User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction

, Volume 16, Issue 3–4, pp 321–348 | Cite as

Design and evaluation of an adaptive incentive mechanism for sustained educational online communities

  • Ran ChengEmail author
  • Julita Vassileva
Open Access
Original Paper


Most online communities, such as discussion forums, file-sharing communities, e-learning communities, and others, suffer from insufficient user participation in their initial phase of development. Therefore, it is important to provide incentives to encourage participation, until the community reaches a critical mass and “takes off”. However, too much participation, especially of low-quality can also be detrimental for the community, since it leads to information overload, which makes users leave the community. Therefore, to regulate the quality and the quantity of user contributions and ensure a sustainable level of user participation in the online community, it is important to adapt the rewards for particular forms of participation for individual users depending on their reputation and the current needs of the community. An incentive mechanism with these properties is proposed. The main idea is to measure and reward the desirable user activities and compute a user participation measure, then cluster the users based on their participation measure into different classes, which have different status in the community and enjoy special privileges. For each user, the reward for each type of activity is computed dynamically based on a model of community needs and an individual user model. The model of the community needs predicts what types of contributions (e.g. more new papers or more ratings) are most valuable at the current moment for the community. The individual model predicts the style of contributions of the user based on her past performance (whether the user tends to make high-quality contributions or not, whether she fairly rates the contributions of others). The adaptive rewards are displayed to the user at the beginning of each session and the user can decide what form of contribution to make considering the rewards that she will earn. The mechanism was evaluated in an online class resource-sharing system, Comtella. The results indicate that the mechanism successfully encourages stable and active user participation; it lowers the level of information overload and therefore enhances the sustainability of the community.


Online communities Virtual communities Participation Ratings Incentive mechanisms Personalized rewards 


  1. Alfonseca, E., Carro, R., Martin, E., Ortigosa, A. and Paredes, P.: The impact of learning styles on student grouping for collaborative learning: a case study, 2006Google Scholar
  2. Beenen, G., Ling, K., Wang, X., Chang, K., Frankowski, D., Resnick, P., Kraut, R. E.: Using social psychology to motivate contributions to online communities. Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 212–221, Chicago, Illinois (2004)Google Scholar
  3. Burgahain, C., Agrawal, D., Suri, S.: A game theoretic framework for incentives in P2P system. In: Proceedings 3rd IEEE International Conference on P2P Computing, Linkoeping, Sweden, IEEE Press (2003)Google Scholar
  4. Cheng, R., Vassileva, J.: User motivation and persuasion strategy for peer-to-peer communities. Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Mini-track “Online Communities in the Digital Economy”), pp. 193–202, IEEE PressGoogle Scholar
  5. Golle, P., Leyton-Brown, K., Mironov, I.: Incentives for sharing in peer to peer networks. Proceedings Electronic Commerce 2001, pp. 264–267, Tampa, FL, ACM Press, 12–17 Oct 2001Google Scholar
  6. Greer, J., McCalla, G., Vassileva, J., Deters, R., Bull, S., Kettel, L.: Lessons learned in deploying a multi-agent learning support system: the I-help experience. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 410–421, San Antonio (2001)Google Scholar
  7. Herlocker, J. L., Konstan, A. J., Riedl, J.: Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations. Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 241–250, (2000)Google Scholar
  8. Hiltz S.R., Turoff M. (1978): The Network Nation: Human Communication Via Computer. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Inc., LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Introne, J., Alterman, R.: Using Shared Representations to Improve Coordination and Intent Inference, in this issueGoogle Scholar
  10. Jones, Q., Rafaeli, S.: User population and user contributions to virtual publics: a systems model. Proceedings of the international ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, pp. 239–248, Phoenix, Arizona (1999)Google Scholar
  11. Lampe, C., Resnick, P.: Slash(dot) and burn: distributed moderation in a large online conversation space. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 543–550, Vienna, Austria (2004)Google Scholar
  12. Levitt S., Dubner S. (2005): Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything. Harper Collins, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Lowry, R.: Subchapter 11a: the Mann-Whitney test & subchapter 12a: the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test. Concepts and Applications of Inferential Statistics, 1999 Available online at (last accessed on May 30, 2006)Google Scholar
  14. Masthoff, J., Gatt, A.: In pursuit of satisfaction and the prevention of embarrassment: affective state in group recommender systems, 2006Google Scholar
  15. McLaren, B., Walker, E., Harrer, A., Bollen, L., Sewall, J.: Creating cognitive tutors for collaborative learning: steps toward realization, 2006Google Scholar
  16. Merton R., Zuckerman H.A. (1968): The matthew effect in science: the reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science, 199(3810): 55–63Google Scholar
  17. Preece J. (2000): Online Communities: Designing Usability, Supporting Sociability. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UKGoogle Scholar
  18. Shenk D. (1997): Data Smog: Surviving the Information Glut. HarperCollins, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Shirky, C.: Fame vs. fortune: micro-payments and free content. First published Sept. 5, 2003 on the “Network, Economics and Culture” mailing list, available on line at: writings/fame_vs_fortune.html. (last accessed on May 30, 2006)Google Scholar
  20. Vassileva, J.: Motivating participation in peer to peer communities. Proceedings of the Workshop on Emergent Societies in the Agent World, ESAW’02, pp. 141–155. Madrid, Springer Verlag LNAI 2577, 2002Google Scholar
  21. Vassileva, J., Cheng, R., Sun, L., Han, W.: Stimulating user participation in a file-sharing P2P system supporting university classes. P2P Journal, July 2004 issue, 14–23. Available online at: http:// (last accessed on May 30, 2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of SaskatchewanSaskatoonCanada

Personalised recommendations