Plant Ecology

, 185:41 | Cite as

The effects of plant density upon pollination success, reproductive effort and fruit parasitism in Cistus ladanifer L. (Cistaceae)

  • D. B. Metcalfe
  • W. E. Kunin


Human activity often causes a decline in the local density of plant populations. Below some critical lower density, populations may suffer a progressive decline in reproductive success because of the difficulties associated with finding suitable mates. Therefore, to conserve endangered plant species it is necessary to understand in greater detail how changes in population density affect different determinants of plant reproductive success. We simultaneously recorded individual plant pollination success, reproductive effort and fruit parasitism in three populations of Cistus ladanifer L. in eastern Portugal. Pollination success declined significantly as distance to the nearest conspecific increased (p<0.001). However, reproductive effort and fruit parasitism showed the opposite pattern (both p<0.001). On average, plants farther than 1 m from their nearest conspecific suffered from three times more fruit parasitism compared to plants closer to a conspecific. Overall, net female reproductive output decreased as nearest neighbor distance rose (p<0.001). Thus, isolated plants were able to compensate only partially for reduced pollination success through increased reproductive effort. We conclude that management plans for plant populations should recognize that reproductive success is the accumulated result of several different processes, which may each respond to plant density in different ways.

Key words

Competition Density dependence Reproduction Resource allocation 



This project was, to a large extent, supported financially by an M.Sc project grant from the School of Biology, University of Leeds. Thanks go to the following people whose input significantly improved the manuscript; Chris Thomas and Steve Sait. We are deeply indebted to Manuela Pires da Fonseca and Joao Tiago Sabino Marques for providing extensive logistical support and advice in the field.


  1. Allee W.C. (1951) The Social Life of Animals, 2nd edition. Beacon Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  2. Allee W.C., Emerson A.E., Park O., Park T., Schmidt K.P. (1949) Principles of Animal Ecology. W.B. Saunders Company, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  3. Atsatt P.R., O’Dowd D.J. (1976) Plant defense guilds. Science 193:24–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bastida F., Talavera S. (2002) Temporal and spatial patterns of seed dispersal in two Cistus species (Cistaceae). Ann. Bot. 89:427–434CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Burd M. 1994. Bateman's principle and plant reproduction: the role of pollen limitations in fruits and seed set. Bot. Rev. 60:83–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. KlinKhamer PlG.L. and de Jong T.J. (1990) Effects of plant size, plant density and sex differential nectar reward on pollinator visitation in the protandrous Echium vulgare (Boraginaccae). Oikos 57:399–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kunin W.E. (1993) Sex and the single mustard: population density and pollinator behavior effects on seed-set. Ecology 74:2145–2160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kunin W.E. (1999) Patterns of herbivore incidence on experimental arrays and field populations of ragwort, Senecio jacobaea. Oikos 84:515–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Larson B.M.H., Barrett S.C.H. (2000) A comparative analysis of pollen limitation in flowering plants. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 69:503–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mustajarvi K., Siikamaki P., Rytkonen S., Lammi A. (2001) Consequences of plant population size and density for plant-pollinator interactions and plant performance. J. Ecol. 89:80–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Otway S.J., Hector A., Lawton J.H. (2005) Resource dilution effects on specialist insect herbivores in a grassland biodiversity experiment. J. Anim. Ecol. 74:234–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pielou E.C. (1977) Mathematical Ecology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Rathcke B. (1983) Competition and facilitation among plants for pollination. In: Real L. (eds) Pollination Biology. Academic Press, Orlando, pp 305–329Google Scholar
  14. Root R.B. (1973) Organisation of a plant–arthropod association in simple and diverse habitats: the fauna of collards (Brassica oleracea). Ecol. Monogr. 43:95–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Serrano J.M., Delgado J.A., Lopez F., Acosta F.J., Fungairino. S.G. (2001) Multiple infestation by seed predators: the effect of loculate fruits on intraspecific insect larval competition. Acta Oecologia 22:153- 160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Stanton M.L., Bereczky J.K., Hasbrouck H.D. (1987) Pollination thoroughness and maternal yield regulation in wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum (Brassicaceae). Oecologia 74:68–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Talavera S., Gibbs P.E., Herrera J. (1993) Reproductive biology of Cistus ladanifer (Cistaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 186:123–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wilcock C., Neiland R. (2002) Pollination failure in plants: why it happens and when it matters. Trends Plant Sci. 7:270–277CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation, School of BiologyUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK
  2. 2.School of Geosciences, Institute of GeographyUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations