Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Quantitative estimation of vegetation changes by comparing two vegetation maps

  • 115 Accesses

  • 6 Citations

Abstract

The main goal of our work was to estimate how large the errors are associated with repeated vegetation mapping. We compared two vegetation maps (both 1:10 000) of the Pieniny National Park—ca 2300 ha (southern Poland), the first made in 1966 and the second in 2001. We superimposed—using the ARC-INFO software—a dense grid of points (50 × 50 m) upon each map, and we determined the identity of vegetation unit in each point for the year 1966 and for the year 2001. That procedure was repeated 100 times, each time changing the position of the grid by a random vector. To estimate the size of mapping errors, we compared the patches of communities which should not change their location during 35 years: vegetation of rocky outcrops and local wet depressions, and fertile beech forest, considered a climax community for the Pieniny Mountains. Overlapping small vegetation patches (average patch size below 0.5 ha) yielded highly erroneous results, while the reliability of overlapping the communities with large patches is much higher, exceeding 80% for average patch size of 5 ha. Taking into consideration the communities of average patch size of 1 ha, we can estimate that the vegetation has undergone profound changes: some communities expanded, while others shrunk. The area of meadows remained about the same, but majority of meadows in 2001 was located in former arable fields and previous meadow areas become forested. Among beech forests, we recorded an increase of area covered by floristically rich variants at the expense of floristically poor variants. We conclude that some information about vegetation changes may be obtained only by comparing sequential vegetation maps, but the reliability of the results strongly depends on the size of vegetation patches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Aviksoo K (1993) Changes in 5plant cover and land use types (1950’s to 1980’s) in three mire reserves and their neighborhood in Estonia. Landsc Ecol 8(4):287–301. doi:10.1007/BF00125134

  2. Bernhardt-Römermann M, Kudernatsch T, Pfadenhauer J (2007) Long-term effects of nitrogen deposition on vegetation in a deciduous forest near Munich Germany. Appl Veg Sci 10:399–406

  3. Bodziarczyk J, Krzus A (2006) Relative age of Phyllitis scolopendrium phytocoenoses as determined by population structure analysis. Bot Guideb 29:47–54

  4. Bodziarczyk J, Szwagrzyk J (1995) Species composition and structure of forest stands in Phyllitido Aceretum community. Ekol pol 43(3–4):153–173

  5. Bodziarczyk J, Kucharzyk S, Różański W (1992) Wtórna sukcesja roślinności leśnej na opuszczonych polanach kośnych w Pienińskim Parku Narodowym [Secondary succession on the abandoned hay-growing glades in the Pieniny National Park (Polish Western Carpathians)]. Pieniny-Przyroda i Człowiek 2:25–41

  6. Bodziarczyk J, Szwagrzyk J, Michalcewicz J (1996) Procesy spontanicznej renaturalizacji w Pienińskim Parku Narodowym [Processes of spontaneous renaturalization in the Pieniny National Park]. Przegl Przyrodniczy 7(3–4):83–94

  7. Bodziarczyk J, Michalcewicz J, Szwagrzyk J (1999) Secondary forest succession in abandoned glades of the Pieniny National Park. Pol J Ecol 47(2):172–189

  8. Braun-Blanquet J (1964) Pflanzensociologie, 3rd edn. Springer, Wien, New York

  9. Butaye J, Honnay O, Hermy M (1999) Vegetation mapping as an aid detecting temporal vegetation changes in the Demer valley (Belgium). Belg J Bot 132(2):119–140

  10. Dziewolski J (1991) Naturalny rozwój drzewostanów Pienińskiego Parku Narodowego w czasie 51 lat (1936–1987) [Natural development of forest stands in the Pieniny National Park over the period of 51 years (1936–1987)]. Ochrona Przyrody 49(1):11–128

  11. Dzwonko Z (1993) Relations between the floristic composition of isolated young woods and their proximity to ancient woodlands. J Veg Sci 4:693–698. doi:10.2307/3236135

  12. Dzwonko Z, Gawroński S (1994) The role of woodland fragments soil types and dominant species in secondary succession on the western Carpathian foothills. Vegetatio 111:149–160. doi:10.1007/BF00040334

  13. Dzwonko Z, Grodzińska K (1979) Numerical classification of epilithic and xerothermic communities in the Pieniny Mountains. Fragm Flor Geobot 25(4):493–508

  14. Faliński JB (1994) Comparison of the maps and general experiences in the vegetation cartography. Phytocoenosis 6(N S):91–104

  15. Ferreira SM, McKinlay B (2000) Recent vegetation trends at the Cromwell Chafer Beetle Nature Reserve in Central Otago New Zealand. NZ J Bot 38(2):235–244

  16. Greco S, Petriccione B, Pignatti F (1994) Vegetation mapping: numerical comparative study of six maps of Białowieża Forest. Phytocoenosis 6(N S):105–113

  17. Grodzińska K (1973) Zbiorowiska chwastów polnych Pienińskiego Pasa Skałkowego [Segetal communities of the Pieniny Klippenbelt (Polish Western Carpathians)]. Fragm Flor Geobot 19(2):151–173

  18. Grodzińska K, Jasiewicz A, Pancer-Kotejowa E, Zarzycki K (1982) Mapa zbiorowisk roślinnych Pieninskiego Parku Narodowego 1965–1968 [vegetation map of the Pieniny National Park (Western Carpathians) 1965–1968]. Supplement to: Zarzycki K (Ed) Przyroda Pienin w obliczu zmian—the Pieniny’s nature in the wake of changes. Studia Naturae 30

  19. Guzik M (2008) Analiza wpływu czynników naturalnych i antropogenicznych na kształtowanie się zasięgu lasu i kosodrzewiny w Tatrach. Dissertation, University of Agriculture in Kraków

  20. Kaźmierczakowa R (ed) (2004) Charakterystyka i mapa zbiorowisk roślinnych Pienińskiego Parku Narodowego [Characteristics and map of plant communities of the Pieniny National Park]. Studia Naturae 49:1–348

  21. Kleinod K, Wissen M, Bock M (2005) Detecting vegetation changes in a wetland area in Northern Germany using earth observations and geodata. J Nat Conserv 13:115–125. doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2005.01.004

  22. Kornaś J, Dubiel E (1991) Land use und vegetation changes in the hay meadows of the Ojców National Park during last thirty years. Veroff Geobot Inst ETH 106:208–231

  23. Küchler AW (1988a) Boundaries, transitions and continua. In: Küchler AW, Zonneveld IS (eds) Vegetation mapping. Handbook of vegetation science, vol 10. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 105–110

  24. Küchler AW (1988b) Mapping dynamic vegetation. In: Küchler AW, Zonneveld IS (eds) Vegetation mapping. Handbook of vegetation science, vol 10. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 321–329

  25. Kulczyński S (1928) Die Pflanzenassoziationen der Pieninen. Bull Acad Pol Sci Cl Math B 2:57–203

  26. Łysik M (2008) Ten years of change in ground-layer vegetation of European beech forest in the protected area (Ojców National Park, South Poland). Pol J Ecol 56:17–31

  27. Matuszkiewicz W (1984) Die Karte der potentiellen natürlichen Vegetation von Polen. Braun-Blanquetia 1:1–99

  28. Matuszkiewicz W (2001) Przewodnik do oznaczania zbiorowisk roślinnych Polski. PWN, Warszawa

  29. Mill W (2007) Dynamic modelling of Polish forest soil response to changes in atmospheric acid deposition. Environ Prot Eng 3:39–45

  30. Pancer-Kotejowa E (1973) Zbiorowiska leśne Pienińskiego Parku Narodowego [Forest communities of the Pieniny National Park (Western Carpathians)]. Fragm Flor Geobot 19(2):197–258

  31. Peterken GF, Game M (1984) Historical factors affecting the number and distribution of vascular plant species in the woodlands of central Lincolnshire. J Ecol 72:155–182. doi:10.2307/2260011

  32. Poore MED (1956) The use of phytosociological methods in ecological investigations. IV. General discussion of phytosociological problems. J Ecol 44:28–50. doi:10.2307/2257153

  33. Sanders ME, Dirkse GM, Slim PA (2004) Objectifying thematic, spatial and temporal aspects of vegetation mapping for monitoring. Commun Ecol 5:81–91. doi:10.1556/ComEc.5.2004.1.8

  34. van der Maarel E, Boot R, van Dorp D, Rijntjes J (1985) Vegetation succession on the dunes near Oostvoorne, the Netherlands; a comparison of the vegetation in 1959 and 1980. Vegetatio 58:137–187. doi:10.1007/BF00163874

  35. Weiers S, Bock M, Wissen M, Rossner G (2004) Mapping and indicator approaches for the assessment of habitats at different scales using remote sensing and GIS methods. Landsc Urban Plan 67:43–65. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00028-8

  36. Wildi O, Feldmeyer-Christe E, Ghosh S, Zimmermann NE (2004) Comments on vegetation monitoring approaches. Commun Ecol 5:1–5. doi:10.1556/ComEc.5.2004.1.1

  37. Wittig R, Alberternst B (1999) The importance of geobotanical methods for biomonitoring in protected areas. Phytocoenosis Suppl Cartografiae Geobotanicae 11:155–160

  38. Zarzycki K (1981) Rośliny naczyniowe Pienin: Rozmieszczenie i warunki występowania [the vascular plants of the Pieniny Mountains (West Carpathians): distribution and habitats]. PWN, Warszawa-Kraków

  39. Zarzycki K (ed) (1982) Przyroda Pienin w obliczu zmian [The Pieniny’s nature in the wake of changes]. Studia Naturae 30:3–578

  40. Zarzycki J, Kaźmierczakowa R (2006) Przemiany łąk świeżych i pastwisk w Pienińskim Parku Narodowym w ciągu ostatnich 35 lat XX wieku [changes in fresh meadows and pastures in the Pieniny National Park during the last 35 years of the last 20th century]. Studia Naturae 54(1):275–304

  41. Zonneveld IS (1988) Monitoring vegetation and surveying dynamics. In: Küchler AW, Zonneveld IS (eds) Vegetation mapping. Handbook of vegetation science, vol 10. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 331–334

Download references

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to Krystyna Grodzińska, Jan Holeksa and Jerzy Lesiński for their helpful comments on the earlier versions of the manuscript.

Author information

Correspondence to Elżbieta Pancer-Koteja.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 5, 6.

Table 5 A scheme of pooling plant communities in order to compare two vegetation maps
Table 6 Result of superimposing vegetation maps from 1966 and from 2001—number of points (see “Methods”)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pancer-Koteja, E., Szwagrzyk, J. & Guzik, M. Quantitative estimation of vegetation changes by comparing two vegetation maps. Plant Ecol 205, 139 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-009-9604-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Plant communities
  • Vegetation dynamics
  • Western Carpathians