Advertisement

Plant Ecology

, 200:191 | Cite as

Linking population density and habitat structure to ecophysiological responses in semiarid Spanish steppes

  • David A. Ramírez
  • Juan Bellot
Article

Abstract

We have studied the underlying factors responsible for the heterogeneous ecophysiological status of a semiarid Stipa tenacissima L. steppe in a subcatchment of SE Spain by assessing population composition and habitat structure of S. tenacissima stands. To do this, we measured and estimated 18 variables (11 biotic and seven abiotic) in 15 plots randomly distributed in the subcatchment, and then zoned this area by plot affinity using PCA. This analysis produced three sectors determined mainly by S. tenacissima cover and soil depth variables. The linear relationship fitted between S. tenacissima tussock biomass and tussock density in monospecific stands (both logarithmic) indicated a curve close to −1, suggesting that the system is close to the maximum constant yield state. Ecophysiological measurements (gas exchange, fluorescence and individual leaf area index) were taken in two periods with different water availability in a representative plot in each sector. The intraspecific competition (inferred from the density dependence of green biomass) and rock outcrops were the main factors influencing the ecophysiological status in the study area. While, in the wet season, intraspecific competition regulated water consumption in zones where S. tenacissima tussocks (monospecific stands) are dominant, during the dry season, stands in zones with extensive rock outcrops and stone cover (tussocks in “soil pockets”) had no access to non-rainfall water gains because of the adjacent bare soil, and so in these stands, gas exchange was lower and photoinhibition higher. This article stresses the importance of considering the connection between tussocks and bare-ground interspace in the functional and structural analysis of semiarid steppes.

Keywords

Biomass-density relationship Intraspecific competition Self-thinning Stipa tenacissima Soil connectivity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Adela Blasco for her assistance with ecophysiological assessments and Dr. Juan R. Sánchez for his assistance with the field work. We also thank Dr. Francisco Domingo for his valuable comments on a draft of this manuscript and José Carlos Cristóbal for plant sample analyses. Financial support was provided by the “Efecto de la cubierta vegetal en el balance hídrico y en la disponibilidad y calidad del agua, propuesta para aumentar la recarga de acuíferos” Project, funded by the CICYT (REN2000-0529HID, CGL2004-03627) and by “AQUADAPT: Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development” Project founded by the European Community (EVK1-2001-00149).

References

  1. Armas C (2003) Balance de la interacción entre plantas superiores en ambientes semiáridos: mecanismos y procesos. PhD thesis, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
  2. Armas C, Pugnaire FI (2005) Plant interactions govern populations dynamics in a semi-arid plant community. J Ecol 93:978–989. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01033.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balaguer L, Pugnaire FI, Martinez-Ferri E, Armas C, Valladares F, Manrique E (2002) Ecophysiological significance of chlorophyll loss and reduced photochemical efficiency under extreme aridity in Stipa tenacissima L. Plant Soil 240:343–352. doi: 10.1023/A:1015745118689 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bertiller MB, Zaixso P, Irisarri MP, Brevedan ER (1996) The establishment of Festuca pallescens in arid grasslands in Patagonia (Argentina): the effect of soil water stress. J Arid Environ 32(2):161–171. doi: 10.1006/jare.1996.0014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonet A (2004) Secondary succession of semi-arid Mediterranean old-fields in south-eastern Spain: insights for conservation and restoration of degraded lands. J Arid Environ 56:213–233. doi: 10.1016/S0140-1963(03)00048-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chirino E (2003) Influencia de las precipitaciones y de la cubierta vegetal en el balance hídrico superficial y en la recarga de acuíferos en clima semiárido. PhD thesis, University of Alicante, SpainGoogle Scholar
  7. de Kroon H, Kalliola R (1995) Shoot dynamics of the giant grass Gynerium sagittatum in Peruviam Amazon floodplains, a clonal plant that does show self-thinning. Oecologia 101:124–131. doi: 10.1007/BF00328909 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Domingo F, Gutiérrez L, Brenner AJ, Aguilera C (2002) Limitation to carbon assimilation of two perennial species in semi-arid south east Spain. Biol Plant 45(2):213–220. doi: 10.1023/A:1015136421445 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ferrer-Castán D, Calvo JF, Esteve-Selma MA, Torres-Martínez A, Ramírez-Díaz L (1995) On the use of three performance measures for fitting species responses curves. J Veg Sci 6:57–62. doi: 10.2307/3236256 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gasque M (1999) Colonización del esparto (Stipa tenacissima L.) en sectores degradadas del clima semiárido. PhD thesis, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Agrónomos, SpainGoogle Scholar
  11. Genty B, Briantais JM, Baker NR (1989) The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochim Biophys Acta 99:87–92Google Scholar
  12. Guijarro JA (1981) Aproximación al clima de Alicante y su comarca. In: Excmo. Ayuntamiento de Alicante, (ed) El medio físico de la comarca de Alicante, Ayuntamiento de Alicante, Spain, pp 248–277Google Scholar
  13. Haase P, Pugnaire FI, Clark SC, Incoll L (1999) Environmental control of canopy dynamics and photosynthetic rate in the evergreen tussock grass Stipa tenacissima. Plant Ecol 145:327–339. doi: 10.1023/A:1009892204336 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harper JL (1977) Population biology of plants. Academic Press Inc., San Diego, CA, pp 857Google Scholar
  15. Ivans CY, Leffler AJ, Spaulding U, Stark JM, Ryel RJ, Caldwell MM (2003) Root responses and nitrogen acquisition by Artemisia tridentate and Agropyron desetorum following small summer rainfall events. Oecologia 134:317–324PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kays S, Harper JL (1974) The regulation of plant and tiller density in a grass Sward. J Ecol 62(1):97–105. doi: 10.2307/2258882 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kira T, Ogawa H, Shinozaki N (1953) Intraspecific competition among higher plants. 1. Competition-density-yield inter-relationship in regularly dispersed populations. J Inst Polytech Osaka Univ Ser D 4:1–16Google Scholar
  18. Kurc S, Small EE (2004) Dynamics of evapotranspiration in semiarid grassland and shrubland ecosystems during the summer monsoon season, central New Mexico. Water Resour Res 40:1–15. doi: 10.1029/2004WR003068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lázaro R, Rodrigo FS, Gutiérrez L, Domingo F, Puigdefábregas J (2001) Analysis of a 30-year rainfall record (1967–1997) in semi-arid SE Spain for implications on vegetation. J Arid Environ 48:373–395. doi: 10.1006/jare.2000.0755 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Le Houérou HN (2001) Biogeography of the arid steppeland north of the Sahara. J Arid Environ 48:103–128. doi: 10.1006/jare.2000.0679 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lonsdale WM, Watkinson AR (1982) Light and self-thinning. New Phytol 90:431–445. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1982.tb04476.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lonsdale WM, Watkinson AR (1983) Tiller dynamic and self-thinning in grassland habitats. Oecologia 60(3):390–395. doi: 10.1007/BF00376857 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Maestre FT (2006) Linking the spatial patterns of organisms and abiotic factor to ecosystems function and management: insights from semi-arid environments. Web Ecol 6:75–87Google Scholar
  24. Maestre FT, Cortina J (2004a) Do positive interactions increase with abiotic stress? A test from a semi-arid steppe. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 271:S331–S333. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2004.0181 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maestre FT, Cortina J (2004b) Insights into ecosystem composition and function in a sequence of degraded semiarid steppes. Restor Ecol 12(4):493–501. doi: 10.1111/j.1061-2971.2004.03106.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Maestre FT, Cortina J (2006) Ecosystem structure and soil-surface condition drive the variability in the foliar δ13C and δ15N of Stipa tenacissima in semiarid Mediterranean steppes. Ecol Res 21:44–53. doi: 10.1007/s11284-005-0091-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Maestre FT, Bautista S, Cortina J (2003) Positive, negative, and net effects in grass-shrub interactions in Mediterranean semiarid grasslands. Ecology 84(12):3186–3197. doi: 10.1890/02-0635 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mateo G, Crespo MB (2001) Manual para la determinación de la flora valenciana, 2nd edn. Moliner 40-Gómez Coll S. L., Valencia-Spain, pp 503Google Scholar
  29. Puigdefábregas J, Sánchez G (1996) Geomorphological implications of vegetation patchiness on semi-arid slopes. In: Anderson MG, Brooks SM (eds) Advances in hillslopess processes, vol 2. John Wiley, New York, pp 1027–1060Google Scholar
  30. Puigdefábregas J, Sole A, Guitierrez L, del Barrio G, Boer M (1999) Scales and processes of water and sediment redistribution in drylands: results from the Rambla Honda field site in Southeast Spain. Earth Sci Rev 48:39–70. doi: 10.1016/S0012-8252(99)00046-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pugnaire FI, Haase P (1996) Comparative physiology and growth of two perennial tussock grass species in a semi-arid environment. Ann Bot (Lond) 77:81–86. doi: 10.1006/anbo.1996.0010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pugnaire FI, Haase P, Incoll L, Clark SC (1996) Response of tussock grass Stipa tenacissima to watering in a semi-arid environment. Funct Ecol 10:265–274. doi: 10.2307/2389852 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ramírez DA (2006) Estudio de la transpiración del esparto (Stipa tenacissima L.) en una cuenca del semiárido alicantino: un análisis pluriescalar. PhD thesis, University of Alicante, SpainGoogle Scholar
  34. Ramírez DA, Valladares F, Blasco F, Bellot A (2006) Assessing transpiration in the tussock grass Stipa tenacissima L.: the crucial role of the interplay between morphology and physiology. Acta Oecol 30(3):386–398. doi: 10.1016/j.actao.2006.06.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ramírez DA, Bellot J, Domingo F, Blasco A (2007) Can water responses in Stipa tenacissima L. during the summer season be promoted by non-rainfall water gains in soil? Plant Soil 291:67–79. doi: 10.1007/s11104-006-9175-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Raventós J, Silva JF (1995) Competition effects and responses to variable numbers of neighbors in two tropical savanna grasses in Venezuela. J Trop Ecol 11(1):39–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Reynolds JF, Kemp PR, Ogle K, Fernandez RJ (2004) Modifying the “pulse reserve” paradigm for deserts of North America: precipitation pulses, soil water and plant responses. Oecologia 141:194–210. doi: 10.1007/s00442-004-1524-4 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sackville Hamilton NR, Matthew C, Lemaire G (1995) In defence of the −3/2 boundary rule: a re-evaluation of self-thinning concepts and status. Ann Bot (Lond) 76:569–577. doi: 10.1006/anbo.1995.1134 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sánchez G, Puigdefábregas J (1994) Interactions of plant growth and sediment movement on slopes in a semi-arid environment. Geomorphology 9:243–260. doi: 10.1016/0169-555X(94)90066-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Servicio del Esparto (1953) Estudios y Experiencias sobre el Esparto, vol II. Ministerios de Industria y Comercio y de Agricultura, MadridGoogle Scholar
  41. Sher AA, Goldberg DE, Novoplansky A (2004) The effect of mean and variance in resource supply on survival of annual from Mediterranean and desert environments. Oecologia 141:353–362. doi: 10.1007/s00442-003-1435-9 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schwinning S, Sala OE (2004) Hierarchy of responses to resources pulses in arid and semi-arid ecosystems. Oecologia 141:211–220PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Silvertown JW (1982) Introduction to plant population ecology. Longman Inc., New York, pp 209Google Scholar
  44. Tongway DJ, Cortina J, Maestre FT (2004) Heterogeneidad espacial y gestión de medios semiáridos. Ecosistemas 2004/1 (URL: http://aeet.org/ecosistemas/041/revision5.htm)
  45. Valentini C, d’Herbes JM, Poesen J (1999) Soil and water components of banded vegetation patterns. Catena 37:1–24. doi: 10.1016/S0341-8162(99)00053-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Valladares F, Pugnaire FI (1999) Tradeoffs between irradiance capture and avoidance in semi-arid environments assessed with a crown architecture model. Ann Bot (Lond) 83:459–469. doi: 10.1006/anbo.1998.0843 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vallejo VR, Serrasoles I, Cortina J, Seva JP, Valdecantos A, Vilagrosa A (2000) Restoration strategies and actions in Mediterranean degraded lands. In: Enne G, Zanolla Ch, Peter D (eds) Desertification in Europe: mitigation strategies land-use planning. EC DGXII Environment and Climate Program, European Commission, Brussels, pp 211–233Google Scholar
  48. Watkinson AR (1984) Yield-density relationship: the influence of resource of availability on growth and self-thinning in population of Vulpia fasciculata. Ann Bot (Lond) 53:469–482Google Scholar
  49. Weller D (1990) Will the real self-thinning rule please stand up?—a reply to Osawa and Sugita. Ecology 71(3):1204–1207. doi: 10.2307/1937389 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. White J, Harper JL (1970) Correlated changes in plant size and number in plant populations. J Ecol 58:467–485. doi: 10.2307/2258284 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yoda K, Kira T, Osawa H, Hozumi H (1963) Intraspecific competition among higher plants. XI Self-thinning in overcrowded pure stands under cultivated and natural conditions. J Inst Polytech Osaka City Univ 14:107–129Google Scholar
  52. Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis, 4th edn. Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey, pp 931Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Ciencias AmbientalesUniversidad de Castilla-La ManchaToledoSpain
  2. 2.Departamento de EcologíaUniversidad de AlicanteAlicanteSpain

Personalised recommendations