Plant Ecology

, Volume 190, Issue 1, pp 71–80

Disturbance persistence in managed grasslands: shifts in aboveground community structure and the weed seed bank

Original paper

Abstract

The length of time and form in which disturbances persist in systems depends on the intensity and frequency of disturbance and on the abilities of resident species to recover from such events. In grazed grasslands, trampling by large mammalian herbivores can periodically facilitate weed establishment by exposing patches of bare ground but whether an intense soil disturbance event results in a temporary increase in weed abundance or a persistent weed problem remains unclear. In May 2002, cattle trampling following heavy rain caused severe damage to nine-month old, rotationally grazed, cool-season pastures (Midwest USA). In September 2002, we compared the aboveground composition of paddocks (i.e., fenced pasture sections) that were heavily disturbed to those that received no damage. Relative to undisturbed paddocks, forage species relative cover was 17% lower in disturbed paddocks, and weed species and bare ground relative cover was 61% and 100% higher, respectively. By September 2004, paddock types did not differ in all aboveground community components. However, the abundance and species richness of weed seeds in the soil seed bank averaged respectively 82% and 30% higher in disturbed paddocks between 2003 and 2004. These findings indicate that a spatially extensive, intense soil disturbance event may soon become undetectable in components of aboveground pasture structure but can persist as an augmented weed seed bank. Because of high weed seed bank longevity, disturbances to formerly disturbed pastures would likely result in higher weed recruitment, with more species represented, than in those which lack previous disturbance. Disturbance history may thus be a useful predictor of weed community composition following subsequent disturbance. Based on empirical data supporting this proposition, we recommend that grassland managers explicitly incorporate disturbance history into dynamic management planning and do not rely exclusively on aboveground characters to evaluate the invasion status or colonization potential of an area by undesirable plants. We emphasize that the ecological legacies of past soil disturbance events cannot only influence the contemporary patterns and processes of grasslands, but importantly, affect their compositional trajectories following subsequent perturbation.

Keywords

Ecological legacies Site history Community trajectories Soil seed bank C3 pasture invasions Weed recruitment dynamics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altesor A, Oesterheld M, Leoni E, Lezama F, Rodríquez C (2005) Effect of grazing on community structure and productivity of a Uruguayan grassland. Plant Ecol 179:83–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Austrheim G, Eriksson O (2003) Recruitment and life-history traits of sparse plant species in subalpine grasslands. Can J Bot 81:171–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakker JP, ter Heerdt GNJ (2005) Organic grassland farming in the Netherlands: a case study of effects on vegetation dynamics. Basic Appl Ecol 6:205–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bellemare J, Motzkin G, Foster DR (2002) Legacies of the agricultural past in the forested present: an assessment of historical land-use effects on rich mesic forests. J Biogeogr 29:1401–1420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buckland SM, Thompson K, Hodgson JG, Grime JP (2001) Grassland invasions: effects of manipulations of climate and management. J Appl Ecol 38:301–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burke MJW, Grime JP (1996) An experimental study of plant community invasibility. Ecology 77:776–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chazdon RL (2003) Tropical forest recovery: legacies of human impact and natural disturbances. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 6:51–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cleland EE, Smith MD, Andelman SJ, Bowles C, Carney KM, Horner-Devine MC, Drake JM, Emery SM, Gramling JM, Vandermast DB (2004) Invasion in space and time: non-native species richness and relative abundance respond to interannual variation in productivity and diversity. Ecol Lett 7:947–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dale VH, Lugo AE, MacMahon JA, Pickett STA (1998) Ecosystem management in the context of large, infrequent disturbances. Ecosystems 1:546–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis AS, Cardina J, Forcella F, Johnson GA, Kegode G, Lindquist JL, Luschei EC, Renner KA, Sprague CL, Williams MM II (2005) Environmental factors affecting seed persistence of annual weeds across the US corn belt. Weed Sci 53:860–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis MA, Grime JP, Thompson K (2000) Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. J Ecol 88:528–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis MA, Pelsor M (2001) Experimental support for a resource-based mechanistic model of invasibility. Ecol Lett 4:421–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DiTomaso JM (2000) Invasive weeds in rangelands: species, impacts, and management. Weed Sci 48:255–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eriksson O, Ehrlén J (1992) Seed and microsite limitation of recruitment in plant populations. Oecologia 91:360–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eskelinen A, Virtanen R (2005) Local and regional processes in low-productive mountain plant communities: the roles of seed and microsite limitation in relation to grazing. Oikos 110:360–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fales SL, McMurry SA, Weise WT (1993) The role of pasture in northeastern dairy farming: historical perspective, trends, research imperatives for the future. In: Sims JT (ed) Agricultural research in the United States: critical review and future perspectives. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp 111–133Google Scholar
  17. Fargione JE, Tilman D (2005) Diversity decreases invasion via both sampling and complementarity effects. Ecol Lett 8:604–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Foster BL (2001) Constraints on colonization and species richness along a grassland productivity gradient: the role of propagule availability. Ecol Lett 4:530–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Foster BL, Dickson TL, Murphy CA, Karel IS, Smith VH (2004) Propagule pools mediate community assembly and diversity-ecosystem regulation along a grassland productivity gradient. J Ecol 92:435–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Foster DR, Aber JD, Melillo JM, Bowden RD, Bazzaz FA (1997) Forest response to disturbance and anthropogenic stress. Bioscience 47:437–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Foster DR, Fluet M, Boose ER (1999) Human or natural disturbance: landscape-scale dynamics of the tropical forests of Puerto Rico. Ecol Appl 9:555–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fukami T (2001) Sequence effects of disturbance on community structure. Oikos 92:215–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harper JL (1977) Population biology of plants. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Higgins SI, Richardson DM (1998) Pine invasions in the southern hemisphere: modeling interactions between organism, environment and disturbance. Plant Ecol 135:79–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hooper DU, Chapin FS, Ewel JJ, Hector A, Inchausti P, Lavorel S, Lawton JH, Lodge DM, Loreau M, Naeem S, Schmid B, Setala H, Symstad AJ, Vandermeer J, Wardle DA (2005) Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol Monogr 75:3–35Google Scholar
  26. Huston MA (2004) Management strategies for plant invasions: manipulating productivity, disturbance, and competition. Divers Distrib 10:167–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kalamees R, Zobel M (2002) The role of the seed bank in gap regeneration in a calcareous grassland community. Ecology 83:1017–1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Keeley JE, Lubin D, Fotheringham CJ (2003) Fire and grazing impacts on plant diversity and alien plant invasions in the southern Sierra Nevada. Ecol Appl 13:1355–1374Google Scholar
  29. Kwit C, Platt WJ (2003) Disturbance history influences regeneration of non-pioneer understory trees. Ecology 84:2575–2581Google Scholar
  30. Littell RC, Stroup W, Freund RJ (2002) SAS for linear models. 4th edn. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USAGoogle Scholar
  31. McNaughton SJ (1983) Serengeti grassland ecology: the role of composite environmental factors and contingency in community organization. Ecol Monogr 53:291–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McNaughton SJ (1985) Ecology of a grazing ecosystem: the Serengeti. Ecol Monogr 55:259–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Milbau A, Nijs I, De Raedemaecker F, Reheul D, De Cauwer B (2005) Invasion in grassland gaps: the role of neighbourhood richness, light availability and species complementarity during two successive years. Funct Ecol 19:27–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Naeem S, Knops JMH, Tilman D, Howe KM, Kennedy T, Gale S (2000) Plant diversity increases resistance to invasion in the absence of covarying extrinsic factors. Oikos 91:97–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Oesterheld M, Sala OE (1990) Effects of grazing on seedling establishment: the role of seed and safe-site availability. J Veg Sci 1:353–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Peco B, de Pablos I, Traba J, Levassor C (2005) The effect of grazing abandonment on species composition and functional traits: the case of dehesa grasslands. Basic Appl Ecol 6:175–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pickett STA, White PS (1985) The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. Academic Press, Orlando, FL, pp 371–384Google Scholar
  38. Pimentel D, Kounang N (1998) Ecology of soil erosion in ecosystems. Ecosystems 1:416–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pimentel D, Lach L, Zuniga R, Morrison D (2000) Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States. Bioscience 50:53–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Renne IJ, Tracy BF, Colonna IA (2006) Shifts in grassland invasibility: effects of soil resources, disturbance, composition, and invader size. Ecology 87:2264–2277Google Scholar
  41. Sankaran M, McNaughton SJ (1999) Determinants of biodiversity regulate compositional stability of communities. Nature 401:691–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. SAS (2003) The statistical analysis system, version 91. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USAGoogle Scholar
  43. Seabloom EW, Harpole WS, Reichman OJ, Tilman D (2003) Invasion, competitive dominance, and resource use by exotic and native California grassland species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:13384–13389PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shea K, Roxburgh SH, Rauschert ESJ (2004) Moving from␣pattern to process: coexistence mechanisms under intermediate disturbance regimes. Ecol Lett 7:491–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sheley RL, Krueger-Mangold J (2003) Principles for restoring invasive plant-infested rangeland. Weed Sci 51:260–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Smith MD, Knapp AK (1999) Exotic plant species in a C4-dominated grassland: invasibility, disturbance, and community structure. Oecologia 120:605–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Suding KN, Gross KL, Houseman GR (2004) Alternative states and positive feedbacks in restoration ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 19:46–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tracy BF, Renne IJ (2005) Reinfestation of endophyte-infected tall fescue in renovated endophyte-free pastures under rotational stocking. Agron J 97:1473–1477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tracy BF, Renne IJ, Gerrish J, Sanderson MA (2004) Effects of plant diversity on invasion of weed species in experimental pasture communities. Basic Appl Ecol 5:543–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tracy BF, Sanderson MA (2000) Seedbank diversity in grazing lands of the Northeast United States. J Range Manage 53:114–118Google Scholar
  51. Tracy BF, Sanderson MA (2004) Forage productivity, species evenness and weed invasion in pasture communities. Agric Ecosyst Environ 102:175–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tilman D (1997) Community invasibility, recruitment limitation, and grassland biodiversity. Ecology 78:81–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tilman D (2004) Niche tradeoffs, neutrality, and community structure: a stochastic theory of resource competition, invasion, and community assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:10854–10861PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tilman D, Reich PB, Knops JMH (2006) Biodiversity and ecosystem stability in a decade-long grassland experiment. Nature 441:629–632PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Turnbull LA, Crawley MJ, Rees M (2000) Are plant populations seed-limited? A review of seed sowing experiments. Oikos 88:225–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Uriarte M, Rivera LW, Zimmerman JK, Aide TM, Power AG, Flecker AS (2004) Effects of land use history on hurricane damage and recovery in a neotropical forest. Plant Ecol 174:49–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Uva RH, Neal JC, DiTomaso JM (1997) Weeds of the Northeast. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, 397 ppGoogle Scholar
  58. Watkinson AR, Ormerod SJ (2001) Grasslands, grazing and biodiversity: editors’ introduction. J Appl Ecol 38:233–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wilsey BJ, Polley HW (2002) Reductions in grassland species evenness increase dicot seedling invasion and spittle bug infestation. Ecol Lett 5:676–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wilsey BJ, Polley HW (2003) Effects of seed additions and grazing history on diversity and productivity of subhumid grasslands. Ecology 84:920–931Google Scholar
  61. Woitke M, Dietz H (2002) Shifts in dominance of native and invasive plants in experimental patches of vegetation. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 5:165–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zeiter M, Stampfli A, Newbery DM (2006) Recruitment limitation constrains local species richness and productivity in dry grassland. Ecology 87:942–951PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Zobel M, Otsus M, Liira J, Moora M, Möls T (2000) Is small-scale species richness limited by seed availability or microsite availability? Ecology 81:3274–3282CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Crop SciencesUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesYoungstown State UniversityYoungstownUSA

Personalised recommendations