Advertisement

User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction

, Volume 15, Issue 5, pp 389–424 | Cite as

Combining Experimental Observations and Modelling in Investigating Feedback and Emotions in Repeated Selection Tasks

  • Arnout R. H. Fischer
  • Frans J. J. Blommaert
  • Cees J. H. Midden
Article

Abstract

People seem to learn tasks even without formal training. This can be modelled as the outcome of a feedback system that accumulates experience. In this paper we investigate such a feedback system, following an iterative research approach. A feedback loop is specified that is detailed using contemporary ideas on human behaviour. The resulting model is investigated in an empirical study. Finally, we consider a computational mechanism to explain the results. This approach is aimed at understanding how a feedback mechanism might work rather than at observing its outcomes. In this paper, we study the approach through adjustments in card selections in a game consisting of repeated card choices. Playing this game, participants do not know what rules determine gains and losses. Therefore there is some tension between exploring the options and achieving immediate profit. To decide in such situations it is argued that often evaluations below the level of conscious awareness, such as affect, play an important role. The results support the hypothesis that participants would draw better cards as the game progressed. There is some evidence that emotions are involved, since the hypothesis that profit and emotions are correlated is confirmed. Further evidence that formal logic is not sufficient follows from the observed effects of music on card selections. In the second part of the paper the aim is to understand the results from a computational point of view. Four possible ways of integrating feedback into a decision criterion are compared. Using one of these mechanisms, a computational model is investigated that might describe the role of music in card selection. Although there are limitations to both the empirical and computational findings, the chosen approach indicates that computational modelling of experiential appraisal, at a preconscious level, and the effect of external factors, such as music, is in principle feasible, and can lead to a research agenda aimed at understanding such phenomena.

Keywords

cognitive model emotions experience experiential processing feedback 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, C.A., Carnagey, N.L., Eubanks, J. 2003Exposure to violent media: The effects of songs with violent lyrics on aggressive thoughts and feelingsJournal of Personality and Social Psychology84960971Google Scholar
  2. Barr-Zisowitz, C. 2000“Sadness”- is there such a thing?Lewis, M.Haviland-Jones, J.M. eds. Handbook of emotionssecond editionGuilford PressLondon607622Google Scholar
  3. Bechara, A., Damasio, A.R., Damasio, H., Anderson, S.W. 1994Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortexCognition50715Google Scholar
  4. Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., Damasio, A.R. 1997Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategyScience27512931294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blumberg, S.H., Izard, C.E. 1986Discriminating patterns of emotions in 10- and 11- year-old children’s anxiety and depressionJournal of personality and social psychology51852857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Braitenberg, V. 1984Vehicles: Experiments in synthetic psychologyThe MIT PressCambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  7. Cabanac, M. 1992Pleasure: The common currencyJournal of Theoretical Biology155173200Google Scholar
  8. Carver, C.S., Scheier, M.F. 1998On the self-regulation of behaviorCambridge University PressNew York, NY, USGoogle Scholar
  9. Carver, C.S., Scheier, M.F. 2000Scaling back goals and recalibration of the affect system are processes in normal adaptive self-regulation: Understanding “response shift” phenomenaSocial Science and Medicine5017151722Google Scholar
  10. Clore, G.L., Ortony, A. 2000Cognition in Emotion, Always, Sometimes, or Never?Lane, R.D.Nadel, L. eds. Cognitive Neuroscience of EmotionOxford University PressOxford UK2461Google Scholar
  11. Cohen, H.A. 1974The art of snaring dragonsMIT Artificial Intelligence LaboratoryCambridge MA(AI Memo No. 338).Google Scholar
  12. Damasio, A.R. 1994Descartes Error, emotion, reason, and the human brainPutnamNew York, NYGoogle Scholar
  13. Dennett, D.C. 1994Cognitive science as reverse engineering: Several meanings of “top-down” and “bottom-up”Prawitz, D.Skyrms, B.Westerståhl, D. eds. Logic, methodology and philosophy of science IX, a companion to the philosophy of mindBlackwell PressOxford UK236244Google Scholar
  14. Dennett, D.C. 1995Darwin’s dangerous idea: evolution and the meaning of lifeSimon and SchusterNew York, NYGoogle Scholar
  15. Epstein, S. 1994Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconsciousAmerican Psychologist49709724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Evans, D. 2002Emotion: The science of sentimentOxford University PressOxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  17. Fischer, A.R.H. 2004User adaptation in user-system-interactionEindhoven University of TechnologyEindhoven, the NetherlandsDoctoral dissertationGoogle Scholar
  18. Fischer A. R. H., Blommaert, F. J. J. and Midden, C. J. H.: 2004a, Monitoring and evaluation of time delay. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, In Press.Google Scholar
  19. Fischer, A. R. H., Blommaert, F. J. J., and Midden, C. J. H.: 2004b, The role of accumulating experiences in adjusting interaction: Evaluation of visual search tasks. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  20. Frijda, N.H. 1986The emotionsCambridge University PressCambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  21. Gasper, K., Clore, G.L. 2000Do you have to pay attention to your feelings to be influenced by them?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin26698711Google Scholar
  22. Isen, A.M. 2000Positive affect and decision makingLewis, M.Haviland-Jones, J.M. eds. Handbook of emotionssecond editionGuilfordNew York NY417435Google Scholar
  23. Izard, C.E., Ackerman, B.P. 2000Motivational, organizational, and regulatory functions of discrete emotionsLewis, M.Haviland-Jones, J.M. eds. Handbook of emotionssecond editionGuilford PressLondon253264Google Scholar
  24. Johnston, V.S. 1999Why we feel: The science of human emotionsPerseus PublishingCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  25. Lazarus, R.S. 1991Emotion and AdaptationOxford University PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Lerner, J.S., Keltner, D. 2001Fear, anger, and riskJournal of Personality and Social Psychology81146159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lewis, L.M., Dember, W.N., Schefft, B.K., Radenhausen, R.A. 1995Can experimentally induced mood affect optimism and pessimism scores?Current Psychology: Developmental, Learning, Personality, Social142941Google Scholar
  28. Marr, D. 1982Vision: a computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual informationFreemanSan FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  29. Mellers, B.A. 2000Choice and the relative pleasure of consequencesPsychological Bulletin126910924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mellers, B.A., Schwartz, A., Ritov, I. 1999Emotion-based choiceJournal of Experimental Psychology: General128332345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miller, G.A., Eugene, G., Pribram, K.H. 1960Plans and the structure of behaviorHoltOxford, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  32. Newell, A. 1990Unified theories of cognitionHarvard University PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  33. Newell, A., Simon, H.A. 1972Human problem solvingPrentice-HallOxford UKGoogle Scholar
  34. Oatley, K., Jenkins, J.M. 1996Understanding emotionsBlackwell PublishersMalden, MAGoogle Scholar
  35. Oatley, K., Johnson-Laird, P.N. 1987Towards a cognitive theory of emotionsCognition and Emotion12950Google Scholar
  36. Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T. 1981Attitudes and persuasion: classic and contemporary approachesWestviewOxford UKGoogle Scholar
  37. Schmitt, W.A., Brinkley, C.A., Newman, J.P. 1999Testing Damasio’s somatic marker hypothesis with psychopathic individuals: Risk takers or risk averse?Journal of Abnormal Psychology108538543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schwarz, N., Clore, G.L. 1983Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective statesJournal of Personality and Social Psychology45513523Google Scholar
  39. Schwarz, N., Clore, G.L. 2003Mood as information: 20 years laterPsychological Inquiry14294301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shafir, E., Tversky, A. 1995Decision makingSmith, E.E.Osherson, D.N. eds. An invitation to cognitive sciencesecond editionMIT PressCambridge, MA77100Google Scholar
  41. Simon, H.A. 1967Motivational and Emotional Controls of CognitionPsychological Review742939Google Scholar
  42. Sloman, A.: 1999, Beyond shallow models of emotion. Paper presented at the I3 spring days workshop on behaviour planning for life-like characters and avatars.Google Scholar
  43. Sloman, S.A. 1996The empirical case for two systems of reasoningPsychological Bulletin119322Google Scholar
  44. Slovic, P., Finucane, M.L., Peters, E., MacGregor, D.G. 2004Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationalityRisk Analysis24311322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D. 1974Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biasesScience18511241131Google Scholar
  46. Vaa, T.: 2001, Cognition and emotions in driver behaviour models: some critical viewpoints. Paper presented at the 14th ICTCT workshop, Caserta.Google Scholar
  47. Velásquez, J. D.: 1998, Modelling Emotion-Based Decision-Making. Paper presented at the the 1998 AAAI fall symposium: Emotional and Intelligent: The tangled knot of cognition, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
  48. Watson, D., Clark, L.A., Tellegen, A. 1988Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scalesJournal of Personality and Social Psychology5410631070Google Scholar
  49. Winston, P.H. 1992Artificial intelligenceThird editionAddison-WesleyAmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  50. Zajonc, R.B. 1980Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferencesAmerican Psychologist35151175Google Scholar
  51. Zajonc, R.B., Rajecki, D.W. 1969Exposure and affect: A field experimentPsychonomic Science17216217Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arnout R. H. Fischer
    • 1
  • Frans J. J. Blommaert
    • 2
  • Cees J. H. Midden
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Human-Technology-Interaction (MTI)Eindhoven University of Technology and Marketing and Consumer Behaviour Group, Wageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Human-Technology-Interaction (MTI)Eindhoven University of TechnologyEindhovenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of Human-Technology-Interaction (MTI)Eindhoven University of TechnologyEindhovenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations