Advertisement

Supporting Critical Social Analysis: Empowering Processes in a Youth Organizing Group

  • Celeste NicholasEmail author
  • Heather Eastman-Mueller
Article
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

Critical social analysis is a foundational sociopolitical learning experience which supports youth development and social action. While practical guidance for facilitating critical social analysis exists, there is a need for empirical work exploring educator and participant experiences. To understand how urban educators implement critical social analysis and how participants experience it, reflective interviews were conducted with adult leaders and former youth organizers in Teen Advocates for Sexual Health. In a highly-segregated midwestern city, leaders engaged diverse youth in critical social analysis and social action around access to comprehensive school-based sexual health education. Three empowering interpersonal processes supported critical conversations on power, privilege, and sexual health. First, adult leaders established norms for power sharing and group communication. Second, leaders helped youth distinguish between feeling uncomfortable, integral to social justice learning, and feeling emotionally unsafe. Third, leaders supported emotional safety, allowing youth to determine their level of participation. Youth were empowered to remain engaged when uncomfortable, take action if they felt unsafe, and share responsibility for community safety. Combined with other organizing experiences, critical social analysis empowered participants as teens and contributed to adult social justice commitments. Findings contribute to literature on how urban educators can support sociopolitical development across settings.

Keywords

Youth organizing Reproductive justice Social justice education Empowerment Critical social analysis Sexual education 

Notes

References

  1. Adams, M. (2016). Pedagogical foundations for social justice education. In M. Adams & L. A. Bell (Eds.), Teaching for diversity and social justice (3rd ed., pp. 27–54). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, M., & Bell, L. A. (Eds.). (2016). Teaching for diversity and social justice (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Adams, M., & Zúñiga, X. (2016). Getting started: Core concepts for social justice education. In M. Adams & L. A. Bell (Eds.), Teaching for diversity and social justice (3rd ed., pp. 95–130). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Advocates for Youth. (2001). Sex education programs: Definitions & point-by-point comparison. Transitions,12(3), 4. Retrieved from https://advocatesforyouth.org/resources/fact-sheets/sex-education-programs-definitions-and-point-by-point-comparison/.
  5. Bailey, A. (2011). Reconceiving surrogacy: Toward a reproductive justice account of Indian surrogacy. Hypatia,26(4), 715–741.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01168.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review,84(2), 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bell, L. A. (2016). Theoretical foundations for social justice education. In M. Adams & L. A. Bell (Eds.), Teaching for diversity and social justice (3rd ed., pp. 3–26). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Bell, L. A., Goodman, D. J., & Oullett, M. L. (2016). Design and facilitation. In M. Adams & L. A. Bell (Eds.), Teaching for diversity and social justice (3rd ed., pp. 56–94). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Braxton, E., Buford, W., & Marasigan, L. (2013). National field scan. The funders’ collaborative on youth organizing. Retrieved November 30, 2018, from https://fcyo.org/resources/type/research.
  10. Carlisle, L. R., Jackson, B. W., & George, A. (2006). Principles of social justice education: The social justice education in schools project. Equity & Excellence in Education,39(1), 55–64.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680500478809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2015). Division of adolescent and school health 2015 annual report. Retrieved November 30, 2018, from https://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/about/pdf/DASH2015AnnualReport.pdf.
  12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016a). Sexually transmitted diseases surveillance. Retrieved November 30, 2018, from https://www.cdc.gov/std/stats16/default.htm.
  13. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016b). MMWR recommendations and reports: Past volume (65). Retrieved November 30, 2018, from https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/indrr_2016.html.
  14. Chrisler, J. C. (Ed.). (2012). Reproductive justice: A global concern. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.Google Scholar
  15. Conner, J. (2011). Youth organizers as young adults: Their commitments and contributions. Journal of Research on Adolescence,21(4), 923–942.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00766.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Conner, J. (2016). Pawns or power players: The grounds on which adults dismiss or defend youth organizers in the USA. Journal of Youth Studies,19(3), 403–420.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2015.1083958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology,13(1), 3–21.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Corrêa, S., Petchesky, R., & Parker, R. (2008). Sexuality, health and human rights. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. DeJong, K., & Love, B. (2013). Ageism & adultism introduction. In M. Adams, W. Blumenfeld, C. Castaneda, H. W. Hackman, M. L. Peters, & X. Zuniga (Eds.), Readings for diversity and social justice (3rd ed., pp. 535–588). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Dibennedetto, A. (1991). An analysis of youth empowerment through group involvement (EdD dissertation). University of Massachusetts - Amherst.Google Scholar
  21. Elia, J. P., & Eliason, M. J. (2010). Dangerous omissions: Abstinence-only-until-marriage school-based sexuality education and the betrayal of LGBTQ youth. American Journal of Sexuality Education,5(1), 17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. For the sake of all: A report on the health and well-being of African Americans in St. Louis and why it matters for everyone. (2014). St. Louis, MO: Washington University and St. Louis University. Retrieved from https://forthesakeofall.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/for-the-sake-of-all-report.pdf.
  23. Ford, J., Barnes, R., Rompalo, A., & Hook, E. W. (2013). Sexual health training and education in the U.S. Public Health Reports,128(Suppl 1), 96–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. (M. B. Ramos, Trans.) (30th Anniversary edition). New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  25. Gee, J. P. (2011). How to do discourse analysis: A tool kit. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Ginwright, S. (2002). Youth organizing: Expanding possibilities for youth development. Occasional Papers Series on Youth Organizing #3. Retrieved November 30, 2018, from https://fcyo.org/uploads/resources/4243_Papers_no3_v3.qxd.pdf.
  27. Gordon, C. (2009). Mapping decline: [City] and the fate of the American city. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  28. Guttmacher Institute. (2018). State laws and policies. Retrieved November 30, 2018, from https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/laws-policies.
  29. Hackman, H. W. (2005). Five essential components for social justice education. Equity & Excellence in Education,38(2), 103–109.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680590935034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Heathcott, J. (2005). Black archipelago: Politics and civic life in the Jim Crow city. Journal of Social History,38(3), 705–736.  https://doi.org/10.1353/jsh.2005.0035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). New York, NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  32. Jennings, L. B., Parra-Medina, D. M., Hilfinger-Messias, D. K., & McLoughlin, K. (2006). Toward a critical social theory of youth empowerment. Journal of Community Practice,14(1–2), 31–55.  https://doi.org/10.1300/J125v14n01_03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kirby, D. (2007). Emerging answers 2007: Research findings on programs to reduce teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases. Washington, DC: National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy.Google Scholar
  34. Krings, A., Austic, E. A., Gutiérrez, L. M., & Dirksen, K. E. (2015). The comparative impacts of social justice educational methods on political participation, civic engagement, and multicultural activism. Equity & Excellence in Education,48(3), 403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lee, V., Tobin, J. M., & Foley, E. (2006). Relationship of cervical ectopy to chlamydia infection in young women. The Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care,32(2), 104–106.  https://doi.org/10.1783/147118906776276440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Leonardo, Z., & Porter, R. K. (2010). Pedagogy of fear: Toward a Fanonian theory of ‘safety’ in race dialogue. Race Ethnicity and Education,13(2), 139–157.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2010.482898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lewis-Charp, H., Yu, H. C., Sengouvanh, S., & Lacoe, J. (2003). Extending the reach of youth development through civic activism. Takoma Park, MD: Innovation Center for Community and Youth Development.Google Scholar
  38. Luna, Z., & Luker, K. (2013). Reproductive justice. Annual Review of Law and Social Science,9(1), 327–352.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102612-134037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  40. Mira, M. L. (2013). Pushing the boundaries what youth organizers at Boston’s Hyde Square Task Force have to teach us about civic engagement. Democracy & Education,21(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
  41. Nicholas, C., Eastman-Mueller, H., & Barbich, N. (2019). Empowering change agents: Youth organizing groups as sites for sociopolitical development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 63(1–2), 46–60.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  43. Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  44. Planned Parenthood Action Fund. (2016). Sex education. Retrieved November 30, 2018, from https://www.plannedparenthoodaction.org/issues/sex-education/.
  45. Planned Parenthood of the the St. Louis Region and Southwest Missouri. (2017). Teen Advocates for Sexual Health (TASH) program manual.Google Scholar
  46. Pugh, G. L. (2014). The experiential learning cycle in undergraduate diversity and social justice education. Journal of Teaching in Social Work,34(3), 302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Racette, R. (2016). Another 40 years of inequity: Two-tier schooling as the lasting legacy of desegregation policy in St. Louis, Missouri. (Ph.D. dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 10153731).Google Scholar
  48. Rogers, J., Mediratta, K., & Shah, S. (2012). Building power, learning democracy: Youth organizing as a site of civic development. In K. M. Borman, A. B. Danzig, & D. R. Garcia (Eds.), Education, democracy, and the public good (Vol. 36, pp. 43–66). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  49. Santelli, J. S., Kantor, L. M., Grilo, S. A., Speizer, I. S., Lindberg, L. D., Heitel, J., et al. (2017). Abstinence-only-until-marriage: An updated review of U.S. policies and programs and their impact. Journal of Adolescent Health,61(3), 273–280.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.05.031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schutz, A. (1967). The phenomenology of the social world. (G. Walsh & F. Lenhert, Trans.). Chicago, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Seidman, I. (2009). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  52. Seidman, I. (2012). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (4th ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  53. Stanger-Hall, K. F., & Hall, D. W. (2011). Abstinence-only education and teen pregnancy rates: Why we need comprehensive sex education in the U.S. PLOS ONE,6(10), e24658.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Storms, S. B. (2012). Preparing students for social action in a social justice education course: What works? Equity & Excellence in Education,45(4), 547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Inc.Google Scholar
  56. Watts, R., Williams, N., & Jagers, R. (2003). Sociopolitical development. American Journal of Community Psychology,31(1–2), 185–194.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023091024140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Watts, R. J., & Flanagan, C. (2007). Pushing the envelope on youth civic engagement: A developmental and liberation psychology perspective. Journal of Community Psychology,35(6), 779–792.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Watts, R. J., & Guessous, O. (2006). Sociopolitical development: The missing link in research and policy on adolescents. In S. Ginwright, P. Noguera, & J. Cammarota (Eds.), Beyond resistance! Youth activism and community change: New democratic possibilities for practice and policy for America’s youth (pp. 59–80). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  59. Watts, R. J., & Hipolito-Delgado, C. P. (2015). Thinking ourselves to liberation? Advancing sociopolitical action in critical consciousness. The Urban Review,47(5), 847–867.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-015-0341-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Welton, A. D., Harris, T. O., La Londe, P. G., & Moyer, R. T. (2015). Social justice education in a diverse classroom: Examining high school discussions about race, power, and privilege. Equity & Excellence in Education,48(4), 549–570.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2015.1083839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zembylas, M. (2015). ‘Pedagogy of discomfort’ and its ethical implications: the tensions of ethical violence in social justice education. Ethics & Education,10(2), 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zimmerman, M. A. (2000). Empowerment theory. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology (pp. 43–63). New York: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4193-6_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zion, S., Allen, C. D., & Jean, C. (2015). Enacting a critical pedagogy, influencing teachers’ sociopolitical development. The Urban Review,47(5), 914–933.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-015-0340-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zúñiga, X., Naagda, B. A., & Sevig, T. D. (2002). Intergroup dialogues: An educational model for cultivating engagement across differences. Equity & Excellence in Education,35(1), 7–17.  https://doi.org/10.1080/713845248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.BloomingtonUSA
  2. 2.School of EducationIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  3. 3.School of Public HealthIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations