User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 87–108 | Cite as

Exploring the feasibility of web form adaptation to users’ cultural dimension scores

  • Matías Recabarren
  • Miguel Nussbaum
Original Paper


With many daily tasks now performed on the Internet, productivity and efficiency in working with web pages have become transversal necessities for all users. Many of these tasks involve the inputting of user information, obligating the user to interact with a webform. Research has demonstrated that productivity depends largely on users’ personal characteristics, implying that it will vary from user to user. The webform development process must therefore, include modeling of its intended users to ensure the interface design is appropriate. Taking all potential users into account is difficult, however, primarily because their identity is unknown, and some may be effectively excluded by the final design. Such discrimination can be avoided by incorporating rules that allow webforms to adapt automatically to the individual user’s characteristics, the principal one being the person’s culture. In this paper we report two studies that validate this option. We begin by determining the relationships between a user’s cultural dimension scores and their behavior when faced with a webform. We then validate the notion that rules based on these relationships can be established for the automatic adaptation of a webform in order to reduce the time taken to complete it. We conclude that the automatic webform adaptation to the cultural dimensions of users improves their performance.


User modeling Human–computer interaction Usability User culture Adaptive webform Webform design Hofstede’s cultural dimensions 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, C.R., Domingos, P., Weld, D.S.: Personalizing web sites for mobile users. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 565–575 (2001)Google Scholar
  2. Baldoni M., Baroglio C., Henze N.: Personalization for the semantic web. In: Eisinger, N., Małuszyński, J. (eds) Reasoning Web LNCS, vol. 3564, pp. 173–212. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar
  3. Bargas-Avila J., Oberholzer G., Schmutz P., De Vito M., Opwis K.: Usable error message presentation in World Wide Web: Do not show errors right away. Interact. Comput. 19, 330–341 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumgarten M.: Kids and the internet: a developmental summary. ACM Comput. Entertain. 1(1), 11–11 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berkovsky S., Kuflik T., Ricci F.: Mediation of user models for enhanced personalization in recommender systems. User Model. User-adapt. Interact.: J. Pers. Res. 18, 245–286 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berners-Lee, T.: What the semantic web can represent. World Wide Web Consortium (1998)
  7. Brusilovsky P.: Adaptive hypermedia. User Model. User-adapt. Interact.: J. Pers. Res. 11, 87–110 (2001)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brusilovsky P., Millán E.: User models for adaptive hypermedia and adaptive educational systems. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 4321, 3 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Camenisch, J., Shelat, A., Sommer, D., Zimmermann, R.: Securing user inputs for the web. In: Proceedings of the Second ACM Workshop on Digital Identity Management, pp. 33–44 (2006)Google Scholar
  10. Carrol J., Rosson M.B.: The paradox of the active user. In: Carrol, J. Interfacing Thought: Cognitive Aspects of Human–Computer Interaction, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1989)Google Scholar
  11. Chadwick-Dias, A., McNulty, M., Tullis, T.: Web usability and age: how design changes can improve performance. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Universal Usability, pp. 30–37 (2003)Google Scholar
  12. Chellapa R.K., Sin R.: Personalization versus privacy: an empirical examination of the online consumer’s dilemma. Inf. Technol. Manage. 6, 181–202 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen S.Y., Macredie R.D.: Cognitive modeling of student learning in web-based instructional programmes. Int. J. Human–Comput. Interact. 17, 375–402 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen Y., Xie X., Ma W.Y., Zhang H.J.: Adapting web pages for small-screen devices. IEEE Internet Comput. 9(1), 2–8 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cho Y.H., Kim J.K., Kim S.H.: A personalized recommender system based on web usage mining and decision tree induction. Expert Syst. Appl. 23, 329–342 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. ChoiceStream Personalization Survey: Consumer trends and perceptions. (2008)
  17. Cranor, L.F.: Web privacy with P3P. O’Reilly Media (2002)Google Scholar
  18. Cyr D., Bonanni C.: Gender and website design in e-business. Int. J. Electron. Bus. 3(6), 565–582 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Das, S., McEwan, T., Douglas, D.: Using eye-tracking to evaluate label alignment in online forms. In: Proceedings of the 5th Nordic Conference on Human–Computer Interaction, pp. 451–454 (2008)Google Scholar
  20. De Bra P., Aroyo L., Chepegin V.: The next big thing: adaptive web-based systems. J. Digit. Infor. 5(1), 10–18 (2004)Google Scholar
  21. De Troyer, O.: Designing well-structured websites: lessons to be learned from database schema methodology. In: International Conference on Conceptual Modeling/the Entity Relationship Approach, pp. 51–64 (1998)Google Scholar
  22. Dong Y., Lee K.P.: A cross-cultural comparative study of users’ perceptions of a webpage: with a focus on the cognitive styles of Chinese, Koreans and Americans. Int. J. Des. 2(2), 19–30 (2008)Google Scholar
  23. Downey S., Wentling R.M., Wentling T., Wadsworth A.: The relationship between national culture and the usability of an e-learning system. Hum. Resour. Dev. Int. 8(1), 47–64 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Evett L., Brown D.: Text formats and web design for visually impaired and dyslexic readers—clear text for all. Interact. Comput. 17, 453–472 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fischer G.: User modeling in human–computer interaction. User Model. User-adapt. Interact.: J. Pers. Res. 11, 65–86 (2001)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ford, G., Gelderblom, H.: The effects of culture on performance achieved through the use of human computer interaction. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Annual Research Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists on Enablement Through Technology, Republic of South Africa, pp. 218–230 (2003)Google Scholar
  27. Ford N., Miller D., Moss N.: Web search strategies and human individual differences: cognitive and demographic factors, internet attitudes, and approaches. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 56(7), 741–756 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Frias-Martinez E., Chen S.Y., Macredie R.D., Liu X.: The role of human factors in stereotyping behavior and perception of digital library users: a robust clustering approach. User Model. User-adapt. Interact.: J. Pers. Res. 17, 305–337 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gehrke, D., Turban, E.: Determinants of successful website design: relative importance and recommendations for effectiveness. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Second Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 5–8 (1999)Google Scholar
  30. Germanakos, P., Mourlas, C., Panayiotou, C., Samaras, G.: Personalization systems and processes review based on a predetermined user interface categorization. In: Proceedings of the III International Conference on Communication and Reality, Digital Utopia in the Media: From Discourses to Facts, pp. 431–444 (2005)Google Scholar
  31. Hoffman D., Novak T., Venkatesh A.: Has the internet become indispensable?. Commun. ACM 47(7), 37–42 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hofstede, G.: Culture’s consequences: international differences. Sage, Beverly Hills, California: Work-Related Values (1980)Google Scholar
  33. Hofstede, G.: Values survey module 1994, (1994)
  34. Hoft N.: Developing a cultural model. John Wisley, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  35. ISO-9241, Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (Parts 1–17), International Organization for Standardization, (1996–2002)Google Scholar
  36. Jarret, C., Minott, C.: Making a better web form. In: Proceeding of UPA (2004).Google Scholar
  37. Jarrett, C., Gaffney, G.: Form that Works: Designing Web Forms for Usability. Morgan Kaufmann (2008)Google Scholar
  38. Kamppuri, M., Bednarik, R., Tukiainen, M.: The expanding focus of HCI: case culture. In: Proceedings of NordiCHI, pp. 405–408 (2006)Google Scholar
  39. Keevil, B.: Measuring the usability index of your web site. In: Proceedings of the Computer Human Interaction CHI ‘98 Conference, pp. 271–277 (1998)Google Scholar
  40. Kralisch, A., Eisend, M., Berendt, B.: The impact of culture on website navigation behavior. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction, Las Vegas (2005)Google Scholar
  41. Kobsa A.: Generic user modeling systems. User Model. User-adapt. Interact.: J. Pers. Res. 11(1–2), 49–63 (2001)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kobsa A.: Personalized hypermedia and international privacy. Commun. ACM 45(5), 64–67 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kobsa A.: Privacy-enhanced web personalization. In: Brusilovsky, P., Kobsa, A., Nejdl, W. (eds) The Adaptive Web: Methods and Strategies of Web Personalization, pp. 628–670. Springer, Berlin (2007)Google Scholar
  44. Kurniawan S.H., King A., Evans D.G., Blenkhorn P.L.: Personalising web page presentation for older people. Interact. Comput. 18, 457–477 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Laakko T.: Context-aware web content adaptation for mobile user agents. In: Richi, N., Nikhil, I., Lakhmi, C.J. (eds) Evolution of the Web in Artificial Intelligence Environments, pp. 69–99. Springer, Berlin (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Larson, K., Czerwinski, M.: Web page design: implications of memory, structure and scent for information retrieval. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 25–32 (1998)Google Scholar
  47. Lennard, A., Parkes, A. An architecture for adaptive interfaces AAI/AI-ED. Technical Report No.110, Computing Department, Lancaster University, Lancaster, England (1995)Google Scholar
  48. Luna D., Peracchio L.A., Juan M.D.: Cross-cultural and cognitive aspects of web site navigation. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 30(4), 397–410 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Manfreda, K.L., Batagelj, Z., Vehovar, V.: Design of web survey questionnaires: three basic experiments. J. Computer-Mediated Commun. 7(3) (2002)Google Scholar
  50. Marcus A., Gould E.W.: Crosscurrents cultural dimensions and global web user-interface design. Interactions 7(4), 32–46 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mockovak, W.: Comparing the Effectiveness of Alternative Approaches for Displaying Edit-Error Messages in Web Forms. Retrieved 19th July 2009 from (2005)
  52. Palmer J.W.: Web site usability, design and performance metrics. Inform. Syst. Res. 13(2), 151–167 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Perkowitz M., Etzioni O.: Adaptive web sites: an AI challenge. Int. Joint Conf. Artif. Intell. 15, 16–23 (1997)Google Scholar
  54. Perkowitz M., Etzioni O.: Towards adaptive web sites: conceptual framework and case study. Artif. Intell. 118, 245–275 (2000)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Peytchev A., Couper M., McCabe S.E., Crawford S.D.: Web survey design: paging versus scrolling. Public Opin. Q. 70(4), 596–607 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Recabarren M., Nussbaum M., Leiva C.: Cultural divide and the internet. Comput. Human Behav. 24(6), 2917–2926 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Reinecke, K., Bernstein, A.: Culturally adaptive software: moving beyond internationalization. In: Proceedings of the HCII, Beijing, China (2007)Google Scholar
  58. Shen S., Wooley M., Prior S.: Towards culture-centered design. Interact. Comput. 18, 820–852 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Singh, N., Pereira, A.: The culturally customized web site: customizing web sites for the global marketplace. Butterworth-Heinemann (2005)Google Scholar
  60. Singh N., Fassott G., Zhao H., Boughton P.: A cross-cultural analysis of German, Chinese and Indian consumers’ perception of web site adaptation. J. Consumer Behav. 5(1), 56–68 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Simon S.J.: The impact of culture and gender on web sites: an empirical study. DATA BASE Adv. Inf. Syst. 32(1), 19 (2001)Google Scholar
  62. Tan G.W., Wei K.K.: An empirical study of web browsing behavior: towards an effective website design. Electron. Commerce Res. Appl. 5, 261–271 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wang, Y., Kobsa, A., van der Hoek, A., White, J.: PLA-based runtime dynamism in support of privacy-enhanced Web personalization. In: 10th International Software Product Line Conference, Baltimore, pp. 151–162 (2006)Google Scholar
  64. Wroblewski, L.: Web Form Design: Filling in the Blanks. Rosenfeld Media (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Facultad de Ingenieríay Ciencias AplicadasUniversidad de Los AndesSantiagoChile
  2. 2.Computer Science Department, School of EngineeringPontificia Universidad Católica de ChileSantiago 22Chile

Personalised recommendations