Plant Ecology

, Volume 183, Issue 1, pp 1–8

Seed supply of native and cultivated grasses in pine forests of the southwestern United States and the potential for vegetation recovery following wildfire



In this study we examined seed supply (seed banks and seed rain) and vegetation of seeded cultivated grasses and naturally occurring native grasses following a wildfire in northern New Mexico, USA. We specifically examined density of native and cultivated grass seeds and plants in areas of high, moderate, and low fire severity. We also examined the similarity between density of native and cultivated grass seeds to density of above ground plants. Density of native grass seed per square meter was higher in areas that burned under low fire severity (85.18 ± 44.83) compared to areas of moderate (18.52 ± 11.26) and high (7.41 ± 4.90) fire severity; however, differences were not statistically significant due, in part, to the high error associated with estimates. Density of cultivated grass seed per square meter was higher than that of native grass seed in areas of high (439.60 ± 117.98) and moderate (437.02 ± 146.50) fire severity, areas that were seeded with cultivated grasses after the wildfire for erosion control. Density of seeded grass plants per square meter was also higher than that of native grass plants in areas of high (18.78 ± 4.59 versus 0.33 ± 0.24) and moderate (8.22 ± 1.76 versus 0.22 ± 0.15) fire severity. There was a higher correspondence between the density of cultivated grass seeds and plants (highest value 0.32 ± 0.11) compared to density of native grass seeds and plants (highest value 0.05 ± 0.04). The high density of seeds, plants, and correspondence indicated that seeds from cultivated grasses are more likely to establish as post-fire vegetation than seeds from native grasses. Seeding with cultivated grasses following a wildfire may slow or inhibit recovery of native grasses in the short term. Longer-term implications for site occupancy deserve further study.


Disturbance Diversity Exotic Fire Seed bank Seed rain 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Archibold O.W. (1989) Seed banks and vegetation processes in coniferous forests. In: Leck M.A., Parker V.T. and Simpson R.L., (eds), Ecology of soil seed banks. San Diego CA, Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar
  2. Armour C.D., Bunting S.C., and Neuenschwander L.F. (1984) Fire intensity effects on the understory in ponderosa pine forests. Journal of Range Management 37:44–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benoit D.L., Kenkel N.C. and Cavers P.B. (1989) Factors influencing the precision of soil seed bank estimates. Canadian Journal of Botany 67:2833–2840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bock C.E., Bock J.H., Jepson K. and Ortega J.C. (1986) Ecological effects of planting African lovegrasses in Arizona. National Geography Research 2:456–463Google Scholar
  5. Brooks M.L. (2003) Effects of increased soil nitrogen on the dominance of alien annual plants in the Mojave Desert. Journal of Applied Ecology 40:344–353Google Scholar
  6. Cavers P.B. and Benoit D.L. (1989) Seed banks of arable land. In: Leck M.A., Parker V.T. and Simpson R.L., (eds), Ecology of soil seed banks. San Diego CA, Academic Press IncGoogle Scholar
  7. Chambers J.C. (1993) Seed and vegetation dynamics in an alpine herb field – effects of disturbance type. Canadian Journal of Botany 71:471–485Google Scholar
  8. Conard S.G., Beyers J.L. and Wohlgenmuth P.M. (1995) Impacts of post-fire grass seeding on chaparral systems – what do we know and where to we go from here?. In: Scott T., (eds), Brushfires in California wildlands: Ecology and resource management. Fairfield, WA, International Association of Wildland FireGoogle Scholar
  9. Cooper C.F. (1960) Changes in vegetation, structure, and growth of southwestern pine forests since white settlement. Ecological Monographs 30:130–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Covington W.W. and Moore M.M. (1994) Southwestern ponderosa forest structure – changes since euro-American settlement. Journal of Forestry 92:39–47Google Scholar
  11. DeBano L.F., Neary D.G. and Folliott P.F. (1988) Fire’s effects on ecosystems. New York NY, John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
  12. Ehrenreich J.H. and Aikman J.M. (1963) An ecological study of the effect of certain management practices on native prairie in Iowa. Ecological Monographs 33:113–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elliot K.J. and White A.S. (1987) Competitive effects of various grasses and forbs on ponderosa pine seedlings. Forest Science 33:356–366Google Scholar
  14. Ferrandis P., Herranz J.M. and Martinez-Sanchez J.J. (2001) Response to fire of a predominantly transient seed bank in a Mediterranean weedy pasture (eastern-central Spain). Ecoscience 8:211–219Google Scholar
  15. Foxx T.S. 1994. Vegetation succession after the La Mesa fire at Bandelier National Monument. In: Allen C.D. (ed.), Fire Effects in Southwestern Forests: Proceedings of the 2nd La Mesa Fire Symposium Los Alamos, New Mexico March 29–31, 1994. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-GTR-286. Fort Collins, CO. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest Range and Experiment StationGoogle Scholar
  16. Fulbright T.E., Redente E.F. and Hargis N.E. 1982. Growing Colorado plants from seed: a state of the art. Vol. II: Grasses and Grasslike Plants. U.S. Dept. of Interior. Fish and Wildlife Service. FWS/OBS-82/29Google Scholar
  17. Greig-Smith P. (1964) Quantitative plant ecology. Washington, ButterworthsGoogle Scholar
  18. Griffin J.R. (1982) Pine seedling, native ground cover, and Lolium multiflorum on the marble-cone burn, Santa Lucia range, California. Madrono. 29:177–188Google Scholar
  19. Gross K.L. (1990) A comparison of methods for estimating seed numbers in soil. Journal. of Ecology 78:1079–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gustafson D.J., Gibson D.J. and Nickrent D.L. (2004) Competitive relationships of Andropogon gerardii (Big Bluestem) from remnant and restored native populations and select cultivated varieties. Functional Ecology 18:451–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hassan M.A. and West N.E. (1986) Dynamics of soil seed pools in burned and unburned sagebrush semi-deserts. Ecology 67:269–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Humphrey D.L. and Schupp E.W. (2002) Seedling survival from locally and commercially obtained seeds on two semiarid sites. Restoration Ecology 10:88–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hunter M.E. 2004 Post-fire grass seeding for rehabilitation and erosion control: implications for native plant recovery and exotic species establishment. Ph.D. Dissertation, Colorado State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  24. Interagency Burned Area Emergency Stabilization and Rehabilitation (ESR) Handbook, version 2.
  25. Korb J., Johnson N. and Covington W. (2004) Slash pile burning effects on soil biotic and chemical properties and plant establishment: recommendations for amelioration. Restoration Ecology 12:52–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Levine J.M. (2001) Local interactions, dispersal, and native and exotic plant diversity along a California stream. Oikos 95:397–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Major J. and Pyott W.T. (1966) Buried, viable seeds in two California bunchgrass sites and their bearing on the definition of flora. Vegetatio 13:253–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McMurray M.H., Jenkins S.H. and Longland W.S. (1997) Effects of seed density on germination and establishment of a native and an introduced grass species dispersed by granivorous rodents. American Midland Naturalist 138:322–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Melgoza G., Nowak R.S. and Tausch R.J. (1990) Soil-water exploitation after fire – competition between Bromus tectorum (cheatgrass) and two native species. Oecologia 83:7–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. O’Leary J.F. (1995) Potential impacts of emergency seeding on cover and diversity patterns of Californian shrubland communities. In: Scott T., (eds), Brushfires in California wildlands: ecology and resource management. Fairfield WA, International Association of Wildland FireGoogle Scholar
  31. Omi P.N. and Kalabokidis K.D. (1991) Fire damage on extensively vs. intensively managed forests stands in the north fork fire, 1988. Northwest Science 65:149–157Google Scholar
  32. Parker V.T., Simpson R.L. and Leck M.A. (1989) Pattern and process in the dynamics of seed banks. In: Leck M.A., Parker V.T. and Simpson R.L., (eds), Ecology of soil seed banks. San Diego CA, Academic Press IncGoogle Scholar
  33. Pierce S.M. and Cowling R.M. (1991) Disturbance regimes as determinants of seed banks in coastal dune vegetation of the southeastern cape. Journal of Vegetation Science 2:403–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rice K.J. (1989) Impacts of seed banks on grassland community structure and population dynamics. In: Leck M.A., Parker V.T. and Simpson R.L., (eds), Ecology of soil seed banks. San Diego CA, Academic Press IncGoogle Scholar
  35. Robichaud P.R., Beyers J.L. and Neary D.G. 2000. Evaluating the effectiveness of post-fire rehabilitation treatments. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-63. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO, USGoogle Scholar
  36. SAS (1999) SAS/STAT Users’ Guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary NCGoogle Scholar
  37. Springer J.D. 1999. Soil seed bank in southwestern ponderosa pine: implications for ecological restoration. M.S. Thesis, Northern Arizona UniversityGoogle Scholar
  38. Ungar I.A. and Woodell S.R.J. (1996) Similarity of seed banks to aboveground vegetation in grazed and ungrazed salt marsh communities on the Gower peninsula, South Wales. International Journal of Plant Science 157:746–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service. 2004. The PLANTS Database, version 3.5 ( National Plant Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
  40. van der Valk A.G. and Pederson R.L. (1989) Seed banks and the management and restoration of natural vegetation. In: Leck M.A, Parker V.T. and Simpson R.L., (eds), Ecology of soil seed banks. San Diego CA, Academic Press IncGoogle Scholar
  41. Vose J.M. and White A.S. (1987) Processes of understory seedling recruitment 1 year after prescribed fire in an Arizona ponderosa pine community. Canadian Journal of Botany 65:2280–2290CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Forest, Rangeland, and Watershed StewardshipColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations