Advertisement

Plant Ecology

, Volume 185, Issue 1, pp 151–161 | Cite as

Is there a trade-off between species diversity and genetic diversity in forest tree communities?

  • Christian Wehenkel
  • Fritz Bergmann
  • Hans-Rolf GregoriusEmail author
Article

Abstract

The two most important components of biodiversity, species diversity and genetic diversity, have generally been treated as separate topics, although a coordination between both components is believed to be critical for ecosystem stability and resilience. Based on a new trait concept that allows for the assessment of genetic diversity across species, the relationship between species diversity and genetic diversity was examined in eight forest tree communities composed of different tree genera including both climax and pioneer species. It was intended to check whether a trade-off exists between the two diversity components as was found in a few studies on animal species.

Using several isozyme-gene systems as genetic markers, the genetic diversity across species within each of the tree communities was determined by two measures, the commonly used intraspecific genetic diversity averaged over species and the recently developed transspecific genetic diversity per species. Both data sets were compared with the corresponding community-specific species diversity resulting in a positive relationship between the two diversity components. A statistically significant positive correlation was established between the transspecific genetic diversity per species and the species diversity for three isozyme-gene systems. Beyond that, consistent results were obtained using different parameters of the diversity measure which characterize the total, the effective and the number of prevalent variants. The number of prevalent variants reflected most significantly the non-randomness of the observed diversity patterns.

These findings can be explained by the observation that the pioneer tree species reveal a by far higher genetic diversity than the climax tree species, which means that an increase in species diversity, due to the addition of several pioneer species at the expense of one or two climax species, goes along with an increase in the level of genetic diversity. Forest tree communities with the highest degree of species diversity exhibit therefore the highest transspecific genetic diversity per species. This result was discussed with regard to the particular composition and stability of forest tree communities.

Key words:

Climax species Diversity measures Environmental predictability hypothesis Isozyme systems Pioneer species Transspecific genetic diversity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a grant Gr 435/23-1 of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. Permission to utilize the study sites by “Stadt Mühlhausen” and “Freistaat Thüringen” as well as the technical assistance of M. Nöring is greatly appreciated. The authors thank Mark Vellend for helpful comments.

References

  1. Bergmann, F. and Wehenkel, Chr. 2003. Zusammenhänge zwischen Artendiversität und genetischer Diversität in einem Weißtannen-Buchen-Bergahorn-Mischbestand. In: Maurer, W.D., (ed.) Ökologie und Waldbau der Weißtanne (Abies alba Mill.). Tagungsbericht zum 10. Internationalen IUFRO-Tannensymposium, Trippstadt, S. pp. 25–30.Google Scholar
  2. Gaston K.J. (1996). Biodiversity. Blackwell Science, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Gregorius H.-R. (1978). The concept of genetic diversity and its formal relationship to heterozygosity and genetic distance. Math. Biosci. 41: 253–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gregorius H.-R. (1996). The contribution of the genetics of populations to ecosystem stability. Silvae Genetica 45: 267–271Google Scholar
  5. Gregorius H.-R., Bergmann F., Wehenkel Chr. (2003). Analysis of biodiversity across levels of biological organization: a problem of defining traits. Perspectives Plant Ecol., Evol. Syst. 5:209–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hamrick J.L., Murawski D.A. (1991). Levels of allozyme diversity in populations of uncommon neotropical tree species. J. Tropical Ecol. 7:395–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hamrick J.L., Godt M.J.W., Sherman-Broyles S.L. (1992). Factors influencing levels of genetic diversity in woody plant species. New Forests 6:95–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hill M.O. (1973). Diversity and evenness: A unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 54:427–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hosius, B., Leinemann, L., Bergmann, F., Maurer, W., Tabel, U. and Eder, W. 2001. Artendiversität und genetische Diversität: besteht ein Zusammenhang? Allg. Forst- u. Jagd.-Ztg. 172 Jg., 87–91Google Scholar
  10. Johnson G.B. (1973). Relationship of enzyme polymorphism to species diversity. Nature 242:193–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Karlin A.A., Guttman S.I., Rathbun S.L. (1984). Spatial autocorrelation analysis of heterozygosity and geographic distribution in population of Desmognathus fuscus (Amphibia: Plethodontidae). Copeia 1984: 341–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Levins R. (1968). Evolution in Changing Environments. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  13. Nevo E. (1988). Genetic diversity in nature. Patterns and theory. Evol. Biol. 23: 217–246Google Scholar
  14. Otto H.-J. (1994). Waldökologie. Verlag Eugen Ulmer, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  15. Pott R. (1992). Die Pflanzengesellschaften Deutschlands. Verlag Eugen Ulmer, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  16. Slobodkin, L. and Sanders, H. 1969. On the contribution of environmental predictability to species diversity. In: Diversity and Stability in Ecological Systems. Brookhaven Symp. in Biology No. 22, pp. 82–95.Google Scholar
  17. Stern K. and Roche, L. (1974). Genetics of Forest Ecosystems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Vellend M. (2003). Island biogeography of genes and species. Am. Naturalist 162: 358–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Vellend, M. 2004. Parallel effects of land-use history on species diversity and genetic diversity of forest herbs. Ecology 85: 3043–3055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wendel J.F. and Weeden N.F. (1989). Visualization and interpretation of plant isozymes. In: Soltis D.E., Soltis P.S. (eds) Isozymes in Plant Biology. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 5–45Google Scholar
  21. West D.C., Shugart H.H. and Botkin D.B. (1981). Forest Succession – Concepts and Application. Springer-Verlag, New York, Heidelberg, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  22. Ziehe M., Hattemer H.H., Müller-Starck R. and Müller-Starck G. (1999). Genetic structures as indicators for adaptation and adaptational potentials. In: Matyas C. (eds) Forest Genetics and Sustainability. Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 75–89Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Wehenkel
    • 1
  • Fritz Bergmann
    • 1
  • Hans-Rolf Gregorius
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Institut für Forstgenetik und Forstpflanzenzüchtung, Universität GöttingenGöttingenGermany

Personalised recommendations