Plant Ecology

, Volume 204, Issue 2, pp 207–216

Defining plant functional groups to guide rare plant management

  • Andrew J. Franks
  • Colin J. Yates
  • Richard J. Hobbs
Article

Abstract

To effectively manage plant populations for conservation, there is a need to provide reliable information on the conditions required for maintaining viable populations. This is particularly true for the management of populations of rare plant taxa. Western Australia contains over 45% of Australia’s gazetted rare or threatened flora, 80% of which are found within the highly fragmented southwest region. Resources do not exist to undertake comprehensive studies on the population dynamics and demographics for every rare plant of this diverse region. Here, we describe a method of classifying rare plant taxa into functional groups as a basis for guiding rare flora conservation and management. Data on four floral and two life-history traits were collected for each of the 351 declared rare flora taxa of Western Australia. A hierarchical, agglomerative clustering method was applied to the resulting taxa by traits matrix to extract emergent groupings of plant taxa. The resulting polythetic groups were analysed to determine the variation in traits, including response to disturbance and recorded flower visitors, and how these may affect population persistence in a fragmented landscape. Multivariate methods were used to define emergent groups based on a combination of floral structure and life-history traits of the declared rare flora of Western Australia. Seven emergent functional groups were identified and were largely differentiated by flower shape and life form. These seven functional groupings varied significantly in their response to disturbance. By deriving these functional groups, we plan to develop models for each group on how rates of pollination, seed production and seed fitness are affected by population size and landscape context. The rationale would be to use these profiles to determine whether there are thresholds in population size or position in the landscape at which reproductive rates severely decline. General management guidelines could then be developed for each functional group.

Keywords

Declared rare flora Functional groups Generalisation Pollination Western Australia 

Abbreviations

DRF

Declared rare flora

SWAFR

Southwest Australian Floristic Region

Supplementary material

11258_2009_9585_MOESM1_ESM.doc (1.5 mb)
DOC 1,555 kb

References

  1. Aizen MA, Feinsinger P (1994) Forest fragmentation, pollination, and plant reproduction in a Chaco dry forest, Argentina. Ecology 75:330–351. doi:10.2307/1939538 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blondel J (2003) Guilds or functional groups: does it matter? Oikos 100:223–231. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12152.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bond WJ (1994) Do mutualisms matter? Assessing the impact of pollinator and disperser disruption on plant extinction. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B 344:83–90. doi:10.1098/rstb.1994.0055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradstock RA, Kenny BJ (2003) An application of plant functional types to fire management in a conservation reserve in southeastern Australia. J Veg Sci 14:345–354. doi:10.1658/1100-9233(2003)014[0345:AAOPFT]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown A, Thomson-Dans C, Marchant N (eds) (1998) Western Australia’s threatened flora. Department of Conservation and Land Management, PerthGoogle Scholar
  6. Clarke KR, Gorley RN (2001) PRIMER v5: user manual/tutorial. PRIMER-E, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
  7. Coates DJ, Atkins KA (2001) Priority setting and the conservation of Western Australia’s diverse and highly endemic flora. Biol Conserv 97:251–263. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00123-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dafni A (1992) Pollination ecology. A practical approach. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Díaz S, Cabido M (2001) Vive la différence: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends Ecol Evol 16:646–655. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02283-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Endress PK (1994) Diversity and evolutionary biology of tropical flowers. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Faegri K, van der Pijl L (1979) The principles of pollination ecology. Pergamon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. Gitay H, Noble IR (1997) What are functional types and how should we seek them? In: Smith TM, Shugart HH, Woodward FI (eds) Plant functional types. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–19Google Scholar
  13. Glanznig A (1995) Native vegetation clearance, habitat loss and biodiversity decline. An overview of recent native vegetation clearance in Australia and its implications for biodiversity. Biodiversity Unit, Department of the Environment, Sport and Territories, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  14. Gower JC (1971) A general co-efficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics 27:857–871. doi:10.2307/2528823 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hobbs RJ (1993) Effects of landscape fragmentation on ecosystem processes in the Western Australian wheatbelt. Biol Conserv 64:193–201. doi:10.1016/0006-3207(93)90321-Q CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hopper SD, Gioia P (2004) The Southwest Australian Floristic Region: evolution and conservation of a global hot spot of diversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:623–650. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.112202.130201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jennersten O (1988) Pollination in Dianthus deltoides (Caryophyllaceae): effects of habitat fragmentation on visitation and seed set. Conserv Biol 2:359–366. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.1988.tb00200.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnson SD, Steiner KE (2000) Generalization versus specialization in plant pollination systems. Trends Ecol Evol 15:140–143. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01811-X PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kearns CA, Inouye DW, Waser NM (1998) Endangered mutualisms: the conservation of plant–pollinator interactions. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29:83–112. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.83 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kolb A, Diekmann M (2005) Effects of life-history traits on responses of plant species to forest fragmentation. Conserv Biol 19:929–938. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00065.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lambeck RJ (1997) Focal species: a multi-species umbrella for nature conservation. Conserv Biol 11:849–856. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.96319.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lavorel S, Garnier E (2002) Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail. Funct Ecol 16:545–556. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00664.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lavorel S, McIntyre S, Landsberg J, Forbes TDA (1997) Plant functional classifications: from general groups to specific groups based on response to disturbance. Trends Ecol Evol 12:474–478. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01219-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ludwig JA, Reynolds JF (1988) Statistical ecology: a primer on methods and computing. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. McIntyre S, Díaz S, Lavorel S, Cramer W (1999) Plant functional types and disturbance dynamics—introduction. J Veg Sci 10:604–608. doi:10.2307/3237077 Google Scholar
  26. Noble IR, Gitay H (1996) A functional classification for predicting the dynamics of landscapes. J Veg Sci 7:329–336. doi:10.2307/3236276 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Noble IR, Slatyer RO (1980) The use of vital attributes to predict successional changes in plant communities subject to recurrent disturbances. Vegetatio 43:5–21. doi:10.1007/BF00121013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Paczkowska G, Chapman AR (2000) The Western Australian Flora. Wildflower Society of Western Australia, Western Australian Herbarium, Department of Conservation and Land Management, Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority, PerthGoogle Scholar
  29. Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ, Margules CR (1991) Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conserv Biol 5:18–32. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.1991.tb00384.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Smith TM, Shugart HH, Woodward FI, Burton PJ (1993) Plant functional types. In: Solomon SM, Shugart HH (eds) Vegetation dynamics and global change. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp 272–292Google Scholar
  31. Spira TP (2001) Plant pollinator interactions; a threatened mutualism with implications for the ecology and management of rare plants. Nat Areas J 21:78–88Google Scholar
  32. Thompson JD (2001) How do visitation patterns vary among pollinators in relation to floral display and floral design in a generalist pollination system? Oecologia 126:386–394. doi:10.1007/s004420000531 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Walker J, Hopkins MS (1990) Vegetation. In: McDonald RC, Isbell RF, Speight JG, Walker J, Hopkins MS (eds) Australian soil and land survey handbook. Inkata Press, Melbourne, pp 58–86Google Scholar
  34. Waser NM, Chittka L, Price MV, Williams NM, Ollerton J (1996) Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters. Ecology 77:1043–1060. doi:10.2307/2265575 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Western Australian Herbarium (1998) FloraBase—information on the Western Australian Flora. Department of Conservation and Land Management, Perth. http://florabase.calm.wa.gov.au
  36. Woodward FI, Cramer W (1996) Plant functional types and climatic changes. Introduction. J Veg Sci 7:306–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yates CJ, Ladd PG (2004) Breeding system, pollination and demography in the rare granite shrub Verticordia staminosa ssp. staminosa in south-west Western Australia. Austral Ecol 29:189–200. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2004.01336.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew J. Franks
    • 1
    • 2
  • Colin J. Yates
    • 3
  • Richard J. Hobbs
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Environmental ScienceMurdoch UniversityMurdochAustralia
  2. 2.GHD Pty LtdBrisbaneAustralia
  3. 3.Department of Environment and ConservationBentley Delivery CentreBentleyAustralia
  4. 4.School of Plant BiologyThe University of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia

Personalised recommendations