Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Exploring the feasibility of web form adaptation to users’ cultural dimension scores

Abstract

With many daily tasks now performed on the Internet, productivity and efficiency in working with web pages have become transversal necessities for all users. Many of these tasks involve the inputting of user information, obligating the user to interact with a webform. Research has demonstrated that productivity depends largely on users’ personal characteristics, implying that it will vary from user to user. The webform development process must therefore, include modeling of its intended users to ensure the interface design is appropriate. Taking all potential users into account is difficult, however, primarily because their identity is unknown, and some may be effectively excluded by the final design. Such discrimination can be avoided by incorporating rules that allow webforms to adapt automatically to the individual user’s characteristics, the principal one being the person’s culture. In this paper we report two studies that validate this option. We begin by determining the relationships between a user’s cultural dimension scores and their behavior when faced with a webform. We then validate the notion that rules based on these relationships can be established for the automatic adaptation of a webform in order to reduce the time taken to complete it. We conclude that the automatic webform adaptation to the cultural dimensions of users improves their performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Anderson, C.R., Domingos, P., Weld, D.S.: Personalizing web sites for mobile users. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 565–575 (2001)

  2. Baldoni M., Baroglio C., Henze N.: Personalization for the semantic web. In: Eisinger, N., Małuszyński, J. (eds) Reasoning Web LNCS, vol. 3564, pp. 173–212. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

  3. Bargas-Avila J., Oberholzer G., Schmutz P., De Vito M., Opwis K.: Usable error message presentation in World Wide Web: Do not show errors right away. Interact. Comput. 19, 330–341 (2007)

  4. Baumgarten M.: Kids and the internet: a developmental summary. ACM Comput. Entertain. 1(1), 11–11 (2003)

  5. Berkovsky S., Kuflik T., Ricci F.: Mediation of user models for enhanced personalization in recommender systems. User Model. User-adapt. Interact.: J. Pers. Res. 18, 245–286 (2008)

  6. Berners-Lee, T.: What the semantic web can represent. World Wide Web Consortium (1998) http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/RDFnot.html

  7. Brusilovsky P.: Adaptive hypermedia. User Model. User-adapt. Interact.: J. Pers. Res. 11, 87–110 (2001)

  8. Brusilovsky P., Millán E.: User models for adaptive hypermedia and adaptive educational systems. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 4321, 3 (2001)

  9. Camenisch, J., Shelat, A., Sommer, D., Zimmermann, R.: Securing user inputs for the web. In: Proceedings of the Second ACM Workshop on Digital Identity Management, pp. 33–44 (2006)

  10. Carrol J., Rosson M.B.: The paradox of the active user. In: Carrol, J. Interfacing Thought: Cognitive Aspects of Human–Computer Interaction, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1989)

  11. Chadwick-Dias, A., McNulty, M., Tullis, T.: Web usability and age: how design changes can improve performance. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Universal Usability, pp. 30–37 (2003)

  12. Chellapa R.K., Sin R.: Personalization versus privacy: an empirical examination of the online consumer’s dilemma. Inf. Technol. Manage. 6, 181–202 (2005)

  13. Chen S.Y., Macredie R.D.: Cognitive modeling of student learning in web-based instructional programmes. Int. J. Human–Comput. Interact. 17, 375–402 (2004)

  14. Chen Y., Xie X., Ma W.Y., Zhang H.J.: Adapting web pages for small-screen devices. IEEE Internet Comput. 9(1), 2–8 (2005)

  15. Cho Y.H., Kim J.K., Kim S.H.: A personalized recommender system based on web usage mining and decision tree induction. Expert Syst. Appl. 23, 329–342 (2002)

  16. ChoiceStream Personalization Survey: Consumer trends and perceptions. http://www.choicestream.com/ (2008)

  17. Cranor, L.F.: Web privacy with P3P. O’Reilly Media (2002)

  18. Cyr D., Bonanni C.: Gender and website design in e-business. Int. J. Electron. Bus. 3(6), 565–582 (2005)

  19. Das, S., McEwan, T., Douglas, D.: Using eye-tracking to evaluate label alignment in online forms. In: Proceedings of the 5th Nordic Conference on Human–Computer Interaction, pp. 451–454 (2008)

  20. De Bra P., Aroyo L., Chepegin V.: The next big thing: adaptive web-based systems. J. Digit. Infor. 5(1), 10–18 (2004)

  21. De Troyer, O.: Designing well-structured websites: lessons to be learned from database schema methodology. In: International Conference on Conceptual Modeling/the Entity Relationship Approach, pp. 51–64 (1998)

  22. Dong Y., Lee K.P.: A cross-cultural comparative study of users’ perceptions of a webpage: with a focus on the cognitive styles of Chinese, Koreans and Americans. Int. J. Des. 2(2), 19–30 (2008)

  23. Downey S., Wentling R.M., Wentling T., Wadsworth A.: The relationship between national culture and the usability of an e-learning system. Hum. Resour. Dev. Int. 8(1), 47–64 (2005)

  24. Evett L., Brown D.: Text formats and web design for visually impaired and dyslexic readers—clear text for all. Interact. Comput. 17, 453–472 (2005)

  25. Fischer G.: User modeling in human–computer interaction. User Model. User-adapt. Interact.: J. Pers. Res. 11, 65–86 (2001)

  26. Ford, G., Gelderblom, H.: The effects of culture on performance achieved through the use of human computer interaction. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Annual Research Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists on Enablement Through Technology, Republic of South Africa, pp. 218–230 (2003)

  27. Ford N., Miller D., Moss N.: Web search strategies and human individual differences: cognitive and demographic factors, internet attitudes, and approaches. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 56(7), 741–756 (2005)

  28. Frias-Martinez E., Chen S.Y., Macredie R.D., Liu X.: The role of human factors in stereotyping behavior and perception of digital library users: a robust clustering approach. User Model. User-adapt. Interact.: J. Pers. Res. 17, 305–337 (2007)

  29. Gehrke, D., Turban, E.: Determinants of successful website design: relative importance and recommendations for effectiveness. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Second Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 5–8 (1999)

  30. Germanakos, P., Mourlas, C., Panayiotou, C., Samaras, G.: Personalization systems and processes review based on a predetermined user interface categorization. In: Proceedings of the III International Conference on Communication and Reality, Digital Utopia in the Media: From Discourses to Facts, pp. 431–444 (2005)

  31. Hoffman D., Novak T., Venkatesh A.: Has the internet become indispensable?. Commun. ACM 47(7), 37–42 (2004)

  32. Hofstede, G.: Culture’s consequences: international differences. Sage, Beverly Hills, California: Work-Related Values (1980)

  33. Hofstede, G.: Values survey module 1994, http://feweb.uvt.nl/center/hofstede/VSM.html (1994)

  34. Hoft N.: Developing a cultural model. John Wisley, New York (1996)

  35. ISO-9241, Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (Parts 1–17), International Organization for Standardization, (1996–2002)

  36. Jarret, C., Minott, C.: Making a better web form. In: Proceeding of UPA (2004).

  37. Jarrett, C., Gaffney, G.: Form that Works: Designing Web Forms for Usability. Morgan Kaufmann (2008)

  38. Kamppuri, M., Bednarik, R., Tukiainen, M.: The expanding focus of HCI: case culture. In: Proceedings of NordiCHI, pp. 405–408 (2006)

  39. Keevil, B.: Measuring the usability index of your web site. In: Proceedings of the Computer Human Interaction CHI ‘98 Conference, pp. 271–277 (1998)

  40. Kralisch, A., Eisend, M., Berendt, B.: The impact of culture on website navigation behavior. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction, Las Vegas (2005)

  41. Kobsa A.: Generic user modeling systems. User Model. User-adapt. Interact.: J. Pers. Res. 11(1–2), 49–63 (2001)

  42. Kobsa A.: Personalized hypermedia and international privacy. Commun. ACM 45(5), 64–67 (2002)

  43. Kobsa A.: Privacy-enhanced web personalization. In: Brusilovsky, P., Kobsa, A., Nejdl, W. (eds) The Adaptive Web: Methods and Strategies of Web Personalization, pp. 628–670. Springer, Berlin (2007)

  44. Kurniawan S.H., King A., Evans D.G., Blenkhorn P.L.: Personalising web page presentation for older people. Interact. Comput. 18, 457–477 (2006)

  45. Laakko T.: Context-aware web content adaptation for mobile user agents. In: Richi, N., Nikhil, I., Lakhmi, C.J. (eds) Evolution of the Web in Artificial Intelligence Environments, pp. 69–99. Springer, Berlin (2008)

  46. Larson, K., Czerwinski, M.: Web page design: implications of memory, structure and scent for information retrieval. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 25–32 (1998)

  47. Lennard, A., Parkes, A. An architecture for adaptive interfaces AAI/AI-ED. Technical Report No.110, Computing Department, Lancaster University, Lancaster, England (1995)

  48. Luna D., Peracchio L.A., Juan M.D.: Cross-cultural and cognitive aspects of web site navigation. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 30(4), 397–410 (2002)

  49. Manfreda, K.L., Batagelj, Z., Vehovar, V.: Design of web survey questionnaires: three basic experiments. J. Computer-Mediated Commun. 7(3) (2002)

  50. Marcus A., Gould E.W.: Crosscurrents cultural dimensions and global web user-interface design. Interactions 7(4), 32–46 (2000)

  51. Mockovak, W.: Comparing the Effectiveness of Alternative Approaches for Displaying Edit-Error Messages in Web Forms. Retrieved 19th July 2009 from http://www.bls.gov/osmr/pdf/st050010.pdf (2005)

  52. Palmer J.W.: Web site usability, design and performance metrics. Inform. Syst. Res. 13(2), 151–167 (2002)

  53. Perkowitz M., Etzioni O.: Adaptive web sites: an AI challenge. Int. Joint Conf. Artif. Intell. 15, 16–23 (1997)

  54. Perkowitz M., Etzioni O.: Towards adaptive web sites: conceptual framework and case study. Artif. Intell. 118, 245–275 (2000)

  55. Peytchev A., Couper M., McCabe S.E., Crawford S.D.: Web survey design: paging versus scrolling. Public Opin. Q. 70(4), 596–607 (2006)

  56. Recabarren M., Nussbaum M., Leiva C.: Cultural divide and the internet. Comput. Human Behav. 24(6), 2917–2926 (2008)

  57. Reinecke, K., Bernstein, A.: Culturally adaptive software: moving beyond internationalization. In: Proceedings of the HCII, Beijing, China (2007)

  58. Shen S., Wooley M., Prior S.: Towards culture-centered design. Interact. Comput. 18, 820–852 (2005)

  59. Singh, N., Pereira, A.: The culturally customized web site: customizing web sites for the global marketplace. Butterworth-Heinemann (2005)

  60. Singh N., Fassott G., Zhao H., Boughton P.: A cross-cultural analysis of German, Chinese and Indian consumers’ perception of web site adaptation. J. Consumer Behav. 5(1), 56–68 (2006)

  61. Simon S.J.: The impact of culture and gender on web sites: an empirical study. DATA BASE Adv. Inf. Syst. 32(1), 19 (2001)

  62. Tan G.W., Wei K.K.: An empirical study of web browsing behavior: towards an effective website design. Electron. Commerce Res. Appl. 5, 261–271 (2006)

  63. Wang, Y., Kobsa, A., van der Hoek, A., White, J.: PLA-based runtime dynamism in support of privacy-enhanced Web personalization. In: 10th International Software Product Line Conference, Baltimore, pp. 151–162 (2006)

  64. World Wide Web Consortium. http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/intro/intro.html

  65. Wroblewski, L.: Web Form Design: Filling in the Blanks. Rosenfeld Media (2008)

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Matías Recabarren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Recabarren, M., Nussbaum, M. Exploring the feasibility of web form adaptation to users’ cultural dimension scores. User Model User-Adap Inter 20, 87–108 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-010-9071-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • User modeling
  • Human–computer interaction
  • Usability
  • User culture
  • Adaptive webform
  • Webform design
  • Hofstede’s cultural dimensions