Plant Ecology

, Volume 195, Issue 2, pp 273–285

Light response in seedlings of a temperate (Quercus petraea) and a sub-Mediterranean species (Quercus pyrenaica): contrasting ecological strategies as potential keys to regeneration performance in mixed marginal populations

  • Jesús Rodríguez-Calcerrada
  • Jose Alberto Pardos
  • Luis Gil
  • Peter B. Reich
  • Ismael Aranda
Article

Abstract

In order to understand better the ecology of the temperate species Quercus petraea and the sub-Mediterranean species Quercus pyrenaica, two deciduous oaks, seedlings were raised in two contrasting light environments (SH, 5.3% full sunlight vs. HL, 70% full sunlight) for 2 years, and a subset of the SH seedlings were transferred to HL (SH–HL) in the summer of the second year. We predicted that Q. pyrenaica would behave more as a stress-tolerant species, with lower specific leaf area (SLA), allocation to leaf mass, and growth rate and less responsiveness to light in these metrics, than Q. petraea, presumed to be more competitive when resources, especially light and water, are abundant. Seedlings of Q. petraea had larger leaves with higher SLA, and exhibited a greater relative growth rate (RGR) in both SH and HL. They also displayed a higher proportion of biomass in stems (SMF), and a lower root to shoot ratio (R/S) in HL than those of Q. pyrenaica, which sprouted profusely, and had higher rates of photosynthesis (An) and stomatal conductance (gwv), but lower whole-plant net assimilation rate (NAR). On exposure to a sudden increase in light, SH–HL seedlings of both species showed a short period of photoinhibition, but fully acclimated photosynthetic features within 46 days after transference; height, main stem diameter, RGR and NAR all increased at the end of the experiment compared to SH seedlings, with these increases more pronounced in Q. petraea. Observed differences in traits and responses to light confirmed a contrasting ecology at the seedling stage in Q. petraea and Q. pyrenaica in consonance with differences in their overall distribution. We discuss how the characteristics of Q. petraea may limit the availability of suitable regeneration niches to microsites of high-resource availability in marginal populations of Mediterranean climate, with potential negative consequences for its recruitment under predicted climatic changes.

Keywords

Acclimation to light Ecological requirements Competitive ability Marginal populations 

References

  1. Antúnez I, Retamosa EC, Villar R (2001) Relative growth rate in phylogenetically related deciduous and evergreen woody species. Oecologia 128:172–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aranda I, Gil L, Pardos JA (2000) Water relations and gas exchange in Fagus sylvatica L. and Quercus petraea (Mattuschka) Liebl. in a mixed stand at their southern limit of distribution in Europe. Trees 14:344–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashton PMS, Berlyn GP (1994) A comparison of leaf physiology and anatomy of Quercus (section Erythrobalanus-Fagaceae) species in different light environments. Am J Bot 81:589–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baraza E, Gómez JM, Hódar JA, Zamora R (2004) Herbivory has a greater impact in shade than in sun: response of Quercus pyrenaica seedlings to multifactorial environmental variation. Can J Bot 82:357–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bond WJ, Midgley JJ (2003) The evolutionary ecology of sprouting in woody plants. Int J Plant Sci 164:103–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bragg JG, Westoby M (2002) Leaf size and foraging for light in a schlerophyll woodland. Funct Ecol 16:633–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brites D, Valladares F (2005) Implications of opposite phyllotaxis for light interception efficiency of Mediterranean woody plants. Trees 19:671–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cai Z-Q, Rijkers T, Bongers F (2005) Photosynthetic acclimation to light changes in tropical monsoon forest woody species differing in adult stature. Tree Physiol 25:1023–1031PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Calvo L, Santalla S, Marcos E, Valbuena L, Tárrega T, Luis E (2003) Regeneration after wildfire in communities dominated by Pinus pinaster, an obligate seeder, and in others dominated by Quercus pyrenaica, a typical resprouter. For Ecol Manage 184:209–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Castro J, Zamora R, Hódar JA, Gómez JM (2004) Seedling establishment of a boreal tree species (Pinus sylvestris) at its southernmost distribution limit: consequences of being a marginal Mediterranean habitat. J Ecol 92:266–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chambel MR, Climent J, Alía R, Valladares F (2005) Phenotypic plasticity: a useful framework for understanding adaptation in forest species. Investigación Agraria: Sistemas y Recursos Forestales 14:334–344Google Scholar
  12. Chapin FS III, Autumn K, Pugnaire F (1993) Evolution of suites of traits in response to environmental stress. Am Nat 142:78–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chazdon RL, Pearcy RW Lee DW, Fetcher N (1996) Photosynthetic responses of tropical forest plants to contrasting light environments. In: Mulkey SS, Chazdon RL, Smith AP (eds) Tropical forest plant ecophysiology. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp 5–55Google Scholar
  14. Cornelissen JHC, Castro Díez P, Hunt R (1996) Seedling growth, allocation and leaf attributes in a wide range of woody plant species and types. J Ecol 84:755–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fetcher N, Strain BR, Oberbauer SF (1983) Effects of light regime on the growth, leaf morphology and water relations of seedlings of two species of tropical trees. Oecologia 58:314–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grime JP (1977) Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Am Nat 111:1169–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hampe A (2005) Fecundity limits in Frangula alnus (Rhamnaceae) relict populations at the species’ southern range margin. Oecologia 143:377–386PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kamaluddin M, Grace J (1993) Growth and photosynthesis of tropical forest tree seedlings (Bischofia javanica Blume) as influenced by a change in light availability. Tree Physiol 13:189–201PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Keddy PA, Twolan-Strutt L, Shipley B (1997) Experimental evidence that interspecific competitive asymmetry increases with soil productivity. Oikos 80:253–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kelly DL (2002) The regeneration of Q. petraea (sessile oak) in southwest Ireland: a 25-year experimental study. For Ecol Manage 166:207–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. King DA (2003) Allocation of above-ground growth is related to light in temperate deciduous saplings. Funct Ecol 17:482–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kruger EL, Reich PB (1997) Responses of hardwood regeneration to fire in mesic forest openings. III. Whole-plant growth, biomass distribution, and nitrogen and carbohydrate relations. Can J For Res 27:1841–1850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Küppers M (1989) Ecological significance of above-ground architectural patterns in woody plants: a question of cost-benefit relationships. Trends Ecol Evol 4:375–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lambers H, Scheurwater I, Mata C, Nagel OW (1998) Root respiration of fast-and slow-growing plants, as dependent on genotype and nitrogen supply: a major clue to the functioning of slow-growing plants. In: Lambers H, Poorter H, Van Vuuren MMI (eds) Inherent variation in plant growth. Physiological mechanisms and ecological consequences. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands, pp 139–157Google Scholar
  25. Maxwell K, Johnson GN (2000) Chlorophyll fluorescence – a practical guide. J Exp Bot 51:659–668PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Miyazawa K, Lechowicz MJ (2004) Comparative seedling ecology of eight North American spruce (Picea) species in relation to their geographic ranges. Ann Bot 94:635–644PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Naidu SL, DeLucia EH (1998) Physiological and morphological acclimation of shade-grown tree seedlings to late-season canopy gap formation. Plant Ecol 138:27–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Niinemets Ü, Kull K (1994) Leaf weight per area and leaf size of 85 Estonian woody species in relation to shade-tolerance and light availability. For Ecol Manage 70:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Niinemets Ü, Portsmuth A, Truus L (2002) Leaf structural and photosynthetic characteristics, and biomass allocation to foliage in relation to foliar nitrogen content and tree size in three Betula species. Ann Bot 89:191–204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pardo F, Gil L, Pardos JA (2004) Structure and composition of pole-stage stands developed in an ancient wood pasture in central Spain. Forestry 77:67–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pausas JG, Bradstock RA, Keith DA, Keeley JE, GCTE (global change of terrestrial ecosystems) fire network (2004) Plant functional traits in relation to fire in crown-fire ecosystems. Ecology 85:1085–1100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Poorter H, de Jong R (1999) A comparison of specific leaf area, chemical composition and leaf construction costs of field plants from 15 habitats differing in productivity. New Phytol 143:163–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Reich PB, Ellsworth DS, Walters MB, Vose JM, Gresham C, Volin JC, Bowman WD (1999) Generality of leaf trait relationships: a test across six biomes. Ecology 80:1955–1969Google Scholar
  34. Reich PB, Wright IJ, Cavender-Bares J, Craine JM, Oleksyn J, Westoby M, Walters MB (2003) The evolution of plant functional variation: traits, spectra, and strategies. Int J Plant Sci 164(suppl 3):143–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ribeiro RV, Souza GM, Oliveira RF, Machado EC (2005) Photosynthetic responses of tropical tree species from different successional groups under contrasting irradiance conditions. Revista Brasileira de Botânica 28:149–161Google Scholar
  36. Sakai A, Ohsawa T, Oshawa M (1995) Adaptive significance of sprouting of Euptelea polyandra, a deciduous tree growing on steep slopes with shallow soil. J Plant Res 108:377–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schlichting CD (1986) The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 17:667–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schwilk DW, Ackerly DD (2005) Is there a cost to resprouting? Seedling growth rate and drought tolerance in sprouting and nonsprouting Ceanothus (Rhamnaceae). Am J Bot 92:404–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Strauss-Debenedetti S, Bazzaz FA (1991) Plasticity and acclimation to light in tropical Moraceae of different successional positions. Oecologia 87:377–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Valladares F, Sánchez-Gómez D (2006) Ecophysiological traits associated with drought in Mediterranean tree seedlings: individual responses versus interspecific trends in eleven species. Plant Biol 8:688–697PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Valladares F, Martinez-Ferri E, Balaguer L, Perez-Corona E, Manrique E (2000) Low leaf-level response to light and nutrients in Mediterranean evergreen oaks: a conservative resource-use strategy? New Phytol 148:79–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Valladares F, Chico JM, Aranda I, Balaguer L, Dizengremel P, Manrique E, Dreyer E (2002a) The greater seedling high-light tolerant of Quercus robar over Fagus sylvatica is linked to a greater physiological plasticity. Trees 16:395–403Google Scholar
  43. Valladares F, Balaguer L, Martinez-Ferri E, Perez-Corona E, Manrique E (2002b) Plasticity, instability and canalization: is the phenotypic variation in seedlings of schlerophyll oaks consistent with the environmental unpredictability of Mediterranean ecosystems? New Phytol 156:457–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Valladares F, Arrieta S, Aranda I, Lorenzo D, Sánchez-Gómez D, Tena D, Suárez F, Pardos JA (2005) Shade-tolerance, photoinhibition sensitivity and phenotypic plasticity of Ilex aquifolium in continental Mediterranean sites. Tree Physiol 25:1041–1052PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Veneklaas EJ, Poorter L (1998) Growth and carbon partitioning of tropical tree seedlings in contrasting light environments. In: Lambers H, Poorter H, Van Vuuren MMI (eds) Inherent variation in plant growth. Physiological mechanisms and ecological consequences. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands, pp 337–361Google Scholar
  46. Villar R, Ruíz-Robleto J, Quero JL, Porter H, Valladares F, Marañón T (2004) Tasas de crecimiento en especies leñosas: aspectos funcionales e implicaciones ecológicas. In: Valladares F (ed) Ecología del bosque mediterráneo en un mundo cambiante. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid, pp 191–227Google Scholar
  47. Walters MB, Reich PB (2000) Seed size, nitrogen supply, and growth rate affect tree seedling survival in deep shade. Ecology 81:1887–1901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Westoby M, Falster DS, Moles AT, Vesk PA, Wright IJ (2002) Plant ecological strategies: some leading dimensions of variation between species. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:125–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Willi Y, Van Buskirk J, Hoffmann AA (2006) Limits to the adaptive potential of small populations. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 37:433–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wright IJ, Reich PB, Cornelissen JHC, Falster DS, Groom PK, Hikosaka K, Lee W, Lusk CH, Niinemets Ü, Oleksyn J, Osada N, Poorter H, Warton DI, Westoby M (2005) Modulation of leaf economic traits and trait relationship by climate. Global Ecol Biogeogr 14:411–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yamashita N, Ishida A, Kushima H, Tanaka N (2000) Acclimation to sudden increase in light favoring an invasive over native trees in subtropical islands, Japan. Oecologia 125:412–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jesús Rodríguez-Calcerrada
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jose Alberto Pardos
    • 1
    • 2
  • Luis Gil
    • 1
    • 2
  • Peter B. Reich
    • 3
  • Ismael Aranda
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.Unidad de Anatomía, Fisiología y Genética Forestal, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de MontesUniversidad Politécnica de MadridMadridSpain
  2. 2.Unidad Mixta INA-UPM MadridSpain
  3. 3.Department of Forest ResourcesUniversity of MinnesotaSt. PaulUSA
  4. 4.Centro Nacional de Investigación Forestal (CIFOR)Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA)MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations