Advertisement

Plant Ecology

, 204:11 | Cite as

Hedgerows as an environment for forest plants: a comparative case study of five species

  • Stephan WehlingEmail author
  • Martin Diekmann
Article

Abstract

Many areas in Europe are dominated by agricultural land use, and as a consequence, many typical forest plant species suffer from habitat loss and fragmentation. Hedgerows, one of the common elements of rural landscapes, have been considered as potential refuges for these species. The main objective of this study was to examine whether forests and hedgerows differ in environmental conditions, and whether important life-history attributes of the populations differ between the two habitat types. We selected five species commonly found in the region in both forests and hedgerows (Adoxa moschatellina, Anemone nemorosa, Circaea lutetiana, Polygonatum multiflorum and Stellaria holostea), and sampled data on 10 populations of each species in each habitat type, including measurements of light and various soil factors. Hedgerows had higher relative light availability and tended to have higher soil nutrient contents and lower soil water values than forests. The comparison of plant performance values between habitat types did not show consistent patterns across species. Anemone and Polygonatum performed equally well in hedgerows and forests, whereas Stellaria appeared to have a higher fitness in hedgerows. In contrast, Circaea showed a higher reproduction under forest conditions. For Adoxa, the results were somewhat contradictory: whereas the reproductive output of this species was higher in forests, population density was higher in hedgerows. The abiotic factors most closely related to the performance values were relative light and soil water availability. The majority of plant performance values did not differ between hedgerows and forests. We therefore conclude that the tested forest species are capable of growing also in hedgerows and will survive equally well in forest and its “surrogate” habitat.

Keywords

Agricultural land use Light availability Plant performance Reproductive output Soil nutrients 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the grant to S.W. from the German Federal Environmental Foundation (Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt, DBU). We also thank our colleagues at the University of Bremen and two anonymous reviewers for their useful comments and constructive suggestions on the earlier versions of this article.

References

  1. Andrews M, Mercer C, Griffin P, Andrews ME, Cherrill A (1999) Autecology of common herbaceous hedgerow species in Britain. Asp Appl Biol 54:353–360Google Scholar
  2. Baudry J, Bunce RGH, Burel F (2000) Hedgerows: an international perspective on their origin, function and management. J Environ Manage 60:7–22. doi: 10.1006/jema.2000.0358 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bossuyt B, Hermy M, Deckers B (1999) Migration of herbaceous plant species across ancient-recent forest ecotones in central Belgium. J Ecol 87:628–638. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.1999.00379.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cherrill A, Mercer C, McClean C, Tudor G (2001) Assessing the floristic diversity of hedge networks: a landscape perspective. Landsc Res 26:55–64. doi: 10.1080/01426390120024484 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Corbit M, Marks PL, Gardescu S (1999) Hedgerows as habitat corridors for forest herbs in central New York, USA. J Ecol 87:220–232. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.1999.00339.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cunningham SA (2000) Effects of habitat fragmentation on the reproductive ecology of four plant species in mallee woodland. Conserv Biol 14:758–768. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98609.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. de Blois S, Domon G, Bouchard A (2002) Factors affecting plant distribution in hedgerows of southern Quebec. Biol Conserv 105:355–367. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00219-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Keersmaeker L, Martens L, Verheyen K, Hermy M, De Schrijver A, Lust N (2004) Impact of soil fertility and insolation on diversity of herbaceous woodland species colonizing afforestations in Muizen forest (Belgium). For Ecol Manage 188:291–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deckers B, De Becker P, Honnay O, Hermy M, Muys B (2005) Sunken roads as habitats for forest plant species in a dynamic agricultural landscape: effects of age and isolation. J Biogeogr 32:99–109. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2004.01101.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ellenberg H (1996) Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen. Eugen Ulmer, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  11. Ellenberg H, Weber HE, Düll R, Wirth V, Werner W, Paulißen D (1992) Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. Scr Geobot 18:1–258Google Scholar
  12. Endels P, Adriaens D, Verheyen K, Hermy M (2004) Population structure and adult plant performance of forest herbs in three contrasting habitats. Ecography 27:225–241. doi: 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2004.03731.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Forman RTT (1995) Land mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and regions. University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Forman RTT, Baudry J (1984) Hedgerows and hedgerow networks in landscape ecology. Environ Manage 8:495–510. doi: 10.1007/BF01871575 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Freemark KE, Boutin C, Keddy CJ (2002) Importance of farmland habitats for conservation of plant species. Conserv Biol 16:399–412. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00387.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. French DD, Cummins RP (2001) Classification, composition, richness and diversity of British hedgerows. Appl Veg Sci 4:213–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fritz R, Merriam G (1993) Fencerow habitats for plants moving between farmland forests. Biol Conserv 64:141–148. doi: 10.1016/0006-3207(93)90650-P CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grashof-Bokdam C (1997) Forest species in an agricultural landscape in the Netherlands: effects of habitat fragmentation. J Veg Sci 8:21–28. doi: 10.2307/3237238 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Green RE, Cornell SJ, Scharlemann JPW, Balmford A (2005) Farming and the fate of wild nature. Science 307:550–555. doi: 10.1126/science.1106049 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grime JP, Hodgson JP, Hunt R (1988) Comparative plant ecology: a functional approach to common British species. Unwin Hyman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Hegarty CA, McAdam JH, Cooper A (1994) Factors influencing the plant species composition of hedges––implications for management in environmentally sensitive areas. Br Crop Prot Counc Monogr 58:227–234Google Scholar
  22. Helliwell DR (1975) The distribution of woodland plant species in some Shropshire hedgerows. Biol Conserv 7:61–72. doi: 10.1016/0006-3207(75)90030-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hermy M, Honnay O, Firbank L, Grashof-Bokdam C, Lawesson JE (1999) An ecological comparison between ancient and other forest plant species of Europe, and the implications for forest conservation. Biol Conserv 91:9–22. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00045-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Holderegger R, Stehlik I, Schneller JJ (1998) Estimation of the relative importance of sexual and vegetative reproduction in the clonal woodland herb Anemone nemorosa. Oecologia 117:105–107. doi: 10.1007/s004420050637 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Honnay O, Degroote B, Hermy M (1998) Ancient-forest plant species in western Belgium: a species list and possible ecological mechanisms. Belg J Bot 130:139–154Google Scholar
  26. Honnay O, Hermy M, Coppin P (1999) Impact of habitat quality on forest plant species colonization. For Ecol Manage 115:157–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hughes JW, Fahey TJ (1991) Colonization dynamics of herbs and shrubs in a disturbed northern hardwood forest. J Ecol 79:605–616. doi: 10.2307/2260656 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jobin B, Boutin C, DesGranges J-L (1997) Effects of agricultural practices on the flora of hedgerows and woodland edges in southern Quebec. Can J Plant Sci 77:293–299Google Scholar
  29. Kleijn D, Snoeijing GIJ (1997) Field boundary vegetation and the effects of agrochemical drift: botanical change caused by low levels of herbicide and fertilizer. J Appl Ecol 34:1413–1425. doi: 10.2307/2405258 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Klotz S, Kühn I, Durka W (2002) Eine Datenbank mit biologisch-ökologischen Merkmalen zur Flora von Deutschland. Schr Reihe Vegetationskde 38:1–334Google Scholar
  31. McCollin D, Jackson JI, Bunce RGH, Barr CJ, Stuart R (2000) Hedgerows as habitat for woodland plants. J Environ Manage 60:77–90. doi: 10.1006/jema.2000.0363 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Middleton J, Merriam G (1983) Distribution of woodland species in farmland woods. J Appl Ecol 20:625–644. doi: 10.2307/2403531 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Peterken GF (2000) Rebuilding networks of forest habitats in lowland England. Landsc Res 25:291–303. doi: 10.1080/713684681 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pigott CD, Taylor K (1964) The distribution of some woodland herbs in relation to the supply of nitrogen and phosphorus in the soil. J Anim Ecol 33:175–185. doi: 10.2307/2438 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Roy V, de Blois S (2006) Using functional traits to assess the role of hedgerow corridors as environmental filters for forest herbs. Biol Conserv 130:592–603. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.01.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schlenker G (1968) Kulturversuche mit Waldbodenpflanzen bei abgestufter Azidität und variierter Stickstoff-Form. Oecol Plant 3:7–27Google Scholar
  37. Schmidt M, von Oheimb G, Kriebitzsch W-U, Ellenberg H (2002) Liste der im norddeutschen Tiefland typischen Waldgefäßpflanzen. Mitt Bundesforschungsanst Forst-Holzwirtsch 206:1–37Google Scholar
  38. Schmucki R, de Blois S Population structures and individual performances of Trillium grandiflorum in hedgerow and forest habitats. Plant Ecol (in press). doi: 10.1007/s11258-008-9460-8
  39. Shirreffs DA (1985) Anemone nemorosa L. J Ecol 73:1005–1020. doi: 10.2307/2260164 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Slade EA, Causton DR (1979) The germination of some woodland herbaceous species under laboratory conditions: a multifactorial study. New Phytol 83:549–557. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1979.tb07476.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sparks TH, Meek WR, Mountford JO, Pywell RF (2000) The spatial distribution of herbs and woody species in the hedgerows of an arable farm. Asp Appl Biol 58:401–406Google Scholar
  42. Tsiouris S, Marshall EJP (1998) Observations on patterns of granular fertiliser deposition beside hedges and its likely effects on the botanical composition of field margins. Ann Appl Biol 132:115–127. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1998.tb05189.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Usher MB, Brown AC, Bedford SE (1992) Plant species richness in farm woodlands. Forestry 65:1–13. doi: 10.1093/forestry/65.1.1-a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Valverde T, Silvertown J (1995) Spatial variation in the seed ecology of a woodland herb (Primula vulgaris) in relation to light environment. Funct Ecol 9:942–950. doi: 10.2307/2389993 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Valverde T, Silvertown J (1998) Variation in the demography of a woodland understorey herb (Primula vulgaris) along the forest regeneration cycle: projection matrix analysis. J Ecol 86:545–562. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.1998.00280.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Verburg R, Maas J, During HJ (2000) Clonal diversity in differently-aged populations of the pseudo-annual clonal plant Circaea lutetiana L. Plant Biol 2:646–652. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-16633 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Verheyen K, Hermy M (2001) The relative importance of dispersal limitation of vascular plants in secondary forest succession in Muizen Forest, Belgium. J Ecol 89:829–840. doi: 10.1046/j.0022-0477.2001.00596.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wehling S, Diekmann M (2008) Factors influencing the spatial distribution of forest plant species in hedgerows of North-western Germany. Biodivers Conserv 17:2799–2813. doi: 10.1007/s10531-007-9294-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wulf M (1997) Plant species as indicators of ancient woodland in northwestern Germany. J Veg Sci 8:635–642. doi: 10.2307/3237367 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Vegetation Ecology and Conservation Biology, Institute of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of BremenBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations