Plant Ecology

, Volume 200, Issue 1, pp 129–139

Role of invasive Melilotus officinalis in two native plant communities



This study examines the impact of the exotic nitrogen-fixing legume Melilotus officinalis (L.) Lam. on native and exotic species cover in two Great Plains ecosystems in Badlands National Park, South Dakota. Melilotus is still widely planted and its effects on native ecosystems are not well studied. Melilotus could have direct effects on native plants, such as through competition or facilitation. Alternatively, Melilotus may have indirect effects on natives, e.g., by favoring exotic species which in turn have a negative effect on native species. This study examined these interactions across a 4-year period in two contrasting vegetation types: Badlands sparse vegetation and western wheatgrass (Pascopyrum smithii) mixed-grass prairie. Structural equation models were used to analyze the pathways through which Melilotus, native species, and other exotic species interact over a series of 2-year time steps. Melilotus can affect native and exotic species both in the current year and in the years after its death (a lag effect). A lag effect is possible because the death of a Melilotus plant can leave an open, potentially nitrogen-enriched site on the landscape. The results showed that the relationship between Melilotus and native and exotic species varied depending on the habitat and the year. In Badlands sparse vegetation, there was a consistent, strong, and positive relationship between Melilotus cover and native and exotic species cover suggesting that Melilotus is acting as a nurse plant and facilitating the growth of other species. In contrast, in western wheatgrass prairie, Melilotus was acting as a weak competitor and had no consistent effect on other species. In both habitats, there was little evidence for a direct lag effect of Melilotus on other species. Together, these results suggest both facilitative and competitive roles for Melilotus, depending on the vegetation type it invades.


Badlands sparse vegetation Exotic legumes Invasive plants Nitrogen fixer South Dakota Structural equation models Mixed-grass prairie 


  1. Adler PB, D’Antonio CM, Tunison JT (1998) Understory succession following a dieback of Myrica faya in Hawai’i Volcanoes National Park. Pac Sci 52:69–78Google Scholar
  2. Arbuckle JL (2006) Amos 7.0 user’s guide. Amos Development Corporation, Spring House, PA, USAGoogle Scholar
  3. Arendt JD (1997) Adaptive intrinsic growth rates: an integration across taxa. Q Rev Biol 72:149–177. doi:10.1086/419764 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bertness MD, Callaway R (1994) Positive interactions in communities. Trends Ecol Evol 9:191–193. doi:10.1016/0169-5347(94)90088-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brooker RW, Maestre FT, Callaway RM, Lortie CL, Cavieres LA, Kunstler G et al (2008) Facilitation in plant communities: the past, the present, and the future. J Ecol 96:18–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruno JF, Stachowicz JJ, Bertness MD (2003) Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory. Trends Ecol Evol 18:119–125. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(02)00045-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Callaway R, Brooker RW, Choler P, Kikvidze Z, Lortiek CJ, Michalet R et al (2002) Positive interactions among alpine plants increase with stress. Nature 417:844–848. doi:10.1038/nature00812 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carino D, Daehler C (2002) Can inconspicuous legumes facilitate alien grass invasions? Partridge peas and fountain grass in Hawaii. Ecography 25:33–41. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0587.2002.250105.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carson WP, Barrett GW (1988) Succession in old-field plant communities—effects of contrasting types of nutrient enrichment. Ecology 69:984–994. doi:10.2307/1941253 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chaneton EJ, Perelman SB, Omacini M, Leon RJC (2002) Grazing, environmental heterogeneity, and alien plant invasions in temperate Pampa grasslands. Biol Invasions 4:7–24. doi:10.1023/A:1020536728448 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark FE, Cole CV, Bowman RA (1980) Nutrient cycling. In: Breymeyer AI, VanDyne GM (eds) Grasslands, systems analysis, and man. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Cousens R, Mortimer M (1995) Dynamics of weed populations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  13. Daubenmire RF (1959) A canopy coverage method of vegetation analysis. Northwest Sci 33:43–64Google Scholar
  14. ESRI (2001) ArcView version 8.1. Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI), Inc, Redlands, CAGoogle Scholar
  15. Fogarty G, Facelli JM (1999) Growth and competition of Cytisus scoparius, an invasive shrub, and Australian native shrubs. Plant Ecol 144:27–35. doi:10.1023/A:1009808116068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grace JB (2006) Structural equation modeling and natural systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  17. Great Plains Flora Association (1986) Flora of the Great Plains. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, KSGoogle Scholar
  18. Hatcher L (1994) A step by step approach to using the SAS system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  19. Haubensak KA, Parker IM (2004) Soil changes accompanying invasion of the exotic shrub Cytisus scoparius in glacial outwash prairies of western Washington. Plant Ecol 175:71–79. USA. doi:10.1023/B:VEGE.0000048088.32708.58 Google Scholar
  20. Hobbie SE (1992) Effects of plant species on nutrient cycling. Trends Ecol Evol 7:336–339. doi:10.1016/0169-5347(92)90126-V CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D (1996) LISREL 8: User’s reference guide. Scientific Software International, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  22. Klebesadel LJ (2001) Extreme northern acclimatization in biennial yellow sweetclover (Melilotus officinalis) at the Arctic Circle. Univ Alsk Agric For Experiment Stn Bull 89:1–21Google Scholar
  23. Lauenroth WK, Dodd JL (1979) Response of native grassland legumes to water and nitrogen treatments. J Range Manage 32:292–294. doi:10.2307/3897834 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lesica PL, DeLuca TH (2000) Melilotus: a potential problem for the northern Great Plains. J Soil Water Conserv 55:259–261Google Scholar
  25. Lonsdale WM (1999) Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 80:1522–1536Google Scholar
  26. Lorenz RJ, Rogler GA (1972) Forage production and botanical composition of mixed prairie as influenced by nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization. Agron J 64:244–249Google Scholar
  27. Mack RN, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Evans H, Clout M, Bazzaz FA (2000) Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol Appl 10:689–710. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0689:BICEGC]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maron JL, Connors PG (1996) A native nitrogen-fixing shrub facilitates weed invasion. Oecologia 105:302–312. doi:10.1007/BF00328732 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maron JL, Jefferies RL (1999) Bush lupine mortality, altered resource availability, and alternative vegetation states. Ecology 80:443–454Google Scholar
  30. Maron JL, Jeffries RL (2001) Restoring enriched grasslands: effects of mowing on species richness, productivity, and nitrogen retention. Ecol Appl 11:1088–1100. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[1088:REGEOM]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McCune B, Grace JB (2002) Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, ORGoogle Scholar
  32. McLendon T, Redente EF (1992) Effects of nitrogen limitation on species replacement dynamics during early secondary succession on a semiarid sagebrush site. Oecologia 91:312–317. doi:10.1007/BF00317618 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mitchell RJ (1993) Path analysis: pollination. In: Scheiner SM, Gurevitch J (eds) Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Chapman and Hall, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  34. Mooney HA, Drake JA (1986) Ecology of biological invasions of North America and Hawai’i. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Nielsen RD (1996) Soil survey of Custer and Pennington counties, prairie parts, South Dakota. Natural Resources Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Huron, SDGoogle Scholar
  36. O’Connor TG (1995) Acacia karroo invasion of grassland: environmental and biotic effects influencing seedling emergence and establishment. Oecologia 103:214–223. doi:10.1007/BF00329083 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rejmanek M, Richardson DM (1996) What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology 77:1655–1661. doi:10.2307/2265768 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Samuel MJ, Hart RH (1998) Nitrogen fertilization, botanical composition and biomass production on mixed-grass rangeland. J Range Manage 51:408–416. doi:10.2307/4003325 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schlepp RL (1987) Soil survey of Jackson county, northern part, South Dakota. Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Huron, SDGoogle Scholar
  40. Sher A, Hyatt L (1999) The disturbed resource-flux invasion matrix: a new framework for patterns of plant invasion. Biol Invasion 1:107–114. doi:10.1023/A:1010050420466 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shumway SW (2000) Facilitative effects of a sand dune shrub on species growing beneath the shrub canopy. Oecologia 124:138–148. doi:10.1007/s004420050033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Simberloff D (2006) Invasional meltdown 6 years later: important phenomenon, unfortunate metaphor, or both? Ecol Lett 9:912–919. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00939.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Simberloff D, Von Holle B (1999) Positive interactions of nonindigenous species: invasional meltdown? Biol Invasions 1:21–32. doi:10.1023/A:1010086329619 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Smith MD, Wilcox JC, Kelly T, Knapp AK (2004) Dominance not richness determines invasibility of tallgrass prairies. Oikos 106:253–262. doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.13057.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stohlgren TJ, Binkley D, Chong GW, Kalkhan MA, Schell LD, Bull KA et al (1999) Exotic plant species invade hot spots of native plant diversity. Ecol Monogr 69:25–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Thomsen MA, Corbin JD, D’Antonio CM (2006) The effect of soil nitrogen on competition between native and exotic perennial grasses from northern coastal California. Plant Ecol 186:23–35. doi:10.1007/s11258-006-9109-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tilman D (1987) Secondary succession and the pattern of plant dominance along experimental nitrogen gradients. Ecol Monogr 57:189–214. doi:10.2307/2937080 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tobe K, Gao Y (2007) Seed germination and seedling emergence of herbs in sand. Aust J Bot 55:55–62. doi:10.1071/BT06060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Turkington RA, Cavers PB, Empel E (1978) The biology of Canadian weeds. 29. Melilotus alba Desr. and M. officinalis (L.) Lam. Can J Plant Sci 58:523–537Google Scholar
  50. Van Riper LC 2005. The role of the exotic legume yellow sweetclover (Melilotus officinalis) in a low nitrogen system: a potential ecosystem transformer and facilitator of invasion. Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MNGoogle Scholar
  51. Vitousek PM, Walker LR (1989) Biological invasion by Myrica faya in Hawai’i: plant demography, nitrogen fixation, ecosystem effects. Ecol Monogr 59:247–265. doi:10.2307/1942601 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vitousek PM, Walker LR, Whiteaker LD, Mueller-Dombois D, Matson PA (1987) Biological invasion by Myrica faya alters ecosystem development in Hawai’i. Science 238:802–804. doi:10.1126/science.238.4828.802 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Von Loh J, Cogan D, Faber-Langendoen D, Crawford D, Pucherelli MJ (1999) USGS-NPS vegetation mapping program, Badlands National Park, South Dakota. US Department of Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, COGoogle Scholar
  54. Walker LR, Vitousek PM (1991) An invader alters germination and growth of a native dominant tree in Hawaii. Ecology 72:1449–1455. doi:10.2307/1941117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Weaver T, Gustafson D, Lichthardt J (2001) Exotic plants in early and late seral vegetation of fifteen northern Rocky Mountain environments (HTs). West N Am Nat 61:417–427Google Scholar
  56. Wedin DA, Tilman D (1996) Influence of nitrogen loading and species composition on the carbon balance of grasslands. Science 274:1720–1723. doi:10.1126/science.274.5293.1720 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wheeler CT, Helgerson OT, Perry DA, Gordon JC (1987) Nitrogen fixation and biomass accumulation in plant communities dominated by Cytisus scoparius L. in Oregon and Scotland. J Appl Ecol 24:231–237. doi:10.2307/2403800 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wight JR, Black AL (1979) Range fertilization: plant response and water use. J Range Manage 32:345–349. doi:10.2307/3898012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wilcove DS, Rothstein D, Dubow J, Phillips A, Losos E (1998) Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. Bioscience 48:607–615. doi:10.2307/1313420 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Willems JH, Peet RK, Bik L (1993) Changes in chalk-grassland structure and species richness resulting from selective nutrient additions. J Veg Sci 4:203–212. doi:10.2307/3236106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wivstad M (1999) Nitrogen mineralization and crop uptake of N from decomposing N-15 labelled red clover and yellow sweetclover plant fractions of different age. Plant Soil 208:21–31. doi:10.1023/A:1004407119638 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wolf JJ, Beatty SW, Carey G (2003) Invasion by sweet clover (Melilotus) in montane grasslands, Rocky Mountain National Park. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 93:531–543. doi:10.1111/1467-8306.9303001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Woodmansee RG (1978) Additions and losses of nitrogen in grassland ecosystems. Bioscience 28:448–453. doi:10.2307/1307227 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wu S-H, Chaw S-M, Rejmánek M (2003) Naturalized Fabaceae (Leguminosae) species in Taiwan: the first approximation. Bot Bull Acad Sin 44:59–66Google Scholar
  65. Zakhia F, de Lajudie P (2001) Taxonomy of rhizobia. Agronomie 21:569–576. doi:10.1051/agro:2001146 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology, Evolution, and BehaviorUniversity of MinnesotaSt. PaulUSA
  2. 2.Department of Agronomy and Plant GeneticsUniversity of MinnesotaSt. PaulUSA
  3. 3.U.S. Geological Survery, Northern Prairie Wildlife Research CenterSt. PaulUSA

Personalised recommendations