Advertisement

Plant Ecology

, Volume 208, Issue 1, pp 93–122 | Cite as

Plant composition in the Maya Biosphere Reserve: natural and anthropogenic influences

  • Ingrid NesheimEmail author
  • Rune Halvorsen
  • Inger Nordal
Article

Abstract

We studied the floristic composition and stand structure of lowland forests of the Maya Biosphere Reserve (MBR) of El Petén, Guatemala. Sampling was performed over a gradient of human influence, including a newly established returnee community (migrant), the cooperative Unión Maya Itzá, as well as an adjacent protected area within the core area of the MBR. Five 1-ha plots, each divided into 100 contiguous 10 × 10 m2 subplots, were used to record presence of all tree and vine species. The study area is a low-diversity rainforest with a canopy layer dominated by species of Fabaceae, a shrub layer dominated by Rubiaceae, and vines dominated by Bignoniaceae. Vines were conspicuous both in number and in diversity. Variation in both tree life-form composition and canopy abundance pattern apparently reflect variation in intensity of forestry among the plots. The similarities between the plots in the cooperative (a logging plot and a settlement plot) with regard to species area curves, and mean number of tree and understory species per subplot, may indicate effects of disturbance (in general) on vegetation structure. Detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) was used to investigate gradients in species composition among the five plots (125 subplots) and to generate hypotheses about vegetation–environment relationships. The study area appears as a mosaic of site-specific forest types or associations determined by a particular species or groups of co-dominant species. The main environmental characteristics of the area determining species composition and structure are related to the drainage of soils and human disturbance.

Keywords

Species composition Maya Biosphere Reserve Vines Understory Low diversity forest Spatial structure Ordination analyses 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Norwegian Research council (NFR) with a doctoral fellowship to I. Nesheim. The authors would like to thank the organization Centro Maya, the Biology Department at the University of San Carlos, and the Consejo Nacional de Areas Protegidas, CONAP, for assistance and collaboration during field periods in Guatemala. Thanks also go to Robin Foster at the Field Museum in Chicago, Ron Liesner at the Missouri Botanical Garden, Caroline Withford at the Natural History Museum, London, for help with the identification of the plants.

References

  1. Anonymous (2002) S-PLUS Version 6.2. Insightful Corp., SeattleGoogle Scholar
  2. Anonymous (2004) Package cluster stats. The R foundation for statistical computing. http://cran.r-project.org
  3. Anonymous (2005) R Version 2.1.0 for Windows. The R foundation for statistical computing. http://cran.r-project.org
  4. Ashton PS (1964) Ecological studies in the mixed dipterocarp forest of Brunei State. Oxf. For. Mem. 25. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Balvanera P, Lott E, Segura G, Diebe C, Islas A (2002) Patterns of β-diverstiy in a Mexican tropical dry forest. J Veg Sci 13:145–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barberis IM, Batista WB, Pire EF, Lewis JP, León RJC (2002) Woody population distribution and environmental heterogeneity in a Chaco forest, Argentina. J Veg Sci 13:607–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bongers F, Popma J, Meave del Castillo J, Carabias J (1988) Structure and floristic composition of the lowland rain forest of Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. J Veg Sci 74:55–80Google Scholar
  8. Brokaw N (1985) Gap-phase regeneration in a tropical forest. Ecology 66:682–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burnham RJ (2002) Dominance, diversity and distribution of lianas in Yasuní, Ecuador: who is on the top? J Trop Ecol 18:845–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. CATIE (1990) Principales programas para el manejo del parque nacional “Biotopo El Zotz” (San Miguel/La Palotada), Petén, Guatemala. XIII Curso annual de planificación y manejo de areas protegidas. July 25–August 29, 1990. GuatemalaGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark DB, Palmer MW, Clark DA (1999) Edaphic factors and the landscape-scale distributions of tropical rain forest trees. Ecology 80:2662–2675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Condit R, Pitman N, Leigh EG Jr, Chave J, Terborgh J, Foster RB, Nuñez PV, Aguilar S, Valencia R, Villa G, Muller-Landau HC, Losos E, Hubbell SP (2002) Beta-diversity in tropical forests trees. Science 295:666–668CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Curtis JT, McIntosh RP (1951) An upland forest continuum in the prairie-forest border region of Wisconsin. Ecology 31:476–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dallmeier F, Kabel M, Taylor C, Romano CB, Rice R, Mayne JC (1991) Users guide to the Bisley biodiversity plots, Luquillo Biosphere Reserve, Puerto Rico. SI/MAB Biodiversity Program, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  15. Dhillion SS, Ampornpan L, Austreng I (2003) Land-use and plant diversity in Ban Bung and Na Heao Forest Reserve. In: Ampornpan L, Dhillion SS (eds) The Environment of Na Haeo, Thailand: biodiversity, non-timber products and conservation. Craftsman Press Ltd., Bangkok, pp 47–82Google Scholar
  16. Dhillion SS, Aguilar Støen M, Camargo-Ricalde SL (2004) Integrated ecological restoration and the involvement of local communities in the Tehuacán-Cuicatlán Valley, Mexico. Environ Conserv 31:1–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Duivenvoorden JF (1994) Vascular plant species counts in the rain forest of the middle Caquetá area, Colombian Amazonia. Biodivers Conserv 3:685–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Duivenvoorden JF (1995) Tree species composition and rain forest-environment relationships in the middle Caquetá area, Colombia, NW Amazonia. Vegetatio 120:91–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Duque A, Sánchez M, Cavelier J, Duivenvoorden JF (2002) Different floristic patterns of woody understorey and canopy plants in Colombian Amazonia. J Trop Ecol 18:499–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Foster RB (1990) The floristic composition of the Rio Manu floodplain forest. In: Gentry AH (ed) Four neotropical rainforests. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 99–111Google Scholar
  21. Foster RB, Brokaw NVL (1982) Structure and history of the vegetation on Barro Colorado Island. In: Leigh EG Jr, Rand AS, Windsor DM (eds) The ecology of a tropical forest: seasonal rhythms. Smithsonian Inst. Press, Washington, DC, pp 67–81Google Scholar
  22. Foster RB, Hubbell SP (1990) The floristic composition of the Barro Colorado Island Forest. In: Gentry AH (ed) Four neotropical rainforests. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 85–98Google Scholar
  23. Gentry AH (1982) Patterns of neotropical plant species diversity. Evol Biol 15:1–84Google Scholar
  24. Gentry AH (1990) Floristic similarities and differences between southern Central American and upper and Central Amazonia. In: Gentry AH (ed) Four neotropical rain forests. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 141–157Google Scholar
  25. Gentry AH, Dodson C (1987) Contribution of non-trees to species richness of a tropical rain forest. Biotropica 19:149–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gentry AH, Emmons LH (1987) Geographical variation in fertility, phenology, and composition of the understory of Neotropical forests. Biotropica 19:216–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gerwing JJ (2006) The influence of reproductive traits on liana abundance 10 years after conventional and reduced-impacts logging in the eastern Brazilian Amazon. For Ecol Manag 221:83–90Google Scholar
  28. Hammel B (1990) The distribution of diversity among families, genera and habit types in the la Selva Flora. In: Gentry AH (ed) Four neotropical rainforests. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 75–84Google Scholar
  29. Harms KE, Powers JS, Montgomery RA (2004) Variation in small sapling density, understory cover, and resource availability in four Neotropical Forests. Biotropica 36:40–51Google Scholar
  30. Harper JL (1977) Population biology of plants. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Hegarty EE, Caballé G (1991) Distribution and abundance of vines in forest communities. In: Putz FE, Mooney HA (eds) The biology of vines. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 313–335Google Scholar
  32. Henderson A (1995) The palms of the Amazon. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Hill MO (1979) DECORANA—a FORTRAN program for detrended correspondence analysis and reciprocal averaging. Cornell University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Hill MO, GAUCH HGJ (1980) Detrended correspondence analysis: an improved ordination technique. Vegetatio 42:47–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Holdridge LR, Grenke WC, Hatheway WH, Liand T, Tosi JA Jr (1971) Forest environments in tropical life zones. A pilot study. Pergamon Press, Oxford, p 747Google Scholar
  36. Holmgren PK, Holmgren NH, Barnett LC (eds) (1990) Index herbariorum. New York Botanical Garden, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Hubbell SP (1997) A unified theory of biogeography and relative species abundance and its application to tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Coral Reefs 16(Suppl):S9–S21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Huston M (1993) Biological diversity, soils and economics. Science 262:1676–1680CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Islebe GA, Hooghiemstra H, Brenner M, Curtis JH, Hoddell DA (1996) A Holocene vegetation history from lowland Guatemala. Holocene 6:265–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Legendre P (1993) Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or a new paradigm? Ecology 74:1659–1673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Legendre P, Legendre P (1998) Numerical ecology. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  42. Lieberman M, Lieberman D, Hartshorn GS, Peralta R (1985) Small-scale altitudinal variation in lowland wet tropical forest vegetation. J Ecol 73:505–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lundell CL (1937) Vegetation of Petén. Carnegie Institution, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  44. Magurran AE (2004) Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, p 256Google Scholar
  45. Martin PH, Sherman RE, Fahey TJ (2004) Forty years of tropical forest recovery from agriculture: structure and floristics of secondary and old-growth riparian forests in the Dominican Republic. Biotropica 36:297–317Google Scholar
  46. McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1989) Generalized linear models, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  47. Minchin PR (1987) An evaluation of the relative robustness of techniques for ecological ordination. Vegetatio 69:89–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mutchnick PA, McCarthy BC (1997) An ethnobotanical analysis of the tree species common to the subtropical moist forests of the Petén, Guatemala. Econ Bot 51:158–183Google Scholar
  49. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Myers RH, Montgomery DC, Vining GG (2002) Generalized linear models with applications in engineering and the sciences. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Nekola JC, White PS (1999) The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology. J Biogeogr 26:867–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nesheim I, Økland RH (2007) Do vine species in Neotropical forests see the forest or the trees? J Veg Sci 18:395–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nesheim I, Dhillion SS, Stølen KA (2006) What happens to traditional knowledge and use of natural resources when people migrate? Human Ecol 34:99–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Økland RH (1990) Vegetation ecology: theory, methods and applications with reference to Fennoscandia. Sommerfeltia Suppl. 1:1–233Google Scholar
  55. Økland RH (1996) Are ordination and constrained ordination alternative or complementary strategies in general ecological studies? J Veg Sci 7:289–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Økland RH (2007) Wise use of statistical tools in ecological field studies. Folia Geobot 42:123–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Økland RH, Økland T, Rydgren K (2001) Vegetation-environment relationships of boreal spruce swamp forests in Østmarka Nature Reserve, SE Norway. Sommerfeltia 29:1–190Google Scholar
  58. Oksanen J (2004) Package ‘vegan’ Version 1.7–24. University of Oulu, Oulu. http://cc.oulu.fi/~jarioksa/softhelp/vegan.html
  59. Phillips OL, Hall P, Gentry AH, Sawyer SA, Vasquez S (1994) Dynamics and species richness of tropical rain forests. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:2805–2809CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Pielou EC (1969) An introduction to mathematical ecology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  61. Pitman NCA, Terborgh J, Silman MR, Nuñez VP (1999) Tree species distributions in an upper Amazonian forest. Ecology 80:2651–2661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pitman NCA, Terborugh J, Silman MR, Nuñez VP, Neill DA, Cerón CE, Palacios WA, Aulestia M (2001) Dominance and distribution of tree species in upper Amazonian terra firme forests. Ecology 82:2101–2117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Poulsen AD, Balslev H (1991) Abundance and cover of ground herbs in an Amazonian rain forest. J Veg Sci 2:315–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Proctor J, Anderson JM, Chai P, Vallack HW (1983) Ecological studies in four contrasting lowland rain forests in Gunung Mulu National Park, Sarawak. I. Forest environment, structure and floristics. J Ecol 71:237–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Qian H, Klinka K, Økland RH, Krestov P, Kayahara GJ (2003) Understorey vegetation in boreal Picea mariana and Populus tremuloides stands in British Columbia. J Veg Sci 14:173–184Google Scholar
  66. Reining CCS, Heinzman RM, Madrid MC, López S, Solórzano A (1992) Non timber forest products of the Maya Biosphere Reserve, Peten, Guatemala. Conservation International Foundation, Washington, DC, p 213Google Scholar
  67. Sader SA, Sever T, Smoot JC, Richards M (1994) Forest change estimates for the northern Petén region of Guatemala. Human Ecol 22:317–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Salafsky N, Dugelby BL, Terborgh JW (1993) Can extractive reserves save the rainforest? An ecological and socioeconomic comparison of nontimber forest product extractions in Petén, Guatemala, and West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Conserv. Biol. 7:39–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Salazar ME, Cancino JCM (1998) Plan de manejo forestal “Cooperativa Unión Maya Itzá” La Libertad, Petén, Guatemala. Proyecto Centro Maya, PeténGoogle Scholar
  70. Scariot A (1999) Forest fragmentation effects on palm diversity in central Amazonia. J Ecol 87:66–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. SEGEPLAN (Secretaría general del consejo de planificación de la economía nacional) (1992) Region VIII. APESAR, Santa Elena, PeténGoogle Scholar
  72. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry, 3rd edn. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  73. Souza AF (2005) Spatial variation and dynamics of flooding, canopy openness, and structure in a Neotropical swamp forest. Plant Ecol 180:161–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Stølen KA (2003) Constructing the future: experiences of Guatemalan returnees. In: Shanmugaratnam N, Lund R, Stølen KA (eds) In the maze of displacement, conflict, migration and change. Norwegian Academic Press, Oslo, pp 127–153Google Scholar
  75. Svenning J-C, Kinner DA, Stallard RF, Engelbrecht BM, Wright SJ (2004) Ecological determinism in plant community structure across a tropical forest landscape. Ecology 85:2526–2538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P (2002) Canoco reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows users guide. Software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  77. Ter Steege H, Sabatier D, Castellanos H, Van Andel T, Duivenvoorden J, De Oliveira AA (2000) An analysis of the floristic composition and diversity of Amazonian forests including those of the Guiana Shield. J Trop Ecol 15:801–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Ter Steege H, Pitman N, Sabatier D, Castellanos H, Van der Hout P, Vasques R, Van Andel T, Duivenvoorden J, De Oliveira AA, Ek R, Lilwah R, Thomas R, Van Essen J, Baider C, Maas P, Mori S, Terborgh J, Vargas PN, Mogollón H, Morawetz W (2003) A spatial model of tree α-diversity and tree density for the Amazon. Biodivers Conserv 12:2255–2277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Tracey JG (1969) Edaphic differentiation of some forest types in eastern Australia I. Soil physical factors. J Ecol 57:805–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Tuomisto H, Ruokolainen K (1993) Distribution of Pteridophyta and Melastomataceae along an edaphic gradient in an Amazonian rain forest. J Veg Sci 4:2534Google Scholar
  81. Tuomisto H, Ruokolainen K, Aguilar M, Sarimento A (2003a) Floristic patterns along a 43-km long transect in an Amazonian rain forest. J Ecol 91:743–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Tuomisto H, Ruokolainen K, Yli-Halla M (2003b) Dispersal, environment, and floristic variation of Western Amazonian forests. Science 299:241–244CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. UNESCO (2002) What is a biosphere reserve? http://www.unesco.org/mab/nutshell.htm
  84. Valencia R, Balslev H, Paz H, Miño CG (1994) High tree alpha-diversity in Amazonian Ecuador. Biodivers Conserv 3:21–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Valencia R, Foster RB, Villa G, Condit R, Svenning J-C, Hernández C, Romoleroux K, Losos E, Magårds E, Balslev H (2004) Tree species distributions and local habitat variation in the Amazon: large forest plot in eastern Ecuador. J Ecol 92:214–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Veldkamp E, Weitz AM, Staritsky IG, Huising EJ (1992) Deforestation trends in the Atlantic Zone of Costa Rica: a case study. Land Degrad Rehab 3:71–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  88. Vormisto J, Phillips OL, Ruokolainen K, Tuomisto H, Vázuez R (2000) A comparison of fine-scale distribution patterns of four plant groups in an Amazonia rainforest. Ecography 23:349–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Webb LJ (1969) Edaphic differentiation of some forest types in eastern Australia II. Soil chemical factors. J Ecol 57:817–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Whitmore TC (1975) Tropical rain forest of the Far East. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  91. Wright SJ (1992) Seasonal drought, soil fertility, and the species diversity of tropical forest plant communities. Trends Ecol Evol 7:260–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Development and the Environment (SUM)University of OsloOsloNorway
  2. 2.Department of Botany, Natural History MuseumUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
  3. 3.Department of Botany and Plant PhysiologyUniversity of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations