Advertisement

Modeling real-time data and contextual information from workouts in eCoaching platforms to predict users’ sharing behavior on Facebook

  • Ludovico BorattoEmail author
  • Salvatore Carta
  • Federico Ibba
  • Fabrizio Mulas
  • Paolo Pilloni
Article
  • 37 Downloads

Abstract

eCoaching platforms have become powerful tools to support users in their day-to-day physical routines. More and more research works show that motivational factors are strictly linked with the user inclination to share her fitness achievements on social media platforms. In this paper, we tackle the problem of analyzing and modeling users’ contextual information and real-time training data by exploiting state-of-the-art classification algorithms, to predict if a user will share her current running workout on Facebook. By analyzing user’s performance, collected by means of an eCoaching platform for runners, and crossing them with contextual information such as the weather, we are able to predict with a high accuracy if the user will post or not on Facebook. Given the positive impact that social media posts have in these scenarios, understanding what are the conditions that lead a user to post or not, can turn the output of the classification process into actionable knowledge. This knowledge can be exploited inside eCoaching platforms to model user behavior in broader and deeper ways, to develop novel forms of intervention and favor users’ motivation on the long term.

Keywords

Personalized persuasive technologies Social networks Healthy lifestyle eCoaching Motivation Behavior modeling Behavior prediction Personalized recommendations 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Marika Cappai and Davide Spano for their contribution in this research work. This work is partially funded by Regione Sardegna under Projects AI4fit (Artificial Intelligence & Human Computer Interaction per l’e-coaching), through AIUTI PER PROGETTI DI RICERCA E SVILUPPO - POR FESR SARDEGNA 2014–2020, and NOMAD (Next generation Open Mobile Apps Development), through PIA—Pacchetti Integrati di Agevolazione “Industria Artigianato e Servizi” (annualità 2013).

References

  1. Aral, S., Nicolaides, C.: Exercise contagion in a global social network. Nat. Commun. 8, 14753 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boratto, L., Carta, S., Fenu, G., Manca, M., Mulas, F., Pilloni, P.: The role of social interaction on users motivation to exercise: a persuasive web framework to enhance the self-management of a healthy lifestyle. Pervasive Mobile Comput. 36, 98–114 (2017a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boratto, L., Carta, S., Mulas, F., Pilloni, P.: An e-coaching ecosystem: design and effectiveness analysis of the engagement of remote coaching on athletes. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 21(4), 689–704 (2017b).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-017-1026-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, I., Mues, C.: An experimental comparison of classification algorithms for imbalanced credit scoring data sets. Expert Syst. Appl. 39(3), 3446–3453 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Curry, S.J.: eHealth research and healthcare delivery. Am. J. Prev. Med. 32(5), S127–S130 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fernández-Delgado, M., Cernadas, E., Barro, S., Amorim, D.: Do we need hundreds of classifiers to solve real world classification problems? J. Mach. Learn. Res. 15(1), 3133–3181 (2014)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Fogel, J., Nehmad, E.: Internet social network communities: risk taking, trust, and privacy concerns. Comput. Hum. Behav. 25(1), 153–160 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gui, X., Chen, Y., Caldeira, C., Xiao, D., Chen, Y.: When fitness meets social networks: investigating fitness tracking and social practices on werun. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1647–1659. ACM (2017)Google Scholar
  9. Lemaître, G., Nogueira, F., Aridas, C.K.: Imbalanced-learn: a python toolbox to tackle the curse of imbalanced datasets in machine learning. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 18(17), 1–5 (2017)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Marketingland.Com: Nearly 80 percent of social media time now spent on mobile devices (2016). https://marketingland.com/facebook-usage-accounts-1-5-minutes-spent-mobile-171561. Accessed 1 Aug 2018
  11. Pilloni, P., Piras, L., Carta, S., Fenu, G., Mulas, F., Boratto, L.: Recommender system lets coaches identify and help athletes who begin losing motivation. Computer 51(3), 36–42 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rathore, S.S., Kumar, S.: A decision tree logic based recommendation system to select software fault prediction techniques. Computing 99(3), 255–285 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sakr, S., Elshawi, R., Ahmed, A.M., Qureshi, W.T., Brawner, C.A., Keteyian, S.J., Blaha, M.J., Al-Mallah, M.H.: Comparison of machine learning techniques to predict all-cause mortality using fitness data: the henry ford exercise testing (fit) project. BMC Med. Inf. Decis. Making 17(1), 174 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sakr, S., Elshawi, R., Ahmed, A., Qureshi, W.T., Brawner, C., Keteyian, S., Blaha, M.J., Al-Mallah, M.H.: Using machine learning on cardiorespiratory fitness data for predicting hypertension: the henry ford exercise testing (fit) project. PLoS ONE 13(4), e0195344 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schudy, S., Utikal, V.: ‘You must not know about me’-on the willingness to share personal data. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 141, 1–13 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Smartinsights.Com: Statistics on consumer mobile usage and adoption to inform your mobile marketing strategy mobile site design and app development (2018). https://www.smartinsights.com/mobile-marketing/mobile-marketing-analytics/mobile-marketing-statistics/. Accessed 1 Aug 2018
  17. Statista.Com: Running & jogging—statistics & facts (2018). https://www.statista.com/topics/1743/running-and-jogging/. Accessed 1 Aug 2018
  18. Stone, M.: Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. J. R Stat. Soc. Series B(Methodological), 111–147 (1974)Google Scholar
  19. Stragier, J., Evens, T., Mechant, P.: Broadcast yourself: an exploratory study of sharing physical activity on social networking sites. Media Int. Aust. 155(1), 120–129 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wiese, J., Kelley, P.G., Cranor, L.F., Dabbish, L., Hong, J.I., Zimmerman, J.: Are you close with me? Are you nearby? Investigating social groups, closeness, and willingness to share. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, UbiComp ’11, pp. 197–206. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2030112.2030140
  21. Zhang, R.: The stress-buffering effect of self-disclosure on facebook: an examination of stressful life events, social support, and mental health among college students. Comput. Hum Behav. 75, 527–537 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhu, Y., Dailey, S.L., Kreitzberg, D., Bernhardt, J.: Connecting social features of wearable fitness trackers with physical exercise. J. Health Commun. 22(12), 974–980 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ziefle, M., Halbey, J., Kowalewski, S.: Users willingness to share data on the internet: Perceived benefits and caveats. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Internet of Things and Big Data (IoTBD 2016), pp. 255–265 (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Data Science and Big Data Analytics - EURECAT, Centre Tecnológic de CatalunyaBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Matematica e InformaticaUniversità di CagliariCagliariItaly

Personalised recommendations