Plant Ecology

, Volume 202, Issue 1, pp 191–194 | Cite as

Response of Arnica dealbata to climate change, nitrogen deposition, and fire

  • Matthew Hurteau
  • Malcolm North


Predicted changes in climate and increasing nitrogen deposition are likely to have significant impacts on species that have limited distributions or are already experiencing diminished population size. Arnica dealbata (A. Gray, Asteraceae), a listed sensitive species in Yosemite National Park, is endemic to California and has limited distribution within the park boundaries. The objective of this research was to examine the effects of altered precipitation resulting from climate change, increasing nitrogen deposition resulting from pollution, and prescribed fire on A. dealbata. A. dealbata cover significantly increased with increasing snowpack and prescribed fire. Increasing nitrogen deposition negatively affected cover. Our results suggest Yosemite’s A. dealbata populations can thrive even under a changing climate if prescribed fire is frequently applied coupled with increased moisture availability.


Climate change Mixed-conifer Sierra Nevada 



We would like to thank Jan van Wagtendonk from the USGS and Kara Paintner from the NPS for assistance with project establishment, Mike Beasley and Yosemite Helitack for implementing the burn treatments, Jason Jimenez, Don Stevens, and Kevin Tucker for help with data collection, and the USFS PSW Sierra Nevada Research Center for providing funding for this project.


  1. Baldwin BG (1999) New combinations in California Arnica and Monolopia (Compositae). Novon 9:460–461. doi: 10.2307/3392142 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown JK, Smith JK (eds) (2000) Wildland fire in ecosystems: effects of fire on flora, vol 2. USDA Forest Service, RMRS-GTR-42, p 257Google Scholar
  3. Cayan DR, Maurer EP, Dettinger MD, Tyree M, Hayhoe K (2008) Climate change scenarios for the California region. Clim Change 87(Suppl 1):S21–S42. doi: 10.1007/s10584-007-9377-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fenn ME, Poth MA, Aber JD et al (1998) Nitrogen excess in North American ecosystems: predisposing factors, ecosystem responses, and management strategies. Eco Apps 8:706–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fenn ME, Haeuber R, Tonnesen GS et al (2003) Nitrogen emissions, deposition, and monitoring in the western United States. Bioscience 53:391–403. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0391:NEDAMI]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Field CB, Daily GC, Davis FW, Gaines S, Matson PA, Melack J et al (1999) Confronting climate change in California: ecological impacts on the Golden State. Union of Concerned Scientists, Cambridge, MA and Ecological Society of America, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  7. Grime JP, Brown VK, Thompson K et al (2000) The response of two contrasting limestone grasslands to simulated climate change. Science 289:762–765PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Harris JA, Hobbs RJ, Higgs E, Aronson J (2006) Ecological restoration and global climate change. Rest Ecol 14:170–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hayhoe K, Cayan D, Field CB et al (2004) Emissions pathways, climate change, and impacts on California. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:12422–12427. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0404500101 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hickman JC (ed) (1993) The Jepson manual higher plants of California. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  11. Hurteau M, North M (2008) Mixed-conifer understory response to climate, nitrogen, and fire. Global Change Biol 14:1543–1552. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2468.2008.01584.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lenihan JM, Bachelet D, Neilson RP, Drapek R (2008) Response of vegetation distribution, ecosystem productivity, and fire to climate change scenarios for California. Clim Change 87(Suppl 1):S215–S230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Miller C, Urban DL (1999) Forest pattern, fire, and climatic change in the Sierra Nevada. Ecosystems 2:76–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. North M, Innes J, Zald H (2007) Comparison of thinning and prescribed fire restoration treatments to Sierran mixed-conifer historic conditions. Can J For Res 37:331–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Shaw MR, Zavaleta ES, Chiariello NR et al (2002) Grassland responses to global environmental changes suppressed by elevated CO2. Science 298:1987–1990PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Witty JH, Graham RC, Hubbert KR, Doolittle JA, Wald JA (2003) Contributions of water supply from the weathered bedrock zone to forest soil quality. Geoderma 114:389–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Zavaleta ES, Shaw MR, Chiariello NR et al (2003) Grassland responses to three years of elevated temperature, CO2, precipitation, and N deposition. Ecol Monogr 73:585–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological Sciences, Merriam Powell Center for Environmental ResearchNorthern Arizona UniversityFlagstaffUSA
  2. 2.USFS Sierra Nevada Research CenterDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations