Advertisement

Plant Ecology

, Volume 178, Issue 1, pp 111–120 | Cite as

Soil pH and species diversity in coastal dunes

  • M. IsermannEmail author
Article

Abstract

Soil pH was measured at two different spatial scales in coastal dunes on Norderney, North Sea, and in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Baltic Sea, Germany. Relationships between the variability in soil pH, species richness and species diversity are presented. Species richness and diversity were highest in grey dunes, where soil pH was at intermediate levels; both variables were lower in yellow and brown dunes. The variability in pH increased with increasing species diversity and also with scale. Overall, soil pH variability decreased with increasing vegetation cover. The lowest pH heterogeneity was found in heath dominated by Empetrum nigrum L. and grey dunes dominated by Campylopus introflexus (Hedw.) Brid. Increasing abundance of dominant species and decreasing species diversity of vegetation apparently reduces soil heterogeneity. Decreasing species diversity of vegetation is likely to explain decreasing variability in soil pH.

Keywords

Spatial variability Species richness Vegetation heterogeneity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aarssen, L.W. 2001On correlations and causations between productivity and species richness in vegetation: predictions from habitat attributesBasic Appl. Ecol.2105114Google Scholar
  2. Averiss, R.J., Skene, K.R. 2001Changes in nutrient heterogeneity along sand dune and slack chronosequences at Tentsmuir Point eastern ScotlandBot. J. Scotland534556Google Scholar
  3. Beckett, P.H.T, Webster, R. 1971Soil variability: a reviewSoils Fertil.34115Google Scholar
  4. Bogaert, G., Lemeur, R. 1995The use of diversity indices in the detection of succession and ecological disturbances in Belgian dune vegetation (at Koksijde)Mededelingen der Land bouwhoge school en der Opzoekingsstations van den Staat te Gent606168Google Scholar
  5. Caldwell, M.M., Manwaring, J.H., Durham, S.L. 1996Species interactions at the level of fine roots in the field: influence of soil nutrient heterogeneity and plant sizeOecologia106440447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, B.D., Grime, J.P. 1989A comparative study of plant responsiveness to the duration of episodes of mineral nutrient enrichmentNew Phytol.112261267Google Scholar
  7. Carter, R.W.G 1988Coastal environmentsAn introduction to physical, ecological and cultural systems of coastlinesAcademic PressLondon617Google Scholar
  8. Collins, B., Wein, G. 1998Soil heterogeneity effects on canopy structure and composition during early successionPlant Ecol.138217230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dahiya, I.S., Richter, J., Malik, R.S. 1984Soil spatial variability: a reviewInt. J. Trop. Agric.21102Google Scholar
  10. Dekker, L.W., Jungerius, P.D. 1990Water repellency in the dunes with special reference to The NetherlandsCatena (Suppl.)18173183Google Scholar
  11. Dolling, P.J., Porter, W.M., Robson, A.D. 1990Soil pH and aluminium and their spatial variation in western Australian acidic soilsAust. J. Exp. Agric.30637644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Downes, R.G., Beckwith, R.S. 1951Studies in the variation of soil reaction. I. Field variations at BaroogaN.S.WAust. J. Agric. Res.26072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gibson, D.J. 1988The maintenance of plant and soil heterogeneity in dune grasslandJ. Ecol.76497508Google Scholar
  14. Giesler, R., Hogberg, M., Hogberg, P. 1998Soil chemistry and plants in Fennoscandian boreal forest as exemplified by a local gradientEcology79119137Google Scholar
  15. Goderya, F.S. 1998Field scale variations in soil properties for spatially variable control: a reviewJ. Soil Contam.7243264Google Scholar
  16. Gough, L., Shaver, G.R., Carroll, J., Royer, D.L., Laundre, J.A. 2000Vascular plant species richness in Alaskan arctic tundra: the importance of soil pHJ. Ecol.885466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grigal, D.F., McRoberts, R.E., Ohmann, L.F. 1991Spatial variation in chemical properties of forest floor and surface mineral soil in the North central united statesSoil Sci.151282290Google Scholar
  18. Grime, J.P. 1973Competitive exclusion in herbaceous vegetationNature242344347Google Scholar
  19. Hunsaker, D.J., Bucks, D.A. 1992Statistical analyses of soil variability: effects of variability on level-basin irrigation of wheatAgric. Water Manage.21177195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Isermann M. 1997. Vegetations- und standortskundliche Untersuchungen in Kü stendü nen Vorpommerns. Dissertation Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universitä t Greifswald, 323 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Jackson, R.B., Caldwell, M.M. 1989The timing and degree of root proliferation in fertile-soil microsites for three cold-desert perennialsOecologia81149153Google Scholar
  22. Jackson, R.B., Caldwell, M.M. 1993Geostatistical patterns of soil heterogeneity around individual perennial plantsJ. Ecol.81683692Google Scholar
  23. Jackson, R.B., Caldwell, M.M. 1996Integrating resource heterogeneity and plant plasticity: modelling nitrate and phosphate uptake in a patchy soil environmentJ. Ecol.84891903Google Scholar
  24. Jungerius, P.D. 1990The characteristics of dune soilsCatena (Suppl.)18155162Google Scholar
  25. Jungerius, P.D., De Jong, J.H. 1989Variability of water repellence in the dunes along the Dutch coastCatena16491497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jungerius, P.D., Van der Meulen, F. 1988Erosion processes in a dune landscape along the Dutch coastCatena15217228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lichter, J. 1998Primary succession and forest development on coastal lake Michigan sand dunesEcol. Monogr.68487510Google Scholar
  28. Reynolds, H.L., Hungate, B.A., Chapin, F.S., D’Antonio, C.M. 1997Soil heterogeneity and plant competition in an annual grasslandEcology7820762090Google Scholar
  29. Rosenzweig, M.L. 1995Species diversity in space and timeUniversity PressCambridge436Google Scholar
  30. Schaffers, A.P. 2002Soil, biomass, and management of semi-natural vegetation. Part II. Factors controlling species diversityPlant Ecol.158247268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schaminée, J.H.J.Stortelder, A.H.F.Weeda, E.J. eds. 1996De Vegetatie van NederlandDeel 3. Plantengemeenschappen van graslanden zomen en droge heiden.Opulus, Uppsala356Google Scholar
  32. Schaminée, J.H.J.Weeda, E.J.Westhoff, V. eds. 1998De Vegetatie van NederlandDeel 4. Plantengemeenschappen van de kust en van binnenlandse pioniermilieus. OpulusUppsala346Google Scholar
  33. Schöttelndreier, M., Falkengren-Grerup, U. 1999Plant induced alteration in the rhizosphere and the utilisation of soil heterogeneityPlant Soil209297309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Troelstra, S.R., Lotz, L.A.P., Wagenaar, R., Sluimer, L. 1990Temporal and spatial variability in soil nutrient status of a former beach plainPlant Soil127112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tsegaye, T., Hill, R.L. 1998Intensive tillage effects on spatial variability of soil test plant growth and nutrient uptake measurementsSoil Sci.163155165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Umbanhowar, C.E. 1992Abundance vegetation and environment of four patch types in a northern mixed prairieCan. J. Bot.70277284Google Scholar
  37. Venzke, J.F. 1988Untersuchungen zum Pufferungsvermögen von Böden aus Dünenökotopen ostfriesischer InselnDas Beispiel Baltrum. Berichte der Naturhistorischen Gesellschaft Hannover130161175Google Scholar
  38. Webster, R. 2000Is soil variation random?Geoderma97149163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yang, J., Hammer, R.D., Blanchar, R.W. 1995Microscale pH spatial distribution in the Ap horizon of Mexico silt loamSoil Sci.160371375Google Scholar
  40. Zeeb, P.J., Hemond, H.F. 1998Hydrologic response of a wetland to changing moisture conditions: modeling effects of soil heterogeneityClimatic Change40211227CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of BremenBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations