Plant Ecology

, 206:173

Interaction between large herbivore activities, vegetation structure, and flooding affects tree seedling emergence

  • Jan Van Uytvanck
  • Tanja Milotic
  • Maurice Hoffmann
Article

Abstract

Tree establishment in grazed vegetation mosaics involves a series of early bottlenecks, including seed dispersal, germination, seedling emergence, survival and growth. In a field experiment, we studied seedling emergence of two species with contrasting recruitment strategies, Fraxinus excelsior and Quercus robur, in five structurally different vegetations: grazed and ungrazed grassland, ruderal pioneer vegetation, soft rush tussocks, tall sedge mats and bramble scrub. In a simulation experiment, we studied the interaction effects of pre-emergence flooding (3 weeks of inundation), trampling and grazing (simulated by clipping) of grassland vegetation on the emergence and early growth of both tree species in grass swards. Seedling emergence was enhanced in low swards and sparse vegetation types. Despite different recruitment strategies, the interaction of flooding and trampling of swards enhanced seedling emergence of both species. Grazing of soft rush and tall sedges enhanced emergence of F. excelsior. Clipping grass swards increased early growth of emerging Q. robur. Our results support the hypothesis that natural disturbances of soil and vegetation create microsites for seedling emergence and reduce above-ground competition. In grazed systems however, these results suggest a discordant relationship between successful seedling emergence and subsequent seedling growth/survival during the establishment process in structurally different vegetations.

Keywords

Competition for light Grazing Natural disturbances Tree recruitment and establishment Trampling Vegetation gap 

References

  1. Agestam E, Eko PM, Nilsson U, Welander NT (2003) The effects of shelterwood density and site preparation on natural regeneration of Fagus sylvatica in southern Sweden. For Ecol Manage 176:61–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berkowitz AR, Canham CD, Kelly VR (1995) Competition vs facilitation of tree seedling growth and survival in early successional communities. Ecology 76:1156–1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bloor JMG, Leadley PW, Barthes L (2008) Responses of Fraxinus excelsior seedlings to grass-induced above- and below-ground competition. Plant Ecol 194:293–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bokdam J, Gleichman JM (2000) Effects of grazing by free-ranging cattle on vegetation dynamics in a continental north-west European heathland. J Appl Ecol 37:415–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caccia FD, Ballaré CL (1998) Effects of tree cover, understory vegetation, and litter on regeneration of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) in southwestern Argentina. Can J Forest Res 28:683–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Callaway RM, Kikvidze Z, Kikodze D (2000) Facilitation by unpalatable weeds may conserve plant diversity in overgrazed meadows in the Caucasus Mountains. Oikos 89:275–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clarke PJ (2002) Experiments on tree and shrub establishment in temperate grassy woodlands: seedling survival. Aust Ecol 27:606–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crawley MJ, Long CR (1995) Alternate bearing, predator satiation and seedling recruitment in Quercus robur L. J Ecol 83:683–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davis MA, Wrage KJ, Reich PB, Tjoelker MG, Schaeffer T, Muermann C (1999) Survival, growth, and photosynthesis of tree seedlings competing with herbaceous vegetation along a water-light-nitrogen gradient. Plant Ecol 145:341–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deiller AF, Walter JMN, Tremolieres M (2003) Regeneration strategies in a temperate hardwood floodplain forest of the Upper Rhine: sexual versus vegetative reproduction of woody species. For Ecol Manage 180:215–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eriksson O, Ehrlén J (1992) Seed and microsite limitation of recruitment in plant populations. Oecologia 91:360–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frost I, Rydin H (1997) Effects of competition, grazing and cotyledon nutrient supply on growth of Quercus robur seedlings. Oikos 79:53–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gardner G (1977) The reproductive capacity of Fraxinus excelsior on the Derbyshire Limestone. J Ecol 65:107–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gómez JM, Garcia D, Zamora R (2003) Impact of vertebrate acorn- and seedling-predators on a Mediterranean Quercus pyrenaica forest. For Ecol Manage 180:125–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Greiling DA, Kichanan N (2002) Old-field seedling responses to insecticide, seed addition, and competition. Plant Ecol 159:175–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grubb PJ (1988) The uncoupling of disturbance and recruitment, 2 kinds of seed bank, and persistence of plant-populations at the regional and local scales. Ann Zool Fenn 25:23–36Google Scholar
  17. Hagenah N, Munkert H, Gerhardt K, Olff H (2009) Interacting effects of grass height and herbivores on the establishment of an encroaching savanna shrub. Plant Ecol 201:553–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harmer R, Robertson M (2003) Seedling root growth of six broadleaved tree species grown in competition with grass under irrigated nursery conditions. Ann For Sci 60:601–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hodder KH, Bullock JM, Buckland BC, Kirby KJ (2005) Large herbivores in the wildwood and in modern naturalistic grazing systems. English Nature, PeterboroughGoogle Scholar
  20. Husheer SW, Robertson AW, Coomes DA, Frampton CM (2006) Herbivory and plant competition reduce mountain beech seedling growth and establishment in New Zealand. Plant Ecol 183:245–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones EW (1959) Biological flora of the British Isles: Quercus L. J Ecol 47:169–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jurena PN, Archer S (2003) Woody plant establishment and spatial heterogeneity in grasslands. Ecology 84:907–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kelt DA, Meserve PL, Forister ML, Nabors LK, Gutierrez JR (2004) Seed predation by birds and small mammals in semiarid Chile. Oikos 104:133–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kühne C, Bartsch N (2007) Germination of acorns and development of oak seedlings following flooding (Quercus robur L.) following flooding. J For Sci 53:391–399Google Scholar
  25. Mazia CN, Chaneton EJ, Ghersa CM, Leon RJC (2001) Limits to tree species invasion in Pampean grassland and forest plant communities. Oecologia 128:594–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nilsson U, Gemmel P, Johansson U, Karlsson M, Welander T (2002) Natural regeneration of Norway spruce, Scots pine and birch under Norway spruce shelterwoods of varying densities on a mesic-dry site in southern Sweden. For Ecol Manage 161:133–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nystrand O, Granstrom A (2000) Predation on Pinus sylvestris seeds and juvenile seedlings in Swedish boreal forest in relation to stand disturbance by logging. J Appl Ecol 37:449–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Oberdorfer E (1992) Süddeutsche Pflanzengesellschaften: Teil 4: Wälder und Gebüsche. Fischer, Jena, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  29. Olff H, Vera FWM, Bokdam J, Bakker ES, Gleichman JM, De Maeyer K, Smit R (1999) Shifting mosaics in grazed woodlands driven by the alternation of plant facilitation and competition. Plant Biol 1:127–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pérez-Camacho L, Rebollo S (2009) Are irrigation and grazing effects transferred, accumulated or counteracted during plant recruitment? Plant Ecol 201:501–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Posada JM, Mitchell Aide T, Cavelier J (2000) Cattle and weedy shrubs as restoration tools of tropical montane rainforest. Restor Ecol 8:370–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Putman RJ (1986) Grazing in temperate ecosystems. Large herbivores and the ecology of the New Forest. Croom Helm, BeckenhamGoogle Scholar
  33. Rackham O (1980) Ancient woodland. Its history, vegetation and uses in England. London, UKGoogle Scholar
  34. Raquin C, Jung-Muller B, Dufour J, Frascaria-Lacoste N (2002) Rapid seedling obtaining from European ash species Fraxinus excelsior (L.) and Fraxinus angustifolia (Vahl.). Ann For Sci 59:219–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Reyes O, Casal M (2006) Seed germination of Quercus robur, Q. pyrenaica and Q. ilex and the effects of smoke, heat, ash and charcoal. Ann For Sci 63:205–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rudinger MCD, Dounavi A (2008) Underwater germination potential of common ash seed (Fraxinus excelsior L.) originating from flooded and non-flooded sites. Plant Biol 10:382–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schupp EW (1995) Seed seedling conflicts, habitat choice, and patterns of plant recruitment. Am J Bot 82:399–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Setterfield SA (2002) Seedling establishment in an Australian tropical savanna: effects of seed supply, soil disturbance and fire. J Appl Ecol 39:949–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Smit C, Beguin D, Buttler A, Muller-Scharer H (2005) Safe sites for tree regeneration in wooded pastures: a case of associational resistance? J Veg Sci 16:209–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Smit C, Gusberti M, Muller-Scharer H (2006) Safe for saplings; safe for seeds? For Ecol Manage 237:471–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tapper PG (1992) Demography of persistent juveniles in Fraxinus excelsior. Ecography 15:385–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tapper PG (1996) Tree dynamics in a successional Alnus-Fraxinus woodland. Ecography 19:237–244Google Scholar
  43. Thompson K, Bekker RM (1997) Soil seed banks of NW Europe: methodology. density and longevity. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  44. Trimble SW, Mendel AC (1995) The cow as a geomorphic agent—a critical review. Geomorphology 13:233–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. van der Valk AG, Warner BG (2009) The development of patterned mosaic landscapes. Plant Ecol 200:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Van Splunder I, Coops H, Voesenek LAC, Blom CWP (1995) Establishment of alluvial forest species in floodplains: the role of dispersal timing, germination characteristics and water level fluctuations. Acta Bot Neerl 44:269–278Google Scholar
  47. Van Uytvanck J, Decleer K, Hoffmann M (2008a) Establishment patterns of woody species in low intensity grazed pastures after the cessation of intensive agricultural use. For Ecol Manage 256:106–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Van Uytvanck J, Maes D, Vandenhaute D, Hoffmann M (2008b) Restoration of woodpasture on former agricultural land: the importance of safe sites and time gaps before grazing for tree seedlings. Biol Conserv 141:78–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vandenberghe C, Frelechoux F, Gadallah F, Buttler A (2006) Competitive effects of herbaceous vegetation on tree seedling emergence, growth and survival: does gap size matter? J Veg Sci 17:481–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vandenberghe C, Frelechoux F, Buttler A (2008) The influence of competition from herbaceous vegetation and shade on simulated browsing tolerance of coniferous and deciduous saplings. Oikos 117:415–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vera FWM (2000) Grazing ecology and forest history. CABI Publishing, Oxon, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wardle P (1961) Biological flore of the British Isles: Fraxinus excelsior L. J Ecol 49:739–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Weiner J (1990) Asymmetric competition in plant-populations. Trends Ecol Evol 5:360–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Willoughby I, Jinks RL, Kerr G, Gosling PG (2004) Factors affecting the success of direct seeding for lowland afforestation in the UK. Forestry 77:467–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Winn AA (1985) Effects of seed size and microsite on seedling emergence of prunella vulgaris in four habitats. J Ecol 73:831–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ziegenhagen B, Kausch W (1995) Productivity of young shaded oaks (Quercus robur L.) as corresponding to shoot morphology and leaf anatomy. For Ecol Manage 72:97–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan Van Uytvanck
    • 1
    • 2
  • Tanja Milotic
    • 1
  • Maurice Hoffmann
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Research Institute for Nature and ForestBrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.Terrestrial Ecology Unit, Department of BiologyGhent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations