Advertisement

Plant Ecology

, Volume 186, Issue 2, pp 203–216 | Cite as

Liana habitat associations and community structure in a Bornean lowland tropical forest

  • Saara J. DeWalt
  • Kalan Ickes
  • Reuben Nilus
  • Kyle E. Harms
  • David F. R. P. Burslem
Article

Abstract

Lianas (woody vines) contribute substantially to the diversity and structure of most tropical forests, yet little is known about the importance of habitat specialization in maintaining tropical liana diversity and the causes of variation among forests in liana abundance and species composition. We examined habitat associations, species diversity, species composition, and community structure of lianas at Sepilok Forest Reserve, Sabah, Malaysia in northeastern Borneo among three soil types that give rise to three distinct forest types of lowland tropical rain forest: alluvial, sandstone hill, and kerangas (heath) forest. Alluvial soils are more nutrient rich and have higher soil moisture than sandstone soils, whereas kerangas soils are the most nutrient poor and drought prone. Lianas ≥0.5-cm in diameter were measured, tagged, and identified to species in three square 0.25-ha plots in each forest type. The number of lianas ≥0.5 cm did not differ significantly among forest types and averaged 1348 lianas ha−1, but mean liana stem diameter, basal area, estimated biomass, species richness, and Fisher’s \(\upalpha\) diversity index were all greater for plots in alluvial than sandstone or kerangas forests. Liana species composition also differed greatly among the three habitats, with 71% of species showing significant positive or negative habitat associations. Sandstone forests were intermediate to alluvial and kerangas forests in most aspects of liana community structure and composition, and fewer species showed significant habitat associations with this forest type. Ranking of forest types with respect to liana density, biomass, and diversity matches the ranking in soil fertility and water availability (alluvial > sandstone hill > kerangas). These results suggest that edaphic factors play an important role in maintaining liana species diversity and structuring liana communities.

Keywords

Dipterocarp forest Diversity Habitat specialization Randomization tests Sabah Vines 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the field help of B. Kurzel and numerous field hands employed by the Forest Research Centre at Sepilok. Sally Brock helped create the map of study sites. Comments by S.␣Schnitzer, P. Fine, C. Cannon, and three anonymous reviewers as well as discussions with C. Webb improved this manuscript. This work was supported by a BES grant to D.F.R.P. Burslem and other members of the Biotic Interactions in Tropical Rain Forests project.

References

  1. Acres B.D. and Folland C.J. (1975). The Soil of Sabah. Volume 2: Sandakan and Kinabatangan Districts. Land Resource Division, Ministry of Overseas Development, Tolworth Tower, Surbiton, Surrey, UKGoogle Scholar
  2. Appanah S. and Putz F.E. (1984). Climber abundance in virgin dipterocarp forest and the effect of pre-felling climber cutting on logging damage. Malaysian Forester. 47: 335–342Google Scholar
  3. Ashton P.S. 1964. Ecological studies in the mixed dipterocarp forests of Brunei State. Oxford Forestry Memoirs 25Google Scholar
  4. Ashton P.S. and Hall P. (1992). Comparisons of structure among mixed dipterocarp forests of north-western Borneo. J. Ecol. 80: 459–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baltzer J.L., Thomas S.C., Nilus R. and Burslem D.F.R.P. (2005). Edaphic specialization in tropical rain forest trees: physiological correlates and responses to reciprocal transplantation. Ecology 86: 3063–3077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bray J.R. and Curtis J.T. (1957). An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol. Monogr. 27: 325–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brünig E.F. (1971). On the ecological significance of drought in the equatorial wet evergreen rain forest of Sarawak (Borneo). In: Flenley J.R. (eds) The Water Relations of Malesian Forests. Department of Geography, University of Hull, UK, pp. 65–97Google Scholar
  8. Brünig E.F. (1974). Ecological Studies in the Kerangas Forests of Sarawak and Brunei. Borneo Literature Bureau, Kuching, Sarawak, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  9. Burnham R.J. (2002). Dominance, diversity and distribution of lianas in Yasuní, Ecuador: who is on top?. J. Trop. Ecol. 18: 845–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burslem D.F.R.P., Grubb P.J. and Turner I.M. (1996). Responses to simulated drought and elevated nutrient supply among shade-tolerant tree seedlings of lowland tropical forest in Singapore. Biotropica 28: 636–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cannon C.H. and Leighton M. (2004). Tree species distributions across five habitats in a Bornean rain forest. J. Veget. Sci. 15: 257–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clark D.B., Clark D.A. and Read J.M. (1998). Edaphic variation and the mesoscale distribution of tree species in a neotropical rain forest. J. Ecol. 86: 101–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark D.B., Palmer M.W. and Clark D.A. (1999). Edaphic factors and the landscape-scale distributions of tropical rain forest trees. Ecology 80: 2662–2675Google Scholar
  14. Dent D. 2004. The Mechanistic Basis of Habitat Specialisation in Dipterocarps. Ph.D. dissertation, Aberdeen University, Aberdeen, UKGoogle Scholar
  15. DeWalt S.J., Schnitzer S.A. and Denslow J.S. (2000). Density and diversity of lianas along a chronosequence in a central Panamanian tropical forest. J. Trop. Ecol. 16: 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duivenvoorden J.F. (1995). Tree species composition and rain forest–environment relationships in the Middle Caquetá Area, Colombia, NW Amazonia. Vegetatio 120: 91–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ewers F.W., Fisher J.B. and Chiu S.-T. (1990). A survey of vessel dimensions in stems of tropical lianas and other growth forms. Oecologia 84: 544–552Google Scholar
  18. Fine P.V.A., Mesones I. and Coley P.D. (2004). Herbivores promote habitat specialization by trees in Amazonian forests. Science 305: 663–665PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fisher J.B. and Ewers F.W. (1995). Vessel dimensions in liana and tree species of Gnetum (Gnetales). Amer. J. Bot. 82: 1350–1357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fisher J.B., Tan H.T.W. and Toh L.P.L. (2002). Xylem of rattans: Vessel dimensions in climbing palms. Amer. J. Bot. 89: 196–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fox J.E.D. 1973. A handbook to Kabili-Sepilok Forest Reserve, Sabah Forest Record No. 9. Borneo Literature Bureau, Kuching, Sarawak, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  22. Gartner B.L., Bullock S.H., Mooney H.A., Brown V.B. and Whitbeck J.L. (1990). Water transport properties of vine and tree stems in a tropical deciduous forest. Amer. J. Bot. 77: 742–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gentry A.H. (1991). The distribution and evolution of climbing plants. In: Putz F.E. and Mooney H.A. (eds), The Biology of Vines. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 3–49Google Scholar
  24. Harms K.E., Condit R., Hubbell S.P. and Foster R.B. (2001). Habitat associations of trees and shrubs in a 50-ha Neotropical forest plot. J. Ecol. 89: 947–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hubbell S.P. (2001). The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USAGoogle Scholar
  26. Ibarra-Manríquez G. and Martínez-Ramos M. (2002). Landscape variation of liana communities in a Neotropical rain forest. Plant Ecol. 160: 91–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Magurran A.E. (2004). Measuring Biological Diversity. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  28. Marrs R.H., Thompson J., Scott D. and Proctor J. (1991). Nitrogen mineralization and nitrification in terra firme forest and savanna soils on Ilha de Maraca, Roraima, Brazil. J. Trop. Ecol. 7: 123–137Google Scholar
  29. McCune B. and Grace J.B. (2002). Analysis of Ecological Communities. MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, Oregon, USAGoogle Scholar
  30. Mielke P.W. Jr. (1984). Meteorological applications of permutation techniques based on distance functions. In: Krishnaiah P.R. and Sen P.K. (eds) Handbook of Statistics, Vol. 4. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 813–830Google Scholar
  31. Minchin P.R. (1987). An evaluation of relative robustness of techniques for ecological ordination. Vegetatio 69: 89–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Moran J.A., Barker M.G., Moran A.J., Becker P. and Ross S. (2000). A comparison of the soil water, nutrient status, and litterfall characteristics of tropical heath and mixed-dipterocarp forest sites in Brunei. Biotropica 32: 2–13Google Scholar
  33. Newbery D.M. and Proctor J. (1984). Ecological studies in four contrasting lowland rain forests in Gunung Mulu National Park, Sarawak IV. Associations between tree distribution and soil factors. J. Ecol. 70: 475–493Google Scholar
  34. Nilus R. 2004. Effect of Edaphic Variation on Forest Structure, Dynamics, Diversity and Regeneration in a Lowland Tropical Rain Forest in Borneo. Ph.D. dissertation, Aberdeen University, Aberdeen, UKGoogle Scholar
  35. Palmiotto P.A., Davies S.J., Vogt K.A., Ashton M.S., Vogt D.J. and Ashton P.S. (2004). Soil-related habitat specialization in dipterocarp rain forest tree species in Borneo. J. Ecol. 92: 609–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Paoli G.D., Curran L.M. and Zak D.R. (2006). Soil nutrients and beta diversity in the Bornean Dipterocarpaceae: evidence for niche partitioning by tropical rain forest trees. J. Ecol. 94: 157–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Phillips O.L., Nuñez V. P., Monteagudo A.L., Cruz A.P., Zans M.-E.C., Sanchez W.G., Yli-Halla M. and Rose S. (2003). Habitat association among Amazonian tree species: a landscape-scale approach. J. Ecol. 91: 757–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Potts M.D., Ashton M.S., Kaufman L.S. and Plotkin J.B. (2002). Habitat patterns in tropical rain forests: a comparison of 105 plots in northwestern Borneo. Ecology 83: 2782–2797Google Scholar
  39. Proctor J., Anderson J.M., Chai P. and Vallack H.W. (1983a). Ecological studies in four contrasting lowland rain forests in Gunung Mulu National Park, Sarawak I. Forest environment, structure, and floristics. J. Ecol. 71: 237–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Proctor J., Anderson J.M., Chai P. and Vallack H.W. (1983b). Ecological studies in four contrasting lowland rain forests in Gunung Mulu National Park, Sarawak I. Litterfall, litter standing crop and preliminary observations on herbivory. J. Ecol. 71: 261–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Putz F.E. (1984). The natural history of lianas on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Ecology 65: 1713–1724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Richards P.W. (1996). The Tropical Rain Forest: An Ecological Study. Second edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  43. Ruokolainen K., Linna A. and Tuomisto H. (1997). Use of Melastomataceae and pteridophytes for revealing phytogeographical patterns in Amazonian rain forests. J. Trop. Ecol. 13: 243–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sabatier D., Grimaldi M., Prevost M.F., Guillaume J., Godron M., Dosso M. and Curmi P. (1997). The influence of soil cover organization on the floristic and structural heterogeneity of a Guianan rain forest. Plant Ecol. 131: 81–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. SAS Institute 2000. SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Version 8, Volumes 1, 2, and 3, Cary, North Carolina, USAGoogle Scholar
  46. Schnitzer S.A. 2005. A mechanistic explanation for global patterns of liana abundance and distribution. Amer. Nat. 166: 262–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schnitzer S.A. and Bongers F. (2002). The ecology of lianas and their role in forests. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 223–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schnitzer S.A. and Carson W.P. (2001). Treefall gaps and the maintenance of species diversity in a tropical forest. Ecology 82: 913–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schnitzer S.A., Dalling J.W. and Carson W.P. (2000). The impact of lianas on tree regeneration in tropical forest canopy gaps: Evidence for an alternative pathway of gap-phase regeneration. J. Ecol. 88: 655–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schnitzer S.A., DeWalt S.J. and Chave J. In press. Censusing and measuring lianas: a quantitative comparison of the common methods. BiotropicaGoogle Scholar
  51. Slik J.W.F., Poulsen A.D., Ashton P.S., Cannon C.H., Eichhorn K.A.O., Kartawinata K., Lanniari I., Nagamasu H., Nakagawa M., van Nieuwstadt M.G.L., Payne J., Saridan A., Sidiyasa K., Verburg R.W., Webb C.O. and Wilkie P. (2003). A floristic analysis of the lowland dipterocarp forests of Borneo. J. Biogeogr. 30: 1517–1531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sperry J.S. and Tyree M.T. (1988). Mechanism of water stress-induced xylem embolism. Plant Physiol. 88: 581–587PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Svenning J.-C. (1999). Microhabitat specialization in a species-rich palm community in Amazonian Ecuador. J. Ecol. 87: 55–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tuomisto H. and Poulsen A.D. (1996). Influence of edaphic specialization on pteridophyte distribution in neotropical rain forests. J. Biogeogr. 23: 283–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tuomisto H. and Ruokolainen K. (1994). Distribution of Pteridophyta and Melastomataceae along an edaphic gradient in an Amazonian rain-forest. J. Veget. Sci. 5: 25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tuomisto H., Ruokolainen K., Poulsen A.D., Moran R.C., Quintana C., Cañas G. and Celi J. (2002). Distribution and diversity of pteridophytes and Melastomataceae along edaphic gradients in Yasuní National Park, Ecuadorian Amazonia. Biotropica 34: 516–533Google Scholar
  57. Tyree M.T., Patiño S. and Becker P. (1998). Vulnerability to drought-induced embolism of Bornean heath and dipterocarp forest trees. Tree Physiol. 18: 583–588PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Vormisto J., Phillips O.L., Ruokolainen K., Tuomisto H. and Vasquez R. (2000). A comparison of fine-scale distribution patterns of four plant groups in an Amazonian rainforest. Ecography 23: 349–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Webb C.O. and Peart D.R. (2000). Habitat associations of trees and seedlings in a Bornean rain forest. J. Ecol. 88: 464–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Whitmore T.C. (1984). Tropical Rain Forests of the Far East, Second edn. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  61. Wright S.J. 2002. Plant diversity in tropical forests: A review of mechanisms of species coexistence. Oecologia 130: 1–14.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Saara J. DeWalt
    • 1
  • Kalan Ickes
    • 1
    • 2
  • Reuben Nilus
    • 3
  • Kyle E. Harms
    • 4
    • 5
  • David F. R. P. Burslem
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesClemson UniversityClemsonUSA
  2. 2.Plant and Soil Science, School of Biological SciencesUniversity of AberdeenAberdeenUK
  3. 3.Forest Research CentreSabahMalaysia
  4. 4.Department of Biological SciencesLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA
  5. 5.Smithsonian Tropical Research InstituteBalboaRepublic of Panama

Personalised recommendations