Advertisement

Plant Ecology

, Volume 187, Issue 2, pp 163–178 | Cite as

The Role of Seed and Vegetative Reproduction in Plant Recruitment and Demography in Tallgrass Prairie

  • Emily J. Benson
  • David C. Hartnett
Article

Abstract

Recruitment, establishment and survivorship of seed- and vegetatively-derived shoots were quantified biweekly in annually burned and infrequently burned tallgrass prairie to investigate the contributions of seed and vegetative reproduction to the maintenance and dynamics of tallgrass prairie plant populations, the demography of seedlings and ramets, and the influence of fire on the demography of grasses and forbs. Clonally produced grass and forb ramets comprised >99%of all established shoots present at the end of the growing season, whereas established seedlings accounted for <1%,emphasizing the rarity of successful seedling establishment and the importance of vegetative reproduction in driving the annual regeneration and dynamics of aboveground plant populations in tallgrass prairie. Most recruitment from vegetative reproduction occurred early in the growing season and was higher in annually burned than infrequently burned sites, although low levels of new stem recruitment occurred continuously throughout the growing season. Peak recruitment on annually burned prairie coincided with peak recruitment of the dominant C4 grasses Andropogon gerardii and Sorghastrum nutans prior to prescribed spring fire, with a second peak in recruitment occurring following fire. On infrequently burned prairie, grass and forb recruitment was highest in early April and declined steadily through May. The naturalized C3 grass, Poa pratensis, was responsible for most of the early recruitment on unburned sites, whereas A. gerardii contributed most to recruitment later in May. Infrequently burned prairie was dominated by these two grasses and contained a larger forb component than annually burned prairie. The principal demographic effect of fire was on ramet natality rather than mortality. Fire regime, plant functional group, or timing of cohort emergence before or after fire did not affect ramet survivorship. C4 grass shoots that emerged early and were damaged by fire showed similar survivorship patterns to tillers that emerged after fire. Differences in species composition between annually burned and infrequently burned prairie are driven by fire effects on vegetative reproduction and appear to be related principally to the effect of fire and detritus accumulation on the development of belowground vegetative meristems of C4 grasses and their emergence dynamics.

Key words

Fire ecology Grassland Rhizomes Sexual reproduction Survivorship 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M.D. Abrams, Effects of burning regime on buried seed banks and canopy coverage in a Kansas tallgrass prairie. Southwest. Nat. 33 (1988) 65-70Google Scholar
  2. M.D. Abrams and L.C. Hulbert, Effect of topographic position and fire on species composition in tallgrass prairie in northeast Kansas. Am. Midland Nat. 117 (1987) 442-445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. M.D. Abrams, A.K. Knapp and L.C. Hulbert, A ten-year record of aboveground biomass in a Kansas tallgrass prairie: effects of fire and topographic position. Am. J. Bot. 73 (1986) 1509-1515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. D.E. Adams and R.C. Anderson, The response of a central Oklahoma grassland to burning. Southwest. Nat. 23 (1978) 623-632Google Scholar
  5. D.I. Axelrod, Rise of the grassland biomecentral North America. Bot. Rev. 51 (1985) 163-201Google Scholar
  6. E.J. Benson, Effects of Fire on Tallgrass Prairie Plant Population Dynamics. Kansas, USA: Kansas State University (2001).Google Scholar
  7. J.M. Briggs and A.K. Knapp, Interannual variability in primary production in tallgrass prairie: climatesoil moisturetopographic position, and fire as determinants of aboveground biomass. Am. J. Bot. 82 (1995) 1024-1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. P.A. Christiansen and R.Q. Landers, Notes on prairie species in Iowa. I. Germination and establishment of several species. Trans. Iowa Acad. Sci. 73 (1966) 51-59Google Scholar
  9. D.P. Coffin and W.K. Lauenroth, Spatial and temporal variation in the seed bank of a semiarid grassland. Am. J. Bot. 76 (1989) 53-58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. S.L. Collins, S.M. Glenn and D.J. Gibson, Experimental analysis of intermediate disturbance and initial floristic composition: decoupling cause and effect. Ecology 76 (1995) 486-492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. J.T. Curtis and M.L. Partch, Effect of fire on the competition between blue grass and certain prairie plants. Am. Midland Nat. 39 (1948) 437-443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. R. Daubenmire, The ecology of fire in grasslands. Adv. Ecol. Res. 5 (1968) 209-266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. V.A. Deregibus, R.A. Sanchez, J.J. Casal and M.J. Trlica, Tillering responses to enrichment of red light beneath the canopy in a humid natural grassland. J. Appl. Ecol. 22 (1985) 199-206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. D.J. Gibson and L.C. Hulbert, Effects of firetopography and year-to-year climatic variation on species composition in tallgrass prairie. Vegetatio 72 (1987) 175-185Google Scholar
  15. D.C. Glenn-Lewin, L.A. Johnson, T.W. Jurik, A. Akey, M. Leoschke and T. Rosburg, Fire in central North American grasslands: vegetative reproduction, seed germination, and seedling establishment. In: S.L. Collins and L.L. Wallace (eds.) North American Tallgrass Prairies. Norman, Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press (1990) pp. 28-45Google Scholar
  16. Flora of the Great Plains. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas (1986).Google Scholar
  17. N.C. Ellstrand and M.L. Roose, Patterns of genotypic diversity in clonal plant species. Am. J. Bot. 74 (1987) 123-131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. D.C. Hartnett and K.H. Keeler, Population processes. In: A. Joern and K.H. Keeler (eds.) The Changing Prairie: North American Grasslands. Oxford: Oxford University Press (1995) pp. 82-99Google Scholar
  19. J.L. Harper, The Population Biology of Plants. New York: Academic Press (1977).Google Scholar
  20. L.C. Hulbert, Fire and litter effects in undisturbed bluestem prairie in Kansas. Ecology 50 (1969) 874-877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. L.C. Hulbert, Causes of fire effects in tallgrass prairie. Ecology 69 (1988) 46-58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. K.H. Keeler, Local polyploid variation in the native prairie grass Andropogon gerardii. Am. J. Bot. 79 (1992) 1229-1232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. A.K. Knapp, Post burn differences in solar radiation, leaf temperature and water stress influencing production in a lowland tallgrass prairie. Am. J. Bot. 71 (1984) 220-227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. A.K. Knapp and L.C. Hulbert, Production, density, and height of flowering stalks of three grasses in annually burned and unburned eastern Kansas tallgrass prairie: a four year record. Southwest. Nat. 31 (1986) 235-241Google Scholar
  25. A.K. Knapp and T.R. Seastedt, Detritus accumulation limits productivity of tallgrass prairie. Bioscience 36 (1986) 662-668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. A.K. Knapp and M.D. Smith, Variation among biomes in temporal dynamics of aboveground primary production. Science 291 (2001) 481-484PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. C.L. Kucera and J.H. Ehrenreich, Some effects of annual burning on central Missouri prairie. Ecology 43 (1962) 334-346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. C.L. Kucera and M. Koelling, The influence of fire on composition of central Missouri prairie. Am. Midland Nat. 72 (1964) 142-147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. D.A. Levin, The seed bank as a source of genetic novelty in plants. Am. Nat. 135 (1990) 563-572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. T.E. Miller, Effects of emergence time on survival and growth in an early old-field plant community. Oecologia 72 (1987) 272-278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. S.M. Old, Microclimatefire and plant production in an Illinois prairie. Ecol. Monographs 39 (1969) 335-384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. W.J. Platt, The colonization and formation of equilibrium plant species associations on badger disturbances in a tall-grass prairie. Ecol. Monographs 45 (1975) 285-305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. D. Rabinowitz, Buried viable seeds in a North American tallgrass prairie: the resemblance of their abundance and composition to dispersing seeds. Oikos 36 (1981) 191-195Google Scholar
  34. R.J. Reader and J. Buck, Control of seedling density on disturbed ground: role of seedling establishment for some midsuccessional, old-field species. Can. J. Bot. 69 (1991) 773-777Google Scholar
  35. E.L. Rice and R.L. Parenti, Causes of decreases in productivity in undisturbed tall grass prairie. Am. J. Bot. 65 (1978) 1091-1097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. W.E. Rogers and D.C. Hartnett, Temporal vegetation dynamics and recolonization mechanisms on different-sized soil disturbances in tallgrass prairie. Am. J. Bot. 88 (2001) 1634-1642Google Scholar
  37. C.O. Sauer, Grassland climax, fire and man. J. Range Manag. 3 (1950) 16-21Google Scholar
  38. M.E. Soulé and D. Simberloff, What do genetics and ecology tell us about the design of nature reserves?. Biol. Conserv. 35 (1986) 19-40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. E.G. Towne and C. Owensby, Long-term effects of annual burning at different dates in ungrazed Kansas tallgrass prairie. J. Range Manag. 37 (1984) 392-397Google Scholar
  40. A.R. Watkinson and J.C. Powell, Seedling recruitment and the maintenance of clonal diversity in plant populations – a computer simulation of Ranunculus repens. J. Ecol. 81 (1993) 707-717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. J.E. Weaver and N.W. Rowland, Effects of excessive natural mulch on developmentyieldand structure of native grassland. Bot. Gazette 114 (1952) 1-19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. J.B. Wilson, The effect of initial advantage on the course of plant competition. Oikos 51 (1988) 19-24Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of BiologyKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA

Personalised recommendations