Advertisement

User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 75–96 | Cite as

Towards incorporating personality into the design of an interface: a method for facilitating users’ interaction with the display

Article

Abstract

A novel user interface (UI) design based on the personality characteristics of users was proposed and examined in a mobile learning context. It was argued that differences in personality can stimulate individuals’ information processing capabilities in according to their display preferences, thus an effective visual experience. The personality characteristics and design preferences of 87 students (37 male, and 50 female) were collected and analysed. The clustering result (using k-means algorithm) revealed two potential personality types, which we call the neuroticism and the extra-conscientiousness groups. Then, an interface was designed for each personality group using the association rules method. An eye-tracking device was used to record changes in participants’ eye-pupil diameter and fixation duration, and thus examine their cognitive load and attention. The participants’ eye movement data of each group showed that their visual experience was significantly improved when using the interface designed based on their personality characteristics. This work offers some important design and practical insights to the human–computer interaction and the design of mobile device UI.

Keywords

UI design Personality Eye-movements User experience Interaction Display 

References

  1. Al-Samarraie, H., Selim, H., Zaqout, F.: The effect of content representation design principles on users’ intuitive beliefs and use of e-learning systems. Interact. Learn. Environ. 24(8), 1758–1777 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Basu, S.: Modern UI Design. Real World Windows 8 Development, pp. 11–24. Springer, New York (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bellizzi, J.A., Hite, R.E.: Environmental color, consumer feelings, and purchase likelihood. Psychol. Market. 9(5), 347–363 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berggren, N., Richards, A., Taylor, J., Derakshan, N.: Affective attention under cognitive load: reduced emotional biases but emergent anxiety-related costs to inhibitory control. Frontiers in human neuroscience 7, 188 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beymer, D., Russell, D., Orton, P.: An eye tracking study of how font size and type influence online reading. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 22nd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Culture, Creativity, Interaction, vol. 2 (2008)Google Scholar
  6. Boudreaux, C.A., Palmer, S.E.: A charming little cabernet: effects of wine label design on purchase intent and brand personality. Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. 19(3), 170–186 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buechner, V.L., Maier, M.A., Lichtenfeld, S., Schwarz, S.: Red-take a closer look. PLoS ONE 9(9), e108111 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buss, A.H., Plomin, R.: Temperament (ple: Emotion): Early Developing Personality Traits, vol. 3. Psychology Press, London (2014)Google Scholar
  9. Butt, S., Phillips, J.G.: Personality and self reported mobile phone use. Comput. Hum. Behav. 24(2), 346–360 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Capretz, L.F., Ali, A., Ouda, A.: A conceptual framework for measuring the quality aspect of mobile learning. Bull. IEEE Tech. Comm. Learn. Technol. 14(4), 31 (2012)Google Scholar
  11. Chae, M., Kim, J.: Do size and structure matter to mobile users? An empirical study of the effects of screen size, information structure, and task complexity on user activities with standard web phones. Behav. Inf. Technol. 23(3), 165–181 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen, C.M., Lin, Y.-J.: Effects of different text display types on reading comprehension, sustained attention and cognitive load in mobile reading contexts. Interact. Learn. Environ. 24(3), 553–571 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cherubini, M., De Oliveira, R., Hiltunen, A., Oliver, N.: Barriers and bridges in the adoption of today’s mobile phone contextual services. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (2011)Google Scholar
  14. Cianci, A.M., Klein, H.J., Seijts, G.H.: The effect of negative feedback on tension and subsequent performance: the main and interactive effects of goal content and conscientiousness. J. Appl. Psychol. 95(4), 618 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cremers, H.R., Demenescu, L.R., Aleman, A., Renken, R., van Tol, M.-J., van der Wee, N.J., Roelofs, K.: Neuroticism modulates amygdala—prefrontal connectivity in response to negative emotional facial expressions. Neuroimage 49(1), 963–970 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crescente, M.L., Lee, D.: Critical issues of m-learning: design models, adoption processes, and future trends. J. Chin. Inst. Ind. Eng. 28(2), 111–123 (2011)Google Scholar
  17. De Oliveira, R., Cherubini, M., Oliver, N.: Influence of usability on customer satisfaction: a case study on mobile phone services. Paper Presented at the I-UxSED (2012)Google Scholar
  18. de Oliveira, R., Karatzoglou, A., Concejero Cerezo, P., Armenta Lopez de Vicuña, A., Oliver, N.: Towards a psychographic user model from mobile phone usage. Paper Presented at the CHI’11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2011)Google Scholar
  19. Du, X., Shao, F., Wu, S., Zhang, H., Xu, S.: Water quality assessment with hierarchical cluster analysis based on mahalanobis distance. Environ. Monit. Assess. 189(7), 335 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dyson, M.C., Haselgrove, M.: The influence of reading speed and line length on the effectiveness of reading from screen. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 54(4), 585–612 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ehmke, C., Wilson, S.: Identifying web usability problems from eye-tracking data. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 21st British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: HCI. But Not as We Know it, vol. 1 (2007)Google Scholar
  22. Evett, L., Brown, D.: Text formats and web design for visually impaired and dyslexic readers—clear text for all. Interact. Comput. 17(4), 453–472 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Farzan, R., Dabbish, L.A., Kraut, R.E., Postmes, T.: Increasing commitment to online communities by designing for social presence. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (2011)Google Scholar
  24. Fehl, K., van der Post, D.J., Semmann, D.: Co-evolution of behaviour and social network structure promotes human cooperation. Ecol. Lett. 14(6), 546–551 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fleeson, W., Noftle, E.: The end of the person–situation debate: an emerging synthesis in the answer to the consistency question. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass 2(4), 1667–1684 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fleming, J., Koman, R.: Web Navigation: Designing the User Experience. O’reilly, Sebastopol (1998)Google Scholar
  27. Furr, R.M.: Personality psychology as a truly behavioural science. Eur. J. Personal. 23(5), 369–401 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. GeiBler, J., Gauler, M., Streitz, N.A.: Evaluating gedrics: usability of a pen-centric interface. Paper Presented at the Human-Computer Interaction, INTERACT’99: IFIP TC. 13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 30th August–3rd September 1999, Edinburgh, UK (1999)Google Scholar
  29. Goldberg, L.R.: A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. Personal. Psychol. Eur. 7, 7–28 (1999)Google Scholar
  30. Goren-Bar, D., Graziola, I., Pianesi, F., Zancanaro, M.: The influence of personality factors on visitor attitudes towards adaptivity dimensions for mobile museum guides. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 16(1), 31–62 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Graham, E.K., Lachman, M.E.: Personality stability is associated with better cognitive performance in adulthood: are the stable more able? J. Gerontol. Ser. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 67(5), 545–554 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hakim, L., Deswindi, L.: Assessing the effects of e-servicescape on customer intention: a study on the hospital websites in south jakarta. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 169, 227–239 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Han, J., Kamber, M., Pei, J.: Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2011)MATHGoogle Scholar
  34. Harpur, P.-A., de Villiers, R.: Muux-e, a framework of criteria for evaluating the usability, user experience and educational features of m-learning environments. S. Afr. Comput. J. 56(1), 1–21 (2015)Google Scholar
  35. Hewitt, J., Scardamalia, M.: Design principles for distributed knowledge building processes. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 10(1), 75–96 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hyönä, J., Tommola, J., Alaja, A.-M.: Pupil dilation as a measure of processing load in simultaneous interpretation and other language tasks. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 48(3), 598–612 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Judge, T.A., Bono, J.E., Ilies, R., Gerhardt, M.W.: Personality and leadership: a qualitative and quantitative review. J. Appl. Psychol. 87(4), 765 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Judge, T.A., Colbert, A.E., Ilies, R.: Intelligence and leadership: a quantitative review and test of theoretical propositions. J. Appl. Psychol. 89(3), 542 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kamsu-Foguem, B., Rigal, F., Mauget, F.: Mining association rules for the quality improvement of the production process. Expert Syst. Appl. 40(4), 1034–1045 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kane, S.K., Wobbrock, J.O., Smith, I.E.: Getting off the treadmill: evaluating walking user interfaces for mobile devices in public spaces. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (2008)Google Scholar
  41. Karanam, Y., Alotaibi, H., Filko, L., Makhsoom, E., Kaser, L., Voida, S.: Motivational affordances and personality types in personal informatics. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct Publication (2014)Google Scholar
  42. Kim, M., Parl, S.-H., Ahn, S.H., Choi, M.B., Yun, M.-H.: Analysis of font legibility for korean serif and sans serif types in printed and displayed settings. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (2015)Google Scholar
  43. Kokkinos, C.M.: Job stressors, personality and burnout in primary school teachers. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 77(1), 229–243 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lan, M., Jianjun, L., Qizhi, Y.: The smartphone gui design research based on the user experience. Paper Presented at the 2013 Fourth International Conference on Digital Manufacturing & Automation (ICDMA) (2013)Google Scholar
  45. Lee, D.-S., Shieh, K.-K., Jeng, S.-C., Shen, I.-H.: Effect of character size and lighting on legibility of electronic papers. Displays 29(1), 10–17 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Li, Z.-N., Drew, M.S., Liu, J.: Fundamentals of Multimedia. Springer, Berlin (2004)MATHGoogle Scholar
  47. McCrae, R.R., Costa, P.T.: Updating norman’s” adequacy taxonomy”: intelligence and personality dimensions in natural language and in questionnaires. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 49(3), 710 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McCrae, R.R., Costa, P.T.: Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 52(1), 81 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Navarro, J.F., Frenk, C.S., White, S.D.: A universal density profile from hierarchical clustering. Astrophys. J. 490(2), 493 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Oliveira, R.D., Cherubini, M., Oliver, N.: Influence of personality on satisfaction with mobile phone services. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. (TOCHI) 20(2), 10 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Oviatt, S.: Human-centered design meets cognitive load theory: designing interfaces that help people think. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (2006)Google Scholar
  52. Reinecke, K., Bernstein, A.: Knowing what a user likes: a design science approach to interfaces that automatically adapt to culture. MIS Q. 37(2), 427–453 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Reis, H.M., Borges, S.S., Durelli, V.H., de S, M., Fernando, L., Brandao, A.A., Jaques, P.A.: Towards reducing cognitive load and enhancing usability through a reduced graphical user interface for a dynamic geometry system: an experimental study. Paper Presented at the Multimedia (ISM), 2012 IEEE International Symposium on (2012a)Google Scholar
  54. Reis, H.M., Borges, S.S., Durelli, V.H., Moro, L.F.d.S., Brandao, A.A., Barbosa, E.F., Bittencourt, I.I.: Towards reducing cognitive load and enhancing usability through a reduced graphical user interface for a dynamic geometry system: an experimental study. Paper Presented at the Multimedia (ISM), 2012 IEEE International Symposium on (2012b)Google Scholar
  55. Ribeiro, J., Carvalhais, M.: Web design patterns for mobile devices. In: Proceedings of the 19th Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs, p. 13. The Hillside Group (2012)Google Scholar
  56. Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., Preece, J., Tepper, M.: Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction. netWorker: Craft Netw. Comput. 11(4), 34 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sarsam, S.M., Al-Samarraie, H.: A first look at the effectiveness of personality dimensions in promoting users’ satisfaction with the system. SAGE Open, 1–12 (2018)Google Scholar
  58. Siegle, G.J., Ichikawa, N., Steinhauer, S.: Blink before and after you think: blinks occur prior to and following cognitive load indexed by pupillary responses. Psychophysiology 45(5), 679–687 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Strelau, J.: Personality Dimensions Based on Arousal Theories Personality Dimensions and Arousal, pp. 269–286. Springer, Berlin (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Swickert, R.J., Hittner, J.B., Harris, J.L., Herring, J.A.: Relationships among internet use, personality, and social support. Comput. Hum. Behav. 18(4), 437–451 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Thuneberg, H., Hautamäki, J., Hotulainen, R.: Scientific reasoning, school achievement and gender: a multilevel study of between and within school effects in finland. Scand. J. Educ. Res. 59(3), 337–356 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Titulaer, M., van Oers, K., Naguib, M.: Personality affects learning performance in difficult tasks in a sex-dependent way. Anim. Behav. 83(3), 723–730 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Toyama, T., Dengel, A., Suzuki, W., Kise, K.: Wearable reading assist system: augmented reality document combining document retrieval and eye tracking. Paper Presented at the Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), 2013 12th International Conference on (2013)Google Scholar
  64. Tsai, M.-J., Hou, H.-T., Lai, M.-L., Liu, W.-Y., Yang, F.-Y.: Visual attention for solving multiple-choice science problem: an eye-tracking analysis. Comput. Educ. 58(1), 375–385 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Van Der Meer, E., Beyer, R., Horn, J., Foth, M., Bornemann, B., Ries, J., Wartenburger, I.: Resource allocation and fluid intelligence: insights from pupillometry. Psychophysiology 47(1), 158–169 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Viveros, A.M., Rubio, E.H., Ceballos, D.E.V.: Equivalence of Navigation Widgets for Mobile Platforms. Design, User Experience, and Usability. User Experience Design for Diverse Interaction Platforms and Environments, pp. 269–278. Springer, Berlin (2014)Google Scholar
  67. Wang, Y., MacKenzie, C.L., Summers, V.A., Booth, K.S.: The structure of object transportation and orientation in human-computer interaction. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (1998)Google Scholar
  68. Witt, L., Burke, L.A., Barrick, M.R., Mount, M.K.: The interactive effects of conscientiousness and agreeableness on job performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 87(1), 164 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Yovel, I., Revelle, W., Mineka, S.: Who sees trees before forest? The obsessive-compulsive style of visual attention. Psychol. Sci. 16(2), 123–129 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zhao, H., Seibert, S.E.: The big five personality dimensions and entrepreneurial status: a meta-analytical review. J. Appl. Psychol. 91(2), 259 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zheng, Q., Zhao, H., Zhang, W.: A mobile learning system for supporting heterogeneous clients based on p2p live streaming. Paper Presented at the Distributed Smart Cameras (ICDSC), 2012 Sixth International Conference on (2012)Google Scholar
  72. Ziemkiewicz, C., Crouser, R.J., Yauilla, A.R., Su, S.L., Ribarsky, W., Chang, R.: How locus of control influences compatibility with visualization style. Paper Presented at the Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST), 2011 IEEE Conference on (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Instructional Technology and MultimediaUniversiti Sains MalaysiaGelugorMalaysia

Personalised recommendations