Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Sandblasting as a possible factor controlling the distribution of plants on a coastal dune system


Intensity of the abrasive effect of wind-borne sand – sandblasting – in addition to other environmental factors was measured at two vegetation zones on a sandy beach and one site at an inland area. One zone on the beach included foredunes sparsely vegetated by dune species such as Carex kobomugi and Calystegia soldanella. The other zone which was located ∼50 m inland from the first zone was flat grassland dominated by inland species such as Miscanthus sinensis and Imperata cylindrica var. Koenigii. The inland site consisted of short grassland located 3 km inland from the beach. Intensity of sandblasting was estimated by the whiteness of a transparent plastic sheet exposed to the air for 2 weeks. This sheet turned whitely opaque when it was abraded by wind-borne sand. The other environmental factors measured at the beach were intensity of salt spray, soil water content, soil salinity, and sand accumulation, while intensity of salt spray was the only additional factor measured at the inland site. Intensity of sandblasting was considerably higher at the foredune zone, while that at the grassland zone was as low as that at the inland site. Considerable salt spray was detected at the foredune and grassland zones. Differences in other environmental factors were small between the two zones on the beach. In order to compare the difference in tolerance to sandblasting, a jet of sand was applied to one ordinary species, C. kobomugi, from the foredune and two species, M. sinensis and I. cylindrica, from the grassland zone. The difference in tolerance was determined by the decrease in the area of green leaf after applying sandblasting with commercial sandblaster and/or spraying with sea water. M. sinensis and I. cylindrica lost much of the leaf area after sandblasting and salt spraying, while C. kobomugi lost little. These results indicated that one of the characteristic environmental factors of a foredune is the high intensity of sandblasting accompanied by salt spray, and that species found in the foredune are more tolerant to sandblasting than species distributing in more inland areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Armbrust D.V., Paulsen G.M., Ellis R. (1974). Physiological responses to wind- and sandblast-damaged winter wheat plants. Agron. J. 66:421–423

  2. Avis A.M., Lubke R.A. (1985). The effect of wind-borne sand and salt spray on the growth of Scirpus nodosus in a mobile dune system. S Afr. J. Bot. 51:100–110

  3. Barbour M.G. (1978). Salt spray as a microenvironmental factor in the distribution of beach plants at Point Reyes, California. Oecologia 32:213–224

  4. Boyce S.G. (1954). The salt spray community. Ecol. Monogr. 24:29–67

  5. Cartica R.J., Quinn J.A. (1980). Responses of populations of Solidago sempervirens (Compositae) to salt spray across a barrier beach. Amer. J. Bot. 67:1236–1242

  6. Cleugh H.A., Miller J.M., Böhm M. (1998). Direct mechanical effects of wind on crops. Agroforest. Syst. 41:85–112

  7. Danin A. (1996). Plants of Desert Dunes. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg

  8. Fryrear D.W. (1971). Survival and growth of cotton plants damaged by windblown sand. Agronomy Journal 63:638–642

  9. Fryrear D.W., Stubbendieck J., McCully W.G. (1973). Grass seedling response to wind and windblown sand. Crop Sci. 13:622–625

  10. Goldstein G., Drake D.R., Alpha C., Melcher P., Heraux J., Azocar A. (1996). Growth and photosynthetic responses of Scaevola sericea, a Hawaiian coastal shrub, to substrate salinity and salt spray. Intl J. Plant Sci. 157:171–179

  11. Ishikawa S., Furukawa A., Oikawa T. (1995). Zonal plant distribution and edaphic and micrometeorological conditions on a coastal sand dune. Ecol. Res. 10:259–266

  12. Kachi N., Hirose T. (1979). Multivariate approaches to the plant communities related with edaphic factors in the dune system at Azigaura, Ibaraki Pref. I. Association-analysis. Jpn J. Ecol. 29:17–27

  13. Kurauchi I. (1956). Salt spray damage to the coastal forest. Jpn J. Ecol. 5:123–127 (in Japanese)

  14. Lyles L., Woodruff N.P. (1960). Abrasive action of windblown soil on plant seedlings. Agron. J. 52:533–536

  15. Marshall J.K. (1965). Corynephorus canescens (L.) P. Beauv. as a model for the Ammophila problem. J. Ecol. 53:447–463

  16. Maun M.A. (1994). Adaptations enhancing survival and establishment of seedlings on coastal dune systems. Vegetatio 111:59–70

  17. Maze K.M., Whalley R.D.B. (1992). Effects of salt spray and sand burial on Spinifex sericeus R.Br. Austr. J. Ecol. 17:9–19

  18. Moreno-Casasola P. (1986). Sand movement as a factor in the distribution of plant communities in a coastal dune system. Vegetatio 65:67–76

  19. Oosting H.J. (1942). Factors affecting vegetational zonation on coastal dunes. Ecology 23:131–142

  20. Oosting H.J. (1954). Ecological processes and vegetation of the maritime strand in the southeastern United States. Bot. Rev. 20:226–262

  21. Pakeman R.J., Lee J.A. (1991a). The ecology of the strandline annuals Cakile maritima and Salsola kali. I. Environmental factors affecting plant performance. J. Ecol. 79:143–153

  22. Pakeman R.J., Lee J.A. (1991b). The ecology of the strandline annuals Cakile maritima and Salsola kali. II. Role of nitrogen in controlling plant performance. J. Ecol. 79:155–165

  23. Parsons R.F., Gill A.M. (1968). The effects of salt spray on coastal vegetation at Wilson’s Promontory, Victoria, Australia. Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict. 81:1–10

  24. Skidmore E.L. (1966). Wind and sandblast injury to seedling green beans. Agron. J. 58:311–315

  25. Suzuki E., Numata M. (1982). Succession on a sandy coast following the construction of banks planted with Elymus mollis. Jpn J. Bot. 32:129–142

  26. Sykes M.T., Wilson J.B. (1988). An experimental investigation into the response of some New Zealand sand dune species to salt spray. Ann. Bot. 62:159–166

  27. Tezara W., Martínez D., Rengifo E., Herrera A. (2003). Photosynthetic responses of the tropical spiny shrub Lycium nodosum (Solanaceae) to drought, soil salinity and saline spray. Ann. Bot. 92:757–765

  28. Tyndall R.W., Teramura A.H., Mulchi C.L., Douglass L.W. (1987). Effects of salt spray upon seedling survival, biomass, and distribution on Currituck Bank, North Carolina. Castanea 52:77–86

  29. Van der Valk A.G. (1974). Environmental factors controlling the distribution of forbs on coastal foredunes in Cape Hatteras National Seashore. Can. J. Bot. 52:1057–1073

  30. Wagner R.H. (1964). The ecology of Uniola paniculata in the dune-strand habitat of North Calorina. Ecol. Monogr. 34:79–96

  31. Woodruff N.P. (1956). Wind-blown soil abrasive injuries to winter wheat plants. Agron. J. 48:499–504

  32. Yura H (1997). Comparative ecophysiology of Chrysanthemum pacificum Nakai and S. altissima L. 1. Why S. altissima cannot be established on the seashore. Ecol. Res. 12:313–323

Download references


We would like to thank Dr. Emiko Maruta (Faculty of Science, Toho University) for her continual encouragement.

Author information

Correspondence to H. Yura.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yura, H., Ogura, A. Sandblasting as a possible factor controlling the distribution of plants on a coastal dune system. Plant Ecol 185, 199–208 (2006).

Download citation


  • Abrasion
  • Beach
  • Carex kobomugi
  • Maritime species
  • Salt spray
  • Wind