Plant Ecology

, Volume 190, Issue 1, pp 97–107 | Cite as

Effects of water level and temperature on performance of four Sphagnum mosses

  • Bjorn J.M. Robroek
  • Juul Limpens
  • Angela Breeuwer
  • Matthijs G.C. Schouten
Original Paper

Abstract

To evaluate the effects of changes in water level and temperatures on performance of four Sphagnum mosses, S. magellanicum, S. rubellum, S. imbricatum and S. fuscum were grown at two water levels,  −5 cm and  −15 cm, and at two temperatures, 15°C and 20°C. These species differ in their position along the microtopographical gradient and in their geographical distribution. Height increment, subcapitulum bulk density, biomass production, capitulum water content and cumulative evaporation were measured. Height increment and biomass production of S. magellanicum was lower at low water table than at high water table, whereas height increment and biomass production of S. rubellum, S. imbricatum and S. fuscum were unaffected. Height increment of S. magellanicum, S. rubellum and S. imbricatum was higher at high temperature than at low temperature. Biomass production of only S. magellanicum and S. rubellum was higher at high temperature than at low temperature, corresponding with their more southern distribution. Cumulative evaporation of S. magellanicum and S. rubellum was lower at low water table and could be explained by hampered water transport towards the capitula. We conclude that changes in water table and temperature may alter the Sphagnum composition on raised bogs, which may result in changes to important ecosystem processes. Therefore, it is important that species composition and changes therein are taken into account when evaluating global change effects on raised bog ecosystems.

Keywords

Biomass production Climate change Raised bogs Peatlands Sphagnum Water table 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank R.H.A. van Grunsven, M.M.P.D Heijmans, F. Kohler, J. Noordijk, J. Verhulst and two anonymous reviewers for their critical comments on earlier versions of the manuscript, which led to significant improvements. We are indebted to An Taisce and the National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Ireland for permission to enter their nature reserves and to collect the peat samples. We also acknowledge the practical help of P.H. Crushell (University College Cork), J.M. Gleichman, F. Möller and J.D. van Walsem. This research was supported by the National Forest Service of The Netherlands (Staatsbosbeheer) and a grant from the Dutch Foundation for Conservation of Irish bogs.

References

  1. Andrus RE, Wagner DJ, Titus JE (1983) Vertical zonation of Sphagnum mosses along hummock-hollow gradients. Can J Bot 61:3128–3139Google Scholar
  2. Asada T, Warner BG, Banner A (2003) Growth of mosses in relation to climate factors in a hypermaritime coastal peatlands in British Columbia, Canada. Bryologist 106(4):516–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergman I, Lundberg P, Nilsson M (1999) Microbial carbon mineralisation in an acid surface peat: effects of environmental factors in laboratory incubations. Soil Biol Biochem 31:1867–1877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bragazza L, Tahvanainen T, Kutnar L, Rydin H, Limpens J, Hajek M, Grosvernier P, Hajek T, Hajkova P, Hansen I, Iacumin P, Gerdol R (2004) Nutritional constraints in ombrotrophic Sphagnum plants under increasing atmospheric nitrogen deposition in Europe. New Phytol 163(3):609–616. DOI 10.1111/j.1469–8137.2004.01154.xGoogle Scholar
  5. Clymo RS, Hayward PM (1982) The Ecology of Sphagnum. In: Smith AJE (ed) Bryophyte ecology. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Clymo RS, Turunen J, Tolonen K (1998) Carbon accumulation in peatland. Oikos 81:368–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cross JR (1990) The Raised Bogs of Ireland: their ecology, status and conservation. Report to the minister of state at the department of the environment. The Stationary Office, DublinGoogle Scholar
  8. Daniels RE, Eddy A (1990) Handbook of European Sphagna. HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Dorrepaal E, Aerts R, Cornelissen JHC, Callaghan TV, van Logtestijn RSP (2003). Summer warming and increased winter snow cover affect Sphagnum fuscum growth, structure and production in a sub-arctic bog. Global Change Biol 10(1): 93–104. DOI 10.1111/j.1365–2486.2003.00718.xGoogle Scholar
  10. Duckett JG, Clymo RS (1988). Regeneration of bog liverworts. New Phytol 110(1):119–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Garrels RM, Christ CL (1965) Solutions, minerals and equilibria. Harper and Row, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  12. Gerdol R (1995) The growth dynamics of Sphagnum based on field measurements in a temperate bog and on laboratory cultures. J Ecol 83(3):431–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gerdol R (1996) The seasonal growth pattern of Sphagnum magellanicumBrid. in different microhabitats on a mire in the southern Alps (Italy). Oecologia Montana 5:13–20Google Scholar
  14. Gerdol R, Bonara A, Marchesini R, Gualandri R, Pancaldi S (1998) Growth response of Sphagnum capillifolium to nighttime temperature and nutrient level: mechanisms and implications for global change. Arct Alp Res 30(4):388–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gorham E (1991) Northern Peatlands: role in the carbon cycle and probable responses to climatic warming. Ecol Appl 1(2):182–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grosvernier P, Matthey Y, Buttler A (1997) Growth potential of three Sphagnum species in relation to water table level and peat properties with implications for their restoration in cut-over bogs. J Appl Ecol 34:471–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gunnarsson U (2005) Global patterns of Sphagnum productivity. J Bryol 27:269–279. DOI 10.1179/174328205X70029Google Scholar
  18. Gunnarsson U, Granberg G, Nilsson M (2004) Growth, production and interspecific competition in Sphagnum: effects of temperature, nitrogen and sulphur treatments on a boreal mire. New Phytol 163(2):349–359. DOI 10.1111/j.1469–8137.2004.01108.xGoogle Scholar
  19. Hayward PM, Clymo RS (1982). Profiles of water content and pore size in Sphagnum peat, and their relation to peat bog ecology. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 215:299–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heath D (1995) An introduction to experimental design and statistics for biology. UCL Press Limited, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Heijmans MMPD, Klees H, Berendse F (2002) Competition between Sphagnum magellanicum and Eriophorum angustifolium as affected by raised CO2 and increased N deposition. Oikos 97(3):415–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hilbert DW, Roulet N, Moore T (2000). Modelling and analysis of peatlands as dynamical systems. J Ecol 88(2):230–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. IPCC (1996) Climate Change 1995: the science of climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. Kelly L, Schouten MGC (2002) Vegetation. In: Schouten MGC (ed) Conservation and restoration of raised bogs: geological, hydrological and ecological studies. Dúchas—The Heritage Service of the Department of the Environment and Local Government, Ireland; Staatsbosbeheer, the Netherlands, Geological Survey of Ireland, DublinGoogle Scholar
  25. Limpens J, Berendse F (2003a) How litter quality affects mass loss and N loss from decomposing Sphagnum. Oikos 103:537–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Limpens J, Berendse F (2003b) Growth reduction of Sphagnum magellanicum subjected to high nitrogen deposition: the role of amino acid nitrogen concentration. Oecologia 135:339–345. DOI 10.1007/s00442-003-1224-5Google Scholar
  27. Limpens J, Tomassen HBM, Berendse F (2003) Expansion of Sphagnum fallax in bogs: striking the balance between N and P availability. J Bryol 25:83–90. DOI 10.1179/03736680235001733Google Scholar
  28. Lindholm T (1990) Growth dynamics of the peat moss Sphagnum fuscum on hummocks on a raised bog in southern Finland. Ann Bot Fenn 27(1):67–78Google Scholar
  29. Moore PD (2002) The future of cool temperate bogs. Environ Conserv 29(1):3–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Parkes HM, Mitchell FJG (2000) Vegetation history at Clonmacnoise, Co. Offaly. Biol Environ Proc R Irish Acad 100B(1):35–40Google Scholar
  31. Rustad LE, Campbell JL, Marion GM, Norby RJ, Mitchell MJ, Hartley AE, Cornelissen JHC, Gurevitch J and GCTE-NEWS (2001) A meta-analysis of the response of soil respiration, net nitrogen mineralization, and aboveground plant growth to experimental ecosystem warming. Oecologia 126(4):543–562. DOI 10.1007/s004420000544Google Scholar
  32. Rydin H, McDonald AJS (1985a) Tolerance of Sphagnum to water level. J Bryol 13:571–578Google Scholar
  33. Rydin H, McDonald AJS (1985b) Photosynthesis in Sphagnum at different water contents. J Bryol 13:579–584Google Scholar
  34. Rydin H, Sjörs H, Löfroth M (2003) Mires Acta Phytogeogr Suec 84:91–112Google Scholar
  35. Schouten MGC (ed) (2002) Conservation and restoration of raised bogs: geological, hydrological and ecological studies. Dúchas— The Heritage Service of the Department of the Environment and Local Government, Ireland; Staatsbosbeheer, the Netherlands, Geological Survey of Ireland, DublinGoogle Scholar
  36. Sonesson M, Carlsson BA, Callaghan TV, Halling S, Björn LO, Bertgren M, Johanson U (2002) Growth of two peat-forming mosses in subarctic mires: species interactions and effects of simulated climate change. Oikos 99(1):151–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Titus JE, Wagner DJ (1984) Carbon balance for two Sphagnum mosses: water balance resolves a physiological paradox. Ecology 65(6):1765–1774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Van der Schaaf S (2002) Bog hydrology. In: Schouten MGC (ed) Conservation and restoration of raised bogs: geological, hydrological and ecological studies. Dúchas—The Heritage Service of the Department of the Environment and Local Government, Ireland; Staatsbosbeheer, the Netherlands; Geological Survey of Ireland, DublinGoogle Scholar
  39. Wallén B, Falkengren-Gerup U, Malmer N (1988). Biomass, productivity and relative rate of photosynthesis of Sphagnum at different water levels on a South Swedish peat bog. Holarctic Ecol 11:70–75Google Scholar
  40. Weltzin JF, Harth C, Bridgham SD, Pastor J, Vonderharr M (2001) Production and microtopography of bog bryophytes: response to warming and water-table manipulations. Oecologia 128(4):557–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bjorn J.M. Robroek
    • 1
  • Juul Limpens
    • 1
  • Angela Breeuwer
    • 1
  • Matthijs G.C. Schouten
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Nature Conservation and Plant Ecology group, Department of Environmental SciencesWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.National Forest Service of The NetherlandsDriebergenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations