Plant Ecology

, Volume 209, Issue 2, pp 279–290

Responses of saltcedar (Tamarix chinensis) to water table depth and soil salinity in the Yellow River Delta, China

  • Baoshan Cui
  • Qichun Yang
  • Kejiang Zhang
  • Xinsheng Zhao
  • Zheyuan You
Article

Abstract

Significant studies about Tamarix chinensis as an introduced invasive plant species have been implemented in North America. However, the response of native T. chinensis to its environment is not well known in China. T. chinensis is a useful species in preventing sea water intrusion in coastal areas of northern China. It is necessary to fully understand the relationships between environmental conditions and ecological characteristics of this species to better preserve its habitats. The Yellow River Delta Natural Reserve, one of the major distribution regions of T. chinensis, was then selected as a case study area to investigate the response of this species to water table depth and soil salinity (Na+, Cl, Mg2+). It was found that sites with shallow water table depths (less than 1.5 m) and low soil salinity (less than 30 psu), provided the best habitat conditions for T. chinensis. The results also showed that plant height, stem diameter, and crown width were all positively correlated to plant age, while they had negative correlations with water table depth. Negative correlations between plant height and soil salinity, plant stem diameter and soil salinity were also concluded. However, no obvious relationship between the crown breadth of T. chinensis and soil salinity was observed. Four types of T. chinensis habitats were obtained based on the ecological characteristics of T. chinensis individuals associated with soil salinity and water table depth, i.e., (1) Low water table with high soil salinity; (2) Deep water table with high soil salinity; (3) Deep water table with low soil salinity; (4) Inundation with low salinity. These results provide a sound basis for wetland management in the Yellow River Delta.

Keywords

Saltcedar (Tamarix chinensisDistribution Soil salinity Ecological characteristics Water table depth Yellow River Delta 

References

  1. Anniwaer, Yin LK (1997) Study on biomass of the Tamarix genus. Environ Prot Xinjiang 1:46–50Google Scholar
  2. Baum BR (1967) Introduced and naturalized Tamarisks in the United States and Canada. Baileya 15:19–25Google Scholar
  3. Bestelmeyer BT, Brown JR, Havstad KM, Alexander R, Chavez G, Herrick (2003) Development and use of state-and-transition models for rangelands. J Range Manag 56:114–126. doi:10.1002/1096-9837 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brotherson JD, Field D (1987) Tamarix: impacts of a successful weed. Rangelands 9:110–112Google Scholar
  5. Brotherson JD, Carmen JC, Szyska LA (1984) Stem-diameter age relationships of Tamarix ramosissima in central. Utah 37:362–364Google Scholar
  6. Busch DE, Smith SD (1995) Mechanisms associated with decline of woody species in riparian ecosystems of the Southwestern U.S. Ecol Monogr 65:347–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen JX, Qiao LQ, Gou SH, Wang YX, He HB (2008) Experiment of salinity tolerance of Tamarix. Shandong For Sci Tech 1:18–19Google Scholar
  8. Cleverly JR, Dahm CN, Thibault JR, Gilroy DJ, Allred Coonrod JE (2002) Seasonal estimates of actual evapotranspiration from Tamarix ramosissima stands using three-dimensional eddy covariance. J Arid Environ 52:181–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Devitt DA, Piorkowski JM, Smith SD, Cleverly JR, Sala A (1997a) Plant water relations of Tamarix ramosissima in response to the imposition and alleviation of soil moisture stress. J Arid Environ 36:527–540. doi:10.1006/jare.1996.0216 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Devitt DA, Sala A, Mace KA, Smith SD (1997b) The effect of applied water on the water use of saltcedar in a desert riparian environment. J Hydrol 192:233–246. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03105-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Di Tomaso JM (1998) Impact, biology, and ecology of saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) in the southwestern United States. Weed Tech 12:326–336Google Scholar
  12. Dick-Peddie WA (1993) New Mexico vegetation-past, present, and future. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, NM, p 244Google Scholar
  13. Elmore AJ, Mustard JF, Manning SJ (2003) Regional patterns of plant community response to changes in water: Owens Valley, California. Ecol Appl 13:443–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Evangilista P, Kumar S, Stohlgren TJ, Crall AW, Newman GJ (2007) Modeling aboveground biomass of Tamarix ramassissima in the Arkansas River Basin of southeastern Colorado, USA. West N Am Nat 67:503–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fu AH, Chen YN, Chen YP (2008) Changes of stem water potential of Tamarix ramosissima under drought stress in lower reaches. Chin J Ecol 27:532–538Google Scholar
  16. Gaskin JF, Schaal BA (2002) Hybrid Tamarix widespread in U.S. invasion and undetected in native Asian range. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:11256–11259. doi:10.1073/pnas.132403299 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Glenn EP, Nagler PL (2005) Comparative ecophysiology of Tamarix ramosissima and native trees in western U.S. riparian zones. J Arid Environ 61:419–446. doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2004.09.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Graf WL (1985) Tamarisk and river-channel management. Environ Manag 6:283–296. doi:10.1007/BF01875060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gries D, Zeng F, Foetzki A, Arndt SK, Bruelheide H, Thomas FM, Zhang X, Runge M (2003) Growth and water relations of Tamarix amosissima and Populus euphratica on Taklamakan desert dunes in relation to depth to a permanent water table. Plant Cell Environ 26:725–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gu FT (1991) Chinese Tamarisk and its exploration in the mouth area of the yellow River. Grassland Chin 3:33–36Google Scholar
  21. Harris DR (1966) Recent plant invasions in the arid and semi-arid southwest of the United States. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 56:408–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Horton JL, Clark JL (2001) Water table decline alters growth and survival of Salix gooddingii and Tamarix chinensis seedlings. For Ecol Manag 140:239–247. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00314-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Horton JL, Kolb TE, Hart SC (2001a) Responses of riparian trees to inter-annual variation in ground water table depth in a semiarid river basin. Plant Cell Environ 24:293–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Horton JL, Kolb TE, Hart SC (2001b) Physiological response to groundwater depth varies among species and with river flow regulation. Ecol Appl 11:1046–1059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Horton JL, Hart SC, Kolb TE (2003) Physiological condition and water source use of Sonoran Desert riparian trees at the Bill Williams River, AZ, USA. Isotopes Environ Health Stud 39:69–82. doi:10.1080/1025601031000096772 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Huang SW, Liang JY (2007) Progress of studies on Tamarix Linn. Strait Pharm J 19:5–9Google Scholar
  27. James RC, Stanley D, Smith AS, Dale AD (1997) Invasive capacity of Tamarix ramosissimain a Mojave Desert floodplain: the role of drought. Oecologia 111:12–18. doi:10.1007/s004420050202 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnson S (1986) Alien plants drain western waters. Nature Conservency News. September–OctoberGoogle Scholar
