Plant Ecology

, Volume 207, Issue 2, pp 233–244

Morphological traits and water use strategies in seedlings of Mediterranean coexisting species

  • E. I. Hernández
  • A. Vilagrosa
  • J. G. Pausas
  • J. Bellot
Article

Abstract

The distribution of plants is associated with their different patterns of response to their environment. Mediterranean plants have evolved a number of morphological and physiological adaptations that determine their ability to survive and grow, being an effective water uptake and use important factors for drought resistance. In this article, we evaluated interspecific differences in morphology, biomass allocation, and architectural traits and their relationship with water use strategies in seedlings of seven co-occurring Mediterranean species (Anthyllis cytisoides L., Genista scorpius L. DC., Myrtus communis L., Pistacia lentiscus L., Rosmarinus officinalis L., Spartium junceum L. and Ulex parviflorus Pourr.). The results showed that morphological root features vary among species and they are significantly correlated with root hydraulic conductance and leaf gas exchange variables. Species with high specific root length (SRL) showed a low hydraulic conductance per root length (KRRL) but high specific hydraulic conductance (KAs). M. communis and P. lentiscus showed the most contrasting water use patterns with respect to the other species studied. The results are not affected when considering phylogenetic relatedness. Thus, the variability observed in root hydraulic properties and leaf gas exchange suggests important mechanisms for understanding species coexistence in water-limited ecosystems.

Keywords

Hydraulic conductance Leaf gas exchange Mediterranean species Root morphology 

Supplementary material

References

  1. Ackerly D (2004) Functional strategies of chaparral shrubs in relation to seasonal water deficit and disturbance. Ecol Monogr 74:25–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Addington RN, Donovan LA, Mitchell RJ, Vose JM, Pecot SD, Jack SB, Hacke UG, Sperry JS, Oren R (2006) Adjustments in hydraulic architecture of Pinus palustris to maintain similar stomatal conductance in xeric and mesic habitats. Plant Cell Environ 29:535–545CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell DT (2001) Ecological response syndromes in the flora of southwestern Western Australia: fire resprouters versus reseeders. Bot Rev 67:417–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bond BJ, Kavanagh KL (1999) Stomatal behaviour of four woody species in relation to leaf-specific hydraulic conductance and threshold water potential. Tree Physiol 19:503–510PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brodribb TJ, Feild TS (2000) Stem hydraulic supply is linked to leaf photosynthetic capacity: evidence from New Caledonian and Tasmanian rainforests. Plant Cell Environ 23:1381–1388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Canadell J, Zedler PH (1995) Underground structures of woody plants in Mediterranean ecosystems of Australia, California and Chile. In: Fox M, Kalin M, Zedler PH (eds) Ecology and biography of Mediterranean ecosystems in Chile, California and Australia. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, pp 177–210Google Scholar
  7. Chirino E, Vilagrosa A, Hernández EI, Matos A, Vallejo VR (2008) Effects of a deep container on morpho-functional characteristics and root colonization in Quercus suber L. seedlings for reforestation in Mediterranean climate. For Ecol Manag 256:779–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clemente AS, Rego FC, Correoa OA (2005) Growth, water relations and photosynthesis of seedlings and resprouts after fire. Acta Oecol 27:233–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cochard H, Rodolphe M, Gross P, Bogeat-Triboulot MB (2000) Temperature effects on hydraulic conductance and water relations of Quercus robur L. J Exp Bot 51:1255–1259CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis SD, Kolb KJ, Barton KP (1998) Ecophysiological processes and demographic patterns in the structuring of California chaparral. In: Rundel PW, Montenegro G, Jaksic FM (eds) Landscape disturbance and biodiversity in Mediterranean-type ecosystems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heildelberg, pp 297–310Google Scholar
  11. Davis SD, Ewers FW, Wood J, Reeves JJ, Kolb KJ (1999) Differential susceptibility to xylem cavitation among three pairs of Ceanothus species in the transverse mountain ranges of southern California. Ecoscience 6:180–186Google Scholar
  12. Ewers BE, Oren R, Sperry JS (2000) Influence of nutrient versus water supply on hydraulic architecture and water balance in Pinus taeda. Plant Cell Environ 23:1055–1066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Felsenstein J (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am Nat 125:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Filella I, Peñuelas J (2003) Partitioning of water and nitrogen in co-ocurring Mediterranean woody shrub species of different evolutionary history. Oecologia 137:51–61Google Scholar
  15. Fleck I, Diaz C, Pascual M, Iniguez FJ (1995) Ecophysiological differences between first-year resprouts after wildfire and unburned vegetation of Arbutus unedo and Coriaria myrtifolia. Acta Oecol 16:55–56Google Scholar
  16. Fleck I, Hogan KP, Llorens L, Abadía A, Aranda X (1998) Photosynthesis and photoprotection in Quercus ilex resprouts after fire. Tree Physiol 18:607–614PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Flexas J, Gulías J, Jonasson S, Medrano H, Mus M (2001) Seasonal patterns and control of gas exchange in local populations of the Mediterranean evergreen shrub Pistacia lentiscus L. Acta Oecol 22:33–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Galmés J, Flexas J, Savé R, Medrano H (2007) Water relations and stomatal characteristics of Mediterranean plants with different growth forms and leaf habits: responses to water stress and recovery. Plant Soil 290:139–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Green JJ, Baddeley JA, Cortina J, Watson CA (2005) Root development in the Mediterranean shrub Pistacia lentiscus as affected by nursery treatments. J Arid Environ 61:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hacke UG, Sperry JS, Pittermann J (2000) Drought experience and cavitation resistance in six shrubs from the Great Basin, Utah. Basic Appl Ecol 1:31–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hernández EI, Vilagrosa A, Luis VC, Llorca M, Chirino E, Vallejo VR (2009) Root hydraulic conductance, gas exchange and leaf water potential in seedlings of Pistacia lentiscus L. and Quercus suber L. grown under different conditions of fertilization and light regimes. Environ Exp Bot 67:269–276Google Scholar
  22. Huang B, Eissenstat DM (2000) Linking hydraulic conductivity to anatomy in plants that vary in specific root length. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 125:260–264Google Scholar
  23. Hubbard RM, Ryan MG, Stiller VS, Sperry JS (2001) Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis vary linearly with plant hydraulic conductance in ponderosa pine. Plant Cell Environ 24:113–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jacobsen AL, Ewers FW, Pratt RB, Paddock WA III, Davis SD (2005) Do xylem fibers affect vessel cavitation resistance? Plant Physiol 139:546–556CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Jacobsen AL, Agenbag L, Esler KJ, Pratt RB, Ewers FW, Davis SD (2007a) Xylem density, biomechanics and anatomical traits correlate with water stress in 17 evergreen shrub species of the Mediterranean-type climate region of South Africa. J Ecol 95:171–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Ewers FW, Davis SD (2007b) Cavitation resistance among 26 chaparral species of southern California. Ecol Monogr 77:99–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Davis SD, Ewers FW (2008) Comparative community physiology: nonconvergence in water relations among three semi-arid shrub communities. New Phytol 180:100–113CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Keeley JE (1998) Coupling demography, physiology and evolution in chaparral shrubs. In: Rundel PW, Montenegro G, Jaksic FM (eds) Landscape disturbance and biodiversity in Mediterranean-type ecosystems. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 257–264Google Scholar
  29. Keeley JE, Baer-Keeley M, Fotheringham CJ (2005) Alien plant dynamics following fire in Mediterranean-climate California shrublands. Ecol Appl 15:2109–2125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kummerow J (1981) Structure of roots and root systems. In: Di Castri F, Goodall DW, Specht RL (eds) Mediterranean-type shrublands. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp 269–288Google Scholar
  31. Lambers H, Shane MW, Cramer MD, Pearse SJ, Veneklaas EJ (2006) Root structure and functioning for efficient acquisition of phosphorus: matching morphological and physiological traits. Ann Bot 98:693–713CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Levin DA, Schmidt KP (1985) Dynamics of a hybrid zone in Phlox: an experimental demographic investigation. Am J Bot 72:1404–1409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Levitt J (1980) Responses of plants to environmental stress, 2nd edn. Academic Press, USA, p 454Google Scholar
  34. Lo Gullo MA, Salleo S (1988) Different strategies of drought resistance in three Mediterranean sclerophyllous trees growing in the same environmental conditions. New Phytol 108:267–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Martínez-Vilalta J, Piñol J, Beven K (2002) A hydraulic model to predict drought-induced mortality in woody plants: an application to climate change in the Mediterranean. Ecological Modelling 155:127–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Medrano H, Flexas J, Galmés J (2009) Variability in water use efficiency at the leaf level among Mediterranean plants with different growth forms. Plant Soil 317:17–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mencuccini M, Comstock J (1999) Variability in hydraulic architecture and gas exchange of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cultivars under well-watered conditions: interactions with leaf size. Funct Plant Biol 26:115–124Google Scholar
  38. Mitchell PJ, Veneklass EJ, Lambers H, Burgess SSO (2008) Leaf water relations during summer water deficit: differential responses in turgor maintenance and variation in leaf structure among different plant communities in south-western Australia. Plant Cell Environ 31:1791–1802CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Nardini A, Salleo S (2000) Limitation of stomatal conductance by hydraulic traits: sensing or preventing xylem cavitation? Trees 15:14–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Norby RJ, Ogle K, Curtis PS, Badeck FW, Huth A, Hurtt GC, Kohyama T, Peñuelas J (2001) Aboveground growth and competition in forest gap models: an analysis for studies of climatic change. Clim Chang 51:415–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ojeda F, Brun FG, Vergara JJ (2005) Fire, rain and the selection of seeder and resprouter life-histories in fire-recruiting, woody plants. New Phytol 168:155–165CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Osone Y, Tateno M (2005) Applicability and limitations of optimal biomass allocation models: a test of two species from fertile and infertile habitats. Ann Bot 95:1211–1220CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Ostonen I, Püttsepp Ü, Biel C, Alberton O, Bakker MR, Löhmus K, Majdi H, Metcalfe D, Olsthoorn AFM, Pronk A, Vanguelova E, Weih M, Brunner I (2007) Specific root length as an indicator of environmental change. Plant Biosyst 141:426–442Google Scholar
  44. Pardo C, Cubas P, Tahiri H (2004) Molecular phylogeny and systematics of Genista (Leguminosae) and related genera based on nucleotide sequences of nrDNA (ITS region) and cpDNA (trn L- trn F intergenic spacer). Plant Syst Evol 244:93–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Paula S, Pausas JG (2006) Leaf traits and resprouting ability in the Mediterranean basin. Funct Ecol 20:941–947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pausas JG (2004) Changes in fire and climate in the Eastern Iberian Peninsula (Mediterranean Basin). Clim Chang 63:337–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pausas JG, Bradstock RA, Keith DA, Keeley JE, The GCTE (Global Change of Terrestrial Ecosystems) Fire Network (2004) Plant functional traits in relation to fire in crown-fire ecosystems. Ecology 85:1085–1100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pemán J, Voltas J, Gil-Pelegrin E (2006) Morphological and functional variability in the root system of Quercus ilex L. subject to confinement: consequences for afforestation. Ann For Sci 63:425–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pou A, Flexas J, Alsina MDM, Bota J, Carambula C, De Herralde F, Galmés J, Lovisolo C, Jiménez M, Ribas-Carbó M, Rusjan D, Secchi F, Tomàs M, Zsófi Z, Medrano H (2008) Adjustments of water use efficiency by stomatal regulation during drought and recovery in the drought-adapted Vitis hybrid Richter-110 (V. berlandieri × V. rupestris). Physiol Plant 134:313–323CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Pratt RB, Jacobsen AL, Golgotiu KA, Sperry JS, Ewers FW, Davis SD (2007) Life history type and water stress tolerance in nine California chaparral species (Rhamnaceae). Ecol Monogr 77:239–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Preston KA, Cornwell WK, DeNoyer JL (2006) Wood density and vessel traits as distinct correlates of ecological strategy in 51 California coast range angiosperms. New Phytol 170:807–818Google Scholar
  52. Rieger M, Litvin P (1999) Root system hydraulic conductivity in species with contrasting root anatomy. J Exp Bot 50:201–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schwilk DW, Ackerly DD (2005) Limiting similarity and functional diversity along environmental gradients. Ecol Lett 8:272–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sellin A, Kupper P (2007) Effects of enhanced hydraulic supply for foliage on stomatal responses in little-leaf linden (Tilia cordata Mill.). Eur J Forest Res 126:241–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Silva JS, Rego FC, Martins-Louçsão MA (2002) Belowground traits of mediterranean woody plants in a portuguese shrubland. Ecol Mediterr 28:5–13Google Scholar
  56. Specht RL (1987) The effect of summer drought on vegetation structure in the Mediterranean climate region of Australia. In: Tenhunen JD, Catarino FM, Lange OL, Oechel WC (eds) Plant response to stress: functional analysis in Mediterranean ecosystems, NATO ASI Series. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 625–640Google Scholar
  57. Sperry JS, Hacke UG, Oren R, Comstock JP (2002) Water deficits and hydraulic limits to leaf water supply. Plant Cell Environ 25:251–263CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Steudle E (2000) Water uptake by roots: effects of water deficit. J Exp Bot 51:1531–1542CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Trubat R, Cortina J, Vilagrosa A (2006) Plant morphology and root hydraulics are altered by nutrient deficiency in Pistacia lentiscus. Trees 29:2153–2167Google Scholar
  60. Tyree MT, Davis SD, Cochard H (1994) Biophysical perspectives of xylem evolution: is there a tradeoff of hydraulic efficiency for vulnerability to disfunction? IAWA J 15:335–360Google Scholar
  61. Tyree MT, Patiño S, Bennink J, Alexander J (1995) Dynamic measurements of root hydraulic conductance using a high-pressure flowmeter in the laboratory and field. J Exp Bot 46:83–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tyree MT, Velez V, Dalling JW (1998) Growth dynamics of root and shoot hydraulic conductance in seedlings of five neotropical tree species: scaling to show possible adaptation to differing light regimes. Oecologia 114:93–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Valladares F, Hernández LG, Dobarro I, García-Pérez C, Sanz R, Pugnaire FI (2003) The ratio of leaf to total photosynthetic area influences shade survival and plastic response to light of green-stemmed leguminous shrub seedlings. Ann Bot 91:577–584CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Valladares F, Vilagrosa A, Peñuelas J, Ogaya R, Camarero JJ, Corchera L, Sisó S, Gil-Pelegrín E (2008) Estrés hídrico: ecofisiología y escalas de sequía. In: Valladares F (ed) Ecología del bosque mediterráneo en un mundo cambiante, 2nd edn. Organismo Autónomo de Parques Nacionales. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid, Spain, pp 163–190Google Scholar
  65. Vallejo VR, Bautista S, Cortina J (1999) Restoration for soil protection after disturbances. In: Trabaud L (ed) Life and environment in the Mediterranean. Southampton, WIT Press, pp 301–344Google Scholar
  66. Verdaguer D, Ojeda F (2002) Root starch storage and allocation patterns in seeder and resprouter seedlings of two Cape Erica (Ericaceae) species. Am J Bot 89:1189–1196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Vilagrosa A, Bellot J, Vallejo VR, Gil-Pelegrín E (2003) Cavitation, stomatal conductance, and leaf dieback in seedlings of two co-occurring Mediterranean shrubs during an intense drought. J Exp Bot 54:2015–2024CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Webb CO, Ackerly DD, Kembel SW (2008) Phylocom: software for the analysis of phylogenetic community structure and trait evolution. Bioinformatics 24:2098–2100CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. I. Hernández
    • 1
  • A. Vilagrosa
    • 2
  • J. G. Pausas
    • 3
  • J. Bellot
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de EcologíaUniversidad de AlicanteAlicanteSpain
  2. 2.Fundación Centro de Estudios Ambientales del Mediterráneo (CEAM)PaternaSpain
  3. 3.CIDE, CSIC, Apartado OficialAlbalSpain

Personalised recommendations