents. Ecology 61:531–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Parker IM (1997) Pollinator limitation in Cytisus scoparius (Scotch broom), an invasive exotic shrub. Ecology 78:1457–1470Google Scholar
  50. Parker JD, Burkepile DE, Hay ME (2006) Opposing effects of native and exotic herbivores on plant invasions. Science 311:1459–1461CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Pemberton RW, Irving DW (1990) Elaiosomes on weed seeds and the potential for myrmecochory in naturalized plants. Weed Sci 38:615–619Google Scholar
  52. Richardson DM, Allsopp M, D’Antonio CM, Milton SJ, Rejmánek M (2000) Plant invasions—the role of mutualisms. Biol Rev 75:65–93CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Sakai AK, Allendorf FW, Holt JS, Lodge DM, Molofsky J, With KA, Baughman S, Cabin RJ, Cohen JE, Ellstrand NC, McCauley DE, O’Neil P, Parker IM, Thompson JN, Weller SG (2001) The population biology of invasive species. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:305–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sánchez AM, Azcárate FM, Peco B (2006) Effects of harvester ants on seed availability and dispersal of Lavandula stoechas subsp. pedunculata in a Mediterranean grassland-shrubland mosaic. Plant Ecol 185:49–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. SAS System for Windows (2002) v. 9.1. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  56. Sebens KP, Thorne BL (1985) Coexistence of clones, clonal diversity, and the effects of disturbance. In: Jackson JB, Buss LW, Cook RE (eds) Population Biology and Evolution of Clonal Organisms. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 357–398Google Scholar
  57. Shea K, Chesson P (2002) Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 17:170–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Shea K, Kelly D (1998) Estimating biocontrol agent impact with matrix models: Carduus nutans in New Zealand. Ecol Appl 8:824–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Smith LM, Kok LT (1984) Dispersal of musk thistle (Carduus nutans) seeds. Weed Sci 32:120–125Google Scholar
  60. Stachion WJ, Zimdahl RL (1980) Allelopathic activity of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) in Colorado. Weed Sci 28:83–86Google Scholar
  61. Stuckey RL, Forsyth JL (1971) Distribution of naturalized Carduus nutans (Compositae) mapped in relation to geology in northwestern Ohio. Ohio J Sci 71:1–15Google Scholar
  62. Theoharides KA, Dukes JS (2007) Plant invasion across space and time: factors affecting non-indigenous species success during four stages of invasion. New Phytol 176:256–273CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Turnbull CL, Culver DC (1983) The timing of seed dispersal in Viola nuttallii: attraction of dispersers and avoidance of predators. Oecologia 59:360–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vander Wall SB, Longland WS (2004) Diplochory: Are two seed dispersers better than one? Trends Ecol Evol 19:155–161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Vilá M, D’Antonio CM (1998a) Fitness of invasive Carpobrotus (Aizoaceae) hybrids in coastal California. Ecoscience 5:191–199Google Scholar
  66. Vilá M, D’Antonio CM (1998b) Hybrid vigor in Carpobrotus in coastal California: effects of herbivory and water availability on clonal growth. Ecol App 8:1196–1205Google Scholar
  67. Wallace IA, Eerens JPJ, Rahman A, Clarkson BD (2005) Horizontal seed dispersion patterns of Californian thistle (Cirsium arvense). N Z Plant Prot 58:148–151Google Scholar
  68. Watkinson AR, Powell JC (1993) Seedling recruitment and the maintenance of clonal diversity in plant populations—a computer simulation of Ranunculus repens. J Ecol 81:707–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Watson AK, Beauregard R, Keogh W (1980) Biological control of Canada thistle in Quebec. In: Canada Thistle symposium. Agriculture Canada, March 1980, Regina, SaskatchewanGoogle Scholar
  70. Weiss FE (1908) The dispersal of fruits and seeds by ants. New Phytol 7:23–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wenny DG (2001) Advantages of seed dispersal: a re-evaluation of directed dispersal. Evol Ecol Res 3:51–74Google Scholar
  72. Williamson M, Fitter A (1996) The varying success of invaders. Ecology 77:1161–1666CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate Degree Program in Ecology and Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest ManagementColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA
  2. 2.USDA-Agricultural Research ServiceFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations