Plant Ecology

, Volume 201, Issue 2, pp 709–721

Soil amendment effects on the exotic annual grass Bromus tectorum L. and facilitation of its growth by the native perennial grass Hilaria jamesii (Torr.) Benth

Article

Abstract

Greenhouse experiments were undertaken to identify soil factors that curtail growth of the exotic annual grass Bromus tectorum L. (cheatgrass) without significantly inhibiting growth of native perennial grasses (here represented by Hilaria jamesii [Torr.] Benth). We grew B. tectorum and H. jamesii alone (monoculture pots) and together (combination pots) in soil treatments that manipulated levels of soil phosphorus, potassium, and sodium. Hilaria jamesii showed no decline when its aboveground biomass in any of the applied treatments was compared to the control in either the monoculture or combination pots. Monoculture pots of B. tectorum showed a decline in aboveground biomass with the addition of Na2HPO4 and K2HPO4. Interestingly, in pots where H. jamesii was present, the negative effect of these treatments was ameliorated. Whereas the presence of B. tectorum generally decreased the aboveground biomass of H. jamesii (comparing aboveground biomass in monoculture versus combination pots), the presence of H. jamesii resulted in an enhancement of B. tectorum aboveground biomass by up to 900%. We hypothesize that B. tectorum was able to obtain resources from H. jamesii, an action that benefited B. tectorum while generally harming H. jamesii. Possible ways resources may be gained by B. tectorum from native perennial grasses include (1) B. tectorum is protected from salt stress by native plants or associated soil biota; (2) when B. tectorum is grown with H. jamesii, the native soil biota is altered in a way that favors B. tectorum growth, including B. tectorum tapping into the mycorrhizal network of native plants and obtaining resources from them; (3) B. tectorum can take advantage of root exudates from native plants, including water and nutrients released by natives via hydraulic redistribution; and (4) B. tectorum is able to utilize some combination of the above mechanisms. In summary, land managers may find adding soil treatments can temporarily suppress B. tectorum and enhance the establishment of native plants. However, the extirpation of B. tectorum is unlikely, as many native grasses are likely to facilitate its growth.

Keywords

Desert Dryland Invasive annual grass Restoration Salt tolerance 

References

  1. Aguiar MR, Sala OE (1994) Competition, facilitation, seed distribution and the origin of patches in a Patagonian steppe. Oikos 70:26–34. doi:10.2307/3545695 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen EB (1984) VA mycorrhizae and colonizing annuals: implications for growth, competition, and succession. In: Williams SE, Allen MF (eds) VA mycorrhizae and reclamation of arid and semi-arid lands. University of Wyoming, Wyoming Agricultural Experiment Station, Dubois, pp 42–52Google Scholar
  3. Allen EB, Padgett PE, Bytnerowicz A, Minnich RA (1996) Nitrogen deposition effects on coastal sage vegetation of southern California. In: Bytnerowicz A, Arbaugh MJ, Schilling S (eds) Proceedings of the international symposium on air pollution and climate change effects on forest ecosystems, Riverside, February 1996. USDA Forest Service, PSW-GTR-164, Albany, pp 131–140Google Scholar
  4. Allison LE, Moodie CD (1965) Carbonate. In: Black CA (ed) Chemical and microbiological properties. Methods of soil analysis, part 2. American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 1379–1396Google Scholar
  5. Awad F, Römheld V, Marschner H (1994) Effect of root exudates on mobilization in the rhizosphere and uptake of iron by wheat plants. Plant Soil 165:213–218. doi:10.1007/BF00008064 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belnap J, Phillips SL (2001) Soil biota in an ungrazed grassland: response to annual grass (Bromus tectorum) invasion. Ecol Appl 11:1261–1275. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[1261:SBIAUG]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Belnap J, Phillips SL, Sherrod S, Moldenke A (2005) Soil biota can change after exotic plant invasion: does this affect ecosystem processes? Ecology 86:3007–3017. doi:10.1890/05-0333 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Belnap J, Phillips SL, Troxler T (2006) Soil lichen and moss cover and species richness can be highly dynamic: the effects of invasion by the annual exotic grass Bromus tectorum and the effects of climate on biological soil crusts. Appl Soil Ecol 32:63–76. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2004.12.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bever JD (1994) Feedback between plants and their soil communities in an old field community. Ecology 75:1965–1977. doi:10.2307/1941601 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Biondini M, Klein DA, Redente EF (1988) Carbon and nitrogen losses through root exudation by Agropyron spicatum, A smithii and Bouteloua gracilis. Soil Biol Biochem 20:477–482. doi:10.1016/0038-0717(88)90061-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bookman PA, Mack RN (1982) Root interaction between Bromus tectorum and Poa pratensis: a three-dimensional analysis. Ecology 63:640–646. doi:10.2307/1936783 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Booth MS, Caldwell MM, Stark JM (2003) Overlapping resource use in three Great Basin species: implications for community invasibility and vegetation dynamics. J Ecol 91:36–48. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00739.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bremner JM (1996) Nitrogen-total. In: Sparks DL (ed) Chemical methods. Methods of soil analysis, part 3. American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 1085–1121Google Scholar
  14. Bremner JM, Keeney DR (1965) Steam distillation methods for determination of ammonium, nitrate and nitrite. Anal Chim Acta 32:485–495Google Scholar
  15. Cakmak I, Oztürk L, Marschner H, Karanlik S, Ekiz H (1996) Zinc-efficient wild grasses enhance release of phytosiderophores under zinc deficiency. J Plant Nutr 19:551–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Caldwell MM (1990) Water parasitism stemming from hydraulic lift: a quantitative test in the field. Isr J Bot 39:395–402Google Scholar
  17. Caldwell MM, Dawson TE, Richards JH (1998) Hydraulic lift: consequences of water efflux from the roots of plants. Oecologia 113:151–161. doi:10.1007/s004420050363 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Callaway RM, Pugnaire FI (2007) Facilitation in plant communities. In: Pugnaire FI, Valladares F (eds) Functional plant ecology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 435–455Google Scholar
  19. Callaway RM, Newingham B, Zabinski C, Mahall BE (2001) Compensatory growth and competitive ability of an invasive weed are enhanced by soil fungi and native neighbors. Ecol Lett 4:429–433. doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00251.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Callaway RM, Mahall BE, Wicks C, Pankey J, Zabinski C (2003) Soil fungi and the effects of an invasive forb on grasses: neighbor identity matters. Ecology 84:129–135. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0129:SFATEO]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Callaway RM, Thelen GC, Barth S, Ramsey PW, Gannon JE (2004) Soil fungi alter interactions between the invader Centaurea maculosa and North American natives. Ecology 85:1062–1071. doi:10.1890/02-0775 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cannon JP, Allen EB, Allen MF, Dudley LM, Jurinak JJ (1995) The effects of oxalates produced by Salsola tragus on the phosphorus nutrition of Stipa pulchra. Oecologia 102:265–272. doi:10.1007/BF00329792 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Carey EV, Marler MJ, Callaway RM (2004) Mycorrhizae transfer carbon from a native grass to an invasive weed: evidence from stable isotopes and physiology. Plant Ecol 172:133–141. doi:10.1023/B:VEGE.0000026031.14086.f1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chapman HD (1965) Cation-exchange capacity. In: Black CA (ed) Chemical and microbiological properties. Methods of soil analysis, part 2. American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 891–901Google Scholar
  25. Crooke WM, Knight AH (1962) An evaluation of published data on the mineral composition of plants in the light of the cation-exchange capacities of their roots. Soil Sci 93:365–373. doi:10.1097/00010694-196206000-00001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dawson TE (1993) Hydraulic lift and water use by plants: implications for water balance, performance and plant-plant interactions. Oecologia 95:565–574Google Scholar
  27. Deubel A, Gransee A, Merbach W (2000) Transformation of organic rhizodepositions by rhizosphere bacteria and its influence on the availability of tertiary calcium phosphate. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 163:387–392. doi :10.1002/1522-2624(200008)163:4<387::AID-JPLN387>3.0.CO;2-KCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Drake M, Vengris J, Colby WG (1951) Cation-exchange capacity of plant roots. Soil Sci 72:139–147. doi:10.1097/00010694-195108000-00006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Eckert RE Jr, Evans RA (1963) Responses of downy brome and crested wheatgrass to nitrogen and phosphorus in nutrient solution. Weeds 11:170–174. doi:10.2307/4040573 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Evans RA (1961) Effects of different densities of downy brome (Bromus tectorum) on growth and survival of crested wheatgrass (Agropyron desertorum) in the greenhouse. Weeds 9:216–223. doi:10.2307/4040408 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fischer-Walter LE, Hartnett DC, Hetrick BAD, Schwab AP (1996) Interspecific nutrient transfer in a tallgrass prairie plant community. Am J Bot 83:180–184. doi:10.2307/2445936 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Freeman DC, Emlen JM (1995) Assessment of interspecific interactions in plant communities: an illustration from the cold desert saltbush grasslands of North America. J Arid Environ 31:179–198. doi:10.1006/jare.1995.0059 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Greenlee JT, Callaway RM (1996) Abiotic stress and the relative importance of interference and facilitation in montane bunchgrass communities in western Montana. Am Nat 148:386–396. doi:10.1086/285931 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gries D, Runge M (1995) Responses of calcicole and calcifuge Poaceae species to iron-limiting conditions. Bot Acta 108:482–489Google Scholar
  35. Grime JP, Mackey JML, Hillier SH, Read DJ (1987) Floristic diversity in a model system using experimental microcosms. Nature 328:420–422. doi:10.1038/328420a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Harper KT, Van Buren R, Kitchen SG (1996) Invasion of alien annuals and ecological consequences in salt desert shrublands of western Utah. In: Barrow JR, McArthur ED, Sosebee RE, Tausch RJ (eds) Proceedings: shrubland ecosystem dynamics in a changing environment, Las Cruces, May 1995. USDA Forest Service, INT-GTR-338, Ogden, pp 58–65Google Scholar
  37. Hawkes CV, Belnap J, D’Antonio CM, Firestone MK (2006) Arbuscular mycorrhizal assemblages in native plant roots change in the presence of invasive exotic grasses. Plant Soil 281:367–379. doi:10.1007/s11104-005-4826-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Herron GJ, Sheley RL, Maxwell BD, Jacobsen JS (2001) Influence of nutrient availability on the interaction between spotted knapweed and bluebunch wheatgrass. Restor Ecol 9:326–331. doi:10.1046/j.1526-100x.2001.009003326.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Holzapfel C, Mahall BE (1999) Bidirectional facilitation and interference between shrubs and annuals in the Mojave Desert. Ecology 80:1747–1761Google Scholar
  40. Howell W (1998) Germination and establishment of Bromus tectorum L. in relation to cation exchange capacity, seedbed, litter, soil cover and water. Master’s thesis, Prescott CollegeGoogle Scholar
  41. Humphrey LD, Schupp EW (2004) Competition as a barrier to establishment of a native perennial grass (Elymus elymoides) in alien annual grass (Bromus tectorum) communities. J Arid Environ 58:405–422. doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2003.11.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kelrick MI (1991) Factors affecting seeds in a sagebrush-steppe ecosystem and implications for the dispersion of an annual plant species, cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.). Ph.D. Dissertation, Utah State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  43. Kleiner EF, Harper KT (1972) Environment and community organization in grasslands of Canyonlands National Park. Ecology 53:299–309. doi:10.2307/1934086 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kleiner EF, Harper KT (1977) Occurrence of four major perennial grasses in relation to edaphic factors in a pristine community. J Range Manage 30:286–289. doi:10.2307/3897307 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Klironomos JN (2002) Feedback with soil biota contributes to plant rarity and invasiveness in communities. Nature 417:67–70. doi:10.1038/417067a PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kolb A, Alpert P (2003) Effects of nitrogen and salinity on growth and competition between a native grass and an invasive congener. Biol Invasions 5:229–238. doi:10.1023/A:1026185503777 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kotanen PM, Bergelson J, Hazlett DL (1998) Habitats of native and exotic plants in Colorado shortgrass steppe: a comparative approach. Can J Bot 76:664–672. doi:10.1139/cjb-76-4-664 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lajtha K, Harrison AF (1995) Strategies of phosphorus acquisition and conservation by plant species and communities. In: Tiessen H (ed) Phosphorus in the global environment: transfers, cycles, and management. SCOPE 54. Wiley, Chichester, pp 140–147Google Scholar
  49. Lindsay WL, Norvell WA (1978) Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil Sci Soc Am J 42:421–428Google Scholar
  50. Lowe PN, Lauenroth WK (2003) Effects of nitrogen availability on competition between Bromus tectorum and Bouteloua gracilis. Plant Ecol 167:247–254. doi:10.1023/A:1023934515420 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mack RN (1981) Invasion of Bromus tectorum L. into western North America: an ecological chronicle. Agro-Ecosystems 7:145–165. doi:10.1016/0304-3746(81)90027-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Marschner H (1995) Ion uptake mechanisms of individual cells and roots: short-distance transport. Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 6–78Google Scholar
  53. Miller ME (2000) Effects of resource manipulations and soil characteristics on Bromus tectorum L. and Stipa hymenoides R. & S. in calcareous soils of Canyonlands National Park, Utah. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  54. Miller ME, Belnap J, Beatty S, Reynolds RL (2006) Performance of Bromus tectorum L. in relation to soil properties, water additions, and chemical amendments in calcareous soils of southeastern Utah, USA. Plant Soil 288:1–18. doi:10.1007/s11104-006-0058-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ming DW, Mumpton FA (1989) Zeolites in soils. In: Dixon JB, Weed SB (eds) Minerals in soil environments. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 873–911Google Scholar
  56. Monsen SB (1994) The competitive influences of cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) on site restoration. In: Monsen SB, Kitchen SG (eds) Symposium on ecology, management and restoration of intermountain annual rangelands, Boise, 18–22 May 1992. USDA Forest Service, INT-GTR-313, Ogden, pp 43–50Google Scholar
  57. Morrison R (1999) Potassium as a limiting nutrient for germination and production of cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) in the Canyonlands National Park, Utah. Dissertation, University of DenverGoogle Scholar
  58. Moyer-Henry KA, Burton JW, Israel DW, Rufty TW (2006) Nitrogen transfer between plants: a 15N natural abundance study with crop and weed species. Plant Soil 282:7–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Newingham B, Belnap J (2006) Direct effects of soil amendments on field emergence and growth of the invasive annual grass Bromus tectorum L. and the native perennial grass Hilaria jamesii (Torr.) Benth. Plant Soil 280:29–40. doi:10.1007/s11104-005-8551-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean LA (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. US Department of Agriculture, Circular No. 939, Washington DC, pp 1–9Google Scholar
  61. Peek MS, Leffler AJ, Ivans CY, Ryel RJ, Caldwell MM (2005) Fine root distribution and persistence under field conditions of three co-occurring Great Basin species of different life form. New Phytol 165:171–180. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01186.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rasmuson KE, Anderson JE (2002) Salinity affects development, growth, and photosynthesis in cheatgrass. J Range Manage 55:80–87. doi:10.2307/4003267 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rhoades JD (1982) Soluble salts. In: Page AL (ed) Chemical and microbiological properties. Methods of soil analysis, part 2. American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 167–179Google Scholar
  64. Sannazzaro AI, Ruiz OA, Albertó EO, Menéndez AB (2006) Alleviation of salt stress in Lotus glaber by Glomus intraradices. Plant Soil 285:279–287. doi:10.1007/s11104-006-9015-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schoenau JJ, Karamonos RE (1993) Sodium bicarbonate extractable P, K and N. In: Carter MR (ed) Soil sampling and methods of analysis. Canadian Society of Soil Science, Ottawa, pp 51–58Google Scholar
  66. Scott D, Billings WD (1964) Effects of environmental factors on standing crop and productivity of an alpine tundra. Ecol Monogr 34:243–270. doi:10.2307/1948502 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Shen YY, Li Y, Yan GY (2003) Effects of salinity on germination of six salt-tolerant forage species and their recovery from saline conditions. N Z J Agric Res 46:236–269Google Scholar
  68. Sperry LJ, Belnap J, Evans RD (2006) Bromus tectorum invasion alters nitrogen dynamics in an undisturbed arid grassland ecosystem. Ecology 87:603–615. doi:10.1890/05-0836 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Staunton S, LePrince F (1996) Effect of pH and some organic anions on the solubility of soil phosphate: implications for P availability. Eur J Soil Sci 47:231–239. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.1996.tb01394.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ström L, Olsson T, Tyler G (1994) Differences between calcifuge and acidifuge plants in root exudation of low-molecular organic acids. Plant Soil 167:239–245. doi:10.1007/BF00007950 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tausch RJ, Svejcar T, Burkhardt JW (1994) Patterns of annual grass dominance on Anaho Island: implications for Great Basin vegetation management. In: Monsen SB, Kitchen SG (eds) Symposium on ecology, management and restoration of intermountain annual rangelands, Boise, 18–22 May 1992. USDA Forest Service, INT-GTR-313, Ogden, pp 120–125Google Scholar
  72. Thomas GW (1982) Exchangeable cations. In: Page AL (ed) Chemical and microbiological properties. Methods of soil analysis, part 2. American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 159–165Google Scholar
  73. Trappe JM (1981) Mycorrhizae and productivity of arid and semiarid rangelands. In: Manassah JT, Briskey EJ (eds) Advances in food-producing systems for arid and semiarid lands. Academic Press, New York, pp 581–599Google Scholar
  74. Troeh FR, Thompson LM (1993) Soils and soil fertility. Oxford, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  75. Tyler G (1992) Inability to solubilize phosphate in limestone soils: key factor controlling calcifuge habit of plants. Plant Soil 145:65–70. doi:10.1007/BF00009542 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Tyler G (1994) A new approach to understanding the calcifuge habit of plants. Ann Bot (Lond) 73:327–330. doi:10.1006/anbo.1994.1038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Tyler G, Ström L (1995) Differing organic acid exudation pattern explains calcifuge and acidifuge behaviour of plants. Ann Bot (Lond) 75:75–78. doi:10.1016/S0305-7364(05)80011-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Upadhyaya MK, Turkington R, McIlvride D (1986) The biology of Canadian weeds. 75. Bromus tectorum L. Can J Plant Sci 66:689–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Vail D (1994) Management of semi-arid rangelands – impacts of annual weeds on resource values. In: Monsen SB, Kitchen SG (eds) Symposium on ecology, management and restoration of intermountain annual rangelands, Boise, 18–22 May 1992. USDA Forest Service, INT-GTR-313, Ogden, pp 3–5Google Scholar
  80. Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An examination of Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–37. doi:10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wardle DA, van der Putten WH (2002) Biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and above-ground-below-ground linkages. In: Loreau M, Naeem S, Inchausti P (eds) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 155–168Google Scholar
  82. Welsh SL, Atwood ND, Goodrich S, Higgins LC (1993) A Utah flora. Brigham Young University, ProvoGoogle Scholar
  83. Whisenant SG (1990) Changing fire frequencies on Idaho’s Snake River plains: ecological and management implications. In: McArthur ED, Romney EM, Smith SD, Tueller PT (eds) Symposium on cheatgrass invasion, shrub die-off, and other aspects of shrub biology and management, Las Vegas, April 1989. USDA Forest Service, GTR-INT-276, Ogden, pp 4–10Google Scholar
  84. Woodward RA, Harper KT, Tiedemann AR (1984) An ecological consideration of the significance of cation-exchange capacity of roots of some Utah range plants. Plant Soil 79:169–180. doi:10.1007/BF02182339 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Yoder CK, Nowak RS (2000) Phosphorus acquisition by Bromus madritensis ssp. rubens from soil interspaces shared with Mojave Desert shrubs. Funct Ecol 14:685–692. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2435.2000.00482.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Zabinski C, Quinn L, Callaway RM (2002) Phosphorus uptake, not carbon transfer, explains arbuscular mycorrhizal enhancement of Centaurea maculosa in the presence of native grassland species. Funct Ecol 16:758–765. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00676.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Zhang F, Romheld F, Marschner H (1991) Release of Zn mobilizing root exudates in different plant species as affected by Zn nutritional status. J Plant Nutr 14:675–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Zhang FS, Ma J, Cao YP (1997) Phosphorus deficiency enhances root exudation of low-molecular organic acids and utilization of sparingly soluble inorganic phosphates by radish (Raghanus satiuvs L.) and rape (Brassica napus L.) plants. Plant Soil 196:261–264. doi:10.1023/A:1004214410785 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.U.S. Geological Survey, Southwest Biological Science CenterMoabUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of DenverDenverUSA
  3. 3.Sherrod Ecosystems ConsultingGoldenUSA

Personalised recommendations