Plant Ecology

, Volume 209, Issue 1, pp 135–145 | Cite as

Separation of grassland litter and ecosite influences on seasonal soil moisture and plant growth dynamics

  • Eliza S. Deutsch
  • Edward W. Bork
  • Walter D. Willms
Article

Abstract

While plant litter is known to regulate soil moisture, little is known about the extent to which litter impacts moisture over and above the physical environment (i.e., ecosite) throughout the growing season, particularly in cool-temperate grasslands where moisture is considered less limiting for plant growth. In this study, we examined the relative impact of litter and ecosite on growing season soil moisture in a northern rough fescue (Festuca hallii) grassland. We also examined the relationship between litter and plant biomass throughout the growing season, including linkages between litter, plant growth, and the effects of litter on microclimate. During May, only ecosite was found to be associated with soil moisture, with a similar finding for plant biomass. Litter became important in maintaining greater soil moisture in June and July, however, likely through its corresponding negative impact on soil temperature and associated evaporation. In general, litter had a stronger and more consistent influence on soil moisture than ecosite. Finally, litter had a positive relationship with above-ground biomass, but only during June and July, the same months when litter exhibited the strongest relationship with soil moisture. Litter therefore appears to promote mid-season plant growth in these temperate grasslands, presumably through its ability to reduce evaporation and maintain greater soil water during seasonal moisture limitations.

Keywords

Biomass Microclimate Topography Soil texture Soil organic matter 

References

  1. Berendse F (1990) Organic matter accumulation and nitrogen mineralization during secondary succession in heathland ecosystems. J Ecol 78:413–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bork EW, Thomas T, McDougall B (2001) Herbage response to precipitation in central Alberta boreal grasslands. J Range Mange 54:243–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bouyoucos GJ (1962) Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analyses of soils. Am Sci Agron 54:464–465Google Scholar
  4. Brutsaert W, Chen D (1995) Desorption and the two stages of drying of natural tallgrass prairie. Water Resour Res 31:1305–1313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brutsaert W, Chen D (1996) Diurnal variation of surface fluxes during thorough drying (or severe drought) of natural prairie. Water Resour Res 32:2013–2019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Canadian Agricultural Services Coordinating Committee (1998) The Canadian System of soil classification, 3rd edn. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Publication 1646. NRC Research Press, Ottawa, ONGoogle Scholar
  7. Chanasyk DS, Mapfumo E, Willms WD, Naeth MA (2004) Quantification and simulation of soil water on grazed fescue watersheds. J Range Manage 57:169–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chapin FS, Matson PA, Mooney HA (2002) Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology. Springer, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  9. Coupland RT (1958) The effects of fluctuations in weather upon grasslands of the Great Plains. Bot Rev 24:273–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coupland RT (1961) A reconsideration of grassland classification in the northern great plains of North America. J Ecology 49:135–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coupland RT, Brayshaw TC (1953) The fescue grassland in Saskatchewan. Ecology 34:386–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deutsch ES, Bork EW, Willms WD (2010) Soil moisture and plant growth responses to litter and defoliation impacts in Parkland grasslands. Agric Ecosyst Environ 135:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Donkor NT, Bork EW, Hudson RJ (2002) Bromus-Poa response to defoliation intensity and frequency under three soil moisture levels. Can J Plant Sci 82:365–370Google Scholar
  14. Dormaar JF, Carefoot JM (1996) Implications of crop residue management and conservation tillage on soil organic matter. Can J Plant Sci 76:627–634Google Scholar
  15. Dyksterhuis EJ, Schmutz EM (1947) Natural mulches or “litter” of grasslands, with kinds and amounts on a southern prairie. Ecology 28:163–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Environment Canada (2008) National climate data and information archive. www.climate.weatheroffice.ec.gc.ca/climate_normals/index_e.html. Accessed on July 2009
  17. Facelli JM, Pickett STA (1991) Plant litter: its dynamics and effects on plant community structure. Bot Rev 57:1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Flory EW (1936) Comparisons of the environmental and some physiological responses of prairie vegetation and cultivated maize. Ecology 17:67–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gotelli NJ, Ellison AM (2004) A primer of ecological statistics. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, MAGoogle Scholar
  20. Hamrick JL, Lee JM (1987) Effects of soil surface topography and litter cover on germination, survival and growth of musk thistle. Am J Bot 74:451–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Holland EA, Coleman DC (1987) Litter placement effects on microbial and organic matter dynamics in an agroecosystem. Ecology 68:425–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hopkins HH (1954) Effects of mulch upon certain factors of the grassland environment. J Range Manage 7:255–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Horton RE (1933) The role of infiltration in the hydrologic cycle. Trans Am Geophys Union 14:446–460Google Scholar
  24. Hotelling H (1933) Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. J Exp Psych 24(417–441):493–520Google Scholar
  25. International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2001) In: Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs DJ, Noguer M, Van Der Lindon PJ, Xiaosu D (eds) The Scientific Basis. Contribution of working group 1 to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panal on climate change. Chapter 10 Regional Climate Information – Evaluation and Projections. Cambridge University Press, UKGoogle Scholar
  26. Johnson A (1962) Effects of grazing intensity and cover on the water intake rate of fescue grassland. J Range Manage 15:79–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Knapp AK (1985) Effects of fire and drought on the ecophysiology of Andropogon gerardii and Panicum virgatum in a tallgrass prairie. Ecology 66:1309–1320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Knapp AK, Seastedt TR (1986) Detritus accumulation limits productivity of tallgrass prairie. Bioscience 36:622–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Laio F, Porporato A, Ridolfi L, Rodriquez-Iturbe I (2001a) Plants in water- controlled ecosystems: active role in hydrologic processes and response to water stress II. Probabilistic soil moisture dynamics. Adv Water Resour 24:707–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Laio F, Porporato A, Fernandez-Illescas CP, Rodriquez-Iturbe I (2001b) Plants in water-controlled ecosystems: active role in hydrologic processes and response to water stress IV. Discussion of real cases. Adv Water Resour 24:745–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lamb EG (2008) Direct and indirect control of grassland community structure by litter, resources, and biomass. Ecology 89:216–225CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lamb EG, Shore BH, Cahill JF (2006) Water and nitrogen addition differentially impact plant competition in a native rough fescue grassland. Plant Ecol 192:21–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Landi A, Mermut AR, Anderson DW (2004) Carbon distribution in a hummocky landscape from Saskatchewan, Canada. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68:175–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Laurenroth WK, Sala OE (1992) Long term forage production of North American shortgrass steppe. Ecol Appl 2:397–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Leriche H, LeRoux X, Gignoux J, Tuzet A, Fritz H, Abbadie L, Loreau M (2001) Which functional processes control the short-term effect of grazing on net primary production in grasslands. Oecologia 129:114–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mallows CL (1973) Some comments on Cp. Technometrics 15:661–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McCune B, Grace JB (2002) Analysis of ecological communities. MJM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, ORGoogle Scholar
  38. McKinney AL (1929) Effect of forest litter on soil temperature and soil freezing in autumn and winter. Ecology 10:312–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Meeuwig RO (1970) Infiltration and soil erosion as influenced by vegetation and soil in northern Utah. J Range Manage 23:185–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Moss EH, Campbell JA (1947) The fescue grassland of Alberta. Can J Res 25:209–227Google Scholar
  41. Naeth MA, Bailey AW, Chanasyk DS, Pluth DJ (1991a) Water holding capacity of litter and soil organic matter in mixed prairie and fescue grassland ecosystems of Alberta. J Range Manage 44:13–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Naeth MA, Chanasyk DS, Rothwell RL, Bailey AW (1991b) Grazing impacts on soil water in mixed prairie and fescue grassland ecosystems of Alberta. Can J Soil Sci 71:313–325Google Scholar
  43. Pearson K (1901) On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Philos Magaz Sixth Ser 2:559–572Google Scholar
  44. Penfound WT (1964) Effects of denudation on the productivity of grasslands. Ecology 45:838–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rauzi F (1960) Water intake studies on range soils at 3 locations in the Northern Plains. J Range Manage 13:179–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rice EL, Parenti RL (1978) Causes of decreases in productivity in undisturbed tallgrass prairie. Am J Bot 65:1091–1097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Salve R, Allen-Diaz B (2001) Variations in soil moisture content in a rangeland catchment. J Range Manage 54:44–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sauer RH (1978) Effects of removal of standing dead material on growth of Agropyron spicatum. J Range Mange 31:121–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schenk HJ, Jackson RB (2002) Rooting depths, lateral root spreads and below- ground/above-ground allometries of plants in water-limited ecosystems. J Ecol 90:480–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schindler DW, Donahue WF (2006) Inaugural article: an impending water crisis in Canada’s western prairie provinces. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103:7210–7216CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Sydes C, Grime JP (1981) Effects of tree leaf litter on herbaceous vegetation in the deciduous woodlands. II. An experimental investigation. J Ecol 69:249–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Thompson K, Grime JP, Mason G (1977) Seed germination in response to diurnal fluctuations of temperatures. Nature 267:147–149CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Thurow TL, Blackburn WH, Taylor CA Jr (1986) Hydrologic characteristics of vegetation types as affected by livestock grazing systems, Edwards Plateau, Texas. J Range Manage 39:505–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Viessman W, Lewis GL (2003) Introduction to hydrology, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  55. Walsh RPD, Voight PJ (1977) Vegetation litter: an underestimated variable in hydrology and geomorphology. J Biogeogr 4:253–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Weaver JE, Rowland NW (1952) Effect of excessive natural mulch on the development, yield, and structure of a native grassland. Bot Gaz 114:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wilcox BP, Wood MK, Tromble JH (1988) Factors influencing infiltrability of semiarid mountain slopes. J Range Manage 41:197–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Willms WD, Smoliak S, Bailey AW (1986) Herbage production following litter removal on Alberta native grasslands. J Range Manage 39:536–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Willms WD, McGinn SM, Dormaar JF (1993) Influence of litter on herbage production in the mixed prairie. J Range Manage 46:320–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wilson SD (2007) Competition, resources and vegetation during 10 years in native grasslands. Ecology 88:2951–2958CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eliza S. Deutsch
    • 1
  • Edward W. Bork
    • 1
  • Walter D. Willms
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, Faculty of Agricultural, Food & Nutritional ScienceUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  2. 2.Agricultural and Agri-Food CanadaLethbridge Research CentreLethbridgeCanada

Personalised recommendations