  29. Kliebenstein DJ (2004) Secondary metabolites and plant/environment interactions: a view through Arabidopsis thalianatinged glasses. Plant Cell Environ 27:675–684. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2004.01180.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ladenburger CG, Hild AL, Kazmer DJ, Munn LC (2006) Soil salinity patterns in Tamarix invasions in the Bighorn Basin, Wyoming, USA. J Arid Environ 65:111–128. doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2005.07.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lalir A, Pouakoff-Mayber A (1976) Effect of salinity on respiratory pathways in root tips of Tamarix tetragynal. Plant Physiol 57:167–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lesica P, Miles S (2001) Tamarisk growth at the Northern margin of its naturalized range in Montana, USA. Wetlands 2:240–246. doi:10.1672/0277-5212 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lesica P, Miles S (2004) Ecological strategies for managing tamarisk on the C.M. Russell National Wildlife Refuge, Montana, USA. Biol Conserv 119:535–543. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2004.01.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lesica P, Thomas HD (2004) Is Tamarisk allelopathic? Plant Soil 267:357–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Li XY, Zhang XM, He XY, Zeng FJ, Thomas FM, Foetzke A (2004) Drought stress and irrigation effects on water relations of Tamarisk ramosissima in the Qira Oasis. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica 28:644–650Google Scholar
  36. Li SN, Wang GX, Deng W, Lu YX (2008) Variations of groundwater depth in Yellow River Delta in recent two decades. Pro Geogr 5:49–56Google Scholar
  37. Muradian R (2001) Ecological thresholds: a survey. Ecol Econ 38:7–24. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00146-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nurit BN, Alexandra PM (1977) Salinity stress and the content of proline in roots of Pisum sativum and Tamarix tetragyna. Ann Bot 41:173–179Google Scholar
  39. Qaiser M (1981) The genus Tamarix (Tamaricaceae) in Pakistan. Pak J Bot 13:107–158Google Scholar
  40. Radford JQ, Bennett AF (2004) Thresholds in landscape parameters: occurrence of the white-browed treecreeper, Climacteris affinis in Victoria, Australia. Biol Conserv 117:375–391. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2003.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sher AA, Marshall DL (2003) Seedling Competition between native Populus Deltoides (Salicaceae) and exotic Tamarix Ramosissima (Tamaricacea) across water regimes and substrate types. Am J Bot 90:413–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Small H (1989) Ion chromatography. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Stenquist S (2000) Saltcedar integrated weed management and the Endangered Species Act. In: Spencer N (ed) Proceedings of the X International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds 4–14 July 1999. Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA, pp 487–504Google Scholar
  44. Stromberg J (1998) Dynamics of Fremont cottonwood (Populus fremontii) and salt cedar (Tamarix chinensis) populations along the San Pedro River, Arizona. J Arid Environ 40:133–155. doi:10.1006/jare.1998.0438 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tomar OS, Gupta RK (1985) Performance of some forest tree species in saline soils under shallow and saline water-table conditions. Plant Soil 87:329–335. doi:10.1007/BF02181900 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Toms JD, Lesperance ML (2003) Piecewise regression: a tool for identifying ecological thresholds. Ecology 84:2034–2041. doi:10.1890/02-0472 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vandekerckhove L, Poesen J, Wijdenes DO (2000) Thresholds for gully initiation and sedimentation in Mediterranean Europe. Earth Surf Process Landforms 25:1201–1220. doi:10.1002/1096-9837 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Walker LR, Barnes PL, Powell EA (2006) Tamarix aphylla: a newly invasive tree in southern Nevada. Western North Am Nat 66:191–201. doi:10.3398/1527-0904 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wang X, Hou P, Yin LK, Feng DQ, Pan BR (1999) Effect of soluble substance of Tamarix under soil water stress slowly. Arid Zone Res 16:6–11Google Scholar
  50. Welz B (1999) Atomic absorption spectrometry. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Wiesenborn, WD (1996) Saltcedar impacts on salinity, water, fire frequency, and flooding. Saltcedar Management Workshop, Rancho Mirage, CA. California Exotic Pest Plant Council 9–12Google Scholar
  52. Xu F, Guo WH, Wang W, Xu WH, Wang YF, Wang RQ (2007) A comparison of photosynthetic characteristics between Tamarix chinensis and Phragmites australis in the Yellow River Delta. Shandong For Sci 173:29–33Google Scholar
  53. Yang LW, He BY, Huang PY, Nuer B (2006) Evaluation on ecological value of Tamarix spp forest in Hotan basin. J Desert Res 25:268–274Google Scholar
  54. Yao RJ, Yang JS (2007) Quantitative analysis of spatial distribution pattern of soil salt accumulation in plough layer and shallow groundwater in the Yellow River Delta. Trans CSAE 8:45–51Google Scholar
  55. Yin LK (2002) The ex-situ protection and the ecological adaptability of Tamarix L.in China. Arid Zone Res 19:12–16Google Scholar
  56. Zaveleta E (2000) Valuing ecosystem services lost to Tamarix invasion in the United States. In: Mooney HA, Richard JH (eds) Invasive species in a changing world. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 261–302Google Scholar
  57. Zeng FJ, Li XM, Zhan XM (2002) A review of the water physiological characteristics of Tamarix and its prospect. Chin J Appl Ecol 13:611–614Google Scholar
  58. Zhang YM, Pan BR, Yin LK, Yang WM, Zhang DY (2001) The research history of the family Tamaricaceae. Acta Bot Boreal Occident Sin 21:796–804Google Scholar
  59. Zhang DY, Pan BR, Yin LK (2003) The photo geographical studies of Tamarix (Tamaricaceae). Acta Botanica Yummnica 25:415–427Google Scholar
  60. Zhang LB, Song YR, Wu X (2008) Salt tolerance capacity and the effects on the improvement of coastal saline soil. J Anhui Agric Sci 36:5424–5426Google Scholar
  61. Zhuang L, Chen YN, Li WH, Zhao YH (2005) Relationship of the protective enzymes of desert vegetations with water table in the lower reaches of Tarim River. Acto Bot Boreal Occident Sin 25:1287–1294Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Baoshan Cui
    • 1
  • Qichun Yang
    • 1
  • Kejiang Zhang
    • 2
  • Xinsheng Zhao
    • 1
  • Zheyuan You
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Environment, State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution ControlBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Department of Civil Engineering, The Centre of Environmental Engineering Research and Education (CEERE)University of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations