Plant Ecology

, Volume 194, Issue 2, pp 179–194 | Cite as

Use of species richness estimators improves evaluation of understory plant response to logging: a study of redwood forests

  • David T. Loya
  • Erik S. Jules
Original Paper


The recovery of native understory plant communities after timber harvest has received a great amount of attention worldwide. However, most of these studies have ignored the potentially significant effects that differences in habitat across forest development may have on the species–area relationship, even though sampling efficacy among forest developmental stages may differ markedly as a result of equal sampling within stages. We examined vascular plant community structure in coastal redwood forests of northern California (USA) in forest patches in each of four forest stages that develop with forest age: Initiation, Closure, Mature, and Old-growth. We also used a set of traditional and novel approaches to assess sampling efficacy and guide our sampling design. We initially sampled 75 circular plots (0.04 ha) in stands within each forest stage across a 1,347 km2 area. The species–area relationship suggested we had adequately sampled all stages after the first season of data collection, but non-parametric richness estimators (Incidence-based Coverage Estimator or ICE) and Michaelis–Menten means (MMMeans) rarefaction curves, indicated inadequate sampling of the older stages. Thus, we added four more samples within the Old-growth forest stage, establishing a more equitable sample of all stages. Our full data set demonstrated significant differences between plant communities in previously harvested forests (‘managed’ = Initiation, Closure, and Mature) and ‘unmanaged’ forests (Old-growth). Though several understory species were present in all stages, a suite of Old-growth indicator and restricted species suggest that recovery of some species may take long periods in managed forests. Interestingly, a separate suite of common understory species were lacking in Old-growth, and species richness in this stage was lower than in the mature managed forests. We discuss how this departure from the prediction of peak richness in Old-growth may relate to fire suppression in Old-growth forests. Lastly, analysis of our initial, smaller sampling of plots suggested that Old-growth plots were the least species rich. However, additional sampling of the Old-growth stage demonstrated that Old-growth plots were as rich as Closure plots. This has important implications for all studies concerned with measuring recovery after forest disturbances; stage-dependent habitat-mediated differences that affect sampling efficacy may not be captured by traditional sampling methods.


Diversity Redwood forest Richness estimators Sampling efficacy Timber harvest Understory plants 



We would like to thank Gordon Leppig for his generous contributions of time and energy to this study. We would also like to acknowledge Steve Sillett for editorial commentary on an earlier version of this document, David Hankin for his insights into our sampling methods, and two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments. This study was funded in part by generous contributions from the California Department of Fish and Game, the Humboldt State University Foundation, and the Humboldt State University Department of Biological Sciences Master’s Grant program.


  1. Andreassen K, Tomter SM (2003) Basal area growth models for individual trees of Norway spruce, Scots pine, birch and other broadleaves in Norway. For Ecol Manage 180:11–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Battles JJ, Shlisky AJ, Barrett RH, Heald RC, Allen-Diaz BH (2001) The effects of forest management on plant species diversity in a Sierran conifer forest. For Ecol Manage 146:211–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhattarai KR, Vetaas OR (2003) Variation in plant species richness of different life forms along a subtropical elevation gradient in the Himalayas, east Nepal. Global Ecol Biogeogr 12:327–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brose U, Martinez ND, Williams RJ (2003) Estimating species richness: sensitivity to sample coverage and insensitivity to spatial patterns. Ecology 84:2364–2377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruno JF (2002) Causes of landscape-scale rarity in cobble beach plant communities. Ecology 83:2304–2314Google Scholar
  6. Bunge J, Fitzpatrick M (1993) Estimating the number of species: a review. J Am Stat Assoc 88:364–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chazdon RL, Colwell RK, Denslow JS, Guariguata MR (1998) Statistical methods for estimating species richness of woody regeneration in primary and secondary rain forests of NE Costa Rica. In: Dallmeier F, Comiskey JA (eds) Forest biodiversity research, monitoring and modeling: conceptual background and Old World case studies. Parthenon Publishing, Paris, pp 285–309Google Scholar
  8. Chen J, Franklin JF, Spies TA (1992) Vegetation responses to edge environments in old-growth Douglas-fir forests. Ecol Appl 2:387–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark JS, Maklin E, Wood L (1998) Stages and spatial scales of recruitment limitation in southern Appalachian forests. Ecol Monog 68:213–235Google Scholar
  10. Colwell RK (2000) EstimateS: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples (Software and User’s Guide), Version 6.
  11. Colwell RK, Coddington JA (1994) Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond B 345:101–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Costa F, Magnusson W (2002) Selective logging effects on abundance, diversity, and composition of tropical understory herbs. Ecol Appl 12:807–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Currie DJ (1991) Energy and large-scale patterns of animal and plant species richness. Am Nat 137:27–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Currie DJ, Paquin V (1987) Large-scale biogeographical patterns of species richness of trees. Nature 329:326–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dalling JW, Hubbell SP, Silvera K (1998) Seed dispersal, seedling establishment and gap partitioning among tropical pioneer trees. J Ecol 86:674–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dalling JW, Muller-Landau HC, Wright SJ, Hubbell SP (2002) Role of dispersal in the recruitment limitation of neotropical pioneer species. J Ecol 90:714–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dawson TE (1998) Fog in the California redwood forest: ecosystem inputs and use by plants. Oecology 117:476–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dignan P, Bren L (2003) A study of the effect of logging on the understory light environment in riparian buffer strips in a south-east Australian forest. For Ecol Manage 172:161–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dilustro JJ, Collins BS, Duncan LK, Sharitz RR (2002) Soil texture, land-use intensity, and vegetation of Fort Benning upland forest sites. J Torr Bot Soc 129:289–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Donohue K, Foster DR, Motzkin G (2000) Effects of the past and present on species distribution: land-use history and demography of wintergreen. J Ecol 88:303–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Duffy DC, Meier AJ (1992) Do Appalachian herbaceous understories ever recover from clear-cutting? Con Bio 6:196–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dufrêne M, Legendre P (1997) Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol Monog 67:345–366Google Scholar
  23. Dyrness CT (1973) Early stages of plant succession following logging and burning in the western cascades of Oregon. Ecology 54:57–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dzwonko Z, Loster S (1989) Distribution of vascular plant species in small woodlands on the western Carpathian foothills. Oikos 56:77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Foggo A, Rundle SD, Bilton DT (2003) The net result: evaluating species richness extrapolation techniques for littoral pond invertebrates. Freshwater Biol 48:1756–1764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Foster DR, Aber JD, Melillo JM, Bowden RD, Bazzaz FA (1997) Temperate forest response to natural catastrophic disturbance and chronic anthropogenic stress. BioScience 47:437–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Franklin JF (1982) Old-growth forests in the Pacific Northwest: an ecological view. Pages 5 to 27 in old-growth forests: a balanced perspective. University of Oregon, Bureau of Governmental Research and Service, Eugene, Oregon, USAGoogle Scholar
  28. Franklin JF, Spies TA, Van Pelt R, Carey AB, Thornburgh DA, Berg DR, Lendenmayer DB, Harmon ME, Keeton WS, Shaw DC, Bible K, Chen J (2002) Disturbances and structural development of natural forest ecosystems with silvicultural implications, using Douglas-fir forests as an example. Forest Ecol Manage 155:399–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Frost EJ (1992) The effect of forest-clearcut edges on the structure and composition of old-growth mixed conifer stands in the western Klamath Mountains. Masters of Arts thesis presented to Humboldt State University, California, USAGoogle Scholar
  30. Gaston KJ (2000) Global patterns in biodiversity. Nature 405:220–227CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Gilliam FS (2002) Effects of harvesting on herbaceous layer diversity of a central Appalachian hardwood forest in West Virginia, USA. For Ecol Manage 155:33–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gilliam F, Turrill N, Adams MB (1995) Herbaceous-layer and overstory species in clear-cut and mature central Appalachian hardwood forests. Ecol Appl 5:947–955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Godefroid S, Koedam N (2003) Distribution pattern of the flora in a peri-urban forest: an effect of the city-forest ecotone. Landscape Urban Plan 65:169–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Goldberg DE, Estabrook GF (1998) Separating the effects of number of individuals sampled and competition on species diversity: an experimental and analytic approach. J Ecol 86:983–988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK (2001) Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol Lett 4:379–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Greenberg CH, Neary DG, Haris LD, Linda SP (1995) Vegetation recovery following high intensity fire and silviculture treatments in sand pine scrub. Am Mid Nat 133:149–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Greenlee JM, Langenheim JH (1990) Historic fire regimes and their relation to vegetation patterns in the Monterey Bay area of California. Am Mid Nat 124:239–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Grime JP (1986) Predictions of terrestrial vegetation responses to nuclear winter conditions. Int J Environ Stud 28:11–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gustafson EJ, Gardner RH (1996) The effect of landscape heterogeneity on the probability of patch colonization. Ecology 77:94–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Halpern CB (1989) Early successional patterns of forest species interactions of life history traits and disturbance. Ecology 70:704–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Halpern CB, Spies TA (1995) Plant species diversity in natural and managed forests of the Pacific Northwest. Ecol Appl 5:913–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hannerz MK, Hånell B (1997) Effects on the flora in Norway spruce forests following clearcutting and shelterwood cutting. For Ecol Manage 90:29–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Härdtle W, von Oheimb G, Wetphal C (2003) The effects of light and soil conditions on the species richness of the ground vegetation of deciduous forests in northern Germany (Schleswig-Holstein). For Ecol Manage 182:327–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Harris SA (1987) Relationship of convection fog to characteristics of the vegetation of Redwood National Park. M.S. Thesis. Humboldt State University, CA USAGoogle Scholar
  45. Harris LD, Maser C, McKee A (1982) Patterns of old-growth harvest and implications for Cascades wildlife. Trans North Am Wildlife Nat Resour Confer 47:374–392Google Scholar
  46. Heck KL Jr, van Belle G, Simberloff D (1975) Explicit calculation of the rarefaction diversity measurement and the determination of sufficient sample size. Ecology 56:1459–1461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hickman JC (ed) (1993) The Jepson Manual: higher plants of California. University of California Press, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  48. Hintze J (2001) NCSS and PASS. Number Cruncher statistical systems. Kaysville, Utah. www.ncss.comGoogle Scholar
  49. Honnay O, Verheyen K, Butaye J, Jaquemyn H, Bossuyt B, Hermy M (2002) Possible effects of habitat fragmentation and climate change on the range of forest plant species. Ecol Letts 5:525–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Jacobs DF, Cole DW, McBride JR (1985) Fire history and perpetuation of natural coast redwood ecosystems. J For 83:494–497Google Scholar
  51. Jacquemyn H, Butaye J, Hermy M (2001) Forest plant species richness in small fragmented mixed deciduous forest patches: the role of area, time and dispersal limitation. J Biogeogr 28:801–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Jones MD, Durall DM, Cairney JWG (2003) Ectomycorrhizal fungal communities in young forest stands regenerating after clearcut logging. New Phytol 157:399–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Jules ES (1998) Habitat fragmentation and demographic change for a common plant: Trillium in old-growth forest. Ecology 79:1645–1656Google Scholar
  54. Jules ES, Frost EJ, Mills LS, Tallmon DA (1999) Ecological consequences of forest fragmentation in the Klamath Region. Nat Areas J 19:368–378Google Scholar
  55. Jules ES, Rathcke BJ (1999) Mechanisms of reduced trillium recruitment along edges of old-growth forest fragments. Conserv Biol 13:784–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Jules ES, Shahani PC (2003) A broader ecological context to the fragmentation frenzy: why matrix habitat is more important than we thought. J Veg Sci 14:459–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kwit CP, Platt WJ (2003) Disturbance history influences regeneration of non-pioneer understory trees. Ecology 84:2575–2581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lee S, Chao A (1994) Estimating population size via sample coverage for closed capture-recapture models. Biometrics 50:88–97CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Loehle C, Li B (1996) Habitat destruction and the extinction debt revisited. Ecol Appl 6:784–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Longino JT, Coddington J, Colwell RK (2002) The ant fauna of a tropical rain forest: estimating species richness three different ways. Ecology 83:689–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Machon N, Bardin P, Mazer SJ, Moret J, Godelle B, Austerlitz F (2003) Relationship between genetic structure and seed and pollen dispersal in the endangered orchid Spiranthes spiralis. New Phytol 157:677–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Matlack GR (1994) Plant species migration in a mixed-history forest landscape in eastern North America. Ecology 75:1491–1502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. McCune B, Mefford MJ (1999) PC-ORD. Multivariate analysis of ecological data. Version 4.27. MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, Oregon, U.S.AGoogle Scholar
  64. Meier AJ, Brantton SP, Duffy DC (1995) Possible ecological mechanisms for loss of vernal-herb diversity in logged eastern deciduous forests. Ecol Appl 5:935–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Moola FM, Vasseur L (2004) Recovery of late-seral vascular plants in a chronosequence of post-clearcut forest stands in coastal Nova Scotia, Canada. Plant Ecol 172:183–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Oliver CD, Larson BC (1996) Forest stand dynamics. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  67. Peet RK, Christensen NL (1988) Changes in species diversity during secondary forest succession on the North Carolina Piedmont. In: During HJ, Werner MJ (eds) Diversity and pattern in plant communities. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, pp 233–245Google Scholar
  68. Peterken GF, Game M (1984) Historical factors affecting the number and distribution of vascular plant species in the woodlands of central Lincolnshire. J Ecol 72:155–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Primack RB, Maio SL (1992) Dispersal can limit local plant distribution. Conserv Biol 6:513–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Raaijmakers JGW (1987) Statistical analysis of the Michaelis–Menten equation. Biometrics 43:793–803CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Rasmussen HN (1995) Terrestrial orchids: from seed to mycotrophic plant. CambridgeUniversity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  72. Roberts MR (2002) Effects of forest plantation management on herbaceous-layer composition and diversity. Can J Bot 80:378–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Roberts MR (2004) Response of the herbaceous layer to natural disturbance in North American forests. Can J Bot 82:1273–1283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Roberts MR, Gilliam FS (1995) Patterns and mechanisms of plant diversity in forested ecosystems: implications for forest management. Ecol Appl 5:969–977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Roberts MR, Zhu L (2002) Early response of the herbaceous layer to harvesting in a mixed coniferous-deciduous forest in New Brunswick, Canada. For Ecol Manage 155:17–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Ross KA, Fox BJ, Fox MD (2002) Changes to plant species richness in forest fragments: fragment age, disturbance and fire history may be as important as area. J Biogeogr 29:749–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Ross-Davis AL, Frego KA (2002) Comparison of plantations and naturally regenerated clearcuts in the Acadian Forest: forest floor bryophyte community and habitat features. Can J Bot 80:21–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Russell WH, Jones C (2001) The effects of timber harvesting on the structure and composition of adjacent old-growth coast redwood forest, California, USA. Landscape Ecol 16:731–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sanders H (1968) Marine benthic diversity: a comparative study. Am Nat 102:243–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Sillett SC, McCune B, Peck JE, Rambo TR, Ruchty A (2000) Dispersal limitations of epiphytic lichens result in species dependent on old-growth forests. Ecol Appl 10:789–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Stuart JD (1987) Fire history of an old-growth forest of Sequoia sempervirens (Taxodiaceae) forest in Humboldt Redwoods State Park, CA. Madroño 34:128–141Google Scholar
  82. Sullivan TP, Sullivan DS, Lindgren PMF (2001) Influence of variable return harvest on forest ecosystems I. Diversity and stand structure. J Appl Ecol 38:1221–1233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Tilman D, May RM, Lehman CL, Nowak MA (1994) Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371: 65–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Toky OP, Ramakrishnan PS (1983) Secondary succession following slash and burn agriculture in north-eastern India: nutrient cycling. J Ecol 71:747–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Vandermeer J, Ricardo C (2001) Metapopulation dynamics and the quality of the matrix. Am Nat 158:211–220CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Verheyen K, Hermy M (2001) The relative importance of dispersal limitation of vascular plants in secondary forest succession in Muizen Forest, Belgium. J Ecol 89:829–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Verheyen K, Guntenspergen GR, Biesbrouck B (2003) An integrated analysis of the effects of past land use on forest herb colonization at the landscape scale. J Ecol 91:731–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Walker B, Kinzig A, Langridge J (1999) Plant attribute diversity, resilience, and ecosystem function: the nature and significance of dominant and minor species. Ecosystems 2:95–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Walther BA, Martin JL (2001) Species richness estimation of bird communities: how to control for sampling effort. Ibis 143:413–419Google Scholar
  90. Watt MS, Whitehead D, Mason EG, Richardson B, Kimberley MO (2003) The influence of weed competition for light and water on growth and dry matter partitioning of young Pinus radiata at a dryland site. For Ecol Manage 183:363–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Whitney GC, Foster DR (1988) Overstory competition and age as determinants of the understory flora of woods in central New England. J Ecol 76:867–876CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesHumboldt State UniversityArcataUSA

Personalised recommendations