Plant Ecology

, Volume 176, Issue 1, pp 79–85 | Cite as

The physical resistance of grass patches to invasion



One of the important factors determining success in plant competition is the ability of a plant to extend laminae in order to capture resources.To do this in mixed swards the laminae of one plant must first grow into the volume that contains laminae of another. The ability of laminae to overcome the resistance presented by a neighbour, and the ability to resist this ingress, was examined for the grasses Agrostis capillaris, Festuca rubra, Holcus lanatus, Lolium perenne and Poa trivialis that were subject to 3 cm and 6 cm cutting treatments. These abilities were inferred from the behaviour of ‘indicator ’ leaves as they were pushed into monoculture target patches of each species. The 3 cm treatment resisted ingress significantly more than the 6 cm. Species patches differed significantly both in their ability to resist the ingress by the indicator species and in the ability of different indicator species to penetrate the target swards. These effects were still present when differences in leaf density (leaves cm–2) had been taken into account. The results suggest that grasses can vary in the physical resistance that they present to the leaves of an invading neighbour.


Defoliation Grass patch Invasion Invasion resistance 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aphalo, P.J., Ballaré, C.L. 1995On the importance of informa- tion-acquiring systems in plant-plant interactionsFunctional Ecology9514Google Scholar
  2. Aphalo, P.J., Ballaré, C.L., Scopel, A.L. 1999Plant-signalling, the shade-avoidance response and competitionJournal of Experimental Botany5016291634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ballaré, C.L. 1999Keeping up with the neighbours: phytochrome sensing and other signalling mechanismsTrends in Plant Science497102CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Barthram, G.T., Elston, D.A., Birch, C.P.D., Bolton, G.R. 2002Defoliation and site differences influence vegetative spread in grasslandNew Phytologist155257264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barthram, G.T., Marriott, C.A., Common, T.G., Bolton, G.R. 2002The long-term effects on upland sheep production in the UK of a change to extensive managementGrass and Forage Science57124136Google Scholar
  6. Bircham, J.S., Hodgson, J. 1987The influence of sward condition on rates of herbage growth and senescence in mixed swards under continuous stocking managementGrass and Forage Science38323331Google Scholar
  7. Callaway, R.M. 2002The detection of neighbors by plantsTrends in Ecology and Evolution17104105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell, B.D., Grime, J.P., MacKey, M.L. 1992Shoot thrust and its role in plant competitionJournal of Ecology80633641Google Scholar
  9. Chazdon, R.L. 1986The costs of leaf support in under-storey palms: economy versus safetyAmerican Naturalist127930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Engel, B. 1990The analysis of unbalanced linear models with variance componentsStatistica Neerlandica44185219Google Scholar
  11. Givnish, T.J. 1982On the adaptive significance of leaf height in forest herbsAmerican Naturalist120353381Google Scholar
  12. Givnish, T.J 1986

    Biomechanical constraints on crown geometry in forest herbs

    Givinish, T.J eds. On the economy of plant form and functionCambridge University PressCambridge, UK523583
    Google Scholar
  13. Givnish, T.J. 1987Comparative studies of leaf form: assessing the relative roles of selective pressures and phylogenetic constraints. New Phytologist Supplement106131160Google Scholar
  14. Grime, J.P, Thompson, K., Hunt, R., Hodgson, J.G., CornelissenJ.H.C. Rorison, I.H., Hendry, G.A.F., Ashenden, T.W., Askew, A.P., Band, S.R., Booth, R.E., Bossard, C.C., Campbell, B.D., Cooper, J.E.L., Davison, A.W., Gupta, P.L., Hall, W., Hand, W., Hannah, M.A., Hillier, S.H., Hodkinson, D.J., Jalili, A., Liu, Z., Mackey, J.M.L., Matthews, N, Mowforth, M.A., Neal, A.M., Reader, R.J., Reiling, K., RossFraser, W., Spencer, R.E., Sutton, F., Tasker, D.E., Thorpe, P.C., Whitehouse, J. 1997Integrated screening validates primary axes of specialisation in plantsOikos79259281Google Scholar
  15. Hubbard, C.E. 1968Grasses. A guide to their Structure, Identification, Uses and Distribution in the British Isles3Penguin Books LtdLondon, UKGoogle Scholar
  16. Kays, S., Harper, J.L. 1974The regulation of plant and tiller density in a grass swardJournal of Ecology6797105Google Scholar
  17. Lovett Doust, L. 1981Population dynamics and local specialization in a clonal perennial (Ranunculus repens). I. The dynamics of ramets in contrasting habitatsJournal of Ecology69743755Google Scholar
  18. McMahon, T.A., Kronauer, R.E. 1976Tree structures: deducing the principle of mechanical designJournal of Theoretical Biology59442466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Matthew, C., Lemaire, G., Hamilton, N.R.S., Hernandezgaray, A. 1995A modified self-thinning equation to describe size/density relationships for defoliated swardsAnnals of Botany76579587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Niklas, K.J. 1989The cellular mechanics of plantsAmerican Scientist77344349Google Scholar
  21. Niklas, K.J., O’Rourke, T.D. 1982Growth patterns of plants that maximise vertical growth and minimise internal stressesAmerican Journal of Botany6913671374Google Scholar
  22. Pillar, V.D. 1999On the identification of optimal plant functional typesJournal of Vegetation Science10631640Google Scholar
  23. Rose, F. 1989Colour identification guide to the grasses, sedges, rushes and ferns of the British Isles and north-western EuropeVikingLondon, UKGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. T. Barthram
    • 1
  • D. A. Elston
    • 2
  • C. E. Mullins
    • 1
  1. 1.The Macaulay InstituteShottsUK
  2. 2.Biomathematics and Statistics ScotlandMacaulay InstituteAberdeenUK
  3. 3.Department of Plant and Soil ScienceUniversity of AberdeenAberdeenUK

Personalised recommendations