User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 65–98 | Cite as

Adaptation in serious games for upper-limb rehabilitation: an approach to improve training outcomes

  • Nadia Hocine
  • Abdelkader Gouaïch
  • Stefano A. Cerri
  • Denis Mottet
  • Jérome Froger
  • Isabelle Laffont
Article

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a game adaptation technique that seeks to improve the training outcomes of stroke patients during a therapeutic session. This technique involves the generation of customized game levels, which difficulty is dynamically adjusted to the patients’ abilities and performance. Our goal was to evaluate the effect of this adaptation strategy on the training outcomes of post-stroke patients during a therapeutic session. We hypothesized that a dynamic difficulty adaptation strategy would have a more positive effect on the training outcomes of patients than two control strategies, incremental difficulty adaptation and random difficulty adaptation. To test these strategies, we developed three versions of PRehab, a serious game for upper-limb rehabilitation. Seven stroke patients and three therapists participated in the experiment, and played all three versions of the game on a graphics tablet. The results of the experiment show that our dynamic adaptation technique increases movement amplitude during a therapeutic session. This finding may serve as a basis to improve patient recovery.

Keywords

Adaptation Serious games Physical rehabilitation Stroke Upper-limb rehabilitation 

References

  1. Annett, M., Anderson, F., Goertzen, D., Halton, J., Ranson, Q., Bischof, W., Boulanger, P.: Using a multi-touch tabletop for upper extremity motor rehabilitation. In: Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Australian Computer–Human Interaction Special Interest Group, pp. 261–264. Melbourne (2009)Google Scholar
  2. Avila-Sansores, S., Orihuela-Espina, F., Enrique-Sucar, L.: Patient Tailored Virtual Rehabilitation, Converging Clinical and Engineering Research on Neurorehabilitation. Springer, Berlin (2013)Google Scholar
  3. Beynon, M., Beynon, W.: Mediating intelligence through observation, dependency and agency in making construals of malaria. In: Intelligent Tutoring Systems Conference, pp. 664–665. Chania, Crete (2012)Google Scholar
  4. Burke, J., McNeill, M., Charles, D., Morrow, P., Crosbie, J., McDonough, S.: Serious games for upper limb rehabilitation following stroke. In: Conference in Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications, pp. 103–110. Coventry (2009)Google Scholar
  5. Burke, J., McNeill, M., Charles, D., Morrow, P., Crosbie, J., McDonough, S.: Optimising engagement for stroke rehabilitation using serious games. J. Vis. Comput. 25, 1085–1099 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brehm, J., Self, E.: The intensity of motivation. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 40, 109–131 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cameirão, M.S., Badia, S.B., Oller, E.D.: Neurorehabilitation using the virtual reality based Rehabilitation Gaming System: methodology, design, psychometrics, usability and validation. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 7, 48 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chittaro, L., Ranon, R., Carchietti, E., Zampa, A., Biasutti, E., De Marco, L.: A knowledge-based system to support emergency medical services for disabled patients. J. Artif. Intell. Med. 2, 176–180 (2009). (Elsevier)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cirstea, M.C., Levin, M.F.: Improvement of arm movement patterns and endpoint control depends on type of feedback during practice in stroke survivors. J. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 21, 398–411 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen, J.: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Routledge Academic, New York (1988)MATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Conati, C., Maclaren, H.: Modeling user affect from causes and effects. User modeling and user-adapted interaction. J. Personal. Res. 5535, 4–15 (2009)Google Scholar
  12. Conati, C., Manske, M.: Evaluating adaptive feedback in an educational computer game. In: 9th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents, pp. 146–158. Amsterdam (2009)Google Scholar
  13. Czikszentmihalyi, M.: Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Lidové Noviny, Praha (1991)Google Scholar
  14. Dobkin, B.H.: Rehabilitation after stroke. N. Engl. J. Med. 352, 1677–1684 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gouaïch, A., Hocine, N., Van Dokkum, L., Mottet, D.: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGHIT International Health Informatics Symposium, pp. 5–12. Miami (2012)Google Scholar
  16. Goude, D., Björk, S., Rydmark, M.: Game design in virtual reality systems for stroke rehabilitation. J. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 125, 146–148 (2007)Google Scholar
  17. Hocine, N., Gouaich, A.: Therapeutic games difficulty adaptation: an approach based on player ability and motivation. In: Proceddings of 16th International Conference CGAME 2011, pp. 257–261 (2011)Google Scholar
  18. Howcroft, J., Klejman, S., Fehlings, D., Wright, V., Zabjek, K., Andrysek, J., Biddiss, E.: Active video game play in children with cerebral palsy: potential for physical activity promotion and rehabilitation therapies. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 93, 1448–1456 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hunicke, R., Chapman, V.: AI for dynamic difficulty adjustment in games. In: Challenges in Game Artificial Intelligence AAAI Workshop, pp. 91–96 (2004)Google Scholar
  20. IJsselsteijn, W.A., De Kort, Y., Poels, K.: The Game Experience Questionnaire: Development of a self-report measure to assess the psychological impact of digital games. Manuscript (2013)Google Scholar
  21. Khademi, M., Mousavi, H., Lopes, C.V., Dodakian, L., Cramer, S.C.: Haptic augmented reality to monitor human arm’s stiffness in rehabilitation. In: IEEE EMBS Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Sciences, pp. 892–895 (2012)Google Scholar
  22. Kivikangas, J., Ekman, I., Chanel, G., Järvelä, S., Salminen, M., Cowley, B., Henttonen, P., Ravaja, N.: Review on psychophysiological methods in game research. J. Gaming Virtual Worlds 3, 181–199 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kocsis, L., Szepesvari, C.: Bandit based Monte-Carlo planning. Mach. Learn. 2006, 282–293 (2006)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. Kukla, A.: Foundations of an attributional theory of performance. Psychol. Rev. 9, 454–470 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kwakkel, G., Wagenaar, R.C., Koelman, T.W., Lankhorst, G.J., Koetsier, J.C.: Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke a research synthesis. J. Stroke 28, 722–728 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Left 4 Dead video game. http://www.l4d.com (2008)
  27. Levin, F., Sveistrup, H., Subramanian, S.: Feedback and virtual environments for motor learning and rehabilitation. Schedae 1, 19–36 (2010)Google Scholar
  28. Magerko, B., Stensrud, B., Holt, L.: Bringing the schoolhouse inside the box-A tool for engaging, individualized training, pp. 23–29 (2006)Google Scholar
  29. Markow, T.: Mobile music touch: using haptic stimulation for passive rehabilitation and learning. Doctoral dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology (2012)Google Scholar
  30. Max Payne video game. http://www.maxpayne.com (2001)
  31. McCuaig, J., Gauthier, R.: Interoperability for ITS: An Ontology of Learning Style Models. Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Crete (2012)Google Scholar
  32. Mihelj, M., Novak, D., Milavec, M., Ziherl, J., Olenšek, A., Munih, M.: Virtual rehabilitation environment using principles of intrinsic motivation and game design. Presence 21, 1–15 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Murray, T., Arroyo, I.: Toward Measuring and Maintaining the Zone of Proximal Development in Adaptive Instructional Systems. Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Le Mans (2002)Google Scholar
  34. Natkin, S., Yan, C., Jumpertz, S., Market, B.: Difficulty scaling of game aI. In: International Conference on Digital Games Research Association, pp. 33–37. Tokyo (2007)Google Scholar
  35. Nef, T., Riener, R.: Three-Dimensional Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Arm Therapy Robot (ARMin), Neurorehabilitation Technology. Springer, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  36. PCG, Wiki page for procedural content generation site. http://www.pcg.wikidot.com (2014)
  37. Peirce, N., Conlan, O., Wade, V.: Adaptive educational games: providing non-invasive personalised learning experiences. In: Second IEEE International Conference on Digital Games and Intelligent Toys Based Education, pp. 28–35 (2008)Google Scholar
  38. Pirovano, M., Mainetti, R., Baud-Bovy, G., Lanzi, P.L., Borghese, N.: Self-adaptive games for rehabilitation at home. In: IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games (CIG), pp. 179–186. Granada (2012)Google Scholar
  39. PRehab, serious game for stroke rehabilitation, university of Montpellier, video of the game. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfTv9Dtc5Ww
  40. Pugnetti, L., Mendozzi, L., Attree, E.A., Barbieri, E., Brooks, B., Cazzullo, C., Motta, A., Rose, F.D., Psychol, C.: Probing memory and executive functions with virtual reality: past and present studies. Cyber Psychol. Behav. 1, 151–161 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rabin, B., Burdea, G., Hundal, J., Roll, D., Damiani, F.: Integrative motor, emotive and cognitive therapy for elderly patients chronic post-stroke A feasibility study of the BrightArm rehabilitation system. In: International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation, pp. 1–8 (2011)Google Scholar
  42. Rani, P., Sarkar, N., Nilanjan, L., Liu, C.: Maintaining optimal challenge in computer games through real-time physiological feedback. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction, pp. 184–192. Las Vegas (2005)Google Scholar
  43. Rodrigo, R., Fernández-Gajardo, R., Gutiérrez, R., Matamala, J.M., Carrasco, R., Miranda-Merchak, A., Feuerhake, W.: Oxidative stress and pathophysiology of ischemic stroke: novel therapeutic opportunities. J. Oxid. Stress Pathophysiol. Ischemic Stroke 28, 23–29 (2013)Google Scholar
  44. Rojas, D., Kapralos, B., Cristancho, S., Collins, K., Hogue, A., Conati, C., Dubrowski, A.: Developing effective serious games: the effect of background sound on visual fidelity perception with varying texture resolution. J. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 173, 386–392 (2012)Google Scholar
  45. Sanders, T., Cairns, P., Paul : Time perception, immersion and music in videogames. In: Proceedings of the 24th BCS Interaction Specialist Group Conference, pp. 160–167. Swinton (2010)Google Scholar
  46. Sherlock, K.: Plays, Acts and Scenes in Structure, Drama Writing. Grossmont College, El Cajon (2005)Google Scholar
  47. Spronck, P., Ponsen, M., Sprinkhuizen-Kuyper, I., Postma, E.: Adaptive game AI with dynamic scripting. J. Mach. Learn. 63, 23–29 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Spronck, P., Sprinkhuizen-Kuyper, I., Postma, E.: Difficulty scaling of game AI. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Intelligent Games and Simulation, pp. 33–37 (2004)Google Scholar
  49. Tavener, S., Perez, D., Samothrakis, S., Colton, S.: A survey of Monte Carlo tree search methods. IEEE Trans. Comput. Intell. AI Games 4, 1–43 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tijs, T., Brokken, D., IJsselsteijn, W.: Dynamic Game Balancing by Recognizing Affect, Fun and Games. Springer, Berlin (2008)Google Scholar
  51. Togelius, J., Yannakakis, G., Stanley, K., Browne, C.: Search-based procedural content generation applications of evolutionary computation. IEEE Trans. Comput. Intell. AI Games 3, 141–150 (2010)Google Scholar
  52. Varkuti, B., Guan, C., Pan, Y., Phua, K., Ang, K., Kuah, C., Chua, K., Ang, B., Birbaumer, N., Sitaram, R.: Resting state changes in functional connectivity correlate with movement recovery for BCI and robot-assisted upper-extremity training after stroke. J. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 27, 53–62 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vincent, O. R., Folorunso, O.: A descriptive algorithm for sobel image edge detection. In: Proceedings of Informing Science and IT Education Conference (InSITE), pp. 97–107 (2009)Google Scholar
  54. Wertsch, J.: The zone of proximal development: some conceptual issues. New Dir. Child. Adolesc. Dev. 1984, 7–18 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. World Health Organization (WHO): The Top Ten Causes of Death. World Health Organization, Geneva (2013)Google Scholar
  56. Yannakakis, G.N., Hallam, J.: Real-time adaptation of augmented-reality games for optimizing player satisfaction. In: IEEE Symposium of Computational Intelligence and Games, pp. 103–110 (2008)Google Scholar
  57. Zook, A., Riedl, M.: A temporal data-driven player model for dynamic difficulty adjustment. In: The Eighth Annual AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment, pp. 23–29 (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nadia Hocine
    • 1
  • Abdelkader Gouaïch
    • 1
  • Stefano A. Cerri
    • 1
  • Denis Mottet
    • 2
  • Jérome Froger
    • 3
  • Isabelle Laffont
    • 4
  1. 1.Laboratory of Computer Science, Robotics, and Microelectronics (LIRMM), CNRSUniversity of MontpellierMontpellierFrance
  2. 2.University of MontpellierMontpellierFrance
  3. 3.Movement to Health laboratory (M2H)University Hospital of Nimes and MontpellierMontpellierFrance
  4. 4.Movement to Health laboratory (M2H), University Hospital of Nimes and MontpellierUniversity of MontpellierMontpellierFrance

Personalised recommendations