Advertisement

Plant Ecology

, Volume 191, Issue 2, pp 209–220 | Cite as

Imprint of oaks on nitrogen availability and δ15N in California grassland-savanna: a case of enhanced N inputs?

  • Steven S. PerakisEmail author
  • Chev H. Kellogg
Original Paper

Abstract

Woody vegetation is distributed patchily in many arid and semi-arid ecosystems, where it is often associated with elevated nitrogen (N) pools and availability in islands of fertility. We measured N availability and δ15N in paired blue-oak versus annual grass dominated patches to characterize the causes and consequences of spatial variation in N dynamics of grassland-savanna in Sequoia-Kings Canyon National Park. We found significantly greater surface soil N pools (0–20 cm) in oak patches compared to adjacent grass areas across a 700 m elevation gradient from foothills to the savanna-forest boundary. N accumulation under oaks was associated with a 0.6‰ depletion in soil δ15N relative to grass patches. Results from a simple δ15N mass balance simulation model, constrained by surface soil N and δ15N measured in the field, suggest that the development of islands of N fertility under oaks can be traced primarily to enhanced N inputs. Net N mineralization and percent nitrification in laboratory incubations were consistently higher under oaks across a range of experimental soil moisture regimes, suggesting a scenario whereby greater N inputs to oak patches result in net N accumulation and enhanced N cycling, with a potential for greater nitrate loss as well. N concentrations of three common herbaceous annual plants were nearly 50% greater under oak than in adjacent grass patches, with community composition shifted towards more N-demanding species under oaks. We find that oaks imprint distinct N-rich islands of fertility that foster local feedback between soil N cycling, plant N uptake, and herbaceous community composition. Such patch-scale differences in N inputs and plant–soil interactions increase biogeochemical heterogeneity in grassland-savanna ecosystems and may shape watershed-level responses to chronic N deposition.

Keywords

Nitrogen cycle Mineralization Nitrification Natural abundance isotopes Blue oak savanna 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Jon Keeley, Tom McGinnis, and David Graber for logistical assistance, and Chris Catricala and Kathryn James for sample analysis. Jana Compton and Peter Vitousek provided helpful comments on the manuscript. Support for the research was provided by the National Park Foundation Ecological Research Fellowship Program, through a generous grant from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.

References

  1. Abrahams AD, Parsons AJ (1991) Relation between infiltration and stone cover on a semiarid hillslope, southern Arizona. J Hydrol 122:49–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boonpragob K, Nash III TH, Fox CA (1989) Seasonal deposition patterns of acidic ions and ammonium to the lichen Ramalina menziesii Tayl. in southern California. Environ Exp Bot 29:187–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Breshears DD (2006) The grassland-forest continuum: trends in ecosystem properties for woody plant mosaics? Front Ecol Environ 4:96–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brooks WH (1969) Some quantitative aspects of the grass-oak woodland in Sequoia National Park. Unpublished Report, Sequoia National Park, Three Rivers, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  5. Bytnerowicz A, Fenn ME, Miller PR, Arbaugh MJ (1999) Wet and dry pollutant deposition to the mixed conifer forest. In: Miller PR, McBride JR (eds) Oxidant air pollution impacts in the Montane forests of southern California: a case study of the San Bernardino Mountains, Ecol. Stud., vol 134. Springer-Verlag. New York, pp 235–269Google Scholar
  6. Bytnerowicz A, Tausz M, Alonso R, Jones D, Johnson R, Grulke N (2002) Summer-time distribution of air pollutants in Sequoia National Park, California. Environ Pollut 118:187–203PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheng X, Bledsoe CS (2002) Contrasting seasonal patterns of fine root production for blue oaks (Quercus douglasii) and annual grasses in California oak woodland. Plant Soil 240:263–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheng X, Bledsoe CS (2004) Competition for inorganic and organic N by blue oak (Quercus douglasii) seedlings, an annual grass, and soil microorganisms in a pot study. Soil Biol Biochem 36:135–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Collett JL Jr, Daube BC Jr, Hoffmann MR (1990) The chemical composition of intercepted cloudwater in the Sierra Nevada. Atmos Environ 24A:959–972Google Scholar
  10. Dahlgren R, Singer M, Huang X (1997) Oak tree and grazing impacts on soil properties and nutrients in a California oak woodland. Biogeochemistry 39:45–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davidson EA, Stark JM, Firestone MK (1990) Microbial production and consumption of nitrate in an annual grassland. Ecology 71:1968–1975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dijkstra FA, Wrage K, Hobbie SE, Reich PB (2006) Tree patches show greater N losses but maintain higher soil N availability than grassland patches in a frequently burned oak savanna. Ecosystems 9:441–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fenn ME, Poth MA, Schilling SL, Grainger DB (2000) Throughfall and fog deposition of nitrogen and sulfur at an N-limited and N-saturated site in the San Bernardino Mountains, southern California. Can J For Res 30:1476–1488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fenn M, Haebuer R, Tonnesen GS, Baron J, Grossman-Clarke S, Hope D, Jaffe D, Copeland S, Geiser L, Rueth H, Sickman J (2003a) Nitrogen emissions, deposition and monitoring in the Western United States. Bioscience 53:391–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fenn ME, Poth MA, Bytnerowicz A, Sickman JO, Takemoto BK (2003b) Effects of ozone, nitrogen deposition, and other stressors on montane ecosystems in the Sierra Nevada. In: Bytnerowicz A, Arbaugh MJ, Alonso R (eds) Developments in environmental science, volume 2: Ozone air pollution in the Sierra Nevada: distribution and effects on forests. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 111–155Google Scholar
  16. Frost WE, Edinger SB (1991) Effects of tree canopies on soil characteristics of annual rangeland. J Range Manage 44:286–288Google Scholar
  17. Hanson PJ, Lindberg SE (1991) Dry deposition of reactive nitrogen compounds: a review of leaf, canopy and non-foliar measurements. Atmos Environ 25A:1615–1634Google Scholar
  18. Herman DJ, Rundel PW (1989) Nitrogen isotopic fractionation in burned and unburnedchaparral soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 53:1229–1236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Herman DJ, Halverson LH, Firestone MK (2003) Nitrogen dynamics in an annual grassland: Oak canopy, climate, and microbial population effects. Ecol Appl 13:593–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Högberg P (1997) 15N natural abundance in soil–plant systems. New Phytologist 137:179–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Huntington GL, Akeson MA (1987) Soil resources inventory of Sequoia National Park, California. Department of Land, Air, and Water Resources, University of California, DavisGoogle Scholar
  22. Jackson RD, Allen-Diaz B, Oates LG, Tate KW (2006) Spring-water nitrate increased with removal of livestock grazing in a California oak savanna. Ecosystems 9:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jackson LE, Strauss RB, Firestone MK, Bartolome JW (1990) Influence of tree canopies on grassland productivity and nitrogen dynamics in deciduous oak savanna. Agricult Ecosyst Environ 32:89–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jovan S, McCune B (2004) Regional variation in epiphytic macrolichen communities in northern and central California forests. The Bryologist 107:328–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Knops JMH, Nash III TH, Schlesinger WH (1996) The influence of epiphytic lichens on the nutrient cycling of an oak woodland. Ecol Monogr 66:159–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Millikin Ishikawa C, Bledsoe CS (2000) Seasonal and diurnal patterns of soil water potential in the rhizosphere of blue oaks: evidence for hydraulic lift. Oecologia 125:459–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Millikin C, Bledsoe CS (1999) Biomass and distribution of fine and coarse roots from blue oak (Quercus douglasii) trees in the northern Sierra Nevada foothills of California. Plant Soil 214:27–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Moore RM, Williams JD (1983) Competition among weedy species: diallel experiments. Austr J Agricult Res 34:119–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rice KJ, Nagy ES (2000) Oak canopy effects on the distribution patterns of two annual grasses: the role of competition and soil nutrients. Am J Bot 87:1699–1706PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Robinson D (2001) δ15N as an integrator of the nitrogen cycle. Trends Ecol Evol 16:153–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Russell KM, Galloway JN, Macko SA, Moody JL, Scudlark JR (1998) Sources of nitrogen in wet deposition to the Chesapeake Bay region. Atmos Environ 32:2453–2465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Scholes RJ, Archer SR (1997) Tree-grass interactions in savannas. Annu Rev Ecol System 28:545–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schulz H, Gehre M, Hofmann D, Jung K (2001) Nitrogen isotope ratios in pine bark as an indicator of N emissions from anthropogenic sources. Environ Monitor Assess 69:283–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shearer G, Kohl DH (1988) δ15N method of estimating N2 fixation. In: Rundel PW, Ehleringer JR, Nagy KA (eds) Stable isotopes in ecological research, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 342–374Google Scholar
  35. Sickman JO, Leydecker A, Chang CCY, Kendall C, Melack JM, Lucero DM, Schimel JP (2003) Mechanisms underlying export of N from high-elevation catchments during seasonal transitions. Biogeochemistry 64:1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stohlgren TJ, Parsons DJ (1987) Variation in wet deposition chemistry of Sequoia National Park, California. Atmos Environ 21:1369–1374Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.USGS Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science CenterCorvallisUSA
  2. 2.Department of Forest ScienceOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  3. 3.Center for Restoration of Ecosystems and Watersheds, School of Civil Engineering and Environmental ScienceUniversity of OklahomaNormanUSA

Personalised recommendations